Abstract
The extraction of three-dimensional shape from shading is one of the most perceptually compelling, yet poorly understood, aspects of visual perception. In this paper, we report several new experiments on the manner in which the perception of shape from shading interacts with other visual processes such as perceptual grouping, preattentive search (“pop-out”), and motion perception. Our specific findings are as follows: (1) The extraction of shape from shading information incorporates at least two “assumptions” or constraints—first,that there is a single light source illuminating the whole scene, and second, that the light is shining from “above” in relation to retinal coordinates. (2) Tokens defined by shading can serve as a basis for perceptual grouping and segregation. (3) Reaction time for detecting a single convex shape does not increase with the number of items in the display. This “pop-out” effect must be based on shading rather than on differences in luminance polarity, since neither left-right differences nor step changes in luminance resulted in pop-out. (4) When the subjects were experienced, there were no search asymmetries for convex as opposed to concave tokens, but when the subjects were naive, cavities were much easier to detect than convex shapes. (5) The extraction of shape from shading can also provide an input to motion perception. And finally, (6) the assumption of “overhead illumination” that leads to perceptual grouping depends primarily on retinal rather than on “phenomenal” or gravitational coordinates. Taken collectively, these findings imply that the extraction of shape from shading is an “early” visual process that occurs prior to perceptual grouping, motion perception, and vestibular (as well as “cognitive”) correction for head tilt. Hence, there may be neural elements very early in visual processing that are specialized for the extraction of shape from shading.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allman, J. (1987). Evolution of the brain in primates. In R. L. Gregory, (Ed.),Oxford companion to the mind (pp. 633–639). Oxford University Press.
Beck, J. (1966). Effect of orientation and of shape similarity on perceptual grouping.Perception & Psychophysics,1, 300–302.
Berbaum, K., Bever, T., &Chung, C. (1983). Light source position in the perception of object shape.Perception,12, 411–415.
Bergstrom, S. S. (1987).Color constancy: Support to a vector model for the perception of illumination, colour, and depth (Applied Psychology Rep. No. 26). Umeå, Sweden: University of Umeå, Department of Psychology.
Brewster, D. (1847). On the conversion of relief by inverted vision.Edinburgh Philosophical Transactions,15, 657.
Bulthoff, H. H., &Mallot, H. A. (1988). Integration of depth modules: Stereo and shading.Journal of the Optical Society of America,5, 1749–1758.
Deutsch, J. A., &Ramachandran, V. S. (1990). Binocular depth reversals despite familiarity cues: An artifact?Science,249, 565–566.
Enns, J. T., &Rensink, R. A. (1990). Influence of scene-based properties on visual search.Science,247, 721–723.
Greenwood, J. (1991). Marine quick-change acts.Nature,349, 741–742.
Gregory, R. L. (1970).The intelligent eye. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Helmholtz, H. L. F. Von (1910).Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik. Hamburg und Leipzig: Leopold Voss.
Hoffman, D. D. (1983). The interpretation of visual illusions.Scientific American,249(6), 154–162.
Horn, B. (1975). Obtaining shape from shading information. In P. H. Winston (Ed.),Psychology of computer vision. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Howard, I. P. (1983). Occluding edges in apparent reversal of convexity and concavity.Perception,12, 85–86.
Julesz, B. (1971).Foundations of cyclopean perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kleffner, D., &Ramachandran, V. R. (1989). Perception of three-dimensional shape-from-shading.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,30(Suppl.), 252.
Land, E. H. (1983). Recent advances in retinex theory and some implications for cortical computations: Color vision and the natural image.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,80, 5163–5169.
Lehky, S. R., &Sejnowski, T. J. (1988). Network models of shape-from-shading: Neural function arises from both receptive and projective fields.Nature,333, 452–454.
Livingstone, M., &Hubel, D. H. (1987). Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement and depth.Journal of Neuroscience,7, 3416–3468.
Nakayama, K., &Loomis, J. M. (1974). Optical velocity patterns; velocity sensitive neurons and space perception: A hypothesis.Perception,3, 63–80.
Pettigrew, D. (1972). The neurophysiology of binocular vision.Scientific American,227, 84.
Plummer, D. J., & Ramachandran, V. S. (1991).Perceptual grouping based on expansion/contraction and motion capture. Paper presented at Conference on Neural Networks for Vision and Image Processing, Boston University.
Ramachandran, V. S. (1985). The neurobiology of perception: Guest editorial.Perception,47, 97–105.
Ramachandran, V. S. (1988a). Perceiving shape from shading.Scientific American,269, 76–83.
Ramachandran, V. S. (1988b). Perception of shape from shading.Nature,331, 163–166.
Ramachandran, V. S. (1989a, November). Presidential lecture given at the meeting of the Society for Neurosciences, Phoenix, AZ.
Ramachandran, V. S. (l989b).2-D or not 2-D; that is the question. Lecture given at Symposium on Vision, Art & Brain, Bristol, England. To appear in R. L. Gregory, J. Harris, & P. Heard (Eds.),The artful brain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ramachandran, V. S. (1990). Visual perception in people and machines. In A. Blake & T. Troscianko (Eds.),AI and the eye. Bristol, England: Wiley.
Ramachandran, V. S., & Gregory, R. L. (1991).Unmasking the truth. Manuscript in preparation.
Ramachandran, V. S., &Rogers-Ramachandran, D. C. (1991). Phantom contours: A new class of visual patterns that selectively activates the magnocellular pathway in man.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,29, 391–394.
Reichel, F. D., &Todd, J. T. (1990). Perceived depth inversion of smoothly curved surfaces due to image orientation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 653–664.
Rittenhouse, D. (1786). Explanation of an optical deception.Transactions of the American Philosophical Society,2, 37–42.
Thayer, G. H. (1909).Concealing coloration in the animal kingdom. New York: MacMillan.
Tinbergen, N. (1968).Curious naturalists. New York: Doubleday.
Todd, J. T., &Mingolla, E. (1983). Perception of surface curvature and direction of illumination from patterns of shading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 583–595.
Treisman, A. (1985). Preattentive processing in vision.Computer Vision, Graphics, & Image Processing,31, 156–177.
Treisman A. (1986). Features and objects in visual processing.Scientific American,255, 114–126.
Treisman, A., &Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries.Psychological Review,95, 15–48.
Van Essen, D. C. (1979). Visual cortical areas.Annual Review of Neuroscience,2, 227–263.
Yonas, A., Kuskowski, M., &Sternfels, S. (1979). The role of frames of reference in the development of responsiveness to shading.Child Development,50, 495–500.
Zeki, S. M. (1978). Functional specialization in the visual cortex of the rhesus monkey.Nature,274, 423–428.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kleffner, D.A., Ramachandran, V.S. On the perception of shape from shading. Perception & Psychophysics 52, 18–36 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206757
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206757