Abstract
A version of Sternberg’s (1966) short-term visual memory recognition paradigm with pictures of unfamiliar faces as stimuli was used in three experiments to assess the applicability of the distinctiveness-based SIMPLE model proposed by Brown, Neath, and Chater (2002). Initial simulations indicated that the amount of recency predicted increased as the parameter measuring the psychological distinctiveness of the stimulus material (c) increased and that the amount of primacy was dependent on the extent of proactive interference from previously presented stimuli. The data from Experiment 1, in which memory lists of four and five faces varying in visual similarity were used, confirmed the predicted extended recency effect. However, changes in visual similarity were not found to produce changes in c. In Experiments 2 and 3, the conditions that influence the magnitude of c were explored. These revealed that both the familiarity of the stimulus class before testing and changes in familiarity, due to perceptual learning, influenced distinctiveness, as indexed by the parameter c. Overall, the empirical data from all three experiments were well fit by SIMPLE.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashby, F. G., &Townsend, J. T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence.Psychological Review,93, 154–179.
Avons, S. E. (1980).Visualization and memorization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Stirling.
Avons, S. E. (1998). Serial report and item recognition of novel visual patterns.British Journal of Psychology,89, 285–308.
Avons, S. E., Wright, K. L., &Pammer, K. (1994). The word-length effect in probed and serial recall.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47A, 207–231.
Broadbent, D. E., &Broadbent, M. H. P. (1981). Recency effects in visual memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 1–15.
Brown, G. D. A., Neath, I., & Chater, N. (2002).A ratio model of scale-invariant memory and identification (Memory Lab Tech. Rep. No. 2002-01). Purdue University.
Bruce, V., &Young, A. W. (1986). Understanding face recognition.British Journal of Psychology,73, 105–116.
Diamond, R., &Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 107–117.
Edelman, S. (1999).Representation and recognition in vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ellis, H. D. (1975). Recognising faces.British Journal of Psychology,66, 409–426.
Goldstone, R. L. (1998). Perceptual learning.Annual Review of Psychology,49, 585–612.
Hanna, A., &Loftus, G. (1993). A model for conceptual processing of naturalistic scenes.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,47, 548–569.
Hay, D. C., &Cox, R. (2002). Developmental changes in the recognition of faces and facial features.Infant & Child Development,9, 199–212.
Hay, D. C., &Young, A. W. (1982). The human face. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.),Normality and pathology in cognitive function (pp. 173–202). London: Academic Press.
Hunt, R. R. (2003). Two contributions of distinctive processing to accurate memory.Journal of Memory & Language,48, 811–825.
Kahana, M. J., &Sekuler, R. (2002). Recognising spatial patterns: A noisy exemplar approach.Vision Research,42, 2177–2194.
Kerr, J. R., Avons, S. E., &Ward, G. (1999). The effect of retention interval on serial position curves for item recognition of visual patterns and faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 1475–1494.
Korsnes, M. S., Magnussen, S., &Reinvang, I. (1996). Serial position effects in visual short-term memory for words and abstract spatial patterns.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,37, 62–73.
Leder, H., Candrian, G., Huber, O., &Bruce, V. (2001). Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces.Perception,30, 73–83.
Manning, S. K., &Schreier, H. (1988). Recency and suffix effects in pictures as a function of recall method.American Journal of Psychology,101, 97–109.
McLaren, I. P. L., Leevers, H. L., &Mackintosh, N. J. (1994). Recognition, categorization and perceptual learning (or, how learning to classify things together helps one to tell them apart). In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconcious information processing (pp. 889–909). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
Moses, Y., Ullman, S., &Edelman, S. (1996). Generalisation to novel images in upright and inverted faces.Perception,25, 443–461.
Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1960). The distinctiveness of stimuli.Psychological Review,67, 16–31.
Murray, J. E. (2004). The ups and downs of face perception: Evidence for holistic encoding of upright and inverted faces.Perception,33, 387–398.
Murray, J. E., Yong, E., &Rhodes, G. (2000). Revisiting the perception of upside-down faces.Psychological Science,11, 492–496.
Nairne, J. S., Riegler, G. L., &Serra, M. (1991). Dissociative effects of generation on item and order retention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 702–709.
Nairne, J. S., Whiteman, H. L., &Woessner, L. (1995). Symmetrical cuing effects for item and position information.American Journal of Psychology,108, 345–358.
Neath, I. (1993). Distinctiveness and serial position effects in recognition.Memory & Cognition,21, 689–698.
Neath, I., &Brown, G. D. A. (2006). SIMPLE: Further applications of a local distinctiveness model of memory. In B. H. Ross (Ed.),Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 46, pp. 210–243). San Diego: Academic Press.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity and the identification-categorization relationship.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 39–57.
Palmeri, T. J., Wong, A. C. N., &Gauthier, I. (2004). Computational approaches to the development of perceptual expertise.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,8, 378–386.
Phillips, W. A., &Christie, D. F. M. (1977). Components of visual memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,29, 117–133.
Pollack, I., &Norman, D. A. (1964). A non-parametric analysis of recognition experiments.Psychonomic Science,1, 125–126.
Riesenhuber, M., &Poggio, T. (1999). Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex.Nature Neuroscience,2, 1019–1025.
Smyth, M. M., Hay, D. C., Hitch, G. J., &Horton, N. J. (2005). Serial position memory in the visual-spatial domain: Reconstructing sequences of unfamiliar faces.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,58A, 909–930.
Sternberg, S. (1966). High-speed scanning in human memory.Science,153, 652–654.
Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,43A, 161–204.
Valentine, T. (Ed.) (1995).Cognitive and computational aspects of face recognition: Explorations in face space. London: Routledge.
Valentine, T., &Endo, M. (1992). Towards an exemplar model of face processing: The effects of race and distinctiveness.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,44A, 671–703.
Walker, P., Hitch, G. J., &Duroe, S. (1993). The effect of visual similarity on short-term memory for spatial location: Implications for the capacity of visual short-term memory.Acta Psychologica,83, 203–224.
Ward, G., Avons, S. E., &Melling, L. (2005). Serial position curves in short-term memory:Memory,13, 308–317.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hay, D.C., Smyth, M.M., Hitch, G.J. et al. Serial position effects in short-term visual memory: A SIMPLE explanation?. Memory & Cognition 35, 176–190 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195953
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195953