Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles

The molecular basis of NMDA receptor subtypes: native receptor diversity is predicted by subunit composition

AL Buller, HC Larson, BE Schneider, JA Beaton, RA Morrisett and DT Monaghan
Journal of Neuroscience 1 September 1994, 14 (9) 5471-5484; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-09-05471.1994
AL Buller
Department of Pharmacology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 68198–6260.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HC Larson
Department of Pharmacology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 68198–6260.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BE Schneider
Department of Pharmacology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 68198–6260.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JA Beaton
Department of Pharmacology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 68198–6260.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RA Morrisett
Department of Pharmacology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 68198–6260.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DT Monaghan
Department of Pharmacology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 68198–6260.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The relationship between four pharmacologically distinct NMDA receptor subtypes, identified in radioligand binding studies, and the recently identified NMDA receptor subunits (NR1a-g, NR2A-D) has not been determined. In this report, we demonstrate that the anatomical distribution of the four NMDA receptor subtypes strikingly parallels the distribution of mRNA encoding NR2A-D subunits. The distribution of NR2A mRNA was very similar to that of “antagonist-preferring” NMDA receptors [defined by high-affinity 3H-2-carboxypiperazine-4-yl-propyl- 1-phosphonic (3H-CPP) binding sites; correlation coefficient = 0.88]. Agonist-preferring NMDA receptors localized to brain regions expressing both NR2B mRNA and NR1- mRNA (NR1 splice variant lacking insert 1). NR2C mRNA was largely restricted to the cerebellar granule cell layer, a region that displays a unique pharmacological profile. NR2D mRNA localized exclusively to those diencephalic nuclei that have a fourth, distinct pharmacological profile (typified by the midline thalamic nuclei). The pharmacology of native NMDA receptors was compared to that of heteromeric NMDA receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes (NR1/NR2A, NR1/NR2B, NR1/NR2C). The oocyte-expressed NR1/NR2A receptor displayed a higher affinity for antagonists and a slightly lower affinity for agonists than the NR1/NR2B receptor. These patterns are analogous to those found for radioligand binding to native receptors in the lateral thalamus and medial striatum, respectively. NMDA receptors in the lateral thalamus (with a high density of NR2A subunit mRNA) displayed higher affinity for antagonists and a lower affinity for agonists than did NMDA receptors of the medial striatum (a region rich in NR2B mRNA). Relative to the NR1/NR2A and NR1/NR2B receptors, oocyte-expressed NR1/NR2C receptors had a lower affinity specifically for both D-3-(2- carboxypiperazin-4-yl)-1-propenyl-1-phosphonic acid (D-CPPene) and homoquinolinate (HQ). This pattern was identical to that observed for cerebellar (NR2C-containing) versus forebrain (NR2A- and NR2B- containing) NMDA receptors. Taken together, the data in this report suggest that the four previously identified native NMDA receptor subtypes differ in their NR2 composition. Furthermore, the NR2 subunits significantly contribute to the anatomical and pharmacological diversity of NMDA receptor subtypes.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 14 (9)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 14, Issue 9
1 Sep 1994
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The molecular basis of NMDA receptor subtypes: native receptor diversity is predicted by subunit composition
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
The molecular basis of NMDA receptor subtypes: native receptor diversity is predicted by subunit composition
AL Buller, HC Larson, BE Schneider, JA Beaton, RA Morrisett, DT Monaghan
Journal of Neuroscience 1 September 1994, 14 (9) 5471-5484; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-09-05471.1994

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
The molecular basis of NMDA receptor subtypes: native receptor diversity is predicted by subunit composition
AL Buller, HC Larson, BE Schneider, JA Beaton, RA Morrisett, DT Monaghan
Journal of Neuroscience 1 September 1994, 14 (9) 5471-5484; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-09-05471.1994
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.