Abstract
Evidence for nongenomic actions of steroids is now coming from a variety of fields of steroid research. Mechanisms of steroid action are being studied with regard to the membrane receptors and the activation of second messengers. The present study investigated the mechanism for the rapid effect of estrogen on acutely dissociated hippocampal CA1 neurons by using the whole-cell, voltage-clamp recording. Under the perforated patch configuration, 17β-estradiol potentiated kainate-induced currents in 38% of tested neurons. The potentiation was stereospecific, rapid in onset, and reversible after the removal of the steroid. Dose–response curves show that the potentiation by 17β-estradiol was evident at a concentration as low as 10 nm and saturated at 10 μm. 17β-Estradiol did not affect the kinetics (i.e., affinity and cooperativity) and reversal potential of kainate-induced currents. This suggests that the potentiation did not result from direct interaction with kainate receptors nor the activation of ion channels other than kainate receptor-channels. The potentiation by 17β-estradiol was similar to the enhancement of kainate-induced currents evoked by 8-bromo-cAMP, and was modulated by an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase (IBMX). The estrogen potentiation was blocked by a specific blocker of PKA (Rp-cAMPS). Under standard recording configuration, the effect was significantly affected by intracellular perfusing with GDP-β-S or GTP-γ-S. The data suggest that the potentiation of kainate-induced currents by 17β-estradiol was likely a G-protein(s) coupled, cAMP-dependent phosphorylation event. By involvement of this nongenomic mechanism, estrogen may play a role in the modulation of excitatory synaptic transmission in the hippocampus.
Estrogen acts on a number of different target organs that contain specific estrogen receptors, including the brain, to modulate a variety of physiological functions (Stumpf and Sar, 1978;McEwen, 1979, 1991; Maggi and Prerez, 1985). Functionally, the effects of estrogen range from rapid actions on membrane excitability and synaptic transmission to long-term actions on sexual differentiation, development and maturation of the brain, morphological properties of neurons, endocrine regulation, and initiation of reproductive behavior (Gould et al., 1990; Woolley and McEwen, 1992).
Two mechanisms have been proposed to characterize the actions of estrogen (Wehling, 1995). The first is the genomic mechanism of action that involves the diffusion or transport of estrogen across the membrane into the neuron, activation of specific intracellular receptors, and transcriptional regulation of particular genes that ultimately results in protein synthesis (Pfaff, 1980; Pfaff and Schwartz-Giblin, 1988; Carson-Jurica et al., 1990; Smith et al., 1993). In contrast, estrogen has also been found to produce short-term actions on the electrical properties of neurons and transmitter release. The rapid onset and time course of these effects suggest that they are distinct from the genomic mechanism of action and indicate that estrogen may act on membrane receptors or other cellular components to alter neuronal events (Nabekura et al., 1986; Smith et al., 1987, 1989;Minami et al., 1990; Kelly et al., 1992; Majewska, 1992; Paul and Purdy, 1992). However, the mechanisms to account for the rapid actions of estrogen have remained elusive.
In hippocampus, 17β-estradiol initiated a rapid and reversible increase in the amplitude of glutamate and kainate-induced or Schaffer collateral-activated EPSPs in CA1 hippocampal neurons. These responses were blocked by a non-NMDA antagonist (Wong and Moss, 1991, 1992). In subsequent experiments using excised patch-clamp recording from CA1 neurons, 17β-estradiol did not affect the parameters of single channel activity induced by kainate, a non-NMDA agonist (Wong and Moss, 1994). Because excised membrane patches lack many important cytoplasmic enzymes and regulatory cofactors, it is likely that the rapid action may require that certain intracellular components remain intact.
There is mounting evidence that estrogen may activate intracellular second messenger systems to modulate neuronal functions. Estrogen has been shown to change cyclic nucleotide levels in the cell (Gunaga et al., 1974; Weissman et al., 1975), and act on potassium channels via a second messenger system involving cAMP to modulate the membrane potential (Minami et al., 1990). Furthermore, estrogen can directly stimulate inositol trisphosphates (Favit et al., 1991; Smith, 1991). At the receptor level, estrogen can rapidly alter ligand-binding properties of several G-protein-coupled neurotransmitter receptors such as 5-HT (Bigeon and McEwen, 1982), norepinephrine (Inaba and Kamata, 1979), and D2 dopamine receptors (Levesque and DiPaolo, 1988; Bazzett and Bender, 1994). Estrogen has also been shown to induce rapid pharmacodynamic changes of the G-protein-coupled mechanism of another ligand, decreasing the potency of opioid agonists in opening inward-rectifying potassium channels (Lagrange et al., 1994). Moreover, estrogen directly potentiates potassium-stimulated dopamine release in rat nucleus accumbens (Thompson and Moss, 1994).
In the experiments described here we address the hypothesis that 17β-estradiol potentiates the kainate-induced current by the activation of a cAMP cascade. We show that 17β-estradiol potentiates the kainate-induced current and that this potentiation is mimicked by cAMP and blocked by Rp-cAMPS. Administration of GDP-β-S suppresses, whereas GTP-γ-S prolongs, the potentiation by estrogen. The findings suggest the nongenomic action of estrogen on kainate-induced currents involves activation of a cAMP-dependent phosphorylation process.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All animal experimentation was conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
Preparation of acutely dissociated neurons. CA1 hippocampal pyramidal neurons were acutely dissociated using modified procedures ofKay and Wong (1986). Sprague–Dawley male and female rats from 2 to 4 weeks old were decapitated via a guillotine. Hippocampi were removed from the brain and quickly blocked and placed in cold PIPES-saline solution (in mm): NaCl, 120; KCl, 5.0; CaCl2, 1.0; MgCl2, 1.0;d-glucose, 25; PIPES, 20; pH 7.4. The blocked tissue was cut on a vibratome (Oxford) at ∼450 μm thick while bathed in 4°C oxygenated PIPES-saline solution. The slices were placed on a black surface and punches were made in the CA1 area with a capillary tube. The punches were incubated at room temperature (20–22°C) in PIPES-saline solution with 1.5 mg/ml protease (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The incubation medium was stirred slowly and smoothly with 95% O2/5% CO2 blown at its surface. After 30–45 min of enzymatic digestion, punches were rinsed three times in oxygenated PIPES-saline and triturated with a fire-polished Pasteur pipette for mechanical dissociation. The cell suspension was then plated into the central concave area of a slide containing the standard extracellular solution (in mm): NaCl, 140; KCl, 3.0; CaCl2, 2.0; HEPES, 10; pH 7.3. All chemicals were obtained from Sigma.
Whole-cell, patch-clamp recordings. Whole-cell recordings were performed under voltage-clamp mode according to standard techniques (Hammil et al., 1981). Both conventional as well as perforated whole-cell, patch-clamp recordings were used in isolated CA1 hippocampal neurons. The dissociated neurons were ∼30–40 μm in diameter and were visualized with a Nikon inverted phase-contrast microscope equipped with Nomarski optics.
Whole-cell recording electrodes were pulled from borosilicated glass with a Sutter Flaming-Brown electrode puller and fire-polished with a CPM-2 coating/polishing microforge. The electrode resistance was typically 2–5 MΩ in bath solution. The standard internal solution for recording electrode consisted of the following (in mm): CsCl, 140; NaCl, 4.0; EGTA, 10; HEPES, 10; CaCl2, 1. The internal solution was adjusted to pH 7.3 with CsOH. For perforated whole-cell recording, the electrode was first submerged in standard internal solution for 3–5 sec. A small amount of solution would reach the tip by capillary action. Then additional standard internal solution containing 100 mg/ml nystatin was added to the electrode by backfilling the electrode.
After formation of a gigaohm (>1 GΩ) seal, the membrane was ruptured by a slight suction in the case of conventional whole-cell recording. In the case of the perforated whole-cell recording configuration, however, series resistance and cell capacitance from a capacitive transient current evoked by voltage pulses (−10 mV, 20 msec) were monitored after obtaining a giga-seal. During the development of nystatin perforation, the amplitude of the capacitive transient increased and the time constant of the transient decreased. Whole-cell currents evoked by 20 mV voltage steps (from −80 to +80 mV) gradually became larger with time, the series resistance decreased to a stable minimal value (<12 MΩ), indicating the establishment of perforated patch recording. This usually occurred within 15–25 min. The subsequent recordings were held for more than 45 min. The holding potential was −60 mV in both configurations, except in the case of studying the current–voltage relations where the holding potential was varied from −100 to + 50 mV. Access resistance was compensated (80%) electronically and monitored periodically.
Puffer electrode and chemical application. A seven-barrel pipette with a total diameter of 10 μm was used to puff individual substances on the dendrite of the recorded dissociated CA1 hippocampal neuron. Ejection of each chemical could be made separately with a picospritzer unit (General Valve Corp.). Kainate, 17β-estradiol, 17α-estradiol, 8-bromo-cAMP, IBMX,Rp-cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphothioate (Rp-cAMPS), or 8-bromo-cGMP were assigned randomly to one of the seven barrels. To establish a dose–response curve, each barrel of the pipette was assigned with one of the different concentrations of 17β-estradiol (100 pm, 1 nm, 10 nm, 100 nm, 1 μm, 10 μm) and kainate (100 μm), or with one of the different concentrations of kainate (1 μm, 10 μm, 100 μm, 1 mm, 10 mm) and 17β-estradiol (100 nm). All chemicals were from Sigma, but Rp-cAMPS was obtained from LC Laboratories. Kainate currents were induced by pulses of ejection (20 msec, 0.1–1.0 psi) of kainate at the dendrite of CA1 neuron. The application was repeated once every 30 sec and commenced immediately after the patch was ruptured. The effects of the different drugs on the kainate-induced currents were tested by extracellularly perfusing the cell for 3 min. In some experiments, guanosine 5′-O-(2-thiodiphosphate) (GDP-β-S), GDP, GTP, or guanosine 5′-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTP-γ-S) was added to the standard internal solution and allowed to diffuse into the cell. These experiments were conducted under the standard whole-cell recording configuration, and an ATP regeneration system consisting of 4 mg of Tris-ATP, 20 mm phosphocreatine, and 50 U/ml creatine phosphokinase (all from Sigma) was added to the internal solution to minimize the washout effect on kainate-induced currents.
Kainate was made as a concentrated stock solution and was diluted in standard extracellular bath solution before use at a concentration of 100 μm. 17β-Estradiol or 17α-estradiol was initially dissolved in DMSO and diluted with standard extracellular bath solution to one of the following concentrations: 100 pm, 1 nm, 10 nm, 100 nm, 1 μm with the final DMSO concentration not exceeding 0.01%. 8-Bromo-cAMP and 8-bromo-cGMP were made up in a stock solution and frozen. Aliquots were diluted with standard extracellular bath solution immediately before use to concentrations of 500 μm and 1 mm. IBMX was added directly to the external solution for final concentration of 100 μm. Rp-cAMPS was stored in a sealed container at −20°C and diluted in external bath solution immediately before use at 50 μm. GDP-β-S and GTP-γ-S were stored in aliquots at −70°C and diluted to 500 μm with standard internal solution.
Data analysis. Whole-cell currents were recorded under voltage-clamp configuration with Adams/List EPC-9 amplifier and sampled at 2 kHz and filtered at 2.3 kHz. Data were digitized and stored on an Atari Mega 4 computer. Analysis of whole-cell current records was performed with an Atari data analysis program. Peak currents were normalized as I/I0, where Irepresents the amplitude of kainate-induced currents at any testing time point and I0 is the initial value at the beginning of the recording. Percentage change in kainate-induced currents was determined according to the formula (Idrug/I0 − 1)100%, where Idrug represents the peak amplitude of the kainate current in the presence of the test drug. Dose–response data were fitted with the logistic equation in the formIdrug − I0 = [Imax − I0]/[1 + (EC50/D)nH] for 17β-estradiol, and I = Imax/[1 + (EC50/D)nH] for kainate, where Imax is the response to a saturating concentration of agonist, EC50 is the concentration that evokes a half-maximal response, and nH is the estimated Hill coefficient that describes the steepness of the curve. Fitting was performed with SIGMAPLOT (Jandel Scientific, Corte Madera, CA). Current–voltage data were obtained by subtraction of leak currents from currents recorded in the presence of agonists at each potential. All quantitative data are expressed as mean ± SEM; n indicates the number of cell tested. Statistical analysis was performed using the paired or unpaired Student’s t test. Results were considered significant only for p < 0.05.
RESULTS
Kainate-induced currents
Under the conventional whole-cell recording configuration, application of kainate (100 μm) to the dendrites of CA1 hippocampal neurons initially evoked an inward current. The initial amplitude of kainate-induced current was 560 ± 214 pA (n = 12). The amplitude declined by 50% within 20 min (Fig. 1A,B). This washout effect was apparently attributable to intracellular dialysis (Korn et al., 1991) and was similar to that previously reported for kainate and NMDA currents (MacDonald et al., 1989; Wang et al., 1991). The application of 17β-estradiol (100 nm) significantly retarded the decline in kainate-induced current amplitude observed during washout (Fig. 1A,C). The effect of 17β-estradiol was observed in 3 out of 10 neurons tested, occurred within 5 min of application, and reversed within 3–5 min. To circumvent the washout of the kainate-induced currents, the perforated patch technique was used to record whole-cell currents. In this configuration, whole-cell recording can be done without diluting important substances from the cytoplasm, and physiologically relevant mechanisms remain operational. Repeated application of kainate (100 μm) onto a cell yielded responses with a peak value of 691 ± 382 pA (n = 82). The amplitude rarely varied (within ±10%) and was stable for a period of more than 45 min (Fig. 1A,D). All subsequent results were obtained under this perforated configuration except in the case where GTP-γ-S or GDP-β-S was included in the recording pipette.
Potentiation of kainate-induced currents by 17β-estradiol
The amplitude of kainate-induced currents was increased in the presence of 17β-estradiol (100 nm, 3 min) by 45.86 ± 4.1% of its original value (31 of 82 cells tested, 38%). The potentiation was rapid in onset (within 3 min of application) and reversible. However, in the cells (n = 16) responsible to 17β-estradiol, the application of 17α-estradiol (100 nm, 3 min), an inactive isomer of 17β-estradiol, induced no obvious change in the kainate current (104.76 ± 5.81% compared with control as 100%) (Fig.2). It suggested that the potentiation was a stereospecific effect.
The potentiation by 17β-estradiol was evident at a concentration as low as 10 nm and appeared to be saturated at 10 μm (n = 5). The dose–response curve gave an EC50 16.370 ± 2.763 nm and a nH 0.8878 ± 0.0918 (Fig.3A). In the absence of kainate, 17β-estradiol alone had no obvious effect on membrane current (data not shown). Dose–response curves for various concentrations of kainate before 17β-estradiol (100 nm) application show an EC50 114.20 ± 0.52 μmand a nH 1.33 ± 0.11. The application of 17β-estradiol significantly (p < 0.02) increased the amplitude of kainate-induced currents (56 ± 5%; n = 5) at the tested kainate concentrations of 100 μm, 1 mm, and 10 μm. 17β-Estradiol had no evident effect on the values of EC50 (102.96 ± 0.92 μm) and nH (1.15 ± 0.16) (Fig. 3B).
Current–voltage curves show a nearly identical reversal potential (0.350 ± 0.3561 mV compared with control 0.7625 ± 0.1322 mV;n = 6) and linearity. However, the slopes were significantly different (2.220 ± 1.090 nS compared with control 1.6333 ± 0.1291 nS;p < 0.01; n = 6). This result is consistent with the involvement of a nonspecific cationic conductance of kainate-induced currents. In the illustrated recording (Fig.4), the conductance to kainate was increased from 1.8 nS to 2.5 nS by 17β-estradiol (100 nm).
Mediation of cyclic nucleotide
To investigate the mechanism underlying the potentiation of kainate-induced currents by 17β-estradiol, possible modulatory agents including cyclic nucleotides (cAMP, cGMP) and IBMX were tested on the neurons responsive to 17β-estradiol. 8-Bromo-cAMP (500 μm), a membrane-permeant and phosphodiesterase-resistant analog of cAMP, increased the amplitude of kainate-induced currents (39.60 ± 3.88%; n = 10), whereas 8-bromo-cGMP (500 μm) had no effect on kainate-induced currents (105.64 ± 8.52% compared with control as 100%; n = 10). This finding suggests the possibility of specific effect of cAMP on kainate-induced currents. The enhancement evoked by 8-bromo-cAMP was similar to that of 17β-estradiol in the latency and magnitude of current increase (Fig. 5). IBMX, a membrane-permeant phosphodiesterase inhibitor, was tested to identify whether 17β-estradiol was exerting its effect via the cAMP cascade. IBMX (100 μm) enhanced the effects of a subsaturating concentration (100 nm) of 17β-estradiol (28.97 ± 6.03%; p < 0.05; n = 4) (Fig. 6A). IBMX applied alone had no obvious effect on membrane current or kainate-induced currents (n = 4; data not shown). Furthermore, the presence of 17β-estradiol at its saturating concentration (10 μm) occluded the enhancement induced by 8-bromo-cAMP (500 μm) (Fig. 6B), even though both agents could potentiate the kainate-induced current when applied alone (n = 3).
Involvement of cAMP-dependent protein kinase and GTP-binding protein(s)
In hippocampal CA1 neurons, the principle cellular target site of cAMP is the regulatory subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA). Because the results from the present study indicate that the effects of 17β-estradiol could be mediated by cAMP, inhibiting PKA should block the potentiation of 17β-estradiol on kainate currents. Experiments treating neurons with an inhibitor of PKA were consistent with this hypothesis. The administration of Rp-cAMPS (50 μm; n = 5), a particularly potent competitive inhibitor of PKA (Dostmann et al., 1990), completely eliminated the potentiation normally observed with the application of 17β-estradiol. An example of the effect of Rp-cAMPS on 17β-estradiol potentiation of kainate-induced currents is illustrated in Figure 7.
To verify whether the pathway mediating the actions of 17β-estradiol on kainate currents involves a G-protein(s), isolated hippocampal neurons (n = 38) were recorded under the conventional whole-cell recording configuration and intracellularly perfused with GDP-β-S (500 μm) or GTP-γ-S (500 μm). Ten of 27 cells tested (37%) were responsive to 17β-estradiol (100 nm). The potentiation was significantly (p < 0.001) suppressed by the application of GDP-β-S (46 ± 11%; n = 3; Fig.8A). Whereas intracellular administration of GDP(500 μm) alone, as well as GTP (500 μm; data not shown), had no effect on the kainate-induced currents (n = 3; Fig. 8B). The potentiation induced by 17β-estradiol was significantly (p < 0.001) prolonged in the presence of GTP-γ-S compared with control (n = 4; Fig. 8C). Intracellular diffusion of GDP-β-S or GTP-γ-S alone caused no evident effect on membrane current or kainate-induced currents (n = 11; data not shown).
DISCUSSION
The results indicate that 17β-estradiol potentiated kainate-induced currents in a subpopulation (38 and 37% from perforated recording and standard recording, respectively) of acutely dissociated hippocampal CA1 neurons. The effects of 17β-estradiol were stereospecific, reversible, rapid in onset, and persisted for the duration of its application. Furthermore, the effects of 17β-estradiol on kainate-induced currents were mimicked by 8-bromo-cAMP and modulated by IBMX. The estrogen-induced potentiation was blocked by a specific blocker of PKA (Rp-cAMPS), suppressed by GDP-β-S, and prolonged by GTP-γ-S. The data suggest that the potentiation of kainate-induced currents by 17β-estradiol appears to be mediated by a G-protein(s) coupled, cAMP-dependent phosphorylation of kainate receptors.
Despite previous electrophysiological evidence for modulation of glutamate receptors by estrogen, Wong and Moss reported that a single-channel analysis of both NMDA and non-NMDA receptors in the excised membrane patch failed to find evidence of direct glutamate receptor-channel modulation by estrogen, even though pregnenolone sulfate was shown to potentiate NMDA receptor-channel activity in the experiments (Wong and Moss, 1994). Their studies argued for an indirect interaction between estrogen and glutamate receptor ligands. However, there is more evidence from both non-neural and neural tissues that estrogen may directly activate the production of the cyclic nucleotide second messengers (Szego and Davis, 1967; Weissman et al., 1975; Mugge et al., 1993). Biochemical studies suggest that estrogen can directly stimulate adenylate cyclase activity in uterine cells (Bergamini et al., 1985). Estrogen can acutely elevate the level of cAMP in hypothalamic neurons (Gunaga et al., 1974), and estrogen-induced depolarization associated with decreased potassium conductance is enhanced by a specific adenylate cyclase activator and a phosphodiesterase inhibitor (Minami et al., 1990). In the cerebellum, the estrogen-induced potentiation of excitatory responses to glutamate may be mediated by the inositol triphosphate second messenger system, as acute estrogen treatment increases quisqualate-stimulated phosphatidyl inositol in cerebellar neurons (Smith, 1991).
Several studies have suggested that brain second messenger systems, well known for altering nerve cell activity by modifying characteristics of voltage-gated channels (Kaczmarek and Levitan, 1987), also play a role in the modulation of ligand-gated ionotropic glutamate receptors (Wang et al., 1991, 1994; Blackstone et al., 1994;Lieberman and Mody, 1994). In cultured hippocampal neurons, the whole-cell current response to glutamate and kainate was enhanced by forskolin, an activator of adenylate cyclase, and the opening frequency and the mean open time of the non-NMDA-type glutamate receptor channel was increased by adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate-dependent protein kinase (PKA) (Greengard et al., 1991). Based on the sequences of cloned subunits, most of the ligand-gated ionotropic glutamate receptors contain potential phosphorylation sites for PKC and Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (McGlade-McCulloh et al., 1993). The GluR6 subunit contains a consensus sequence for phosphorylation by PKA. Phosphorylation of kainate receptor complexes that contain the GluR6 subunit increases the glutamate- or kainate-induced responses (Raymond et al., 1993; Wang et al., 1993). The phenomenon of washout in the conventional whole-cell recording of kainate induced-currents resulted from the decreased ability of the neuron to maintain such physiologically relevant mechanisms, especially intracellular phosphorylation. Intracellular application of the catalytic subunit of PKA and cAMP prevented the rundown of kainate-induced currents (Wang et al., 1991). The retardatory effect of 17β-estradiol occurred with a short latency and appeared similar to that of PKA in preventing the washout of kainate-induced currents. This result suggested that the effect of 17β-estradiol likely involved the maintenance or activation of intracellular cAMP-dependent phosphorylation rather than a genomic mechanism.
An interesting feature of potentiation by 17β-estradiol on the kainate-induced current is the concentration of the steroid. In vivo, the gonads are the most likely source of estrogen and progestin. After release into the circulation, steroids can access most of the brain uniformly. At present there is no evidence for de novo synthesis of estrogens in the brain, however, the brain (glial cells and synaptic terminals) does contain a necessary enzyme (aromatase) for the conversion of circulating testosterone to 17β-estradiol. Pregnenolone and dehydroepiandrosterone are derived from cholesterol and are found in the brain at concentrations superior to those found in the blood on the order of 10 nmand 100 nm (Baulieu and Robel, 1991). In the present study, the effect of 17β-estradiol was dose-dependent; concentrations as low as 10 nm potentiated the kainate-induced current. As 17β-estradiol was applied to the extracellular solution, the real concentration affecting the cell was lower than 10 nm and probably within the effective concentration range of other neurosteroids (Wong and Moss, 1992, 1994; ffrench-Mullen et al., 1994, 1995).
Dose–response curves show that the concentration of kainate required to evoke a half-maximal response was the same before and during the application of 17β-estradiol as were the calculated Hill slopes. This finding suggests that no substantial changes in either the apparent affinity or cooperativity of the response occurred during the application of 17β-estradiol. Analysis of current–voltage relationships before and after the introduction of 17β-estradiol showed that 17β-estradiol caused no obvious changes in the reversal potential of the kainate-induced current. This result suggests that the potentiation by 17β-estradiol did not result from activation of additional ionic conductance but was caused by increasing the conductance of the kainate receptor-channels. As the potentiation by 17β-estradiol was similar to the enhancement of kainate currents by 8-bromo-cAMP both in the time course and degree, 17β-estradiol may have activated an intrinsic second messenger system rather than acted directly on the kainate receptors.
Evidence that 17β-estradiol acted through elevation of cAMP levels was obtained by application of IBMX, an agent that prolongs the lifetime of cAMP by inhibiting phosphodiesterase. IBMX enhanced the effect of 17β-estradiol. The ability of a saturating concentration of 17β-estradiol to occlude the modulation produced by 8-bromo-cAMP also argues for a shared pathway. The fact that a specific PKA inhibitor,Rp-cAMPS, was able to block the effect of 17β-estradiol makes a more convincing case for the involvement of cAMP-dependent phosphorylation in the estrogenic modulation of kainate-induced currents.
Involvement of a G-protein(s) in the 17β-estradiol potentiation of kainate-induced currents was addressed by including the nonhydrolyzable GTP analogs, GDP-β-S and GTP-γ-S, in the recording electrode. GDP-β-S and GTP-γ-S compete with intracellular GTP for the binding site of G-protein at a subunit. GDP-β-S locks the GTPase cycle in an inactive status, and GTP-γ-S activates G-proteins irreversibly (Gilman, 1987; Hepler and Gilman, 1992). The estrogenic potentiation on kainate-induced currents was affected by intracellular perfusion of GDP-β-S or GTP-γ-S, which suggests the action of 17β-estradiol was likely to be G-protein(s) coupled. The identity of the G-protein(s) and the specific subclass cannot be determined from the present data.
Recent reports indicate that some neurosteroids modulate voltage-gated calcium currents in hippocampal CA1 neurons via a pertussis toxin-sensitive G-protein-coupled mechanism and the data suggests that the steroids can access their binding site from the extracellular surface (ffrench-Mullen et al., 1994, 1995). At the present time and to our knowledge, no evidence exists to support the notion of specific membrane binding sites for estrogen in hippocampus. Although high affinity membrane estrogen-binding sites have been identified from several specific brain regions, such as hypothalamus, cerebellum, and olfactory bulb (Zheng and Ramirez, 1994). In our recent preliminary experiments, 17β-estradiol conjugated with BSA had no observable effect on kainate-induced currents when applied to the outside of the cell (data not shown). Estrogen-BSA has been demonstrated to be biologically active (Lieberherr et al., 1993; Tesarik and Mendoza, 1995). Because estrogen is lipophilic and readily crosses the membrane and the conjugate (BSA) is membrane impermeable, this finding suggests that 17β-estradiol might have to cross the membrane to affect kainate-induced currents. a subpopulation of cytoplasmic steroid receptors that are not translocated to the nucleus has been described (Welshons and Judy, 1995). The estrogen could bind to these receptors and, theoretically, participate in rapid, nongenomic estrogen events.
In conclusion, the present results demonstrate that physiological levels of 17β-estradiol reversibly potentiate the amplitude of kainate-induced currents. This modulation is associated with a G-protein(s) coupled, cAMP dependent phosphorylation process. This potentiation of kainate-induced currents may participate in the regulation of glutamatergic transmission in hippocampus, where the glutamate receptors have been implicated in memory, epilepsy, excitotoxicity, and some neurodegenerative diseases (Collingridge and Lester, 1989; Meldrum and Garthwaite, 1990). Future studies are required to identify the binding sites on which 17β-estradiol exerts this nongenomic effect and to clarify the physiological significance of the enhancement of kainate-induced currents by 17β-estradiol in hippocampus.
Footnotes
This work was supported by Research Grant 1 RO1-MH 47418 from the National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, awarded to R.L.M. We thank Carol Dudley for her comments and criticisms on this manuscript and Dr. Tina Thompson for her technical assistance. We also thank Drs. Susan Mumby and Al Gilman for their generous gift of purified GDP-β-S and GTP-γ-S.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Robert L. Moss, Department of Physiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75235-9040.