Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles

Induction of Hebbian and Non-Hebbian Mossy Fiber Long-Term Potentiation by Distinct Patterns of High-Frequency Stimulation

Nathaniel N. Urban and German Barrionuevo
Journal of Neuroscience 1 July 1996, 16 (13) 4293-4299; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-13-04293.1996
Nathaniel N. Urban
1Department of Neuroscience and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
German Barrionuevo
1Department of Neuroscience and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    L-HFS and B-HFS result in different time courses of potentiation. Time of HFS is indicated by the triangle. Each point represents the peak amplitude at the given time point from seven experiments, normalized and averaged. Error bars give the SE. Sample waveforms from before and 15 min after HFS are shown in the inset. A, In seven whole-cell recordings,L-HFS to the mossy fibers resulted in very large PTP lasting for several min after HFS, followed by stable LTP (151 ± 18% of control; n = 7). Scale bar: 100 pA, 10 msec.B, In seven experiments, EPSPs were recorded with intracellular sharp electrodes. B-HFS to the mossy fibers resulted in LTP (169 ± 11% of control; n = 7) without PTP. Scale bar: 10 mV, 20 msec. C, In three experiments, potentiation of the extracellularly recorded field EPSP lasted >2.5 hr after B-HFS. The potentiation at 150 min was 165 ± 20% of control. Scale bar: 0.1 mV, 5 msec.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Induction of mossy fiber LTP by B-HFS depends on stimulation intensity. A, Mossy fiber field EPSPs were recorded in response to stimulation of the granule cells of the dentate gyrus. B-HFS was applied at the indicated times. Initial responses were recorded by using a stimulation intensity that elicited a response <30% of maximal amplitude. Application of B-HFSat this stimulation intensity did not induce LTP. A second application of B-HFS at a higher intensity resulted in LTP.B, Data from six experiments showing results similar to the experiment in A. Each pair of symbols with aconnecting line represents data from one slice. When applied at a stimulation intensity <30% of maximal, B-HFS failed to induce potentiation (post-B-HFS = 98 ± 7% of control;n = 6). Symbols clustered at the left end of each line indicate the amount of LTP observed at 20 min after this first B-HFS. When the stimulation intensity was increased by the factor indicated on the x-axis, the same B-HFS induced significant LTP (post-B-HFS = 137 ± 9% of control; p < 0.02).

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Induction of mossy fiber LTP by B-HFS requires glutamatergic ionotropic synaptic transmission. A, After recording baseline field EPSPs, 10 mmkynurenic acid (KYN) was applied to block AMPA and NMDA receptors. When evoked EPSPs were eliminated, B-HFS(black diamonds) or L-HFS (opentriangles) was applied, and the KYN was washed out. After L-HFS, the response recovered to a potentiated level (response at 35 min post-HFS = 194 ± 29% of baseline; n = 3), whereas after B-HFS, the response was not potentiated (response at 35 min post-HFS = 92 ± 7% of baseline; n = 15).B, Group data showing recovery from KYN after no HFS (control), B-HFS, andL-HFS were applied during the KYN. Also shown, data from experiments in which LTP was induced after washout of KYN by either B-HFS or L-HFS in the 15 slices in which B-HFS first was applied in the presence of KYN.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    B-HFS does not induce mossy fiber LTP after whole-cell dialysis. A, Averaged data from five experiments in which whole-cell EPSCs (WC EPSC) and field EPSPs (Field EPSP) were recorded simultaneously. At 20 min post-B-HFS, the field EPSP, but not the whole-cell EPSC, was potentiated (EPSP = 162 ± 9%; EPSC = 94 ± 20%;n = 5, p < 0.02). B, EPSC and field EPSP waveforms from one example experiment. Scale bars: 5 msec, 25 pA (EPSC); 2 msec, 0.1 mV (EPSP).

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Induction of mossy fiber LTP by B-HFS requires simultaneous afferent stimulation and postsynaptic depolarization. In six cells, three separate manipulations were tested for their effect on mossy fiber EPSP amplitude. A, B-HFS paired with hyperpolarization (−2.5 nA, 100 msec square pulses passed simultaneously with the application of the B-HFS) failed to induce long-lasting changes in mossy fiber EPSP amplitude (amplitude at 15 min = 91 ± 11% of baseline). B, Depolarization alone (+2.5 nA, 100 msec square pulse repeated 10 times at 5 sec intervals) resulted in a slight decrease in mossy fiber EPSP amplitude (amplitude at 15 min = 81 ± 14% of baseline). C, Pairing of depolarization (+2.5 nA, 100 msec square pulse) with the B-HFS resulted in LTP (amplitude at 15 min = 197 ± 32% of control).

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 16 (13)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 16, Issue 13
1 Jul 1996
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Induction of Hebbian and Non-Hebbian Mossy Fiber Long-Term Potentiation by Distinct Patterns of High-Frequency Stimulation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Induction of Hebbian and Non-Hebbian Mossy Fiber Long-Term Potentiation by Distinct Patterns of High-Frequency Stimulation
Nathaniel N. Urban, German Barrionuevo
Journal of Neuroscience 1 July 1996, 16 (13) 4293-4299; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-13-04293.1996

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Induction of Hebbian and Non-Hebbian Mossy Fiber Long-Term Potentiation by Distinct Patterns of High-Frequency Stimulation
Nathaniel N. Urban, German Barrionuevo
Journal of Neuroscience 1 July 1996, 16 (13) 4293-4299; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-13-04293.1996
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • hippocampus
  • CA3
  • LTP
  • mossy fiber
  • Hebbian
  • synaptic plasticity
  • granule cell
  • dentate gyrus
  • NMDA

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.