Abstract
The spectrotemporal receptive field (STRF) is a functional descriptor of the linear processing of time-varying acoustic spectra by the auditory system. By cross-correlating sustained neuronal activity with the dynamic spectrum of a spectrotemporally rich stimulus ensemble, one obtains an estimate of the STRF. In this article, the relationship between the spectrotemporal structure of any given stimulus and the quality of the STRF estimate is explored and exploited. Invoking the Fourier theorem, arbitrary dynamic spectra are described as sums of basic sinusoidal components—that is, moving ripples. Accurate estimation is found to be especially reliant on the prominence of components whose spectral and temporal characteristics are of relevance to the auditory locus under study and is sensitive to the phase relationships between components with identical temporal signatures. These and other observations have guided the development and use of stimuli with deterministic dynamic spectra composed of the superposition of many temporally orthogonal moving ripples having a restricted, relevant range of spectral scales and temporal rates. The method, termed sum-of-ripples, is similar in spirit to the white-noise approach butenjoys the same practical advantages—which equate to faster and moreaccurate estimation—attributable to the time-domain sum-of-sinusoidsmethod previously employed in vision research. Application of the methodis exemplified with both modeled data and experimental data from ferretprimary auditory cortex (AI).
References
Aertsen A, Johannesma P (1980) Spectro-temporal receptive fields of auditory neurons in the grassfrog. I. Characterization of tonal and natural stimuli. Biol. Cybernetics 38:223-234.
Aertsen A, Johannesma P (1981a) A comparison of the spectro-temporal sensitivity of auditory neurons to tonal and natural stimuli. Biol. Cybernetics 42:145-156.
Aertsen A, Johannesma P (1981b) The spectro-temporal receptive field: A functional characteristic of auditory neurons. Biol. Cybernetics 42:133-143.
Aertsen A, Johannesma P, Hermes D (1980a) Spectro-temporal receptive fields of auditory neurons in the grassfrog. II. Analysis of the stimulus-event relation for tonal stimuli. Biol. Cybernetics 38:235-248.
Aertsen A, Olders J, Johannesma P (1980b). Spectro-temporal receptive fields of auditory neurons in the grassfrog. III. Analysis of the stimulus-event relation for natural stimuli. Biol. Cybernetics 39:195-209.
Arieli A, Sterkin A, Grinvald A, Aertsen A (1996) Dynamics of ongoing activity: Explanation of the large variability in evoked cortical responses. Science 273:1868-1871.
Attias H, Schreiner CE (1997) Temporal low-order statistics of natural sounds. In: Mozer M, Jordan M, Petsche T, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Vol. 9, p. 27.
Azouz R, Gray C (1999) Cellular mechanisms contributing to response variability of cortical neurons in vivo. J. Neurosci. 19:2209-2223.
Backoff P, Clopton B (1991) A spectrotemporal analysis of DCN single unit responses to wideband noise in guinea pig. Hearing Res. 53:28-40.
Boyd S, Tang Y, Chua L (1983) Measuring Volterra kernels. IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems 30:571-577.
Carney L, Friedman M (1998) Spatiotemporal tuning of low-frequency cells in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus. J. Neurosci. 18:1096-1104.
Carney L, Yin T (1988) Temporal encoding of resonances by low-frequency auditory nerve fibers: Single-fiber responses and a population model. J. Neurophysiol. 60:1653-1677.
Chi T-S, Gao Y, Guyton M, Shamma S (1999) Spectro-temporal modulation transfer functions and speech intelligibility (in press). J. Acoustical Soc. America 106:2719-2732.
Clopton B, Backoff P (1991) Spectrotemporal receptive fields of neurons in cochlear nucleus of guinea pig. Hearing Res. 52:329-344.
Cohen L (1995) Time-Frequency Analysis. Prentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
de Boer E (1967) Correlation studies applied to the frequency resolution of the cochlea. J. Auditory Res. 7:209-217.
de Boer E, de Jongh H (1978) On cochlear encoding: Potentialities 110 Klein et al. and limitations of the reverse-correlation technique. J. Acoustical Soc. America 63:115-135.
deCharms R, Blake D, Merzenich M (1998) Optimizing sound features for cortical neurons. Science 280:1439-1443.
Depireux D, Simon J, Klein D, Shamma S (1998a) Representation of dynamic complex spectra in primary auditory cortex. Abstracts of the Twenty-first ARO Mid-Winter Meeting. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. Abs., Vol. 2 Mt. Royal, NJ.
Depireux D, Simon J, Shamma S (1998b) Measuring the dynamics of neural responses in primary auditory cortex. Comments on Theoretical Biol. 5:89-118.
Eggermont J (1993) Wiener and Volterra analyses applied to the auditory system. Hearing Res. 66:177-201.
Eggermont J, Aertsen A, Hermes D, Johannesma P (1981) Spectro-temporal characterization of auditory neurons: Redundant or necessary? Hearing Res. 5:109-121.
Eggermont J, Aertsen A, Johannesma P (1983a) Prediction of the responses of auditory neurons in the midbrain of the grass frog based on the spectro-temporal receptive field. Hearing Res. 10:191-202.
Eggermont J, Aertsen A, Johannesma P (1983b) Quantitative characterisation procedure for auditory neurons based on the spectro-temporal receptive field. Hearing Res. 10:167-190.
Eggermont J, Johannesma P, Aertsen A (1983c) Reverse-correlation methods in auditory research. Quarterly Rev. Biophysics 16:341-414.
Eggermont J, Smith G (1990) Characterizing auditory neurons using the Wigner and Rihacek distributions: A comparison. J. Acoustical Soc. America 87:246-259.
Epping W, Eggermont J (1985) Single-unit characteristics in the auditory midbrain of the immobilized grassfrog. Hearing Res. 18:223-243.
Escabí M, Schreiner C, Miller L (1998) Dynamic time-frequency processing in the cat midbrain, thalamus, and auditory cortex: Spectro-temporal receptive fields obtained using dynamic ripple spectra. Soc. Neurosci. Abstracts 24:1879.
Hermes D, Aertsen A, Johannesma P, Eggermont J (1981) Spectro-temporal characteristics of single units in the midbrain of the lightly anaesthetised grass frog (Rana temporaria L.) investigated with noise stimuli. Hearing Res. 5:147-178.
Johnson D (1980) Applicability of white-noise nonlinear system analysis to the peripheral auditory system. J. Acoustical Soc. America 68:876-884.
Kim P, Young E (1994) Comparative analysis of spectro-temporal receptive fields, reverse correlation functions, and frequency tuning curves of auditory-nerve fibers. J. Acoustical Soc. America 95:410-422.
Korenberg M, Hunter I (1996) The identification of nonlinear biological systems: Volterra kernel approaches. Annals of Biomed. Eng. 24:250-268.
Kowalski N, Depireux D, Shamma S (1996a) Analysis of dynamic spectra in ferret primary auditory cortex. I. Characteristics of single-unit responses to moving ripple spectra. J. Neurophysiol. 76:3503-3523.
Kowalski N, Depireux D, Shamma S (1996b) Analysis of dynamic spectra in ferret primary auditory cortex. II. Prediction of unit responses to arbitrary dynamic spectra. J. Neurophysiol. 76:3524-3534.
Kvale M, Schreiner C, Bonham B (1998) Spectro-temporal and adaptive response to AM stimuli in the inferior colliculus. Abstracts of the Twenty-first ARO Mid-Winter Meeting. Vol. 21.
Langner G (1992) Periodicity coding in the auditory system. Hearing Res. 60:115-142.
Lee Y, Schetzen M (1965) Measurement of the Wiener kernels of a non-linear system by crosscorrelation. Intl. J. Control 2:237-254.
Marmarelis P, Marmarelis V (1978) Analysis of Physiological Systems: The White Noise Approach. Plenum, New York.
Marmarelis V (1993) Identification of nonlinear biological systems using Laguerre expansions of kernels. Annals of Biomed. Eng. 21:573-589.
Nelken I, Kim P, Young E (1997) Linear and nonlinear spectral integration in type IV neurons of the dorsal cochlear nucleus. II. Predicting responses with the use of nonlinear models. J. Neurophysiol. 78:800-811.
Nelken I, Rotman Y, Yosef O (1999) Responses of auditory-cortex neurons to structural features of natural sounds. Nature 397:154-157.
Palm G, Popel B (1985) Volterra representation and Wiener-like identification of nonlinear systems: Scope and limitations. Quarterly Rev. Biophysics 18:135-164.
Papoulis A (1962) The Fourier Integral and Its Applications. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Pickles J (1988) An Introduction to the Physiology of Hearing. Academic Press, San Diego.
Ruggero M (1992) Physiology and coding of sound in the auditory nerve. In: Popper A, Fay R, eds. The Mammalian Auditory Pathway: Neurophysiology. Springer-Verlag, New York. pp. 34-93.
Schafer M, Rubsamen R, Dorrscheidt G, Knipschild M (1992) Setting complex tasks to single units in the avian forebrain. II: Do we really need natural stimuli to describe neuronal response characteristics? Hearing Res. 57:231-244.
Schreiner C, Calhoun B (1995) Spectral envelope coding in cat primary auditory cortex: Properties of ripple transfer functions. J. Auditory Neurosci. 1:39-61.
Shamma S (1985) Speech processing in the auditory system I: The representation of speech sounds in the responses of the auditory nerve. J. Acoustical Soc. America 78:1612-1621.
Shamma S, Depireux D, Klein D, Simon J (1998) Representation of dynamic broadband spectra in auditory cortex. Soc. Neurosci. Abstracts 24:402.
Shamma S, Versnel H, Kowalski N (1995) Ripple analysis in the ferret primary auditory cortex. I. Response characteristics of single units to sinusoidally ripples spectra. J. Auditory Neurosci. 1:233-254.
Smolders J, Aertsen A, Johannesma P (1979) Neural representation of the acoustic biotope. Biol. Cybernetics 35:11-20.
Sutter E (1992) A deterministic approach to nonlinear systems analysis. In: Pinter R, Nabet B, eds. Nonlinear Vision: Determination of Neural Receptive Fields, Function, and Networks. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. pp. 171-220.
Swerup C (1978) On the choice of noise for the analysis of the peripheral auditory system. Biol. Cybernetics 29:97-104.
Temchin A, Recio A, van Dijk P, Ruggero M (1995) Wiener-kernel analysis of chinchilla auditory-nerve responses to noise. Abstracts of the Eighteenth ARO Mid-Winter Meeting. Vol. 18.
Theunissen F, Sen K, Doupe A (1998) Characterizing non-linear encoding in the zebra finch auditory forebrain. Soc. Neurosci. Abstracts 24:402.
Valois RD, Valois KD (1990) Spatial Vision. Oxford University Press, New York.
van Dijk P, Wit H, Segenhout J (1997) Dissecting the frog inner ear with Gaussian noise. I. Application of high-order Wiener-kernel analysis. Hearing Res. 114:229-242.
Victor J (1979) Nonlinear systems analysis: Comparison of white noise and sum of sinusoids in a biological system. Proc. National Academy of Sci. USA 76:996-998.
Victor J (1991) Asymptotic approach of generalized orthogonal functional expansions to Wiener kernels. Annals of Biomed. Eng. 19:383-399.
Victor J, Knight B (1979) Nonlinear analysis with an arbitrary stimulus ensemble. Quarterly of Applied Math. 37:113-136.
Victor J, Shapley R (1980) A method of nonlinear analysis in the frequency domain. Biophysical J. 29:459-484.
Volterra V (1930) Theory of Functionals and of Integro-Differential Equations. Dover, New York.
Wiener N (1958) Nonlinear Problems in Random Theory. Wiley, New York.
Yamada W, Lewis E (1999) Predicting the temporal respsonses of non-phase-locking bullfrog auditory units to complex acoustic waveforms. Hearing Res. 130:155-170.
Yamada W, Wolodkin G, Lewis E, Henry K (1997) Wiener kernel analysis and the singular value decomposition. In: Lewis E, ed. Diversity in Auditory Mechanics. World Scientific, Singapore. pp. 111-118.
Yeshurun Y, Wollberg Z, Dyn N, Allon N (1985) Identification of MGB cells byVolterra kernels. I. Prediction of responses to species specific vocalizations. Biol. Cybernetics 51:383-390.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klein, D., Depireux, D., Simon, J. et al. Robust Spectrotemporal Reverse Correlation for the Auditory System: Optimizing Stimulus Design. J Comput Neurosci 9, 85–111 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008990412183
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008990412183