Technical NoteMagnetic Field Strength and Reproducibility of Neodymium Magnets Useful for Transcranial Static Magnetic Field Stimulation of the Human Cortex
Section snippets
INTRODUCTION
Noninvasive neuromodulation techniques have gained a strategic position in cognitive neuroscience and have reshaped the way brain–behavior relations are investigated. Moreover, these techniques have been proposed as a treatment for neuropsychiatric disorders (1,2). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation are commonly used as noninvasive neuromodulation techniques in humans and animals.
Recently we described that the application of transcranial
Magnets
We measured the strength of the static magnetic field produced by 10 magnets and two inert steel cylinders (useful for sham stimulation). The characteristics of the magnets and of the steel cylinders are summarized in Table 1.
We used three different sizes of cylindrical magnets, which will be referred to as magnets 30, 45, and 60 (M30, M45 and M60). The number indicates the diameter (in millimeters). We also tested a 60-mm magnet with a quasi-ring shape. We will refer to this magnet as M60qr
RESULTS
Figure 1 (b–d) shows the magnetic field strength of the different magnets tested at different distances from the magnet base surface. The reproducibility of the results was very high for all magnet sizes (Fig. 1b,d): Specifically, the standard deviation for all measurements performed on the four M45 magnets at different spatial points (Fig. 1b) was <10 mT. As expected, at distances that are relevant for cortical stimulation in humans (i.e., 2–3 cm from the magnet surface), the magnetic field
DISCUSSION
We believe that tSMS can play a role in the development of future strategies for noninvasive neuromodulation. Herein, we measured the magnetic field strength of permanent magnets of different size and shape at different distances from the magnet base surface. The most important result is that there is good reproducibility of the magnetic field strength when similar magnets are compared. Furthermore, at 2–3 cm from the magnet surface the magnetic field strength is in a range between 120 and 200
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Francisco Rivadulla (CIQUS, University of Santiago) for useful technical help during the measurements. This work was partially supported by the Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia (MEC) (BFU2009-08169).
Authorship Statement
Drs. Casto Rivadulla, Guglielmo Foffani, and Antonio Oliviero designed and conducted the study, including data collection and data analysis. Dr. Antonio Oliviero prepared the manuscript draft with important intellectual input from Drs. Casto Rivadulla and Guglielmo Foffani.
REFERENCES (8)
- et al.
Non-invasive brain stimulation in neurological diseases
Neuropharmacology
(2013) - et al.
Inverse correlation between resting motor threshold and corticomotor excitability after static magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex
Brain Stimul
(2013) - et al.
Effects of a 0.5-T static magnetic field on conduction in guinea pig spinal cord
J Neurol Sci
(2004) - et al.
Magnetic field influence on central nervous system function
Exp Neurol
(1987)
Cited by (0)
For more information on author guidelines, an explanation of our peer review process, and conflict of interest informed consent policies, please go to http://www.wiley.com/bw/submit.asp?ref=1094-7159&site=1