Abstract
One’s being able to allocate attention to particular regions or properties of the visual field is fundamental to visual information processing. Visual attention determines what input is carefully analyzed and what input is more or less ignored. But at what stage of the visual system is this process evident? We describe three experiments that demonstrate an effect of voluntary spatial attention and voluntary object-based attention on an orientation illusion (the tilt aftereffect) that is believed to take place in primary visual cortex. This finding, in which selective visual attention influences adaptation to visual orientation information, contributes to mounting evidence for a view of visual perception in which mutual interaction takes place between high-level and low-level subsystems.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Artim, J., &Bridgeman, B. (1989). The physiology of attention: Participation of cat striate cortex in behavioral choice.Psychological Research,50, 223–228.
Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., Pook, P. K., &Rao, R. P. N. (1997). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,20, 723–767.
Bednar, J., &Miikkulainen, R. (1997). A neural network model of visual tilt aftereffects. InProceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 37–42). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Blakemore.C, Carpenter, R., &Georgeson, M. (1970). Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the human visual system.Nature,228, 37–39.
Blakemore, C, &Tobin, E. A. (1972). Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the cat’s visual cortex.Experimental Brain Research,15, 439–440.
Braddick, O. (1990). Switching off an after-effect.Nature,344, 22.
Brefczynski, J. A., &De Yoe, E. A. (1999). A physiological correlate of the “spotlight” of visual attention.Nature Neuroscience,2,370–374.
Broadbent, D. (1958).Perception and communication. London: Pergamon Press.
Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention.Psychological Review,97, 523–547.
Carpenter, R., &Blakemore, C. (1973).Interaction between orientations in human vision.Experimental Brain Research,18, 287–303.
Chaudhuri.A. (1990). Modulation of the motion aftereffect by selective attention.Nature,344, 60–62.
Churchland, P. S., Ramachandran, V., &Sejnowski.T. (1994). A critique of pure vision. In C. Koch & J. Davis (Eds.),Large-scale neuronal theories of the brain (pp. 23–60). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Corbetta, M., Miezen, F., Dobmeyer, S., Shulman, G., &Petersen, S. (1990). Attentional modulation of neural processing of shape, color, and velocity in humans.Science,248, 1556–1559.
Deutsch, J., &Deutsch, D. (1963). Attention: Some theoretical considerations.Psychological Review,70, 80–90.
Devalois, R. L., Yund, E. W., &Hepler, H. (1982). The orientation and direction selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex.Vision Research,22,531–544.
Douglas, R. J., Koch.C, Mahowald, M., Martin, K., &Suarez, H. (1995). Recurrent excitation in neocortical circuits.Science,269, 981–985.
Duncan, J. (1996). Cooperating brain systems in selective perception and action. In T. Inui & J. McClelland (Eds.),Attention and performance XVI: Information integration in perception and communication (pp. 549–578). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ebenholtz, S. M. (1985). Absence of relational determination in the rod-and-frame effect.Perception & Psychophysics,37, 303–306.
Eriksen, C. W., &St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 225–240.
Gandhi, S. P.,Heeger, D. J., &Boynton, G. M. (1998). Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,96, 3314–3319.
Gibson, J. J., &Radner, M. (1937). Adaptation, aftereffect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines.Journal of Experimental Psychology,20, 453–467.
Gilbert, C. D. (1993). Circuitry, architecture, and functional dynamics of visual cortex.Cerebral Cortex,3, 373–386.
Gilbert, C. D. &Weisel.T. N. (1983). Clustered intrinsic connections in cat visual cortex.Journal of Neuroscience,3, 1116–1133.
Haenny, P. E., &Schiller, P. E. (1988). State dependent activity in monkey visual cortex: 1. Single cell activity in VI and V4 on visual tasks.Experimental Brain Research,69, 225–244.
He,S., Cavanaugh.P., &Intriligator, J. (1996). Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness.Nature,383, 334–337.
Heinze, H., Mangun, R., Burchert, W., Hinrichs, H., Scholz.M., Münte, T., Gos, A., Scherg, M., Johannes, S., Hundeshagen, H., Gazzaniga, M., &Hillyard, S. (1994). Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans.Nature,372, 543–556.
Houck, M. R., &Hoffman, J. E. (1986). Conjunction of color and form without attention: Evidence from an orientation-contingent color aftereffect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.12, 186–199.
Humphreys, G. W., Olson, A., Romani, C, &Riddoch.M. J. (1996). Competitive mechanisms of selection by space and object: A neuro-psychological approach. In A. Kramer & M. Coles (Eds.),Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 365–393). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., &Gibbs.B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information.Cognitive Psychology,24,175–219.
Lamme,V. A. R. Super, H., &Spekreuse, H. (1998).Feedforward, horizontal, and feedback processing in the visual cortex.Current Opinion inNeurobiology,8, 529–535.
Lankheet.M. J., &Verstraten, F. (1995). Attentional modulation of adaptation to two-component transparent motion.Vision Research,35, 1401–1412.
Livingstone.M., &Hubel, D. (1988). Segregation of form, color, movement and depth: Anatomy, physiology and perception.Science,240. 740–750.
Magnussen.S., &Kurtenbach.W. (1980). Adapting to two orientations: Disinhibition in a visual aftereffect.Science,207, 908–909.
Marr, D. (1982).Vision. New York:Freeman.
Moran.J., &Desimone.R. (1985). Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex.Science,229, 782–784.
Morani.R. B., &Harris.J. R. (1965). Two different aftereffects of exposure to tilts.American Journal Psychology,78, 218–226.
Morrone.M. C., Burr, D. C. &Maffei, L. (1982). Functional implications of cross-orientation inhibition of cortical visual cells: 1. Neurophysiological evidence.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B,216. 335–354.
Motter, B. (1993). Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas VI, V2. and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli.Journal of Neurophysiology,70, 909–919.
Muir.D., &Over.R. (1970). Tilt aftereffects in central and peripheral vision.Journal of Experimental Psychology,85, 165–170.
Nelson.J. I., &Frost.B. (1978). Orientation-selective inhibition from beyond the classic visual receptive field.Brain Research,139,359–365.
Norman, D. (1976).Memory and attention (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Posner.M. I., Snyder.C. R., &Davidson.B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 160–174.
Pylyshyn.Z. W. (1989). The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model.Cognition,32,65–97.
Pylyshyn.Z. W. (1994). Some primitive mechanisms of spatial attention.Cognition.50, 363–384.
Pylyshyn.Z. W. (1999). Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception.Behavioral & Brain Sciences.22.341–423.
Rees.G., Frith.C. &Lavie.N. (1997). Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task.Science,278, 1616–1619.
Roelfsema.P. R., Lamme, V. A. F., &Spekreuse.H. (1998). Object-based attention in the primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey.Nature.395, 376.
Sengpiel, F., &Hubener.M. (1999). Visual attention: Spotlight on the primary visual cortex.Current Biology,9. R318-R321.
Shallice, T. (1988).From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shulman.G. (1992). Attentional modulation of a figural aftereffect.Perception,21, 7–19.
Sillito, A. M. (1979). Inhibitory mechanisms influencing complex cell orientation selectivity and their modification at high resting discharge levels.Journal of Physiology,289. 33–53.
Sillito, A. M., Jones, H. E., Gerstein, G. L., &West, D. C. (1994). Feature-linked synchronization of thalamic relay cell firing induced by feedback from the visual cortex.Nature,369, 479–482.
Spivey-Knowlton, M. (1993). Simulating tilt illusions with lateral inhibition and a virtual axis. InProceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 953–958).Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
Treisman, A. (1964). Effect of irrelevant material on the efficiency of selective listening.American Journal of Psychology,11, 533–546.
Treisman.A. (1996). Selection for perception for selection for action.Visual Cognition,3, 353–357.
Van Der Heuden, A. H. C. (1996a). Two stages in visual information processing and visual perception?Visual Cognition.3, 325–353.
Van Der Heuden.A. H. C. (1996b). Perception for selection, selection for action, and action for perception.Visual Cognition,3, 357–361.
Vecera, S. P., &Farah, M. J. (1994). Does visual attention select objects or locations?Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,123. 146–160.
Wenderoth.P., Van Der Zwan R., &Johnstone.S. (1989). Mechanisms of orientation illusions. In D. Vickers & P. Smith (Eds.).Human information processing: Measures, mechanisms and models (pp. 83–106). North-Holland: Elsevier.
Wolfe.J. (1984). Short test flashes produce large tilt aftereffects.Vision Research,24,1959–1964.
Yeh.S. L., Chen.I., De Valois, K., &De Valois.R. (1996). Figural aftereffects and visual attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 446–460.
Zeki.S. (1993).A vision of the brain. Oxford: Blackwell. 1534–1544
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship and a Sloan Foundation Fellowship in Neuroscience to M. J. Spivey, and a student grant from the Department of Neurobiology and Behavior at Cornell University to M. J. Spirn.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spivey, M.J., Spirn, M.J. Selective visual attention modulates the direct tilt aftereffect. Perception & Psychophysics 62, 1525–1533 (2000). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212153
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212153