Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles

Individual locomotor response to novelty predicts selective alterations in D1 and D2 receptors and mRNAs

MS Hooks, JL Juncos, JB Justice Jr, SM Meiergerd, SL Povlock, JO Schenk and PW Kalivas
Journal of Neuroscience 1 October 1994, 14 (10) 6144-6152; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-10-06144.1994
MS Hooks
Department of VCAPP, Washington State University, Pullman 99164–6520.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JL Juncos
Department of VCAPP, Washington State University, Pullman 99164–6520.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JB Justice Jr
Department of VCAPP, Washington State University, Pullman 99164–6520.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SM Meiergerd
Department of VCAPP, Washington State University, Pullman 99164–6520.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SL Povlock
Department of VCAPP, Washington State University, Pullman 99164–6520.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JO Schenk
Department of VCAPP, Washington State University, Pullman 99164–6520.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PW Kalivas
Department of VCAPP, Washington State University, Pullman 99164–6520.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Rats that have a greater locomotor response to novelty (high responders, HR) have differences in measures of presynaptic dopamine transmission compared to low responders (LR) to a novel environment, including altered dopamine release and behavioral response to indirect dopamine agonists. This study examined the role of three dopamine terminal fields, the nucleus accumbens, striatum, and medial prefrontal cortex, in differences between HR and LR. In the first experiment, dopamine was infused directly into the nucleus accumbens (0, 3, 10, and 30 micrograms/side) or the striatum (0, 10, 30, and 100 micrograms/side). HR showed a greater behavioral response to both the 3 and 30 micrograms/side doses infused into the nucleus accumbens compared to LR. No differences between HR and LR were revealed by dopamine infusion into the striatum. In the second experiment, radioligand binding assays were performed to determine if differences exist between high and low responder rats in the Bmax and/or KD of radiolabeled antagonist ligands for the dopamine D1 and/or D2 receptors. There were fewer D2 binding sites in the nucleus accumbens and fewer sites in the striatum in HR compared to LR. High responders showed a greater Bmax for D1 binding sites in the nucleus accumbens than LR. No differences in number of binding sites for D1 receptors were observed between HR and LR in the striatum. No differences between HR and LR in D2 or D1 receptor binding were observed in the medial prefrontal cortex. There were no differences in KD for any of the dopamine receptors in the regions examined.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 14 (10)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 14, Issue 10
1 Oct 1994
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Individual locomotor response to novelty predicts selective alterations in D1 and D2 receptors and mRNAs
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Individual locomotor response to novelty predicts selective alterations in D1 and D2 receptors and mRNAs
MS Hooks, JL Juncos, JB Justice Jr, SM Meiergerd, SL Povlock, JO Schenk, PW Kalivas
Journal of Neuroscience 1 October 1994, 14 (10) 6144-6152; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-10-06144.1994

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Individual locomotor response to novelty predicts selective alterations in D1 and D2 receptors and mRNAs
MS Hooks, JL Juncos, JB Justice Jr, SM Meiergerd, SL Povlock, JO Schenk, PW Kalivas
Journal of Neuroscience 1 October 1994, 14 (10) 6144-6152; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-10-06144.1994
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.