Articles

Two Alternative Promoters Direct Neuron-Specific Expression of the Rat Microtubule-Associated Protein 1B Gene

Dong Liu and Itzhak Fischer
Journal of Neuroscience 15 August 1996, 16 (16) 5026-5036; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-16-05026.1996

Abstract

Microtubule-associated protein 1B (MAP1B) is a major constituent of the neuronal cytoskeleton that is expressed at high levels during early brain development and plays a role in axonal growth and neuronal plasticity. Previous studies suggested that the regulation of its gene expression is primarily at the transcriptional level. Thus, the characterization of the promoter region should help to define regulatory elements that control neuron-specific and developmental expression of the MAP1B gene. We have isolated genomic clones containing up to 11 kb of the upstream region of the rat MAP1B gene, sequenced ∼1.8 kb upstream from the translation start codon, and identified several consensus sequences. These sequences include a consensus element common to several neuronal genes, a TCC repeat, a cAMP response element, and two TATA boxes that were 134 nucleotides apart from each other. S1 nuclease and RNase protection assays identified two corresponding groups of transcription initiation sites that were used selectively in distinct regions of the nervous system and during different stages of development. Transient transfection assays with neuronal and non-neuronal cell lines demonstrated that each TATA sequence and its corresponding adjacent region could independently direct neuron-specific expression of a reporter gene. Furthermore, the transcription of the reporter gene was initiated from the same sites as those of the MAP1B gene in vivo. These results suggest that two alternative and overlapping promoters, one inducible and the other constitutive, regulate the temporal and tissue-specific expression of the rat MAP1B gene.

Microtubule-associated protein 1B (MAP1B) is an abundant, high molecular weight (320,000) neuronal protein that is developmentally regulated (Bloom et al., 1984, 1985). Structural analysis of MAP1B indicates that the protein has an extended filamentous structure (Sato-Yoshitake et al., 1989) with an amino-terminal microtubule-binding domain (Noble et al., 1989). The phosphorylated isoform of MAP1B is highly enriched in growing axons of the developing nervous system but is usually present at relatively low levels in mature axons (Mansfield et al., 1992; Black et al., 1994;Boyne et al., 1994). In regions of adult brain that retain a capacity for synaptic remodeling, such as the olfactory bulb and retina, the levels of MAP1B remain relatively high and are not downregulated (Safaei and Fischer, 1989; Tucker and Matus, 1988). Furthermore, adult sensory neurons in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and motor neurons in spinal cord express MAP1B at relatively high levels (Fawcett et al., 1994; Nothias et al., 1995), reflecting their potential to regenerate. Recent experiments with antisense oligonucleotides in PC12 cells (Brugg et al., 1993) and hippocampal neurons (L. Boyne and I. Fischer, unpublished data) resulted in the inhibition of neurite outgrowth. Taken together, these studies strongly support a role for MAP1B in axonal outgrowth.

MAP1B is the earliest MAP expressed during nervous system development. In general, the protein is abundant early in development and at low levels in the adult, although the precise profile of MAP1B expression is region-specific (Safaei and Fischer, 1989; Schoenfeld et al., 1989). The parallel decrease in the levels of MAP1B and its mRNA during development suggests that the expression of MAP1B is regulated mainly at the level of transcription (Safaei and Fischer, 1989;Perrone-Bizzozero et al., 1991). In cell culture systems such as PC12 cells, both protein and mRNA levels of the MAP1B are induced in parallel after NGF treatment (Noble et al., 1989; Brugg and Matus, 1988); however, little information is available on the mechanism or regulatory elements involved in the regulation of MAP1B gene expression.

In this report, we describe the isolation and characterization of the MAP1B promoter region. In contrast to several other neuron-specific genes in which neuronal specificity is conferred by distant silencer elements acting on a relatively promiscuous promoter, we show that 127 bp of the MAP1B proximal promoter are sufficient to confer strong neuron-specific expression of a reporter gene in transient transfection assays. We also describe two TATA box sequences that are 134 nucleotides (nt) apart from each other in the promoter region, each of which in association with its adjacent cis-regulatory elements is sufficient for initiating transcription of a reporter gene at the same sites at which transcription of the MAP1B gene is initiatedin vivo and for conferring neuron-specific expression.In vivo, these two adjacent promoters are used selectively in different regions of the nervous system and at different stages of development, making MAP1B a distinct example of a neuronal gene that can be controlled by positive regulatory elements and alternative promoters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PCR amplification of rat MAP1B cDNA clones. Three primers, designated as p1 (5′-AGAGGAACACTTCTCTCAGGCTTG-3′, sense, nt 15 −38), p2 (5-′CACCAGCAAGTAGAACT TGCTGTC-3′, antisense, nt 177 −154), and p3 (5′- TGAGCTCGCCAGTGTTCTCAAAGC-3′, antisense, nt 504 −481), respectively, derived from the 5′ region of the mouse MAP1B cDNA (Noble et al., 1989) were synthesized. Reverse transcription was performed using total RNA from rat brain. The resulting cDNA product was used subsequently for PCR amplification. Two overlapping cDNA fragments of 162 and 490 bp were amplified using p1/p2 and p1/p3, respectively, and subcloned into pBluescript II (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). These clones were designated as pBS162 and pBS490, respectively.

Screening of a genomic DNA library. A Lambda DASH II library prepared from Sprague–Dawley male rat testis (Stratagene) was screened with the 490 bp cDNA probe under high stringency hybridization conditions. Approximately 500,000 independent clones were screened, and 12 positive clones were isolated. Phage DNA was prepared from these clones as described (Sambrook et al., 1989), digested with different restriction enzymes (Promega, Madison, WI), and analyzed by Southern blots using the 162 and 490 bp fragments. Three fragments positive to both probes, a 2.3 kb EcoRI, a 2.5 kb HindIII, and a 2.3 kb XbaI fragment, were identified and subcloned into pBluescript II or pUC18 vectors. The three resulting clones, pBS-2.3R, pUC-2.5 Hr, and pUC-2.3X, were used for further analysis.

Linker-dependent genomic walking. An alternative method, the PCR-based linker-dependent genomic walking procedure, was used simultaneously to isolate the MAP1B promoter region (Fors et al., 1990). Primers used in the genomic walking experiment were p4 (5′-TAGGAAGCGGTGCGACAGGCTGG-3′, antisense, nt 159–137), p5 (5′-GGTTGCCGATGCTGCCCGATGGCTC-3′, antisense, nt 118–94), and p6 (5′-ATGGCTCCGGCTCGGTGGCTTCCAC-3′, antisense, nt 100–76). Genomic DNA from rat brain first was sheared mechanically using a 22 gauge needle and then digested with a mixture of BglII, XbaI, and BamHI (Promega) overnight. First-strand DNA was synthesized by annealing p4 with digested genomic DNA and extended with Vent DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) at 95°C for 2 min, at 60°C for 30 min, and at 76°C for 10 min using a thermocycler. The resulting products were ligated with a unique linker DNA fragment (LMPCR1, 5′-GCGGTGACCCGGGAGATCTGAATTC-3′; LMPCR2, 5′-GAATTCAGATC-3′). The annealed product contained one blunt end and a single-stranded region at the other end. The ligated products were used for a first round PCR amplification with primers p5 and LMPCR1. PCR products were separated on a 1% agarose gel, transferred onto a nylon membrane, and hybridized with the radiolabeled 490 bp MAP1B cDNA probe. Positive bands were purified and used as templates for a second round of PCR amplification. PCR reaction conditions were the same as above except that p6 was used instead of p5.

Preparation of plasmid constructs. PCR was performed to generate the promoter sequence construct in plasmid p(−549/+60)chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT), using DNA from plasmid pBS-2.3R as a template. The 5′ primer corresponded to the T7 promoter sequence in the pBluescript II vector. The 3′ primer was a 24-mer oligonucleotide (5′-GCTCTAGACCTGCCGGCTCTGCTA-3′) located immediately upstream from the translation start codon ATG of the MAP1B gene containing an XbaI site at its 5′ end for convenient subsequent manipulation. The amplified DNA fragment was digested withHindIII (at the polylinker region of pBluescript II) andXbaI and ligated into p0CAT (pCAT/basic, Promega). Plasmid p(−383/+60)CAT was prepared by digesting p(−549/+60)CAT withHindIII and AvaI, blunt-ending with the Klenow fragment, and self-ligating. Plasmids p(−283/+55)CAT and p(+55/−283)CAT were prepared by ligating a 338 bp NaeI fragment, in both orientations, into p0CAT digested withPstI and blunt-ends generated with the Klenow fragment. Plasmid p(−1610/+60)CAT was prepared by ligating a 1.1 kbHindIII/BstXI fragment from pUC-2.3X with p(−549/+60)CAT digested with HindIII and BstXI. Plasmid p(−1717/+60)CAT was prepared by ligating a 1.2 kbHindIII/BstXI fragment from pUC-2.5 Hr into p(−549/+60)CAT digested with HindIII and BstXI. Plasmids p(−1610/−284)CAT and p(−549/−284)CAT were prepared by deleting the 338 bp NaeI fragment from p(−1610/+60)CAT and p(−549/+60)CAT, respectively. p(−549/−68)CAT and p(−283/−68)CAT were prepared by deleting a BssH II/XbaI fragment from p(−549/+60)CAT and p(−283/+55)CAT, respectively. Plasmid p(−72/+55)CAT was prepared by deleting aHindIII/BssH II fragment from p(−283/+55)CAT. Plasmid p(+55/−72)CAT was prepared by deleting aHindIII/BssH II fragment from p(+55/−283)CAT. Plasmid p(−68/−283)CAT was prepared by deleting a BssH II/XbaI fragment from p(+55/−283)CAT. Plasmids p(−116/+60)CAT, p(−163/+60)CAT, p(−817/+60)CAT, p(−1165/+60)CAT, and p(−1356/+60)CAT were prepared by ExoIII deletion of p(−1610/+60)CAT. Briefly, p(−1610/+60)CAT was first digested withBbuI (SphI) and SalI and treated withExoIII (Promega) at 30°C. Aliquots were taken at different time points after deletion with ExoIII, treated with S1 nuclease for 30 min at room temperature, blunt-ended with the Klenow fragment, and ligated with T4 DNA ligase. All constructs were verified by restriction enzyme digestion and sequence analysis.

Analysis and sequencing of genomic clones. Both strands of the promoter region were sequenced by dideoxynucleotide chain termination method (Sanger et al., 1977) using a sequenase II kit (U.S. Biochemical, Cleveland, OH). First, the coding strand was sequenced by using the sequential deletion products of pCAT constructs as templates and the reverse primer (5′-CAGGAAACAGCTATGAC-3′), whose sequence is present in the pCAT/basic vector. Then, primers complementary to the coding strand were synthesized and used to obtain the second-strand sequence. Nucleotide sequence alignments and analyses were performed with the software package of Genepro (Riverside Scientific Enterprises, Bainbridge Island, WA).

RNA preparation and S1 nuclease and RNase protection assays.Total RNA from cells or tissues was purified by the guanidinium isothiocyanate method (Chomczynski and Sacchi, 1987), except those RNAs from transfected NB2A cells, which were prepared by the CsCl centrifugation method (Glisin et al., 1973) after lysis with guanidinium isothiocyanate solution. For S1 nuclease protection assay, 10 pmol of pBS-2.3R DNA was denatured with NaOH, mixed with 5 pmol of primer p6 (5′- ATGGCTCCGGCTCGGTGGCTTCCAC-3′, antisense, nt +100 to +76), and end-labeled with α-32P-ATP. The mixture was heated at 85°C for 5 min, annealed by cooling slowly to 40°C, and extended by four units of the Klenow fragment for 50 min at 37°C. After PstI digestion, the resulting probe was purified by electrophoresis on a 8.3 m urea/6% polyacrylamide gel. The single-strand end-labeled probe that was generated spanned residue −264 to +100. Approximately 1 × 104 cpm of single-stranded probe was mixed with 50 μg of total RNA from postnatal day 16 rat brain or 50 μg of yeast tRNA. After hybridization, 300 μl of S1 nuclease buffer (0.28 m NaCl/50 mm NaOAc, pH 4.5/4.5 mm ZnSO4 with salmon sperm DNA at 20 mg/ml) and 50 units of S1 nuclease (Promega) were added, and the mixture was incubated at 37°C for 30 min. The protected fragments were electrophoresed on an 8.3 m urea/6% polyacrylamide gel.

RNase protection assays were performed according to standard procedure (Chamberlin et al., 1982). The pGEM-T582 plasmid, containing 5′ flanking region and part of the first exon of MAP1B, was linearized with AvaI and used as template for riboprobe synthesis. The resulting riboprobe spanned residue −383 to +100 of the MAP1B promoter region and exon 1, as well as 52 nt from the pGEM-T vector sequence. The specific activity of the labeled riboprobes was estimated to be 0.5–1 × 108 cpm/μg. Approximately 1 × 105 cpm of the radiolabeled riboprobe was used for each hybridization reaction. After hybridization, 300 μl of RNase digestion buffer [10 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 5 mm EDTA, 300 mm NaCl, 4 μg of RNase A, and 80 units of RNase T1 (Ambion, Austin, TX)] were added, and the samples were incubated at 37°C for 30 min. Then, 35 μl of 10% SDS and 2.5 μl of proteinase K (80 mg/ml) were added and incubated for 30 more min. The protected fragments were electrophoresed in 8.3 m urea/6% polyacrylamide gel.

Cell culture and DNA transfections. PC12 cells (Greene and Tischler, 1976) were grown in DMEM supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum and 5% horse serum. NB2A and L6 cells were grown in DMEM containing 10% fetal calf serum; 3T3 cells were grown in DMEM containing 10% calf serum. All cells were maintained in a humidified 37°C incubator with a 5% CO2/95% air atmosphere. Tissue culture serum, antibiotics, and medium were purchased from Gibco Life Technologies (Gaithersburg, MD), and tissue culture dishes and plates were from Falcon. All tissue culture medium contained 100 U/ml penicillin G and 100 μg/ml streptomycin.

For transfections, PC12 cells were plated on polylysine-coated 12-well tissue culture plates at a density of 2 × 105 cells per well and grown for 16–18 hr. NB2A and 3T3 cells were treated similarly except that they were plated at a density of 5 × 104 cells per well. L6 cells were plated on a 6-well plate at a density of 5 × 104 per well. Transfections were carried out in a 12-well plate using 4 μl of Lipofectamine (2 mg/ml; Gibco Life Technologies), 0.5 μg of p0CAT DNA, or an equimolar amount of other plasmid constructs and pSVCAT in 0.6 ml Opti-Mem medium (Gibco Life Technologies). In addition, 0.5 μg of pSV-β-gal DNA were cotransfected in each well. Duplicate wells were used for each sample. Four hours later, 0.6 ml of complete medium with double concentrations of serum was added in each well. Cells were harvested for CAT and β-galactosidase assays 48 hr later.

CAT assays and quantitation. CAT activity was determined by the liquid scintillation counting method (Seed and Sheen, 1988). Briefly, cell extracts were prepared by rapid freezing/thawing cycles on dry ice. Depending on cell types, from one eighth to half of the cell extracts were used for CAT assay. Cell extracts were incubated with 0.25 μCi of 3H-chloramphenicol andn-butyryl coenzyme A in a total volume of 125 μl at 37°C for 60 min. After incubation, samples were extracted with 300 μl of mixed xylenes. Because each pCAT construct was cotransfected with pSV-β-gal, β-galactosidase activity was used to normalize any transfection variations. CAT activity results, normalized against β-galactosidase activity, were expressed as the percentage of control pSVCAT (pCAT/control, Promega) activity.

RESULTS

Isolation and sequencing of the 5′ end of rat MAP1B cDNA

Two overlapping cDNA fragments of 162 and 490 bp were amplified using p1/p2 and p1/p3, respectively, subcloned into pBluescript II, and sequenced. These clones were designated as pBS162 and pBS490, respectively. The sequence of these clones (Liu and Fischer, 1996; Genbank accession number U55276) corresponds to the missing 5′ end of rat cDNA reported previously (Zauner et al., 1992; Genbank accession number X60550). The overlapping combination of these cDNA sequences represents the entire rat MAP1B cDNA coding sequence. This sequence information, together with the determination of the MAP1B transcription initiation sites (see below), confirms that the first ATG codon identified by Noble et al. (1989) is the actual MAP1B translation start site, because no other potential upstream site could be identified. A comparison of the MAP1B 5′ end cDNA sequence among different species shows that this region is highly conserved. At the amino acid level, the rat MAP1B sequence exhibits 96% and 95% identity, respectively, to its mouse and human counterparts.

Selection and restriction mapping of the rat MAP1B genomic clones

Screening of the genomic phage library with the 490 bp cDNA probe under high stringency conditions (see Materials and Methods) yielded 12 positive clones. Southern blot analysis confirmed that all of these clones contained restriction fragment(s) that hybridized with the 162 or 490 bp cDNA probes (data not shown). Three of these positive clones (10a, 1a, and 8a) were used to obtain a partial restriction map of the genomic DNA (Fig. 1). The results indicated that the 10a clone contained up to 11 kb of the 5′ end of the gene, including the first exon and part of the first intron. Phage clone 8a contained the first exon, the first intron, and at least part of the second exon. The first exon/intron junction was determined by comparing the genomic DNA sequence with the cDNA sequence. The consensus exon/intron junction sequence (A/C)AG/GT(A/G)AGT (Breathnach and Chambon, 1981) matched at six out of nine nt in the region from +242 to +250, including a conserved G at residue 244 and the invariable GT at positions +245 and +246. The first MAP1B exon/intron junction in rat was located at the same site as it is in humans (Lien et al., 1994). The size of the first intron was determined to be >5.3 kb but <10.5 kb, which was comparable with 6.6 kb of the first intron in human MAP1B. The three restriction fragments, 2.3 kb EcoRI, 2.5 kbHindIII, and 2.3 kb XbaI, which contained exon 1 and up to 1.8 kb of the 5′ end of the gene (Fig. 1), were subcloned into the pBluescript II or pUC18 vectors to generate plasmids pBS-2.3R, pUC-2.5 Hr, and pUC-2.3X.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Restriction map and exon/intron organization of MAP1B genomic clones. A, Phage clones 10a, 1a, and 8a were isolated by screening a phage λ Dash II genomic library.B, Restriction map and exon/intron organization of MAP1B genomic clones. The first exon/intron junction was determined by comparing the genomic DNA sequence with the cDNA sequence. The exact location and size of exon 2 were not determined. Exons are indicated bythick lines. C, Phage DNA was digested withEcoRI (R), HindIII (H), and XbaI (X), and the fragments were cloned in pUC18 or pBS II SK (−) plasmids.

Figure 2 shows the results of the genomic walking analysis. After a first-round PCR amplification, no distinct bands were detected by ethidium bromide staining (Fig. 2B), probably attributable to the low degree of specificity of this first step. After Southern blot analysis, however, bands were observed (Fig.2C), suggesting that specific products containing the MAP1B promoter region had been amplified. Indeed, after purifying these bands from the gel and using them as templates for a second round of PCR amplification, two distinct PCR products of 495 and 582 bp were generated (Fig. 2D), which also hybridized with the 490 bp probe used in the library screening (Fig. 2E). These PCR products were subcloned into the pGEM-T vector (Promega) and designated as pGEM-T495 and pGEM-T582. These fragments corresponded to residues −395 to +100 and −482 to +100, respectively. Therefore, both the genomic library screening and the genomic walking methods yielded similar results and successfully generated the 5′ flanking region of the MAP1B gene.

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Isolation of MAP1B promoter region using the linker-dependent genomic walking method. Primers and their relative positions are shown schematically in A. Rat genomic DNA was digested with a mixture of BglII, XbaI, and BamHI, annealed with p4, extended with Klenow fragment, and then ligated with the unique linkers LMPCR1 and LMPCR2. First-round PCR amplification with primers p5 and LMPCR1 (B) and the corresponding Southern blot (C) show a smear with no clearly distinct bands in lane S. Second-round PCR amplification was performed using p6 and LMPCR1 as primers and first-round PCR products as templates (D) with the corresponding Southern blot (E). Lanes 1 and 2 in D and E show two distinct PCR products of 495 and 582 bp. M is a 100 bp DNA ladder.

Sequence analysis of the 5′ flanking region of the rat MAP1B gene

Approximately 1.8 kb of genomic DNA, upstream from the translation start codon, were sequenced (Fig. 3). The numbering system used was based on a proposed transcription initiation site (see below) defined as +1. Several consensus regulatory sequences were found in this region, including a cAMP responsive element sequence (CREB) located at −471, two TATA boxes at −18 and −152, an Sp1 element at −46, a fat-specific element 2 (FSE2) at +7, and a Pu-box at +23. No CAAT box was found on either strand. A sequence comparison between the promoter region of rat and human MAP1B (Fig. 4) showed high homology and suggested the presence of similar regulatory elements for the expression of this protein.

Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Sequence of the rat MAP1B promoter region, the first exon, and the 5′ end of the first intron. The amino acid sequence encoded by the first exon is shown under the nt sequence insingle-letter code. The 5′ end of the first intron of the MAP1B gene is shown in small letters. The conserved initiator at nt −126 and the conserved nucleotides in the exon/intron junction are underlined, and the invariable gt sequence isbold and italic. Three transcription initiation sites (cap sites) determined by RNase and S1 nuclease protection assays are bold and labeled as cap 1, cap 2, and cap 3, respectively. The second transcription initiation site G is also underlined and designated as +1. The translation start codon ATG is underlined. Two TATA boxes are shown in bold and boxed in dotted lines and designated as TATA1 and TATA2, respectively. An Sp1 (GGGCGG) element at nt −46, an FSE2 (CAGAGGA) at nt +7, a Pu-box (GAGGAA) at nt +23, and a cAMP responsive element (CREB) (GACGTCA) at nt −471 are boxed indotted lines. Two motifs, shown in boxes, are designated as neuronal element and TCC repeat motif, respectively. The Genbank accession number for the sequence is U55276.

Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.

Sequence comparison of rat and human MAP1B promoter region. Rat MAP1B promoter region is aligned with the published human MAP1B promoter region (Lien et al., 1994).CON represents the consensus sequence between these two species. The overall homology in this region is 81%. The second transcription initiation site in rat and the transcription initiation site in human MAP1B are bold and designated as +1. Alsobold are the TATA box, a β-A-globin.4 element, an Sp1 site, and an FSE2 element.

Sequence analysis revealed several other motifs commonly found in promoters (Fig. 3), including a “neuronal element” at position −238 to −212. This sequence motif is shared by several other genes specifically expressed in neurons, including GAP-43 (Nedivi et al., 1992), type II sodium channel (Maue et al., 1990), peripherin (Thompson and Ziff, 1989), rat SCG10 (Mori et al., 1992), and mouse neurofilament (Lewis and Cowan, 1986) (Table 1). A second common motif was a stretch of imperfect TCC repeats located at position −197 to −175 (Fig. 3). This motif has been found in promoter regions of many growth factor and hormone receptor genes, such as human EGF receptor, human IGF-I receptor, human progesterone receptor, and human androgen receptor, as well as in promoter regions of many proto-oncogenes, such as chicken myb, human c-erbB-2, human c-k-ras, mouse c-jun, and mouse c-myc proto-oncogenes. In the promoter region of human epidermal growth factor receptor, the motif TCCTCCTCC has been found to be sensitive to S1 nuclease and to bind two specific factors. In addition, mutations in this motif decrease promoter activity by three- to fivefold, indicating its functional importance in regulating EGF receptor gene expression (Johnson et al., 1988).

View this table:
Table 1.

The “neuronal motif” in promoter regions of neuronal genes

Mapping of the MAP1B transcription initiation sites

S1 nuclease protection assay (see Materials and Methods) was carried out with 50 μg of total brain RNA (postnatal day 16) and 50 μg of yeast tRNA as negative control. Two strong bands of 100 and 97 nt were clearly observed after a relatively short exposure (Fig.5A); however, a much weaker band of 224 nt was detected after a longer exposure (Fig. 5B), suggesting that transcription of the MAP1B gene might be initiated from a second site.

Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.

Determination of MAP1B transcription initiation sites by S1 nuclease protection assay. Polyacrylamide gels (A, B) show the results of S1 nuclease protection assay. Approximately 50 μg of rat brain total RNA (S) or control yeast tRNA (C) was hybridized with the32P-end-labeled, single-stranded DNA probe and then treated with S1 nuclease. Three protected fragments and their size (nt) are indicated by arrowheads, and the corresponding TATA boxes are shown above. The size of molecular weight markers (nt) is indicated to the left. P, Untreated probe;M, molecular weight marker; L, DNA sequence ladder obtained by using the same primer and template as for S1 probe preparation. A diagram (D) shows the structure of the single-stranded DNA probe used for S1 nuclease protection assay and the three protected fragments.

To examine whether these potential initiation sites could be used selectively in different regions of the nervous system or at different stages of development, we carried out additional RNase protection assays. Twenty micrograms of total RNA from DRG, brain cortex, and liver of both postnatal day 4 and adult rat as well as 20 μg of total RNA from PC12, NB2A, 3T3, and L6 cells were used. A schematic representation of the riboprobe is shown in Figure6B. Three protected bands with sizes of 224, 101, and 98 nt were detected (Fig. 6A) in neuronal tissues (DRG and brain cortex) and neuronal (PC12) cells, but not in liver or non-neuronal (3T3 and L6) cells. The two shorter bands of 54 and 52 nt, instead of the fully protected bands observed in NB2A mouse neuroblastoma cells, were probably attributable to an incomplete protection of the rat probe by the mouse MAP1B transcripts. The exact transcription initiation sites were tentatively determined to be at an A residue and two G residues at 183, 60, and 57 nt upstream from the translation start codon ATG, respectively, because single-stranded RNA moves slower than the single-stranded DNA ladder, and G or A residues are used more commonly as a transcription initiation site (Bucher and Trifonov, 1986). The second transcription initiation site (G residue) was designated arbitrarily as +1 (Fig. 3). The upstream transcription initiation site (A residue) was located 29 nt downstream from the first TATA sequence, and the functional initiator CTCANTCT (Smale et al., 1990) was conserved at seven out of eight nt. The downstream transcription initiation sites were located 19 and 22 nt downstream from the second TATA sequence, respectively (Fig. 3). MAP1B transcripts were found only in neuronal tissues and cell lines consistent with previous observations on the protein and mRNA distributions (Rienitz et al., 1989; Safaei and Fischer, 1989); however, the transcription initiation sites were used selectively during development in different regions of the nervous system. For example, in brain cortex, the upstream initiation site was much stronger in neonate rat than in adult rat. This observation correlates well with the decreased expression of MAP1B during brain development. In contrast, in DRG sensory neurons, the upstream initiation site was much weaker in neonate rat than in adult rat, consistent with the relatively high levels of MAP1B seen in adult DRG. Little or no change was observed in the usage of the downstream transcription initiation sites during development.

Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.

Determination of MAP1B gene transcription initiation sites by RNase protection assay. In the RNase protection assay (A), 20 μg of total RNA from adult and postnatal day 4 rat DRG (lanes 1, 2), adult and postnatal day 4 rat brain cortex (lanes 3, 4), adult and postnatal day 4 rat liver (lanes 5, 6), PC12 (lane 7), NB2A (lane 8), 3T3 (lane 9), and L6 (lane 10) cells were hybridized with 32P-labeled riboprobe spanning nt −383 to +100 in the MAP1B gene and 52 nt of the pGEM-T vector sequence, and then treated with a mixture of RNase A and RNase T1. The protected fragments and their size (nt) are indicated by arrowheads. The size of molecular weight markers (nt) is indicated to theleft. A diagram (B) shows the structure of the MAP1B gene antisense riboprobe and the three protected fragments.

Selective activity of the MAP1B promoter in neuron-derived cell lines

To better understand the function of the MAP1B promoter, we used a transient transfection system with CAT as a reporter gene. Different fragments of the MAP1B promoter region were ligated to a promoterless vector pCAT/basic (Promega) in front of the reporter gene. For some promoter fragments, both orientations were tested (Fig.7). As a positive control, pSVCAT (pCAT/control, Promega) containing the SV40 promoter and enhancer sequences was used. Two neuron-derived cell lines (PC12, NB2A), which express MAP1B, and two non-neuronal cell lines (L6 and 3T3), which do not express MAP1B (Fig. 6), were used for transfection experiments. Table2 shows CAT activities in different cell lines transiently transfected with various CAT constructs. All constructs derived from 5′ deletions had strong promoter activity in the neuron-derived cell lines but very weak, if any, promoter activity in the non-neuronal cells. The shortest construct tested, p(−72/+55)CAT, still retained a promoter activity comparable to that of the longest promoter construct p(−1610/+60)CAT. Surprisingly, the short construct also conferred significant neuron specificity.

Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.

Rat MAP1B-CAT chimeric constructs. Diagrams of construct structure are aligned with a map of ∼1.8 kb promoter region of the MAP1B gene and the first exon. Two TATA boxes, the translation start codon ATG, and a few restriction sites are shown, and the first exon is indicated as a solid, thicker line. The scale is shown below the map. The locations of the 5′ and 3′ end of each construct are indicated relative to the second transcription initiation site (+1). Each promoter construct is constructed in front of the reporter gene CAT in the orientation indicated by anarrowhead as shown for p(−1720/+60)CAT.

View this table:
Table 2.

CAT activity in transiently transfected cell lines

Two TATA boxes and their adjacent cis-acting elements function independently in conferring neuron-selective expression of the reporter gene

Sequence analysis of the rat MAP1B promoter region indicated the presence of two TATA boxes that were 134 nt apart from each other. Furthermore, S1 nuclease and RNase protection assays identified one upstream and two downstream transcription initiation sites that were located within a consensus distance from the TATA sequences (Fig. 5 and 6), suggesting that both TATA boxes could function in vivoin regulating the initiation of MAP1B gene transcription by RNA polymerase II. To test this hypothesis, several MAP1B promoter-CAT fusion constructs were prepared by deleting one or both TATA boxes. For some constructs, the promoter sequence was subcloned in both orientations relative to the reporter gene. Transient transfections were performed with these constructs, and the results of the CAT activity experiments are shown in Table 2. For example the p(−283/+55)CAT construct that contained both TATA boxes showed high promoter activity and neuronal specificity (Table 2). When both TATA boxes were removed by deletion of this fragment, most of the promoter activity was lost, as shown with p(−1610/−284)CAT and p(−549/−284)CAT. When only the upstream TATA box was deleted, most of the promoter activity and the neuronal specificity remained, as shown with p(−116/+60)CAT and p(−72/+55)CAT. Similar results were obtained when the second TATA box was deleted, as shown with p(−549/−68)CAT and p(−283/−68)CAT. Furthermore, the promoter activity was orientation-dependent for both TATA boxes, because most of the promoter activity was lost when the promoter sequences were positioned in the reverse orientation in front of the reporter gene, as shown with p(+55/−72)CAT and p(−68/−283)CAT. These results demonstrated that each TATA box and its associated cis-elements were able to function independently in regulating the expression of the reporter gene in a transient transfection assay.

MAP1B promoter initiates transcription of the reporter gene from the same MAP1B transcription initiation sites used in vivo

To obtain further evidence that the two TATA boxes in the MAP1B promoter region and their adjacent cis-elements functioned as independent promoters, RNase protection assays were performed using the same probe shown in Figure 6B, with RNA isolated from NB2A cells transfected with various MAP1B promoter-CAT constructs. This mouse neuronal cell line was chosen because its endogenous MAP1B transcripts only partially protected the riboprobe (Fig. 6A) and therefore could be distinguished from those transcripts of the reporter gene.

Four MAP1B promoter-CAT constructs were used to transfect NB2A cells (Fig. 7). Plasmids p(−1610/+60)CAT and p(−283/+55)CAT contained both TATA boxes, but the 3′ends of these two constructs differ from each other by 5 bp. Plasmids p(−72/+55)CAT and p(−283/−68)CAT contained only the downstream or upstream TATA box, respectively. Total RNA was isolated from NB2A cells 24 hr after transfection. RNAs isolated from NB2A cells transfected with p0CAT and untransfected NB2A cells were included as controls. The RNase protection assay results are shown in Figure 8. As expected, two major short fragments of 54 and 52 nt were observed in untransfected NB2A cells and in NB2A cells transfected with p0CAT (lanes 1 and 2, Fig. 8), representing endogenous mouse MAP1B transcripts. In NB2A cells transfected with p(−1610/+60)CAT, three additional protected fragments of 183, 60, and 57 nt in size were observed (lane 3, Fig. 8). Transfection with p(−283/+55)CAT resulted in three protected fragments of 178, 55, and 52 nt, owing to the fact that this plasmid was 5 bp shorter at its 3′ end than p(−1610/+60)CAT (lane 4, Fig. 8). In contrast, NB2A cells transfected with p(−72/+55)CAT showed only the two shorter protected fragments (lane 5, Fig. 8A). The 52 nt protected band overlapped with the endogenous band in lanes 4 and 5 and was therefore more intense than the 54 nt protected fragment. In NB2A cells transfected with p(−283/−68), a construct containing only the upstream TATA box, a protected fragment of 55 nt was observed in addition to the endogenous transcripts (lane 6, Fig. 8). In lanes 3, 4, 5, and 6, the top bands of 443, 338, 127, and 215 nt, respectively, correspond to the riboprobe protected by trace amounts of contaminated plasmid DNA used for transfection in RNA samples. For example, the p(−1610/+60)CAT plasmid protected the riboprobe, which spanned residue −383 to +100, generating a fragment of 443 nt from nt −383 to +60, as observed in lane 3 (top band). Some extra minor bands could be background from endogenous transcripts, as seen in lane 1. These results demonstrated that each TATA box and its associated cis-elements was able to direct initiation of the reporter gene transcription independently from the same transcription initiation site(s) as those used by MAP1B gene in vivo.

Fig. 8.
Fig. 8.

Determination of transcription initiation sites of the reporter gene directed by different MAP1B promoter fragments. RNase protection assay was performed as described in Materials and Methods and in Figure 6 using the same riboprobe, 20 μg of total RNA from untransfected NB2A cells (lane 1) and NB2A cells transfected with p0CAT (lane 2), p(−1610/+60)CAT (lane 3), p(−283/+55)CAT (lane 4), p(−72/+55)CAT (lane 5), and p(−283/−68)CAT (lane 6). The size of the riboprobe protected by endogenous MAP1B transcripts as well as new transcripts encoded by transfected DNA were determined by comparing with the adjacent sequencing ladder (A, G, C, T). Arrowheadsindicate protected fragments in different lanes. The size of molecular weight markers (nt) is indicated to the left. M, Molecular weight marker.

DISCUSSION

We have described the isolation of clones containing up to 11 kb of the upstream sequence of the rat MAP1B gene. Approximately 1.8 kb of the 5′ flanking region from the MAP1B gene was sequenced and analyzed. This region is GC rich and contains several consensus elements common to promoters transcribed by RNA polymerase II. These motifs include two TATA boxes separated from each other by 134 bp. A short fragment of 127 bp of the promoter DNA containing the downstream TATA box is sufficient to direct neuron-specific transcription. Another unusual feature of this promoter is that two distinct groups of transcription initiation sites have been identified by S1 and RNase protection assays. Furthermore, each TATA box and its adjacent sequences can function independently in regulating the transcription of a reporter gene from the same sites used in vivo. These two alternative promoters are used differentially in distinct regions of the nervous system and during different stages of development.

Neuron specificity of the MAP1B promoter

Two major mechanisms for conferring neuron specificity have been observed through functional studies of neuron-specific promoters. The first mechanism includes a “silencer” protein that imposes neuron-selective expression on a relatively nonspecific core promoter, as exemplified by the recent identification of the neuron-restrictive silencer factor NRSF (Schoenherr and Anderson, 1995). This NRSF is expressed in non-neuronal cells and binds to the neuron-restrictive silencer element (NRSE) present within the promoter regions of at least 18 neuronal genes. Functional NRSEs have been identified in four of these neuronal genes: SCG10 (Mori et al., 1992), Na II channel (Kraner et al., 1992), synapsin I (Li et al., 1993), and neuronal Na+, K+-ATPase subunit (Pathak et al., 1994). The second mechanism is that a relatively short region (a few hundred base pairs) of the promoter contains the regulatory elements sufficient to confer neuron specificity. This has been reported for the GAP-43 gene, in which a small, 386 bp fragment containing the core GAP-43 promoter exhibits considerable tissue specificity (Nedivi et al., 1992). Similarly, our results indicate that a 127 bp fragment of the MAP1B promoter can confer neuron-specific expression, and this regulation can be accomplished by a relatively short positive element. It is clear, however, that because of the complexity of the nervous system, the expression of specific genes in different regions and in different types of neurons has to be modulated by the complex interactions of many regulatory elements to ensure neuron-specific expression. It has been proposed that the regulation of neuron-specific expression of a particular gene is related to the evolutionary origin of its tissue-specificity requirements (Nedivi et al., 1992). Thus, the “silencer” mode may have evolved in genes belonging to a multigene family, such as the SCG10, Na II channel, synapsin I, and Na+, K+-ATPase subunit genes that presumably evolved through duplication of an ancestral common gene, which had developed neuronal specificity at later stages by the addition of an upstream silencer to its promoter. In contrast, the mode of neuron specificity characterized by a short region of the individual gene promoter may apply to single genes such as GAP-43 (LaBate and Skene, 1989) and MAP1B (Lewis et al., 1986).

Significance of alternative promoters in regulating MAP1B gene expression during development

The synthesis of distinct mRNAs from a single gene by the alternative usage of promoters was first described in bacteriophage l by Reichardt and Kaiser (1971). A few examples have also been found in eukaryotes, including the α-amylase-1A gene of the mouse (Hagenbuchle et al., 1981; Young et al., 1981; Schibler et al., 1983), the Discoidin-Ia gene of Dictyostelium(Jellinghaus et al., 1982), the alcohol dehydrogenase gene ofDrosophila melanogaster (Benyajati et al., 1983), the rat T-kininogen gene (Sierra et al., 1989), the rat growth hormone-releasing hormone gene (Gonzalez-Crespo and Boronat, 1991), the human aminopeptidase N gene (Shapiro et al., 1991), and the rat brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene (Timmusk et al., 1993). It has been proposed that alternative promoters are commonly used to regulate the expression of a gene at different stages of development or in different cell types (Schibler and Sierra, 1987). The following observations support the notion that two alternative promoters regulate the transcription of MAP1B gene in vivo. (1) Two TATA sequences separated by 134 bp are present in the promoter region and located within the expected distance from two distinct groups of transcription initiation sites; (2) in vivo, these two groups of transcription initiation sites are used differentially in different regions of the nervous system during development; (3)in vitro, each TATA sequence and its adjacent promoter region can independently regulate the expression of a reporter gene in a neuron-specific manner, as determined by transient transfection assay; and (4) the DNA fragments from the MAP1B promoter region regulate the initiation of CAT gene transcription from the same sites used in vivo.

These observations emphasize the importance of the selective usage of alternative promoters in different developmental stages and in various regions of the nervous system. In the case of the MAP1B gene, this mechanism may relate to tissue-specific requirements for regulatory factors. One way differentiated cells could regulate the level of the MAP1B gene expression is by selecting the site, and therefore the rate, at which transcription and/or translation are initiated. It is also possible that the 5′ nontranslated sequences may influence mRNA stability or may be involved in differential processing. We therefore propose that two alternative and overlapping promoters located adjacently regulate MAP1B gene expression during development. The upstream promoter is inducible during development, whereas the downstream promoter is constitutive and allows low levels of MAP1B gene expression in the adult nervous system.

Footnotes

  • This study was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants NS24707, NS24725, and HD07467. We thank Dr. Felipe Sierra for helpful suggestions and Dr. Raul Saavedra for critical reading of this manuscript.

    Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Itzhak Fischer, Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Medical College of Pennsylvania and Hahnemann University, 3200 Henry Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19129.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Benyajati C,
    2. Spoerel N,
    3. Haymerle H,
    4. Ashburner M
    (1983) The messenger RNA for alcohol dehydrogenase in Drosophila melanogaster differs in its 5′ end in different developmental stages. Cell 33:125–133.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Black MM,
    2. Slaughter T,
    3. Fischer I
    (1994) Microtubule-associated protein 1b (MAP1B) is concentrated in the distal region of growing axons. J Neurosci 14:857–870.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Bloom GS,
    2. Schoenfeld TA,
    3. Vallee RB
    (1984) Widespread distribution of the major polypeptide component of MAP1 (microtubule-associated protein 1) in the nervous system. J Cell Biol 98:320–330.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Bloom GS,
    2. Luca FC,
    3. Vallee RB
    (1985) Microtubule associated protein 1B: identification of a major component of the neuronal cytoskeleton. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:5404–5408.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Boyne L,
    2. Martin K,
    3. Hockfield S,
    4. Fischer I
    (1994) Expression and distribution of phosphorylated MAP1B in growing axons of cultured hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci Res 40:439–450.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Breathnach R,
    2. Chambon P
    (1981) Organization and expression of eucaryotic split genes coding for proteins. Annu Rev Biochem 50:349–383.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Brugg B,
    2. Matus A
    (1988) PC12 cells express juvenile microtubule-associated proteins during nerve growth factor-induced neurite outgrowth. J Cell Biol 107:643–650.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Brugg B,
    2. Reddy D,
    3. Matus A
    (1993) Attenuation of microtubule-associated protein 1b expression by antisense oligodeoxynucleotides inhibits initiation of neurite outgrowth. Neuroscience 52:489–496.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Bucher P,
    2. Trifonov EN
    (1986) Compilation and analysis of eukaryotic POL II promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 14:10009–10026.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Chamberlin M,
    2. Ryan T
    (1982) Bacteriophage DNA-dependent RNA polymerase. in The enzymes, ed Boyer P (Academic, New York), XV:87–108.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Chomczynski P,
    2. Sacchi N
    (1987) Single step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162:156–159.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Fawcett JW,
    2. Mathews G,
    3. Housden E,
    4. Goedert M,
    5. Matus A
    (1994) Regenerating sciatic nerve axons contain the adult rather than the embryonic pattern of microtubule-associated proteins. Neuroscience 61:789–804.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Fors L,
    2. Saavedra RA,
    3. Hood L
    (1990) Cloning of the shark P0 promoter using a genomic walking technique based on the polymerase chain reaction. Nucleic Acids Res 18:2793–2799.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Glisin V,
    2. Crkvenjakov R,
    3. Byus C
    (1973) Ribonucleic acid isolated by cesium chloride centrifugation. Biochemistry 13:2633–2677.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Gonzalez-Crespo S,
    2. Boronat A
    (1991) Expression of the rat growth hormone-releasing hormone gene in placenta is directed by an alternative promoter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:8749–8753.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Greene LA,
    2. Tischler AS
    (1976) Establishment of a noradrenergic clonal line of rat adrenal pheochromocytoma cells which respond to nerve growth factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 73:2424–2428.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Hagenbuchle O,
    2. Tosi M,
    3. Schibler U,
    4. Bovey R,
    5. Wellauer PK,
    6. Young RA
    (1981) Mouse liver and salivary gland alpha-amylase mRNAs differ only in 5′ non-translated sequences. Nature 289:643–646.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Jellinghaus U,
    2. Schatzle U,
    3. Schmid W,
    4. Roewekamp W
    (1982) Transcription of a Dictyostelium Discoidin-I gene in yeast: alternative promoter sites used in two different eukaryotic cells. J Mol Biol 159:623–636.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Johnson AC,
    2. Jinno Y,
    3. Merlino GT
    (1988) Modulation of epidermal growth factor receptor proto-oncogene transcription by a promoter site sensitive to S1 nuclease. Mol Cell Biol 8:4174–4184.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Kraner SD,
    2. Chong JA,
    3. Tsay H-J,
    4. Mandel G
    (1992) Silencing the type II sodium channel gene: a model for neural-specific gene regulation. Neuron 9:37–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. LaBate ME,
    2. Skene JHP
    (1989) Selective conservation of GAP-43 structure in vertebrate evolution. Neuron 3:299–310.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Lewis SS,
    2. Cowan NJ
    (1986) Anomalous placement of introns in a member of the intermediate filament multigene family: an evolutionary conundrum. Mol Cell Biol 6:1529–1534.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Lewis SA,
    2. Sherline P,
    3. Cowan N
    (1986) A cloned cDNA encoding MAP1 detects a single copy gene in mouse, and a brain abundant RNA whose level decreases during development. J Cell Biol 102:2106–2114.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Li L,
    2. Suzuki T,
    3. Mori N,
    4. Greengard P
    (1993) Identification of a functional silencer element involved in neuron-specific expression of the synapsin I gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:1460–1464.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Lien LL,
    2. Feener CA,
    3. Fischbach N,
    4. Kunkel LM
    (1994) Cloning of human microtubule-associated protein 1B and the identification of a related gene on chromosome 15. Genomics 22:273–280.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Liu D,
    2. Fischer I
    (1996) Isolation and sequencing of the 5′ end of rat microtubule-associated protein (MAP1B)-encoding cDNA. Gene 171:307–308.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Mansfield SG,
    2. Diaz-Nido J,
    3. Gordon-Weeks PR,
    4. Avila J
    (1992) The distribution and phosphorylation of the microtubule-associated protein MAP1B in growth cones. J Neurocytol 21:1007–1022.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Maue RA,
    2. Kraner SD,
    3. Goodman RH,
    4. Mandel G
    (1990) Neuron-specific expression of the rat brain type II sodium channel gene is directed by upstream regulatory elements. Neuron 4:223–231.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Mori N,
    2. Schoenherr C,
    3. Vandenbergh DJ,
    4. Anderson DJ
    (1992) A common silencer element in the SCG10 and type II Na+ channel genes binds a factor present in non-neuronal cells but not in neuronal cells. Neuron 9:45–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Nedivi E,
    2. Basi GS,
    3. Akey IV,
    4. Skene JHP
    (1992) A neural-specific GAP-43 core promoter located between unusual DNA elements that interact to regulate its activity. J Neurosci 12:691–704.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Noble M,
    2. Lewis SA,
    3. Cowan NJ
    (1989) The microtubule binding domain of microtubule-associated protein MAP1B contains a repeated sequence motif unrelated to that of MAP2 and tau. J Cell Biol 109:3367–3376.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Nothias F,
    2. Boyne L,
    3. Murray M,
    4. Tessler A,
    5. Fischer I
    (1995) The expression and distribution of tau proteins and mRNA in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons during development and regeneration. Neuroscience 66:707–719.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Pathak BG,
    2. Neumann JC,
    3. Croyle ML,
    4. Lingrel JB
    (1994) The presence of both negative and positive elements in the 5′-flanking sequence of the rat Na+, K+-ATPase alpha 3 subunit gene are required for brain expression in transgenic mice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4748–4755.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Perrone-Bizzozero NI,
    2. Neve RL,
    3. Irwin N,
    4. Lewis S,
    5. Fischer I,
    6. Benowitz LI
    (1991) Post-transcriptional regulation of GAP-43 mRNA levels during neuronal differentiation and nerve regeneration. Mol Cell Neurosci 2:402–409.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Reichardt L,
    2. Kaiser AD
    (1971) Control of l repressor synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 68:2185–2189.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Rienitz A,
    2. Grenningloh G,
    3. Hermans-Borgmeyer I,
    4. Kirsch J,
    5. Littauer UZ,
    6. Prior P,
    7. Gundelfinger ED,
    8. Schmitt B,
    9. Betz H
    (1989) Neuraxin, a novel putative structural protein of the rat central nervous system that is immunologically related to microtubule-associated protein 5. EMBO J 8:2879–2888.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Safaei R,
    2. Fischer I
    (1989) Cloning of a cDNA encoding MAP1B in rat brain: regulation of mRNA levels during development. J Neurochem 52:1871–1879.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Sambrook J,
    2. Fritsch EF,
    3. Maniatis T
    (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY).
  39. ↵
    1. Sanger F,
    2. Nicklen S,
    3. Coulson AR
    (1977) RNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:5463–5467.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Sato-Yoshitake R,
    2. Shiomura Y,
    3. Miyasaka H,
    4. Hirokawa N
    (1989) Microtubule-associated protein 1B: molecular structure, localization, and phosphorylation-dependent expression in developing neurons. Neuron 3:229–238.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Schibler U,
    2. Sierra F
    (1987) Alternative promoters in developmental gene expression. Annu Rev Genet 21:237–257.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Schibler U,
    2. Hagenbuchle O,
    3. Wellauer PK,
    4. Pittet AC
    (1983) Two promoters of different strengths control the transcription of the mouse alpha-amylase gene Amy-1a in the parotid gland and the liver. Cell 33:501–508.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Schoenfeld TA,
    2. McKerracher L,
    3. Obar RA,
    4. Vallee RB
    (1989) MAP1A and MAP1B are structurally related microtubule-associated proteins with distinct developmental patterns in the CNS. J Neurosci 9:1712–1730.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Schoenherr CJ,
    2. Anderson DJ
    (1995) The neuron-restrictive silencer factor (NRSF): a coordinate repressor of multiple neuron-specific genes. Science 267:1360–1363.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Seed B,
    2. Sheen J-Y
    (1988) A simple phase-extraction assay for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase activity. Gene 67:271–277.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Shapiro LH,
    2. Ashmun RA,
    3. Roberts WM,
    4. Look AT
    (1991) Separate promoters control transcription of the human aminopeptidase N gene in myeloid and intestinal epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 266:11999–20007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Sierra F,
    2. Fey GH,
    3. Guigoz Y
    (1989) T-kininogen gene expression is induced during aging. Mol Cell Biol 9:5610–5616.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. Smale ST,
    2. Schmidt MC,
    3. Berk AJ,
    4. Baltimore D
    (1990) Transcriptional activation by Sp1 as directed through TATA or initiator: specific requirement for mammalian transcription factor IID. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:4509–4513.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Thompson MA,
    2. Ziff EB
    (1989) Structure of the gene encoding peripherin, an NGF-regulated neuronal-specific type III intermediate filament protein. Neuron 2:1043–1053.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Timmusk T,
    2. Palm K,
    3. Metsis M,
    4. Reintam T,
    5. Paalme V,
    6. Sasrma M,
    7. Persson H
    (1993) Multiple promoters direct tissue-specific expression of the rat BDNF gene. Neuron 10:475–489.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Tucker RP,
    2. Matus AI
    (1988) Microtubule-associated proteins characteristic of embryonic brain are found in the adult mammalian retina. Dev Biol 130:423–434.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Young RA,
    2. Hagenbuchle O,
    3. Schibler U
    (1981) A single mouse α-amylase gene specifies two different tissue-specific mRNAs. Cell 23:451–458.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Zauner W,
    2. Kratz J,
    3. Stauton J,
    4. Feick P,
    5. Wiche G
    (1992) Identification of two distinct microtubule binding domains on recombinant rat MAP1B. Eur J Cell Biol 57:66–74.
    OpenUrlPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

Email
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Respond to this article
Two Alternative Promoters Direct Neuron-Specific Expression of the Rat Microtubule-Associated Protein 1B Gene
Dong Liu, Itzhak Fischer
Journal of Neuroscience 15 August 1996, 16 (16) 5026-5036; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-16-05026.1996
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Keywords

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.