Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles

Hierarchical organization of areas in rat visual cortex

TA Coogan and A Burkhalter
Journal of Neuroscience 1 September 1993, 13 (9) 3749-3772; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-09-03749.1993
TA Coogan
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A Burkhalter
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that areas within rat visual cortex are organized in a multilevel hierarchy, we have employed Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin as an anterograde axonal tracer to visualize the laminar patterns of connections between different cortical areas. For identification of cortical areas, we used a combination of markers that included callosal connections, the patterns of inputs and outputs to ipsilateral cortical and subcortical targets, and geographical location. Projections from area 17 to every identified extrastriate target area extend throughout all layers of cortex and include layer 4. Area LM (lateromedial), contained within the cytoarchitectonic subdivision 18a, projects to area 17, area AL (anterolateral), area RL (rostrolateral), multiple sites within the posterior complex (PX), the anterior complex (AX), the far lateral complex (FLX), the medial complex (MX), perirhinal, entorhinal, retrosplenial, and presubicular cortex. Each of the projections to extrastriate areas resembles those originating from area 17. Only the projection to area 17 differs, and terminates largely in layers outside of lamina 4. Such projections are designated as feedback (Coogan and Burkhalter, 1990). The projections of a second area, AL, of the cytoarchitectonic subdivision 18a are similar to those of LM: all terminate in layers 1–6, except the inputs to area 17, LM, and a site in FLX, which spare layer 4. The feedback projection to LM provides further support that LM and AL constitute distinct cortical areas. Projections from additional distinct sites within area 18a that are located immediately lateral to LM and AL and are designated FLX make feedback projections to area 17 and projections involving all layers to LM and AL. Thus, unlike the asymmetrical laminar organization of reciprocal connections between area 17 and LM, 17 and AL, and LM and AL, the connections between LM and at least one site in FLX are symmetrical. Projections that include layer 4 can, therefore, be components of connections between different hierarchical levels as well as components of connections on the same hierarchical level. The MX sites contained within the cytoarchitectonic subdivision 18b send feedback projections to striate cortex, LM, AL, and PX within 18a. Thus, the connections between these areas are reciprocal and the laminar organization is asymmetrical. The projections to FLX include layer 4, and the projections to frontal, cingulate, and retrosplenial cortex resemble forward projections. Although the areal organization of extrastriate cortex is not yet fully resolved, using the patterns of intracortical connections we are able to construct a provisional hierarchy of cortical areas.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 13 (9)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 13, Issue 9
1 Sep 1993
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Hierarchical organization of areas in rat visual cortex
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Hierarchical organization of areas in rat visual cortex
TA Coogan, A Burkhalter
Journal of Neuroscience 1 September 1993, 13 (9) 3749-3772; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-09-03749.1993

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Hierarchical organization of areas in rat visual cortex
TA Coogan, A Burkhalter
Journal of Neuroscience 1 September 1993, 13 (9) 3749-3772; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-09-03749.1993
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.