Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Production of knockout rats using ENU mutagenesis and a yeast-based screening assay

Abstract

The rat is a widely used model in biomedical research and is often the preferred rodent model in many areas of physiological and pathobiological research. Although many genetic tools are available for the rat, methods to produce gene-disrupted knockout rats are greatly needed. In this study, we developed protocols for creating N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU)-induced germline mutations in several rat strains. F1 preweanling pups from mutagenized Sprague Dawley (SD) male rats were then screened for functional mutations in Brca1 and Brca2 using a yeast gap-repair, ADE2-reporter truncation assay. We produced knockout rats for each of these two breast cancer suppressor genes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Heritable phenotypic mutant rats.
Figure 2: Brca1, Brca2 and agouti yeast cDNA/gDNA truncation assays.
Figure 3: Identification of a Brca2 knockout rat.
Figure 4: Screening for a Brca1 knockout rat.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Accessions

GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ

References

  1. Jacob, H.J. & Kwitek, A.E. Rat genetics: attaching physiology and pharmacology to the genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3, 33–42 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Justice, M.J., Noveroske, J.K., Weber, J.S., Zheng, B. & Bradley, A. Mouse ENU mutagenesis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 8, 1955–1963 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Noveroske, J.K., Weber, J.S. & Justice, M.J. The mutagenic action of N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea in the mouse. Mamm. Genome 11, 478–483 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Russell, W.L. et al. Specific-locus test shows ethylnitrosourea to be the most potent mutagen in the mouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76, 5918–5922 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beier, D.R. Sequence-based analysis of mutagenized mice. Mamm. Genome 11, 594–597 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Justice, M.J. et al. Effects of ENU dosage on mouse strains. Mamm. Genome 11, 484–488 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ishioka, C. et al. Screening patients for heterozygous p53 mutations using a functional assay in yeast. Nat. Genet. 5, 124–129 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kataoka, A. et al. Development of a yeast stop codon assay readily and generally applicable to human genes. Am. J. Pathol. 159, 1239–1245 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Culbertson, M.R. RNA surveillance. Unforeseen consequences for gene expression, inherited genetic disorders and cancer. Trends Genet. 15, 74–80 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Frischmeyer, P.A. & Dietz, H.C. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in health and disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 8, 1893–1900 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuramoto, T., Nomoto, T., Sugimura, T. & Ushijima, T. Cloning of the rat agouti gene and identification of the rat nonagouti mutation. Mamm. Genome 12, 469–471 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Suzuki, A. et al. Brca2 is required for embryonic cellular proliferation in the mouse. Genes Dev. 11, 1242–1252 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Connor, F. et al. Tumorigenesis and a DNA repair defect in mice with a truncating Brca2 mutation. Nat. Genet. 17, 423–430 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Freidman, L.S. et al. Thymic lymphomas in mice with a truncating mutation in Brca2. Cancer Res. 58, 1338–1343 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Flaman, J.-M. et al. A simple p53 functional assay for screening cell lines, blood, and tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 3963–3967 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Andreutti-Zaugg, C., Scott, R.J. & Iggo, R. Inhibition of nonsense-mediated messenger RNA decay in clinical samples facilitates detection of human MSH2 mutations with an in vivo fusion protein assay and conventional techniques. Cancer Res. 57, 3288–3293 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakatsukasa, E. et al. Generation of live rat offspring by intrauterine insemination with epididymal spermatozoa cryopreserved at −196 °C. Reproduction 122, 463–467 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakagata, N. Cryopreservation of mouse spermatozoa. Mamm. Genome 11, 572–576 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Coghill, E.L. et al. A gene-driven approach to the identification of ENU mutants in the mouse. Nat. Genet. 30, 255–256 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamamoto, K. et al. A functional and quantitative mutational analysis of p53 mutations in yeast indicates strand biases and different roles of mutations in DMBA- and BBN-induced tumors in rats. Int. J. Cancer 83, 700–705 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Amy Moser for discussions and suggestions during the course of this work; R. Iggo, M. Tada, and T. Moriuchi for providing the pLSRP53 plasmid and the yIG397 yeast strain used in this paper; Henry Pitot for analysis of the histology sections; and Dinelli M. Monson and Millicent A. Shultz for technical assistance. This work has been supported by grants from the US National Institutes of Health (CA28954 and CA77494).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael N Gould.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zan, Y., Haag, J., Chen, KS. et al. Production of knockout rats using ENU mutagenesis and a yeast-based screening assay. Nat Biotechnol 21, 645–651 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt830

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt830

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing