Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles

Interspecific comparison of a Drosophila gene encoding FMRFamide- related neuropeptides

PH Taghert and LE Schneider
Journal of Neuroscience 1 June 1990, 10 (6) 1929-1942; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.10-06-01929.1990
PH Taghert
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LE Schneider
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

In order to identify functionally important regions of a neuropeptide gene in Drosophila melanogaster, we have studied its occurrence in related species and have characterized the structure of a homologous gene in Drosophila virilis. The melanogaster gene encodes a precursor that contains 13 neuropeptides related to the molluscan tetrapeptide FMRFamide (Nambu et al., 1988; Schneider and Taghert, 1988). Using the melanogaster gene as a probe in Southern blot analysis, related sequences were detected in DNA from each of 7 species tested. D. virilis, which is estimated to have diverged from D. melanogaster between 60 and 80 million years ago (Throckmorton, 1975), was chosen for more detailed study. Immunocytochemical staining using an antibody to authentic FMRFamide revealed a similar set of immunoreactive neurons in the CNS of larvae from the 2 Drosophila species. Using a melanogaster gene probe, overlapping clones were isolated from a virilis genomic library; DNA sequence analysis indicated the presence of a homologous gene. Comparisons of the genes and deduced proteins between the 2 species revealed the following points. (1) Both genes are divided into 2 exons: in D. melanogaster the exons are 106 and 1352 bp long; in D. virilis, they are 169 and at least 1232 bp long; in both species, the intron is approximately 2.5 kb long. (2) The sequence of exon I has largely diverged, and in neither species are exon I sequences translated. In this vicinity of the gene, sequence conservation is limited to a 67 bp region that spans the TATA box and the RNA start site. (3) The deduced neuropeptide precursors have very similar sizes (347 vs 339 amino acids) and the presumed signal sequences are perfectly conserved. (4) While the melanogaster precursor contains 13 FMRFamide-related peptides, the virilis precursor contains only 10. (5) The sequences of some but not all of the FMRFamide-like peptides are perfectly conserved. (6) In the rest of the precursor, significant sequence conservation is found only in the N-terminal portion; immediately downstream of the final FMRFamide-like peptide, the protein sequences are highly divergent. (7) 5′ to the RNA start sites (1.2 kb of melanogaster DNA and 1.8 kb of virilis DNA), 17 small (9–52 base pairs) regions are evolutionarily conserved (greater than 80% sequence conservation). We discuss neuropeptide biosynthesis, the functions and evolution of FMRFamide-like neuropeptides in insects, and the cell-specific regulation of neuropeptide gene expression in the contexts of these results.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 10 (6)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 10, Issue 6
1 Jun 1990
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Interspecific comparison of a Drosophila gene encoding FMRFamide- related neuropeptides
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Interspecific comparison of a Drosophila gene encoding FMRFamide- related neuropeptides
PH Taghert, LE Schneider
Journal of Neuroscience 1 June 1990, 10 (6) 1929-1942; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.10-06-01929.1990

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Interspecific comparison of a Drosophila gene encoding FMRFamide- related neuropeptides
PH Taghert, LE Schneider
Journal of Neuroscience 1 June 1990, 10 (6) 1929-1942; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.10-06-01929.1990
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.