Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles

Development of segment specificity in identified lineages of the grasshopper CNS

KJ Thompson and MV Siegler
Journal of Neuroscience 1 August 1993, 13 (8) 3309-3318; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-08-03309.1993
KJ Thompson
Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MV Siegler
Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the factors underlying differences in population size and composition between segmentally homologous neuronal lineages. The segmental median neuroblasts (MNBs) of grasshoppers are identified stem cells that each produce a midline group of neurons. We traced the embryonic development of the group in two disparate segments, counting MNB progeny and profiles of dying cells in fixed and stained preparations of staged embryos. In the metathoracic segment (T3), about 95 MNB progeny survive embryonic development, whereas in the next posterior segment, the first abdominal (A1), only about 60 survive. In T3, the MNB arises at 29% of embryogenesis and dies at 78%, whereas in A1 the MNB arises at 30% and dies at 73%. In T3, the number of MNB progeny initially increases at a steady rate, 10 cells being added per 5% of embryogenesis. Between 70% and 78% growth tapers off; although the T3 MNB continues to divide, cells die at the same time, specifically removing last-born progeny. By contrast, in A1 the MNB progeny increase in two phases, one from 30% to 45% and the other from 60% to 73%, again at the rate of 10 cells per 5%. Between the two phases, the number of A1 progeny is stable. The A1 MNB continues to divide, but cells die at the same time, specifically removing earlier-born progeny. The episodes of cell death in A1 and T3 coincide with embryonic molts, and thus may be hormonally triggered. Cell death is greater in A1 than T3, accounting for most of the difference in population size. The difference in MNB longevity makes a lesser contribution. The present data, together with corollary anatomical data (Thompson and Siegler, 1991), support the hypothesis that progeny fated to become certain neuronal types are selectively removed from the two MNB lineages: intersegmental interneurons from T3 and efferent neurons and local interneurons from A1.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 13 (8)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 13, Issue 8
1 Aug 1993
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Development of segment specificity in identified lineages of the grasshopper CNS
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Development of segment specificity in identified lineages of the grasshopper CNS
KJ Thompson, MV Siegler
Journal of Neuroscience 1 August 1993, 13 (8) 3309-3318; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-08-03309.1993

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Development of segment specificity in identified lineages of the grasshopper CNS
KJ Thompson, MV Siegler
Journal of Neuroscience 1 August 1993, 13 (8) 3309-3318; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-08-03309.1993
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.