Behavioural neuroscienceCat odor, but not trimethylthiazoline (fox odor), activates accessory olfactory and defense-related brain regions in rats
Section snippets
Subjects
The subjects (n=24) were male Australian Albino Wistar rats, weighing 321±7 g at the time of testing. They were housed in groups of six with free access to food and water in a temperature-controlled colony room (21±2 °C) on a reverse light/dark cycle (lights on from 20:00 to 08:00 h). Behavioral testing occurred during the dark cycle. All efforts were made to minimize both the suffering and the number of rats used. All experimentation was approved by the University of Sydney Animal Ethics
Behavior
ANOVA revealed significant overall group effects on all of the behaviors measured (Table 1). Rats exposed to any of the three odors (cat odor, formaldehyde or TMT) showed more defecation than the CONTROL group (F3,20=7.73, P<0.001). In addition, rats in the group exposed to formaldehyde showed lower rearing scores compared with the CONTROL group (F3,20=3.20, P<0.05). However only rats in the group exposed to cat odor made attempts to escape the test box via jumping (F3,20=5.46, P<0.01). In
Discussion
The results of the current experiment show that cat odor and TMT are easily distinguishable at both the behavioral and neural level. Behaviorally, only cat odor induced repeated escape attempts and an inhibition of adaptive behavior (grooming), while at the neural level, only cat odor produced a typical pattern of Fos activation in accessory olfactory regions, and brain regions previously associated with defensive behavior (Canteras et al 1997, Dielenberg et al 2001, McGregor et al 2004,
Conclusions
The results from the current research suggest that TMT and cat odor are not comparable predator odors. This may be because the ethological relevance of such chemosignals in mammals relies on a complexity (Brennan and Kendrick, 2006) that is retained by naturally occurring fur/skin odors, but lost from synthetic components such as TMT. Alternatively, odors derived from feces may be less predictive of a predatory threat than those derived from sources such fur or skin (Blanchard et al., 2003).
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by an Australian Research Council grant to Iain S. McGregor.
References (40)
- et al.
The effects of ethanol and diazepam on reactions to predatory odors
Pharmacol Biochem Behav
(1990) - et al.
Cue and context conditioning of defensive behaviors to cat odor stimuli
Neurosci Biobehav Rev
(2001) - et al.
A field guide to the anterior olfactory nucleus (cortex)
Brain Res Rev
(2005) - et al.
Severe reduction of rat defensive behavior to a predator by discrete hypothalamic chemical lesions
Brain Res Bull
(1997) - et al.
Neuroanatomical pathways linking vision and olfaction in mammals
Psychoneuroendocrinology
(1994) - et al.
The pattern of brain c-fos mRNA induced by a component of fox odor, 2,5-dihydro-2,4,5-trimethylthiazoline (TMT), in rats, suggests both systemic and processive stress characteristics
Brain Res
(2004) - et al.
Low-dose midazolam attenuates predatory odor avoidance in rats
Pharmacol Biochem Behav
(1999) - et al.
“When a rat smells a cat”: the distribution of Fos immunoreactivity in rat brain following exposure to a predatory odor
Neuroscience
(2001) - et al.
TMT-induced autonomic and behavioral changes and the neural basis of its processing
Neurosci Biobehav Rev
(2005) - et al.
Development of defensive behavior and conditioning to cat odor in the rat
Physiol Behav
(2004)
Neural activity in the horizontal limb of the diagonal band of Broca can be modulated by electrical stimulation of the olfactory bulb and cortex in rats
Neurosci Lett
Not all “predator odours” are equal: cat odour but not 2,4,5 trimethylthiazoline (TMT; fox odour) elicits specific defensive behaviours in rats
Behav Brain Res
The anatomical logic of smell
Trends Neurosci
Neural activation during cat odor-induced conditioned fear and “trial 2” fear in rats
Neurosci Biobehav Rev
Defensive responses of Wistar and Sprague-Dawley rats to cat odour and TMT
Behav Brain Res
The smell of danger: A behavioral and neural analysis of predator odor-induced fear
Neurosci Biobehav Rev
Failure to produce conditioning with low-dose trimethylthiazoline or cat feces as unconditioned stimuli
Behav Neurosci
Activation of brain stem neurons by irritant chemical stimulation of the throat assessed by c-fos immunohistochemistry
Exp Brain Res
Mammalian social odours: attraction and individual recognition
Philos Trans R Soc B
Maternal odours induce Fos in the main but not the accessory olfactory bulbs of neonatal male and female ferrets
J Neuroendocrinol
Cited by (98)
The anterior olfactory nucleus revisited – An emerging role for neuropathological conditions?
2023, Progress in NeurobiologyEffects of predator odor on anti-predation behavior and hypothalamic c-fos mRNA expression of Chinese mole shrew
2022, Applied Animal Behaviour ScienceCitation Excerpt :When this stimulus acts, the c-Fos gene can be rapidly activated, transcribed into c-Fos mRNA, and ultimately translated into a protein (Day et al., 2004; Hegab and Wei, 2014; Yin et al., 2017). To some extent, the number of Fos-positive neurons is proportional to the intensity of the stimulus (Staples et al., 2008; Hegab et al., 2014b; Gu et al., 2018). Therefore, the expression of c-Fos can be regarded as a marker of activation for the point when neurons are subject to noxious stimuli (Morgan and Curran, 1991), and c-Fos can reflect molecular changes associated with different stimuli (Torterolo et al., 2009).
Habenula and interpeduncular nucleus differentially modulate predator odor-induced innate fear behavior in rats
2017, Behavioural Brain Research