Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles

Muscarinic Activation of a Voltage-Dependent Cation Nonselective Current in Rat Association Cortex

Samir Haj-Dahmane and Rodrigo Andrade
Journal of Neuroscience 15 June 1996, 16 (12) 3848-3861; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-12-03848.1996
Samir Haj-Dahmane
1Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan 48201
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rodrigo Andrade
1Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan 48201
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Acetylcholine depolarizes layer V pyramidal neurons of rat medial prefrontal cortex. A, Toptrace, Pressure application of acetylcholine depolarized this neuron and triggered a period of sustained spiking activity.Bottom trace, Two minutes after recovery, a second application of acetylcholine induced a comparable effect. B, After bath administration of 100 nm atropine, the acetylcholine response was almost completely inhibited. These recordings were obtained using potassium methylsulfate-based intracellular solution containing 20 μmEGTA.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Carbachol elicits a concentration-dependent depolarization of resting membrane potential of the cell. Current-clamp recording of the pyramidal neuron was obtained using the nystatin perforated-path recording technique. Bath administration of carbachol resulted in a concentration-dependent depolarization. In this and the subsequent figures, the bar above the traceindicates the period of the carbachol application.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    The carbachol-induced depolarization behaves as if mediated by a decrease in potassium conductance when it is examined using a variety of traditional electrophysiological tests.A, Recording from a pyramidal neuron in current-clamp mode. Hyperpolarizing current pulses (140 ms, 0.2 nA) were applied periodically to monitor the input resistance. Administration of carbachol (30 μm) in the presence of TTX (1 μm) to this cell elicited a membrane depolarization associated with an apparent increase in membrane resistance. B1, Carbachol administration (30 μm) induced an inward current in a different pyramidal neuron voltage-clamped at −65 mV in the presence of TTX (1 μm). B2, Current–voltage (I–V) relationship obtained using a voltage ramp from −120 to −30 mV taken before (○) and during the superfusion with carbachol (•) from the cell illustrated in B1(holding current = 0.16 nA). C, Carbachol-induced current in a different neuron voltage-clamped at −65 mV (holding current = 0.11 nA). Superfusion with barium (2 mm) induced an inward shift of the holding current and a reduction of the amplitude of the carbachol-induced current.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    The inward current caused by carbachol fails to reverse polarity even at potentials more negative thanEK in the majority of cells studied.A, In most cells studied, the net carbachol current failed to reverse at EK. B, In a small proportion of cells, the net carbachol current reversed nearEK. The holding current for the cell illustrated in A was 0.15 nA and in B was 0.12 nA.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Carbachol elicits an inward current atEK as well as belowEK. A, The lefttrace illustrates the inward current induced by carbachol (30 μm), and the right traceshows the outward current elicited by baclofen (30 μm) in a cell held at −65 mV in the control condition (2.5 mm potassium) and in the presence of TTX (1 μm). B, Carbachol-induced currents (left traces) and baclofen-induced currents (right traces) recorded at different holding potentials (−65, −75, and −85 mV) in 6 mmpotassium and 1 μm TTX. Note that carbachol still induced an inward current even at potentials more negative thanEK. C, Recovery of carbachol and baclofen currents in 2.5 mm potassium. All of the traces represented in A, B, andC are from the same cell. The holding current at −65 mV in 2.5 mm potassium was 0.07 nA at the beginning of the experiment and 0.06 nA after recovery from 6 mm potassium. In 6 mmextracellular potassium, the holding current at −65 mV was 0.04 nA, at −75 mV was −0.17 nA, and at −85 mV was −0.27 nA.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    The carbachol current is dependent on the extracellular concentration of sodium. A, Effect of reducing extracellular sodium on the amplitude of the carbachol-induced current on a cell clamped at −65 mV (holding current = 0.17 nA) in the presence of TTX (1 μm). The lefttrace illustrates the carbachol response in control sodium (146 mm), the middle traceillustrates the response to carbachol observed in low sodium (26 mm), and the right traceillustrates the recovery. Dashed lines indicate the baseline current. B, I–V curves of the carbachol current recorded under control conditions (a), in 26 mm sodium (b), and recovery (c) from the same neuron illustrated in A.C, Summary plot of the amplitude of the carbachol-induced current recorded under control conditions (solid bar) and in 26 mm sodium (open bar). Error bars illustrate the SEM from five different determinations. **p < 0.01 versus control.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Voltage dependence of muscarinic-activated inward current. A, Carbachol current recorded with cesium gluconate-based intracellular solution in the presence of cesium (2 mm), barium (100 μm), cadmium (100 μm), and TTX (1 μm) at −40 mV. B, Hyperpolarizing voltage step commands from −40 to −120 mV (protocol represented inupper right traces) were applied before and during carbachol application. B, Net carbachol current tracings were obtained by subtracting the currents obtained in control conditions from those obtained during carbachol application. The instantaneous muscarinic current increases in amplitude with hyperpolarization. However, the hyperpolarizing steps also resulted in a fast outward relaxation, reflecting the voltage-dependent turning-off of the muscarinic current. C, Comparison of the instantaneous and steady-state I–V curves for the carbachol-induced current obtained from the cell represented inA. The holding current at −40 mV was 0.05 nA.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    The carbachol-induced inward current reverses polarity near −15 mV. A, Current–voltage (I–V) plots were obtained using a linear voltage ramp from −80 to +10 mV before and during carbachol application in a neuron recorded with a cesium gluconate-based intracellular solution in the presence of cadmium (100 μm) and TTX (1 μm). B, Net carbachol current obtained by subtracting the I–V plots represented in A. The carbachol-induced current reversed polarity at a mean potential of −16 mV ± 2 mV (n = 4).

  • Fig. 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 9.

    The carbachol-induced current is not reduced by intracellular injection of cesium. A, Carbachol- and baclofen-induced currents were recorded using a potassium methylsulfate-based intracellular solution in the presence of TTX (1 μm). The left traceillustrates the inward current caused by carbachol (30 μm) at a holding potential of −65 mV. Theright trace illustrates the outward current elicited by baclofen (30 μm) in the same cell (holding current = 0.11 nA). B, Carbachol-induced (lefttrace) and baclofen-induced (right trace) currents were recorded using a cesium gluconate-based intracellular solution. Intracellular injection of cesium failed to reduce the carbachol current but suppressed the outward current elicited by baclofen. The holding current for this cell was −0.08 nA.C, Summary plot comparing the absolute amplitude of the carbachol- and baclofen-induced currents recorded using potassium methylsulfate-based (solid bar; n = 6) or cesium gluconate-based (open bar; n = 6) intracellular solutions. Error bars illustrate the SEM determined for each group. **p < 0.01 versus control.

  • Fig. 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 10.

    Effect of elevated extracellular potassium on theI–V curves for the carbachol-induced inward current. A, Control and carbachol I–Vrelationships obtained in the presence of 2.5 mmextracellular potassium. B, Control and carbacholI–V relationships obtained in the presence of 5 mm extracellular potassium. C,I–V relationship for the net carbachol current observed in the presence of 2.5 and 5 mmextracellular potassium (holding current = 0.06 nA).

  • Fig. 11.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 11.

    The carbachol current is insensitive to changes in the chloride gradient. A, Carbachol-induced current recorded at a holding potential of −65 mV in the presence of TTX (1 μm), under control conditions (126.5 mm extracellular chloride, lefttrace), in low extracellular chloride (7.5 mm, middle trace), and during recovery (right trace). Lowering the extracellular concentration of chloride failed to induce changes in either the polarity or the amplitude of the carbachol current. B, Inhibitory postsynaptic potential evoked by stimulation of layer III (25–30 V for 500 μsec) in the presence of DNQX (10 μm) and APV (10 μm) in control conditions and in low chloride. Chloride substitution induced a change in the polarity of GABAA synaptic potential, indicating that this manipulation was effective in altering the chloride gradient across the cell membrane (holding current = 0.11 nA).

  • Fig. 12.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 12.

    TEA inhibits the carbachol current without by itself eliciting an inward current. Administration of carbachol (30 μm) in the presence of TTX (1 μm) elicited an inward current in a cell clamped at −65 mV. Bath administration of TEA (2 mm) after recovery from the carbachol failed to induce any inward current. However, a second application of carbachol in the presence of TEA elicited a greatly reduced inward current. Partial recovery of the carbachol current was observed after removal of the TEA from the bath (holding current = 0.17 nA).

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 16 (12)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 16, Issue 12
15 Jun 1996
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Muscarinic Activation of a Voltage-Dependent Cation Nonselective Current in Rat Association Cortex
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Muscarinic Activation of a Voltage-Dependent Cation Nonselective Current in Rat Association Cortex
Samir Haj-Dahmane, Rodrigo Andrade
Journal of Neuroscience 15 June 1996, 16 (12) 3848-3861; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-12-03848.1996

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Muscarinic Activation of a Voltage-Dependent Cation Nonselective Current in Rat Association Cortex
Samir Haj-Dahmane, Rodrigo Andrade
Journal of Neuroscience 15 June 1996, 16 (12) 3848-3861; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-12-03848.1996
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • acetylcholine
  • muscarinic receptors
  • depolarization
  • cation nonselective current
  • pyramidal neurons
  • cerebral cortex

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.