Abstract
Studies of the spatial distribution of visual attention have shown that attentional facilitation monotonically decreases in a graded fashion with increasing distance from an attended location. However, reaction time (RT) measures have typically shown broader gradients than have signal detection (SD) measures of perceptual sensitivity. It is not clear whether these differences have arisen because the stages of information processing indexed by RT measures are different from those indexed by SD measures, or whether these differences are due to methodological confounds in the SD studies. In the present set of experiments, the spatial distribution of attention was studied by using a luminance detection task in an endogenous cuing paradigm that was designed to permit accurate calculations of SD and RT measures for targets at cued and uncued locations. Subjects made target-present/absent decisions at one of six possible cued or uncued upper visual hemifield locations on each trial. The results from three experiments suggest that the differences between broad and focal attentional distributions are not the result of different stages of information processing indexed by RT measures as opposed to SD measures. Rather, the differing distributions appear to reflect variations in attentional allocation strategies induced by the perceptual requirements typical of RT paradigms as opposed to SD paradigms. These findings support numerous prior studies showing that spatial attention affects perceptual sensitivity and that the strategic allocation of attention is a highly flexible process.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen, G. J. (1990). Focused attention in three-dimensional space.Perception & Psychophysics,47, 112–120.
Andersen, G. J., &Kramer, A. F. (1993). Limits of focused attention in three-dimensional space.Perception & Psychophysics,53, 658–667.
Bashinski, H. S., &Bacharach, V. R. (1980). Enhancement of perceptual sensitivity as the result of selectively attending to spatial locations.Perception & Psychophysics,28, 241–248.
Castiello, U., &Umiltá, C. (1992). Splitting focal attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 837–848.
Craig, A. (1979). Nonparametric measures of sensory efficiency for sustained monitoring tasks.Human Factors,21, 69–78.
Downing, C. J. (1988). Expectancy and visuo-spatial attention: Effects on perceptual quality.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 228–241.
Downing, C. J., &Pinker, S. (1985). The spatial structure of visual attention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 171–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Egly, R., &Homa, D. (1991). Reallocation of visual attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 142–159.
Eriksen, C. W., &St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 225–240.
Eriksen, C. W., &Webb, J. M. (1989). Shifting of attentional focus within and about a visual display.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 175–183.
Eriksen, C. W., &Yeh, Y.-Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 583–597.
Green, D., &Swets, J. (1966).Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
Hawkins, H. L., Hillyard, S. A., Luck, S. J., Mouloua, M., Downing, C. J., &Woodward, D. P. (1990). Visual attention modulates signal detectability.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 802–811.
Heinze, H.-J., Luck, S. J., Münte, T. F., Gös, A., Mangun, G. R., &Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Attention to adjacent and separate positions in space: An electrophysiological analysis.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 42–52.
Heinze, H.-J., &Mangun, G. R. (1995). Electrophysiological signs of sustained and transient attention to spatial locations.Neuropsychologia,33, 889–908.
Heinze, H.-J., Mangun, G. R., Burchert, W., Hinrichs, H., Scholz, M., Münte, T. F., Gös, A., Scherg, M., Johannes, S., Hundeshagen, H., Gazzaniga, M. S., &Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans.Nature,372, 543–546.
Henderson, J. M. (1991). Stimulus discrimination following covert attentional orienting to an exogenous cue.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 91–106.
Henderson, J. M., &Macquistan, A. D. (1993). The spatial distribution of attention following an exogenous cue.Perception & Psychophysics,53, 221–230.
Hodgson, T. L., Müller, H. J., & O’Leary, M. J. (1996).Attentional localization prior to simple and directed manual responses. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Humphreys, G. W. (1981). On varying the span of visual attention: Evidence for two modes of spatial attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 17–31.
Klein, R., Kingstone, A., &Pontefract, A. (1992). Orienting of visual attention. In K. Rayner (Ed.),Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading (pp. 46–63). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
Klein, R., &McCormick, P. (1989). Covert visual orienting: Hemifieldactivation can be mimicked by zoom lens and midlocation placement strategies.Acta Psychologica,70, 235–250.
Kramer, A. F., &Jacobson, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 267–284.
LaBerge, D. (1983). Spatial extent of attention to letters and words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 371–379.
LaBerge, D., &Brown, V. (1986). Variations in size of the visual field in which targets are presented: An attentional range effect.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 188–200.
LaBerge, D., &Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification.Psychological Review,96, 101–124.
LaBerge, D., Brown, V., Carter, M., Bash, D., &Hartley, A. (1991). Reducing the effects of adjacent distracters by narrowing attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 65–76.
Lavie, N., &Tsal, Y. (1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 183–197.
Luck, S. J., Hillyard, S. A., Mouloua, M., Woldorff, M. G., Clark, V. P., &Hawkins, H. L. (1994). Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectability: Psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 887–904.
Mangun, G. R., &Hillyard, S. A. (1987). The spatial allocation of visual attention as indexed by event-related brain potentials.Human Factors,29, 195–212.
Mangun, G. R., &Hillyard, S. A. (1988). Spatial gradients of visual attention: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,70, 417–428.
Mangun, G. R., &Hillyard, S. A. (1991). Modulations of sensoryevoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 1057–1074.
Mangun, G. R., Plager, R., Loftus, W., Hillyard, S. A., Luck, S. J., Handy, T. C., Clark, V. P., &Gazzaniga, M. S. (1994). Monitoring the visual world: Hemispheric asymmetries and subcortical processes in attention.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,6, 267–275.
Miller, J. (1991). The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: A search for boundary conditions.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 270–288.
Müller, H. J., &Findlay, J. M. (1987). Sensitivity and criterion effects in the spatial cuing of visual attention.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 383–399.
Müller, H. J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1991). Luminance-increment detection: Capacity-limited or not?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 107–124.
Pan, K., &Eriksen, C. W. (1993). Attentional distribution in the visual field during same-different judgments as assessed by response competition.Perception & Psychophysics,53, 134–144.
Podgorny, P., &Shepard, R. N. (1983). Distribution of visual attention over space.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 380–393.
Pollack, I., &Norman, D. A. (1964). A non-parametric analysis of recognition experiments.Psychonomic Science,1, 125–126.
Posner, M. I. (1978).Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.
Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., &Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 160–174.
Previc, F. H., &Blume, J. L. (1993). Visual search asymmetries in three-dimensional space.Vision Research,33, 2697–2704.
Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Kinsbourne, M., &Moscovitch, M. (1990). Hemispheric control of spatial attention.Brain & Cognition,12, 240–266.
Santee, J. L., &Egeth, H. E. (1982). Do reaction time and accuracy measure the same aspects of letter recognition?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 489–501.
Shaw, M. L. (1984). Division of attention among spatial locations: A fundamental difference between detection of letters and detection of luminance increments. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 109–121). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shepherd, M., &Müller, H. J. (1989). Movement versus focusing of visual attention.Perception & Psychophysics,46, 146–154.
Shiu, L., &Pashler, H. (1994). Negligible effect of spatial precuing on identification of single digits.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 1037–1054.
Shulman, G. L., &Posner, M. I. (1988).Relating sensitivity and criterion effects to the internal mechanisms of visual spatial attention. (Tech. Rep. No. 88-2). Washington, DC: Office of Naval Research.
Shulman, G. L., Sheehy, J. B., &Wilson, J. (1986). Gradients of spatial attention.Acta Psychologica,61, 167–181.
Shulman, G. L., Wilson, J., &Sheehy, J. B. (1985). Spatial determinants of the distribution of attention.Perception & Psychophysics,37, 59–65.
Sperling, G. (1984). A unified theory of attention and signal detection. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.),Varieties of attention (pp. 103–181). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Sperling, G., &Dosher, B. A. (1986). Strategy and optimization in human information processing. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 2.1–2.65). New York: Wiley.
Tassinari, G., Aglioti, S., Chelazzi, L., Marzi, C. A., &Berlucchi, G. (1987). Distribution in the visual field of the costs of voluntarily allocated attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting.Neuropsychologia,25, 55–71.
Tsal, Y. (1983). Movements of attention across the visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 523–530.
Tsal, Y. (1989). Attending to horizontal, diagonal, and vertical positions in space.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,27, 133–134.
Yantis, S., &Johnston, J. C. (1990). On the locus of visual selection: Evidence from focused attention tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 135–149.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Handy, T.C., Kingstone, A. & Mangun, G.R. Spatial distribution of visual attention: Perceptual sensitivity and response latency. Perception & Psychophysics 58, 613–627 (1996). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213094
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213094