Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Contribution of the FMR1 gene mutation to human intellectual dysfunction

Abstract

The degree to which genetic factors influence human intelligence remains a matter of some controversy. However, there is little doubt that single gene mutations can significantly alter brain development and function. For example, mutations affecting the FMR1 gene cause the fragile X syndrome, the most prevalent known inherited cause of intellectual dysfunction. The most common mutation occurring in the FMR1 locus involves expansion of a trinucleotide (CGG)n repeat sequence within the promoter region of the gene1. Between 6 and 54 repeats are typically observed in individuals from the general population2. When ≥200 CGG repeats are present, the expanded repeat sequence and an adjacent CpG island are usually hypermethylated, a phenomenon associated with transcriptional silencing of the gene and commonly referred to as the FMR1 full mutation3–5. The intermediate range of repeats (approximately 50 to 200 CGGs), referred to as the premutation, is characterized by the absence of hypermethylation within the promoter region and normal phenotype6,7. Some individuals have a combination of methylated and unmethylated alleles of differing size and are referred to as having mosaic status. Most males with the FMR1 full mutation function in the mentally retarded range of intelligence; in contrast, females with the FMR1 full mutation show a broader range of intelligence, from mental retardation to normal IQ8. The wider spectrum of cognitive functioning in females with the full mutation is likely to be due, in part, to variation in cellular X chromosome inactivation patterns and consequent FMR1 protein (FMRP) production in the brain. Despite differences in severity of intellectual dysfunction, both males and females with the FMR1 full mutation manifest a similar cognitive profile with weakness in the visual-spatial and attentional–organizational domains and relatively preserved verbal abilities9,10. Here, we show that the variance in child IQ predicted by mean parental IQ is decreased in 29 girls with the FMR1 full mutation compared to a non-fragile X group of 50 girls of similar age. We also show that activation status of the FMR1 gene, but not repeat size, is strongly correlated with intellectual function in girls with the full mutation, particularly for cognitive measures which distinguish fragile X from non-fragile X groups. These data indicate that FMR1 activation status is directly associated with the severity of intellectual dysfunction in girls with the fragile X syndrome.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Verkerk, A.J. et al. Identification of a gene (FMR-1) containing a CGG repeat coincident with a breakpoint cluster region exhibiting length variation in fragile X syndrome. Cell 65, 905–914 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fu, Y.H. et al. Variation of the CGG repeat at the fragile X site results in genetic instability: resolution of the Sherman paradox. Cell 67, 1047–1058 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hansen, R.S., Gartler, S.M., Scott, C.R., Chen, S.H. & Laird, C.D. Methylation analysis of CGG sites in the CpG island of the human FMR1 gene. Hum. mol. Genet. 1, 571–578 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pai, J.T. et al. Absence of FMR-1 gene expression can be detected with RNA extracted from dried blood specimens. Hum. Genet. 03, 488–493 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pieretti, M. et al. Absence of expression of the FMR-1 gene in fragile X syndrome. Cell 66, 817–822 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Reiss, A.L., Freund, L., Abrams, M.T., Boehm, C. & Kazazian, H. Neurobehavioral effects of the fragile X premutation in adult women: a controlled study. Am. J. hum. Genet. 52, 884–894 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Rousseau, F. et al. A multicenter study on genotype-phenotype correlations in the fragile X syndrome, using direct diagnosis with probe StB12.3: the first 2,253 cases. Am. J. hum. Genet. 56, 225–237 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hagerman, R.J. Physical and behavioral phenotype. in Fragile X Syndrome (eds. Hagerman, R J. & Cronister, A.C.) 3–68 (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Freund, L.S. & Reiss, A.L. A neurocognitive phenotype of young males and females with fragile X. Dev. Neuropsych. in the press.

  10. Mazzocco, M.M., Pennington, B.F. & Hagerman, R.J. The neurocognitive phenotype of female carriers of fragile X: additional evidence for specificity. J. Dev. behav. Pediatr. 14, 328–335 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Plomin, R., DeFries, J.C. & McCleam, G.E. Behavioral Genetics: A Primer (W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kemper, M.B., Hagerman, R.J., Ahmad, R.S. & Mariner, R. Cognitive profiles and the spectrum of clinical manifestations in heterozygous fra (X) females. Am. J. med. Genet. 23, 139–156 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Miezejeski, C.M. et al. A profile of cognitive deficit in females from fragile X families. Neuropsychologia 24, 405–409 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Loesch, D.Z. et al. Genotype-phenotype relationships in fragile X syndrome: a family study. Am. J. hum. Genet. 53, 1064–1073 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Rousseau, F. et al. Direct diagnosis by DNA analysis of the fragile X syndrome of mental retardation. N. Engl. J. Med. 325, 1673–1681 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Daniels, J.K. et al. IQ and variation in the number of fragile X CGG repeats: no association in a normal sample. Intelligence 19, 45–50 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Taylor, A.K. et al. Molecular predictors of cognitive involvement in female carriers of fragile X syndrome. JAMA 271, 507–514 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Abrams, M.T. et al. Molecular-neurobehavioral associations in females with the fragile X full mutation. Am. J. med. Genet. 51, 317–327 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rochiccioli, P. et al. Study of final height in Turner's syndrome: ethnic and genetic influences. Acta. Paediatr. 83, 305–308 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Webb, T. & Jacobs, P.A. Fragile Xq27.3 in female heterozygotes for the Martin-Bell syndrome. J. med. Genet. 27, 627–631 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tuckerman, E. & Webb, T. The inactivation of the fragile X chromosome in female carriers of the Martin Bell syndrome as studied by two different methods. Clin. Genet. 36, 25–30 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rousseau, F., Heitz, D., Oberle, I. & Mandel, J.-L. Selection in blood cells from female carriers of the fragile X syndrome: inverse correlation between age and proportion of active X chromosomes carrying the full mutation. J. med. Genet. 28, 830–836 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. McConkie-Rosell, A. et al. Evidence that methylation of the FMR-1 locus is responsible for variable phenotypic expression of the fragile X syndrome. Am. J. hum. Genet. 53, 800–809 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wohrle, D., Hennig, I., Vogel, W. & Steinbach, P. Mitotic stability of fragile X mutations in differentiated cells indicates early post-conceptional trinucleotide repeat expansion. Nature Genet. 4, 140–142 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Taylor, A.K., Safanda, J.F., Lugenbeel, K.A., Nelson, D.L. & Hagerman, R.J. Molecular and phenotypic studies of fragile X males with variant methylation of the FMR1 gene reveal that the degree of methylation influences clinical severity. Am. J. hum. Genet. 55, A18 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Reiss, A., Abrams, M., Greenlaw, R., Freund, L. & Denckla, M. Neurodevelopmental effects of the FMR-1 full mutation in humans. Nature Med. 1, 159–167 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wechsler, D. WISC-R Manual: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. (The Psychological Corporation, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sattler, J.M. Assessment of Children (J. Sattler, San Diego, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Silverstein, A.B. Two- and four-subtest short forms of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. J. Consult clin. Psychol. 50, 415–418 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reiss, A., Freund, L., Baumgardner, T. et al. Contribution of the FMR1 gene mutation to human intellectual dysfunction. Nat Genet 11, 331–334 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1195-331

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1195-331

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing