Abstract
Change blindness, the failure to detect visual changes that occur during a disruption, has increasingly been used to infer the nature of internal representations. If every change were detected, detailed representations of the world would have to be stored and accessible. However, because many changes are not detected, visual representations might not be complete, and access to them might be limited. Using change detection to infer the completeness of visual representations requires an understanding of the reasons for change blindness. This article provides empirical support for one such reason: change blindness resulting from the failure to compare retained representations of both the pre- and postchange information. Even when unaware of changes, observers still retained information about both the pre- and postchange objects on the same trial.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angelone, B. L., Levin, D. T., &Simons, D. J. (2003). The roles of representation and comparison failures in change blindness.Perception,32, 947–962.
Beck, M. R., &Levin, D. T. (2003). The role of representational volatility in recognizing pre- and postchange objects.Perception & Psychophysics,65, 458–468.
Becker, M. W., Pashler, H., &Antis, S. M. (2000). The role of iconic memory in change-detection tasks.Perception,29, 273–286.
Brawn, P. T., Snowden, R. J., &Wolfe, J. M. (1999). The minimal conditions for “change blindness”: What is hides what was [Abstract].Investigations in Ophthalmology & Visual Science,40, S49.
Gibson, J. J. (1966). The problem of temporal order in stimulation and perception.Journal of Psychology,62, 141–149.
Grimes, J. (1996). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. In K. Akins (Ed.),Perception (Vol. 2, pp. 89–110). New York: Oxford University Press.
Hayhoe, M. (2000). Vision using routines: A functional account of vision.Visual Cognition,7, 43–64.
Hollingworth, A. (2003). Failures of retrieval and comparison constrain change detection in natural scenes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 388–403.
Hollingworth, A., &Henderson, J. M. (2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 113–136.
Hollingworth, A., Schrock, G., &Henderson, J. M. (2001). Change detection in the flicker paradigm: The role of fixation position within the scene.Memory & Cognition,29, 296–304.
Hollingworth, A., Williams, C. C., &Henderson, J. M. (2001). To see and remember: Visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 761–768.
IIrwin, D. E. (1992). Memory for position and identity across eye movements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 307–317.
Levin, D. T., Simons, D. J., Angelone, B. L., &Chabris, C. F. (2002). Memory for centrally attended changing objects in an incidental realworld change detection paradigm.British Journal of Psychology,93, 289–302.
Marr, D. (1982).Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco: Freeman.
McConkie, G. W., &Rayner, K. (1976). Identifying the span of effective stimulus in reading: Literature review and theories of reading. In H. Singer & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.),Theoretical models and processing of reading (pp. 137–162). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Noë, A., Pessoa, L., &Thompson, E. (2000). Beyond the grand illusion: What change blindness really teaches us about vision.Visual Cognition,7, 93–106.
O’Regan, J. K. (1992). Solving the “real” mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory.Canadian Journal of Psychology,46, 461–488.
O’Regan, J. K., &Noë, A. (2002). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,24, 939–1031.
Pashler, H. (1988). Familiarity and visual change detection.Perception & Psychophysics,44, 369–378.
Phillips, W. A. (1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 283–290.
Poggio, T., Torre, V., &Koch, C. (1985). Computational vision and regularization theory.Nature,317, 314–319.
Rensink, R. A. (2000). The dynamic representation of scenes.Visual Cognition,7, 17–42.
Rensink, R. A. (2002). Change detection.Annual Review of Psychology,53, 245–277.
Rensink, R. A., O’Regan, J. K., &Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes.Psychological Science,8, 368–373.
Rosenthal, R., &Rosnow, R. L. (1991).Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ryan, J. D., &Cohen, N. J. (2004). The nature of change detection and online representation of scenes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,30, 988–1015.
Scott-Brown, K. C., Baker, M. R., &Orbach, H. S. (2000). Comparison blindness.Visual Cognition,7, 253–267.
Shore, D., &Klein, R. M. (2000). The effects of scene inversion on change blindness.Journal of General Psychology,127, 27–43.
Silverman, M., &Mack, A. (2001). Priming from change blindness [Abstract].Journal of Vision,1 (3), 13a.
Simons, D. J. (2000). Current approaches to change blindness.Visual Cognition,7, 1–15.
Simons, D. J., Chabris, C. F., Schnur, T., &Levin, D. T. (2002). Evidence for preserved representations in change blindness.Consciousness & Cognition,11, 78–97.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 174–215.
Stroud, J. M. (1955). The fine structure of psychological time. In H. Quastler (Ed.),Information theory in psychology: Problems and methods (pp. 174–207). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Tatler, B. W. (2001). Characterising the visual buffer: Real-world evidence for overwriting early in each fixation.Perception,30, 993–1006.
Trehub, A. (1991).The cognitive brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wolfe, J. M. (1999). Inattentional amnesia. In V. Coltheart (Ed.),Fleeting memories: Cognition of brief visual stimuli (pp. 71–94). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mitroff, S.R., Simons, D.J. & Levin, D.T. Nothing compares 2 views: Change blindness can occur despite preserved access to the changed information. Perception & Psychophysics 66, 1268–1281 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194997
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194997