Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Neural stem cells and neurospheres—re-evaluating the relationship

Abstract

For most of the past century, the prospect of replacing lost or damaged cells in the central nervous system (CNS) was hampered by the opinion that the adult mammalian CNS was incapable of generating new nerve cells. This belief, like most dogmas, was essentially founded on a lack of experimental evidence to the contrary. The overturning of this 'no new neuron' hypothesis began midway through the twentieth century with a series of reports documenting neurogenesis in the postnatal and adult brain1, continued with the isolation and in vitro culture of neurogenic cells from the adult mammalian brain2,3, and culminated in the discovery of a population of multipotent, self-renewing cells in the adult CNS (that is, bona fide neural stem cells)3,4,5. Although a variety of techniques were initially used, the neurosphere assay (NSA)3,6 rapidly emerged as the assay of choice and has since become a valuable tool for isolating, and understanding the biology of, embryonic and adult CNS stem cells. Like all technologies, it is not without its limitations. In this article we will highlight several shortcomings of the assay related to its application and interpretation that we believe have led to a significant body of research whose conclusions may well be misleading.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Detection and expansion of stem and progenitor cells using the neurosphere assay.
Figure 2: Calculation of sphere-forming unit (SFU) frequency.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gross, C.G. Neurogenesis in the adult brain: death of a dogma. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 1, 67–73 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Richards, L.J., Kilpatrick, T.J. & Bartlett, P.F. De novo generation of neuronal cells from the adult mouse brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 8591–8595 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Reynolds, B.A. & Weiss, S. Generation of neurons and astrocytes from isolated cells of the adult mammalian central nervous system. Science 255, 1707–1710 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gage, F.H. Mammalian neural stem cells. Science 287, 1433–1438 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Weiss, S. et al. Is there a neural stem cell in the mammalian forebrain? Trends Neurosci. 19, 387–393 (1996a).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Reynolds, B.A. & Weiss, S. Clonal and population analyses demonstrate that an EGF-responsive mammalian embryonic CNS precursor is a stem cell. Dev. Biol. 175, 1–13 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Potten, C.S. & Loeffler, M. Stem cells: attributes, cycles, spirals, pitfalls and uncertainties. Lessons for and from the crypt. Development 110, 1001–1020 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gritti, A. et al. Epidermal and fibroblast growth factors behave as mitogenic regulators for a single multipotent stem cell-like population from the subventricular region of the adult mouse forebrain. J. Neurosci. 19, 3287–3297 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gritti, A. et al. Multipotent neural stem cells reside into the rostral extension and olfactory bulb of adult rodents. J. Neurosci. 22, 437–445 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vescovi, A.L. et al. Isolation and cloning of multipotential stem cells from the embryonic human CNS and establishment of transplantable human neural stem cell lines by epigenetic stimulation. Exp. Neurol. 156, 71–83 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kondo, M. et al. Biology of hematopoietic stem cells and progenitors: implications for clinical application. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 21, 759–806 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Seaberg, R.M. & van der Kooy, D. Adult rodent neurogenic regions: the ventricular subependyma contains neural stem cells, but the dentate gyrus contains restricted progenitors. J. Neurosci. 22, 1784–1793 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bjornson, C.R., Rietze, R.L., Reynolds, B.A., Magli, M.C. & Vescovi, A.L. Turning brain into blood: a hematopoietic fate adopted by adult neural stem cells in vivo. Science 283, 534–537 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rietze, R.L. et al. Purification of a pluripotent neural stem cell from the adult mouse brain. Nature 412, 736–739 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Capela, A. & Temple, S. LeX/ssea-1 is expressed by adult mouse CNS stem cells, identifying them as nonependymal. Neuron 35, 865–875 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim, M. & Morshead, C.M. Distinct populations of forebrain neural stem and progenitor cells can be isolated using side-population analysis. J. Neurosci. 23, 10703–10709 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pitman, M. et al. LIF receptor signaling modulates neural stem cell renewal. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 27, 255–266 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tropepe, V. et al. Distinct neural stem cells proliferate in response to EGF and FGF in the developing mouse telencephalon. Dev. Biol. 208, 166–188 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shimazaki, T., Shingo, T. & Weiss, S. The ciliary neurotrophic factor/leukemia inhibitory factor/gp130 receptor complex operates in the maintenance of mammalian forebrain neural stem cells. J. Neurosci. 21, 7642–7653 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Vanderluit, J.L. et al. p107 regulates neural precursor cells in the mammalian brain. J. Cell Biol. 166, 853–863 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reynolds, B., Rietze, R. Neural stem cells and neurospheres—re-evaluating the relationship. Nat Methods 2, 333–336 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth758

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth758

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing