Protein synthesis inhibition and memory: Formation vs amnesia☆
Introduction
Many reports begin with a well-accepted statement that there are at least two stages of memory. As generally proposed, memory is maintained soon after experience, by a short-lived temporary process that is dependent on modifications of existing proteins (e.g., Kandel & Schwartz, 1982). As this memory mechanism decays, mechanisms responsible for permanent memory storage supplant the temporary process. These mechanisms are generally believed to be dependent on new protein synthesis and to form the basis for cellular memory consolidation at a cellular level (Dudai, 2002, Kandel, 2001, Squire, 1987).
Of several ways in which new protein synthesis may be important to memory (Glassman, 1969), one is the commonly held view that new protein synthesis is needed for the modifications of neuron–neuron functional connectivity. Many of the studies that discuss protein synthesis-dependent memory do so on the basis of findings that protein synthesis inhibitors impair memory, identifying results obtained with the inhibitors as demonstrating a requirement for protein synthesis in memory consolidation. However, other interpretations of these findings are less often considered (Gold, 2006). One is that intact protein synthesis is necessary in a more constitutive manner for replenishment of materials used in memory formation (Routtenberg & Rekart, 2005). Another possibility is that protein synthesis is needed for maintenance of cell health at a level that can sustain the use of cellular resources to fine-tune the connectivity of the nervous system in response to memory (Rudy, Biedenkapp, Moineau, & Bolding, 2006). Yet another interpretation is that inhibition of protein synthesis results in abnormal neural functions that interfere with memory, a possibility supported by recent evidence from the author’s laboratory (Canal, Chang, & Gold, 2007) as described below.
The present paper examines several classes of findings that are not readily incorporated into the view that new protein synthesis is a necessary component of the mechanisms by which new memories are formed. Although this review will mainly focus on contemporary studies, it is important to note extensive evidence from the 1970s and 1980s that led many investigators to conclude that the evidence did not support the idea that protein synthesis was necessary for memory formation, that the effects of protein synthesis inhibitors on memory were very complex, and that the results supported many alternative explanations (e.g., Barraco and Stettner, 1976, Cooper et al., 1978, Martinez et al., 1981). These points of view were the motivation for the review by Davis and Squire (1984), in which they defended the idea that protein synthesis was necessary for memory. Importantly, whatever conclusion one now draws about this issue, it is not the case that these early studies led to a consensus that protein synthesis was necessary for memory. Nonetheless, statements espousing this view have become standard in the introductions to and rationales for studies of protein synthesis and memory.
Section snippets
Memory
Although protein synthesis inhibitors often impair memory across species and tasks, it is also the case, as noted by Routtenberg and Rekart (2005), that intact memories are sometimes formed even in the presence of extensive inhibition of protein synthesis. Specific behavioral variables appear to be important. For example, amnesia is attenuated in graded manner by increasing the number of training trials or by increasing the intertrial interval (Flood et al., 1975, Quartermain and Botwinick, 1975
If protein synthesis is not necessary for memory formation, why do inhibitors impair memory?
The many instances in which memory and synaptic plasticity can occur in the presence of inhibition of protein synthesis indicate clearly that protein synthesis is not necessary for all forms of memory and synaptic plasticity. What of the reports that do show such impairments after administration of protein synthesis inhibitors? If the examples of failures to impair memory with protein synthesis inhibitors mean that new protein synthesis is not necessary in these cases, do reports that
Proteins and protein synthesis as both modulators and substrates of memory
With considerable evidence against a general requirement for new protein synthesis in order to form new memories, additional data point to an important role for proteins, and for protein synthesis, in memory. The evidence includes training-related changes in immediate early gene expression, changes in gene microarray profiles and changes in specific proteins. One alternative to a need for new protein synthesis is that post-translational modifications of existing protein may be sufficient to
References (79)
- et al.
Positive and negative regulatory mechanisms that mediate long-term memory storage
Brain Research—Brain Research Reviews
(1998) - et al.
Persistence of long-term memory storage requires a late protein synthesis- and BDNF-dependent phase in the hippocampus
Neuron
(2007) - et al.
Adrenergic activation of the nucleus tractus solitarius potentiates amygdala norepinephrine release and enhances retention performance in emotionally arousing and spatial memory tasks
Behavioural Brain Research
(2000) The genomic action potential
Neurobiology of Learning & Memory
(2000)Molecular bases of long-term memories: A question of persistence
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
(2002)- et al.
ADH and related peptides: Effect of pre- or posttraining treatment on puromycin amnesia
Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior
(1978) - et al.
Effects of protein synthesis inhibition on memory for active avoidance training
Physiology & Behavior
(1975) - et al.
The effect of stimulants, depressants, and protein synthesis inhibition on retention
Behavioral Biology
(1977) - et al.
Memory facilitating and anti-amnesic effects of corticosteroids
Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior
(1978) - et al.
A balance of protein synthesis and proteasome-dependent degradation determines the maintenance of LTP
Neuron
(2006)
Actin and the agile spine: How and why do dendritic spines dance?
Trends in Neuroscience
Different molecular cascades in different sites of the brain control memory consolidation
Trends in Neuroscience
Rapid structural remodeling of shaft synapses associated with long-term potentiation in the cat superior cervical ganglion in situ
Neuroscience Research
Functional organization of adult motor cortex is dependent upon continued protein synthesis
Neuron
Attenuation of experimentally-induced amnesia
Progress in Neurobiology
Analysis of Y-maze learning in mice using cycloheximide
General Pharmacology
Leptin promotes rapid dynamic changes in hippocampal dendritic morphology
Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience
Protein synthesis inhibitors, gene superinduction and memory: Too little or too much protein?
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.
Post-translational modification as the substrate for long-lasting memory
Trends in Neuroscience
Rapid plasticity of dendritic spine: Hints to possible functions?
Progress in Neurobiology
On the interaction between nicotine and cycloheximide
Brain Research
Phosphorylated cAMP response element binding protein in the mouse brain after fear conditioning: Relationship to Fos production
Molecular Brain Research
Molecular mechanisms underlying a unique intermediate phase of memory in Aplysia
Neuron
CREB and the formation of long-term memory
Current Opinions in Neurobiology
Arousal and the conversion of “short-term” to “long-term” memory
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA
Antibiotics and memory
Psychological Bulletin
Forced swimming evokes a biphasic response in CREB phosphorylation in extrahypothalamic limbic and neocortical brain structures in the rat
European Journal of Neuroscience
Early maintenance of hippocampal mossy fiber long-term potentiation depends on protein and RNA synthesis and presynaptic granule cell integrity
Journal of Neuroscience
Amnesia produced by altered release of neurotransmitters after intraamygdala injections of a protein synthesis inhibitor
Proceedings of the National Academy of Science
An analysis of dishabituation and sensitization of the gill-withdrawal reflex in Aplysia
International Journal of Neuroscience
The biochemical basis of neuropharmacology
Protein synthesis and memory: A review
Psychological Bulletin
Noradrenergic signaling in the amygdala contributes to the reconsolidation of fear memory: Treatment implications for PTSD
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Protein synthesis inhibitors differentially superinduce c-fos and c-jun by three distinct mechanisms: Lack of evidence for labile repressors
EMBO Journal
Dendritic spine changes associated with hippocampal long-term synaptic plasticity
Nature
Restoration of expression of memory lost after treatment with puromycin
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA
Memory: Modification of anisomycin-induced amnesia by stimulants and depressants
Science
Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation
Nature Neuroscience
The biochemistry of learning: An evaluation of the role of RNA and protein
Annual Review of Biochemistry
Cited by (99)
An expeditious synthesis of novel DNA nucleobase mimics of (+)-anisomycin
2022, Carbohydrate ResearchProtein synthesis inhibitors induce both memory impairment and its recovery
2019, Behavioural Brain ResearchCitation Excerpt :The hypothesis of retrieval state-dependent memory postulates that memory formation and impairment are associated with the specific brain state that is created by inhibitors, including their side effects [3,22]. Moreover, some authors believe that the major effect of protein synthesis inhibitors on memory is implemented through interference in other molecular processes but not through a blockade of transcription processes [27]. Nevertheless, it should be noted that the side effects of inhibitors are selective in cellular targets.
NMDA or 5-HT receptor antagonists impair memory reconsolidation and induce various types of amnesia
2018, Behavioural Brain ResearchCitation Excerpt :Nonetheless, if in these behavioral conditions, memory trace cannot be behaviorally expressed, especially for a long time after amnesia induction, it is suggested to be the result of memory trace erasure. However, it should be noted that at present there is no persuasive experimental evidence to distinguish these two scenarios [9,17–21]. Even in cases in which amnesia persisted for a long time after memory impairment, it can be supposed that the memory is preserved.
Molecular mechanisms controlling protein synthesis in memory reconsolidation
2017, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
- ☆
Research from the author’s laboratory and preparation of this manuscript supported by NIA (AG007648) and NIDA (DA016951 and DA024129).