Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles

Resurgent Sodium Current and Action Potential Formation in Dissociated Cerebellar Purkinje Neurons

Indira M. Raman and Bruce P. Bean
Journal of Neuroscience 15 June 1997, 17 (12) 4517-4526; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-12-04517.1997
Indira M. Raman
1Vollum Institute, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon 97201, and Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bruce P. Bean
1Vollum Institute, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon 97201, and Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Transient sodium currents in Purkinje and CA3 neurons. A, Currents evoked from a holding potential of −90 mV by 50 msec steps to potentials between −80 and +50 mV in 10 mV increments are shown for a Purkinje cell (left) and a CA3 cell (right). The break in the trace represents 39 msec. B, Current–voltage relation for the peak currents in A. The points are connected by a spline function for clarity. C, Peak conductance (filled circles) and steady-state inactivation curves (open circles) for the cells shown in A. Conductance curves were fitted (lines) with the Boltzmann function,G = Gmax/(1 + exp[−(V −Vh)/k]), where G is conductance in nanosiemens, Gmax is the maximal conductance, V is the step potential in mV,Vh is the voltage for half-maximal activation in mV, and k is the slope factor in mV. The fitted Gmax, Vh, and k for the Purkinje neuron were 76.4 nS, −32.3 mV, and 5.5 mV, and for the CA3 neuron 66.7 nS, −28.4 mV, and 4.8 mV. The inactivation curves were fitted by the Boltzmann function 1/(1 + exp(V −Vh)/k).Vh and k values were −56.5 and 5.8 mV for the Purkinje cell (left), and −67 and 6.2 mV for the CA3 cell (right).  

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Sodium currents elicited by slow ramps in Purkinje and CA3 neurons. The membrane voltage was ramped from −90 mV to +30 mV at 0.1 mV/msec (A). Currents evoked by this protocol were recorded in a Purkinje neuron (B) and a CA3 neuron (C). In both cases, sodium current was determined by subtracting control current from that in 300 nm TTX (which seemed to leave only leak and capacity current). In both the Purkinje neuron and CA3 neuron, the maximal current during the ramp occurred at −40 mV. The peak transient current at −30 mV in the CA3 cell was 66% of that in the Purkinje cell, hence the scaling of the ordinates.  

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Resurgent sodium current. A, Sodium current was evoked by a 20 msec step from −90 to +30 mV, after which the membrane was repolarized to voltages between −20 and −60 mV.B, TTX-sensitive sodium current elicited by this protocol in a Purkinje neuron. The transient current at +30 mV is offscale (peak of 2 nA). Leak and capacity currents in 300 nm TTX were subtracted. C, TTX-sensitive sodium current elicited by the same protocol in a CA3 neuron. Peak current at +30 mV was 1.3 nA (offscale). Scale bars apply to both sets of traces.  

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Voltage dependence of resurgent sodium current. A, Peak resurgent sodium current (after 20 msec step to +30 mV) versus repolarization potential for the Purkinje cell in Figure 3. At −10 mV, there was no peak current, but the steady-state current of −50 pA is plotted. B, Rise time (time to peak) and decay time constants for the resurgent sodium currents.  

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Resurgent sodium current after brief steps to +30 mV. Resurgent current at −30 mV is shown after steps to +30 mV of 1, 2, and 5 msec. After the briefest steps to +30 mV, tail currents (arrows) are followed by the resurgent current. The peak current at +30 mV (offscale) is −3100 pA.  

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Single sodium channels in Purkinje neurons.A, Two sets of eight consecutive traces recorded from a one-channel patch are shown. Fourteen hundred such sweeps were recorded from this patch. B, Latency histograms of bursts during the first and second epochs at −30 mV.  

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Recovery from inactivation at −40 mV in Purkinje and CA3 neurons. A, Responses to the voltage protocol shown for a Purkinje cell (top traces) and CA3 cell (bottom traces). The initial conditioning step from −90 to 0 mV was 25 msec. Intervals at −40 mV were 1–14.5 msec in 1.5 msec increments. B, Amplitudes of recovery currents were normalized to the peak current in response to the conditioning step, and the percentage of recovery is plotted against interval. Data were fitted with a single exponential function, Embedded Imagewhere %max is the maximal recovery, tis the interval (msec), τ is the time constant of recovery, and %max + A is the noninactivated percentage of current (0.77% for this cell).  

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Spontaneous firing and conglomerate action potentials in acutely isolated Purkinje cells. A, Spontaneous action potentials recorded in an isolated Purkinje cell.B, Voltage responses of a different Purkinje cell in response to a 1 msec current injection of 1.2 and 1.4 nA. The smaller injection produced the subthreshold response. A steady injection of −40 pA brought the resting potential to −85 mV and stopped the spontaneous firing. Note different time scale fromA.  

  • Fig. 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 9.

    Sodium currents evoked by conglomerate action potential waveforms in Purkinje and CA3 neurons.A, The top panel illustrates the command potential (Vcmd) applied to a voltage-clamped Purkinje cell. The command waveform was obtained from a conglomerate action potential. Thin horizontal linesindicate 0, −45, and −75 mV, on Vcmd as labeled. The middle panel (heavy line) shows the Na+ current (in 50 mmNa+) evoked in this cell by the voltage protocol. Thebottom panel shows the total current flux in physiological solution (140 Na+ plus K+ and Ca2+; see Materials and Methods) calculated from the product of −dV/dt of the spike waveform and the cell capacitance Cm of the cell in which the conglomerate action potential was recorded. The total current is plotted on the same scale as theINa+ to facilitate comparison. The peakItotal is −3525 pA and is offscale in the figure. Dashed lines at 0 pA are included on all the current traces. Vertical dotted lines indicate the relative amplitudes of INa+ andItotal at the onset of the second and third action potentials. B, Same voltage protocol asA applied to a CA3 cell.  

  • Fig. 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 10.

    Inactivation and recovery of Na+current during the conglomerate action potential. A, Responses of a Purkinje cell evoked by the voltage protocol shown. After increasing durations of the action potential waveform, test current was elicited at 0 mV (after a 0.5-msec step to −100 mV). Durations of the action potential waveform (and voltages reached) were 2.85 msec (10 mV), 3.2 msec (−10 mV, bold traces), 3.65 msec (−30 mV), 4.95 msec (−46 mV), 6.35 msec (−43 mV), and 7.35 msec (−39 mV). The inset to A plots the percentage of recovery on the same time base as the traces, for the Purkinje cell shown (filled symbols), and for a representative CA3 cell (open symbols). Percentage of recovery was calculated as the peak test current at 0 mV normalized to the maximal current evoked by a step to 0 directly from the −75 mV holding potential. The amount of recovery that occurs during a half msec at −100 mV, ∼7%, is reflected by the dotted line (see traces in B).B, The response of the Purkinje cell in Ato the step protocol shown.  

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 17 (12)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 17, Issue 12
15 Jun 1997
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Resurgent Sodium Current and Action Potential Formation in Dissociated Cerebellar Purkinje Neurons
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Resurgent Sodium Current and Action Potential Formation in Dissociated Cerebellar Purkinje Neurons
Indira M. Raman, Bruce P. Bean
Journal of Neuroscience 15 June 1997, 17 (12) 4517-4526; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-12-04517.1997

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Resurgent Sodium Current and Action Potential Formation in Dissociated Cerebellar Purkinje Neurons
Indira M. Raman, Bruce P. Bean
Journal of Neuroscience 15 June 1997, 17 (12) 4517-4526; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-12-04517.1997
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • sodium channel
  • Purkinje neuron
  • complex spike
  • afterdepolarization
  • tetrodotoxin
  • pacemaking
  • single channel
  • action potential
  • cerebellum

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.