Components of Attentional Set-switching
Abstract
Abstract. A series of distinct event-related potentials (ERPs) have been recorded from the scalp of human subjects as they switch from one task to another. It is possible that task switching may depend on different mechanisms depending on whether the switch requires a change in attentional set, in other words the redirecting of attention to different aspects of a sensory stimulus, or whether it requires a change in intentional set, in others words a change in the way that responses are selected. To address this issue, the current study recorded ERPs while subjects switched between attentional sets and the results were compared with those of a previous investigation in which subjects switched between intentional sets. Subjects selected stimuli according to two conflicting attentional sets, each emphasizing one visual stimulus dimension (colour, shape). Pairs of stimuli, only one of which was to be attended, were presented for between eight and seventeen trials then either a switch or a stay cue was shown. The switch cue instructed subjects to switch from the current attentional set to the other set, while the stay cue instructed subjects to maintain the current set. Comparing ERPs time-locked to the switch and stay cues revealed neural correlates of the initiation of a task switch. Comparing the ERPs time locked to the first stimuli after either stay or switch cues identified neural correlates of the implementation of a task switch. A similar modulation over parietal electrodes was seen when subjects were switching between either attentional or intentional sets. While an intentional set switch began with a medial frontal modulation, attentional set switching began with a lateral frontal modulation. Implementing a new attentional set was associated with modulation of relatively early visual potentials, while implementing a new intentional set was associated with modulation of later response-related potentials. The results confirm that task switching consists of a number of constituent processes which may be taxed to different degrees depending on whether a task-switch paradigm requires subjects to change the way in which they select stimuli or responses.
References
(1991). American Electroencephalographic Society guidelines for standard electrode placement position nomenclature. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 8, 200– 202
(1999). Task switching: positive and negative priming of task set. In G. W. Humphreys, J. Duncan, & A. Treisman (Eds.), Attention space and action (pp. 273-298). New York: Oxford University Press.
(1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. XV, pp. 421-452).Cambridge, MA: MIT.
(2002). Functional decay of memory for tasks. Psychological Research, 66, 287– 297
(2003). Task switching and the pied homunculus: where are we being led?. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7(8), 340– 341
(2000). Prefrontal modulation of visual processing in humans. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 399– 403
(2002). Think differently: a brain orienting response to task novelty. Neuroreport, 13(15), 1887– 1892
(2002). The role of the frontal cortex in task preparation. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 908– 914
(1993). Primate frontal cortex: effects of stimulus and movement. Experimental Brain Research, 95, 28– 40
(1970). Stimulus set and response set: two kinds of selective attention. In D. I. Mostofsky (Ed.), Attention: Contemporary theory and analysis (pp. 51-60). New York: Appleton.
(2000). The cognitive and neuroanatomical correlates of mulitasking. Neuropsychologia, 38, 848– 863
(1996). Dissociation in prefrontal cortex of affective and attentional shifts. Nature, 380, 69– 72
(2000). Prefrontal cortex activation in task switching: An event-related fmri study. Cognitive Brain Research, 9, 103– 109
(1993). Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a Go/Nogo task. Biological Psychology, 35, 123– 138
(1995). Event-related potential correlates of transient attention shifts to color and location. Biological Psychology, 41, 167– 182
(1999). Dissociation of visual, motor and predictive signals in parietal cortex during visual guidance. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 88– 93
(2000). Prefrontal-cingulate interactions in action monitoring. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 516– 520
(1994). Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans. Nature, 372, 543– 546
(1999). Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. In G. W. Humphreys, J. Duncan, & A. Triesman, Attention, space, and action: studies in cognitive neuroscience(pp 31-53).Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
(2000). The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 284– 291
(2003). Self-control during response conflict by human supplementary eye field. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 117– 118
(1890). Principles of psychology. (Vol. 1). New York: Holt.
(1976). The epsilon-adjustment procedure for repeated measures analyses of variance [letter]. Psychophysiology, 13, 277– 278
(2000). Modulation of task-related neural activity in task-switching: an fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 189– 196
(1997). Distributed cortical network for visual attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 75– 91
(1986). Effects of degradation of visual stimulation components of the event-related potential (ERP) in Go/Nogo reaction tasks. Biological Psychology, 23, 21– 38
(1998). Transient activation of inferior prefrontal cortex during cognitive set shifting. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 80– 84
(1969). Functional identification of perceptual and response biases in choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 79, 295– 299
(1995). Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. Psychophysiology, 32, 4– 18
(1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423– 1442
(2000). Modelling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychological Research, 63, 234– 249
(2000). Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 211– 253
(1999). Orienting attention in time. Modulation of brain potentials. Brain, 122, 1507– 1518
(2003). Task Switching. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 134– 140
(2000). Reconfiguration of task-set: is it easier to switch to the weaker task?. Psychological Research, 63, 250– 264
(1998). Modulation of human extrastriate visual processing by selective attention to colours and words. Brain, 121, 1357– 1368
(1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97– 113
(1991). Extra-dimensional versus intra-dimensional set shifting performance following frontal lobe excisions, temporal lobe excisions, or amygdalohippocampelectomy in man. Neuropsychologia, 29, 993– 1006
(1972). Non-reversal shifts after selective prefrontal ablations in monkeys (Maccaca mulatta). Neuropsychologia, 10, 17– 26
(1998). Attention to action. In A. C. Roberts, T. W. Robbins, & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), The prefrontal cortex: Executive and cognitive functions (pp. 131-143). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
(2001). Switching between dimensions, location, and responses: the role of the left frontopolar cortex. NeuroImage, 14, S118– S124
(2000). A fronto-posterior network involved in visual dimension changes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 480– 494
(1998). Executive attention: conflict, target detection, and cognitive control. In R. Parasuraman (Ed.), The attentive brain (pp. 401-423). Cambridge: MIT Press.
(1995). Costs of predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207– 231
(1998). Dissociating executive mechanisms of task control following frontal lobe damage and Parkinson’s disease. Brain, 121, 815– 842
(2000). Contrasting cortical and subcortical activations produced by attentional-set shifting and reversal learning in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 142– 162
(1985). Motor programming: a review and scheduling theory. In H. Heuer, U. Kleinback, & K.-H. Schmidt (Eds.), Motor behavior: Programming, control, and acquisition (pp. 1-33). Berlin: Springer.
(2001). Complementary localization and lateralization of orienting and motor attention. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 656– 661
(2002b). Role of the human medial frontal cortex in task switching: A combined fMRI and TMS study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 87, 2577– 2592
(2003). The left parietal and premotor cortices: motor attention and selection. Neuroimage, 20(S1), S89– S100
(2001). Complementary lateralization of attention and intention in the human brain: A PET study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 698– 710
(1997). The left parietal cortex and attention to action. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1261– 1273
(2002a). Components of switching intentional set. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1139– 1150
(2001). Attention systems and the organization of the human parietal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 5262– 5271
(1994). Encoding of behavioral significance of visual stimuli by primate prefrontal neurons: Relation to relevant task conditions. Experimental Brain Research, 97, 423– 436
(2001). A code for behavioural inhibition on the basis of color, but not motion, in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex of macaque monkey. The Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 4801– 4808
(2003). Prefrontal interactions reflect future task operations. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 75– 81
(2002). Active maintenance in prefrontal area 46 creates distractor-resistant memory. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 479– 484
(1991). Defecits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain, 114, 727– 741
(2002). Two attentional processes in the parietal lobe. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 1124– 1131
(1997). Coding of intention in the posterior parietal cortex. Nature, 386, 167– 170
(2000). The role of prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex in task switching. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 97, 13448– 13453
(1975). Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 38(4), 387– 401
(2001). Stroop performance in focal lesion patients: Dissociation of processes and frontal lobe lesion location. Neuropsychologia, 39, 771– 786
(1988). Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain.. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme.
(1998). Switching attention without shifting the spotlight: object based attentional modulation of brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 137– 151
(2000). Task switching and the measurement of “switch costs”. Psychological Research, 63, 212– 233
(2000). Cerebral assymetry of the “top-down” allocation of attention to global and local features. The Journal of Neuroscience, 20, RC72–
