Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles

Functional Specificity of Long-Range Intrinsic and Interhemispheric Connections in the Visual Cortex of Strabismic Cats

Kerstin E. Schmidt, Dae-Shik Kim, Wolf Singer, Tobias Bonhoeffer and Siegrid Löwel
Journal of Neuroscience 15 July 1997, 17 (14) 5480-5492; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-14-05480.1997
Kerstin E. Schmidt
1Max-Planck-Institut für Hirnforschung, Abteilung Neurophysiologie, D-60528 Frankfurt AM, Germany,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dae-Shik Kim
2Laboratory for Neural Modeling, Frontier Research Program, The Institute for Physical and Chemical Research, Wako, Saitama 351-01, Japan, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolf Singer
1Max-Planck-Institut für Hirnforschung, Abteilung Neurophysiologie, D-60528 Frankfurt AM, Germany,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tobias Bonhoeffer
3Max-Planck-Institut für Psychiatrie, D-82152 München-Martinsried, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Siegrid Löwel
1Max-Planck-Institut für Hirnforschung, Abteilung Neurophysiologie, D-60528 Frankfurt AM, Germany,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The development of both long-range intracortical and interhemispheric connections depends on visual experience. Previous experiments showed that in strabismic but not in normal cats, clustered horizontal axon projections preferentially connect cell groups activated by the same eye. This indicates that there is selective stabilization of fibers between neurons exhibiting correlated activity. Extending these experiments, we investigated in strabismic cats: (1) whether tangential connections remain confined to columns of similar orientation preference within the subsystems of left and right eye domains; and (2) whether callosal connections also extend predominantly between neurons activated by the same eye and preferring similar orientations. To this end, we analyzed in strabismic cats the topographic relationships between orientation preference domains and both intrinsic and callosal connections of area 17. Red and green latex microspheres were injected into monocular iso-orientation domains identified by optical imaging of intrinsic signals. Additionally, domains sharing the ocular dominance and orientation preference of the neurons at the injection sites were visualized by 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) autoradiography. Quantitative analysis revealed that 56% of the retrogradely labeled cells within the injected area 17 and 60% of the transcallosally labeled neurons were located in the 2-DG-labeled iso-orientation domains. This indicates: (1) that strabismus does not interfere with the tendency of long-range horizontal fibers to link predominantly neurons of similar orientation preference; and (2) that the selection mechanisms for the stabilization of callosal connections are similar to those that are responsible for the specification of the tangential intrinsic connections.

  • long-range intracortical connections
  • callosal connections
  • experience-dependent development
  • optical imaging
  • area 17
  • strabismus

Long-range tangential axon collaterals are a prominent feature of cortical circuitry (Fisken et al., 1975). In the mammalian visual cortex, they interconnect regularly spaced clusters of cells [tree shrew (Rockland and Lund, 1982), squirrel and macaque monkey (Rockland and Lund, 1983; Livingstone and Hubel, 1984), cat (Gilbert and Wiesel, 1983; Kisvárday and Eysel, 1992), and ferret (Rockland, 1985)], which share preferences for similar orientations or colors (Ts’o et al., 1986, 1988; Gilbert and Wiesel, 1989; Gray et al., 1989; Hata et al., 1991; Malach et al., 1993, 1994). It has been proposed that these connections: (1) contribute to the generation of large composite receptive fields (Singer and Tretter, 1976; Gilbert and Wiesel, 1985; Bolz and Gilbert, 1990, Schwarz and Bolz, 1991), (2) mediate inhibitory and subthreshold excitatory effects from beyond the classical receptive field (Blakemore and Tobin, 1972; Nelson and Frost, 1978; Morrone et al., 1982; Allman et al., 1985), (3) contribute to orientation and direction tuning (Eysel et al., 1987, 1990), (4) are responsible for adaptive changes of cortical maps after deafferentiation (Kaas et al., 1990; Heinen and Skavenski, 1991;Gilbert and Wiesel, 1992; Darian-Smith and Gilbert, 1994), and (5) synchronize the responses of spatially distributed neurons as a function of stimulus coherence (Gray et al., 1989; König et al., 1993; Singer, 1993).

In kitten visual cortex, tangential fibers develop mainly after birth and attain their adult specificity within the first 6–8 weeks (Luhmann et al., 1986; Price 1986; Callaway and Katz, 1990; Galuske and Singer, 1996). The refinement of the architecture of these connections depends on visual experience (Callaway and Katz, 1991; Luhmann et al., 1991) whereby extension and elimination of collaterals overlap in time (Callaway and Katz, 1991; Galuske and Singer, 1996). Direct evidence for the hypothesis that connections are stabilized selectively between cells exhibiting correlated activity was obtained in strabismic cats. In these animals, the segregation of geniculocortical afferents in layer IV is accentuated (Shatz et al., 1977; Löwel, 1994), and most neurons become monocular, responding exclusively either to the left or right eye (Hubel and Wiesel, 1965). In addition, tangential intracortical fibers come to preferentially connect cell groups activated by the same eye (Löwel and Singer, 1992).

Callosal connections share a number of features with the intracortical horizontal connections. They originate from and terminate on similar classes of cells in supragranular and infragranular layers, are reciprocal, and exhibit topological specificity (for review, seeInnocenti, 1986). Neurons located close to the representation of the vertical meridian have receptive fields that cross the midline of the visual field, and the responses to stimuli in the ipsilateral hemifield are conveyed by callosal input. The ipsilateral and contralateral moieties of the crossing receptive fields have the same orientation and direction preference (Berlucchi and Rizzolatti, 1968; Lepore and Guillemot, 1982; Blakemore et al., 1983), suggesting that the orientation preference of the callosal afferents is matched with that of their respective target cells. Callosally projecting neurons in sensory, motor, and association areas of many species exhibit a columnar distribution (for review, see Innocenti, 1986), and the axon arbors of callosal neurons are patchy (Houzel et al., 1994), suggesting a relation with functional columns. As the horizontal intracortical fibers, visual callosal connections also can be modified by manipulating early visual experience. In the cat, callosal axons are initially imprecise and exuberant and attain their adult specificity by elimination of ectopic axon terminals (Innocenti and Caminiti, 1980). This process seems to be influenced by activity, because early onset strabismus, monocular deprivation, and short periods of binocular deprivation lead to preservation of ectopic connections (Lund et al., 1978; Innocenti and Frost, 1979; Cynader et al., 1981; Berman and Payne, 1983; Elberger et al., 1983). Thus, both tangential intrinsic fibers and callosal connections exhibit a high degree of selectivity in the adult, and both projections are susceptible to experience-dependent modifications. Because it is established that the former get selected by activity according to a correlation rule, we wondered whether the same is true also for callosal connections. If so, the prediction is that in strabismic animals, callosal connections should become confined to link territories of same eye dominance selectively. Moreover, their selectivity with respect to the orientation preference of interconnected cortical domains should be affected by squint in the same way, if at all, as that of the intrinsic tangential connections. To test these predictions we first examined whether divergent strabismus had any effect on the tendency of the intrinsic connections to link domains with similar orientation preference selectively. In addition, we studied in the same strabismic cats the selectivity of callosal connections with respect to the ocular dominance and orientation preference of the interconnected domains.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study eight cats from the colony of our institute were used. Six of them (cats C1–C6) were raised with surgically induced divergent strabismus, and two of them (cats CN and CC) had normal visual experience.

Induction of squint. In the cats C1–C6 divergent strabismus was induced surgically at the age of 17–18 d by severing the tendon of the medial rectus muscle of the left eye. Two of these animals were from the same litter (C4 and C5). For surgery, kittens were anesthetized with an intramuscular injection of ketamine hydrochloride (10 mg/kg; Ketanest, Parke-Davis) and xylazine hydrochloride (2.5 mg/kg; Rompun, Bayer).

We used the corneal reflex method (Sherman, 1972; Olson and Freeman, 1978; von Grünau, 1979) to check the effectiveness of squint induction. The kittens were restrained manually, and flashlight snapshots were taken weekly until the kittens were 2 months old. The distances between the corneal reflexes and the pupils were measured on the photo prints, and the ratio of the reflex distance over the pupillary distance was used as an indicator of eye alignment (Sherman, 1972; von Grünau, 1979; Sireteanu et al., 1993). The ratios measured in our animals were in the strabismic range throughout the critical period (<0.93 according to Sireteanu et al., 1993): C1, 0.88 ± 0.03 (mean ± SD); C2, 0.88 ± 0.02; C3, 0.89 ± 0.02; C4, 0.88 ± 0.02; C5, 0.91 ± 0.02; and C6, 0.90 ± 0.03. Thus, all our squinting cats exhibited manifest exotropia.

Optical imaging. Optical imaging was performed in all cats except cat CC to guide tracer injections. In cat CC the tracers were injected blind, and the ocular dominance was determined later by inspection of the cortical 2-DG autoradiographs and tracer uptake in the lateral geniculate nucleus.

At the age of 2–3 months, the functional architecture of area 17 was visualized using optical imaging of intrinsic signals (Grinvald et al., 1986) as described in detail by Bonhoeffer and Grinvald (1993). Anesthesia was induced as described above (ketamine and xylazine) and, after tracheal intubation and cannulation of a humeral vein, was maintained by ventilating the cat with a mixture of 70% N2O and 30% O2 supplemented by 0.4–1% halothane (Hoechst Pharmaceuticals, Frankfurt, Germany). Images were taken from the right cortex of cats C1, C2, C3, C5, and CN and the left cortex of cats C4 and C6. Visual stimuli were generated with a monitor (25 × 33 cm) positioned at a distance of 25 cm in front of the animals, covering about 65° of the visual field. The cat’s eyes were refracted accordingly and fitted with corneal contact lenses containing artificial pupils of 3 mm. Stimuli consisted of high-contrast square wave gratings of four different orientations (0, 45, 90, and 135°) with a spatial frequency of 0.5 cycles (cyc)/° and a drift velocity of 4°/sec. Monocular visual stimulation of the cats was achieved with computer-controlled eye shutters.

Tracer injection. At the end of the optical recording session, rhodamine- and fluorescein-conjugated latex microspheres (“red and green beads,” Luma Fluor) (Katz et al., 1984; Katz and Iarovici 1990) were pressure-injected into the center of orientation domains located within territories dominated by either the right or the left eye. Two injections were made in each experiment, one with green beads and the other with red beads, both being aimed into columns of the same eye and same orientation preference to obtain two samples of one condition per animal (Fig. 1). In cat CN, which was raised normally, injections were made in binocular domains of the right hemisphere with orientation specificities orthogonal (green beads, 90°; red beads, 0°) to each other. Using the vascular pattern as a reference, all injections were placed into cortical regions with unambiguous orientation and eye preference as inferred from the respective optical activity maps. Cat CC received two blind injections in left area 17 at Horsley–Clarke (1908) coordinates posterior 3 and lateral 4. A glass micropipette (tip diameter, 25 μm) filled with beads was attached to a micromanipulator and lowered 600–1000 μm into the cortex perpendicular to the cortical laminae, and about 0.25 μl of the microsphere suspension was pressure-injected. Injection sites were restricted to the gray matter and confined to area 17 as confirmed by the distribution of retrogradely labeled cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus (see Fig. 3). The size of the injection sites ranged from 150 to 400 μm in diameter (Table 1) as measured in representative cortical sections.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Monocular orientation preference domains in left area 17 of a strabismic cat (C2), visualized by optical imaging of neuronal activity. The animal was stimulated monocularly with oriented bars of 0° (horizontal), 45 and 90° (vertical), and 135° (4°/sec, 0.5 cyc/°). A, Blood vessel pattern.B–D, Activation patterns evoked with horizontal contours from the right (B) and left (C) eyes and with vertical contours from the right eye (D). Injection sites of red and green beads are indicated by dark (red injection) andlight (green injection) arrowheads(A) or dark and light dots, respectively (B–D). Injections were targeted to horizontal orientation columns activated through the right eye shown in B. Note that the injection sites were localized in “nonactive” regions in the 0° left eye (C) and the 90° right eye (D) stimulus conditions. Cortical coordinates:P, posterior; L, lateral;A, anterior; M, medial. Scale bar, 1 mm.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Topographic relations between intrinsic horizontal connections and monocular orientation domains in area 17 of cat C2.A, Enlarged detail of the 2-DG autoradiograph of Figure2A showing the region within the black frame (Fig. 2A) that contained the injections and the labeled neurons. B, Patchy distribution of retrogradely labeled cells within the same region. Neurons labeled with rhodamine (n = 50) and fluorescein beads (n = 303) are represented byred and green dots. Injection sites are marked by triangles. C, Superposition ofA and B with the help of three landmarks (see Fig. 1A). Both injections are localized in dark columns of the same functional preference (0°, right eye).D, Superposition of labeled neurons on the contrast-enhanced autoradiograph. Note that the cells are predominantly localized in the 2-DG-labeled domains (dark areas) and thus in regions having similar eye and orientation preference as the injection sites. Abbreviations are as in Figure 1. Scale bar, 1 mm.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Distribution of retrogradely labeled neurons in laminae A, A1, and C and the medial interlaminar nucleus of the lateral geniculate nucleus

2-Deoxyglucose autoradiography and histological procedures.Four to 5 d after the tracer injections, domains sharing the ocular dominance and orientation specificity of the injection sites were additionally labeled by 2-[14C]deoxyglucose autoradiography. Anesthesia was induced and maintained as described above and supplemented by a muscle relaxant (Flaxedil, gallamine triethiodide, 160 mg in 50 ml of saline, 3 ml · kg−1 · hr−1; Specia) to prevent eye movements. All strabismic animals (cats C1–C6) were stimulated monocularly through the eye that dominated the neurons at the injection site. The respective nonstimulated eye (left eye in cats C1, C2, C3, and C5; right eye in cats C4 and C6) was covered with a black contact lens and an additional black patch. Simultaneously with the onset of the visual stimulation, the cats received an intravenous injection of 2-deoxy-d-[U-14C]glucose (dose, 100 μCi/kg; specific activity, 295 μCi/mmol; Amersham). Visual stimuli were the same as those used for optical imaging, except that only the orientation was presented that was preferred by the neurons at the injection sites. The normal cat CN was stimulated binocularly with horizontal gratings (0°). Because in normally reared animals ocular dominance territories can only be mapped with the 2-DG method if the animals are awake during monocular stimulation (Löwel and Singer, 1992, 1993b), cat CC had a venous catheter implanted under halothane anesthesia (see above for mixture), and the left eye occluded as described above. After full recovery from anesthesia, 2-DG was injected, and the cat was allowed to move around freely for effective monocular stimulation with contours of all orientations. This experimental paradigm is known to label ocular dominance domains effectively in normally reared cats (Löwel and Singer, 1992,1993b).

After 45 min of visual stimulation, the animals received a lethal dose of pentobarbital (180 mg/kg, Nembutal) injected intravenously. The occipital poles and the lateral geniculate nuclei (LGN) of the brain were removed. The LGN was frozen in methylbutane cooled to −35°C. The visual cortices were flat-mounted (Freeman et al., 1987;Löwel et al., 1987) before freezing the tissue on dry ice. To provide landmarks for later superposition, three holes were melted into the flat mounts with warm needles. Subsequently, 26-μm-thick serial cryostat sections were cut at −16°C. Blocks containing the visual cortex were cut parallel to the cortical surface; those containing the LGN were cut in the frontal plane. Sections were mounted on glass slides, dried on a hot plate, and then exposed to x-ray film (Structurix D7W, Agfa Gevaert) for 3–4 weeks.

Data analysis and image processing. The distributions of labeled neurons, injection sites, and landmarks were mapped with a Zeiss fluorescence microscope equipped with a computer-controlled x/y stage driven by the analysis program Magellan (Halasz and Martin, 1984). Cells were usually plotted at 100-fold magnification (objective, 10×); however, we always assured with a higher magnification (objective, 16×) that weakly labeled cells were not missed. For the analysis of intracortical circuitry, five to eight sections from each hemisphere were analyzed quantitatively. Usually, cells in the immediate vicinity of the injection sites were not plotted, because the intense fluorescence did not allow proper discrimination of labeled cells. In hemispheres contralateral to the injection sites, callosally projecting neurons were found in 6–12 successive sections of supragranular and granular layers. For quantitative analysis, every second section was plotted.

For data presentation, autoradiographs were contrast-enhanced with an image-processing system (Imago II, Compulog) by expanding the gray values. For image processing, the optical density of the autoradiographs was translated into gray values. These are in arbitrary units ranging from 0 (black) to 255 (white). Large scale inhomogeneities in the optical density distributions were compensated by high-pass filtering of the digitized images.

The cell plots and the 2-DG autoradiographs of the same section were superimposed with the aid of the plotted landmarks. For quantitative analysis, 30% of the pixels with the lowest gray values (highest optical density) were displayed black (gray value 0, on a scale ranging from 0 to 255) and considered as the domain that showed the same ocular dominance and orientation preference as the injection site; the remaining 70% were displayed white (gray value 255) (Fig.3D). This thresholding procedure had the effect that the labeled domain occupied 30% of the cortical surface. This particular value was chosen for two reasons. First, visual assessment of borders between active and inactive regions in both optical imaging and 2-deoxyglucose patterns suggested that active zones occupied approximately 30% of the cortical surface. Second, the gray value histograms of all investigated autoradiographs could be approximated by a composite of two gaussian functions, the steeper one with its maximum at low gray values (high optical density) reflecting most likely the signal and the more shallow one the noise. Characteristically, about 30% of the pixels with the lowest gray values were located on the left side of the intersection point of these two functions. For cat CC, which received 2-DG while awake, all orientations were visible; therefore, the threshold was set to 50%, assuming that both eyes occupy cortical territories of equal size. Retrogradely labeled neurons were classified into two groups depending on their location on the 2-DG patterns: (1) neurons within and (2) neuronsoutside the labeled domains. The distributions of labeled neurons differed by less than ±6.5% from the mean between different sections. For quantification, cells in the respective domains were pooled over all plotted sections of one experiment (Table 1). In the case of the callosal connections, distributions from different sections were summed because of small cell numbers (Table 2). For statistical analysis, we normalized the cell numbers relative to the area occupied by the domains sharing the functional properties of the injection site. Absolute numbers of cells in the respective compartments were divided by the relative size of the compartment (0.3 and 0.7, respectively) and than multiplied by 0.5 to keep cell numbers unchanged. The resulting numbers reflect the relative cell densities in the two regions separated by the thresholding equation. The χ2 test was applied to the normalized distributions to test whether the distributions in the two regions were different from chance.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Intrinsic connections in area 17

To determine the ocular dominance of the cells at the injection sites and their relative location to the area 17/18 border, we inspected the cortical autoradiographs and additionally analyzed the laminar distribution of retrogradely labeled neurons in the LGN (Table3). The 17/18 border was determined on the autoradiographs as the lateral border of the region containing labeled orientation domains, because for visual stimulation, we used slowly moving gratings of high spatial frequency (0.5 cyc/°) that are known to stimulate area 17 neurons preferentially.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Callosal connections

LGN cell plots and the autoradiographs were aligned with the help of air bubbles. Because of the monocular stimulation protocol, laminar borders of the LGN could be distinguished on the 2-DG autoradiographs and were confirmed by additional Nissl staining of the tissue sections.

RESULTS

Layout of monocular orientation domains in strabismic cats

Monocular visual stimulation with gratings of a single orientation produced isolated patches of increased 2-DG uptake (Fig.2A,B). This labeling pattern differs from that in normal cats, in which similar stimuli generated a pattern composed of beaded bands (Löwel et al., 1987; Löwel and Singer, 1993a). Another difference is that the optic disk representation of the contralateral eye is identifiable as an unlabeled region in the posterior third of area 17 (Löwel and Singer, 1993a) (Fig. 2). In agreement with 2-DG patterns obtained in normal cats after binocular stimulation with a single orientation (Albus, 1979; Singer, 1981; Löwel et al., 1987Löwel and Singer, 1993a), 2-DG labeling in the strabismic cats extended in columns through the entire cortical thickness.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Layout of 2-DG-labeled monocular orientation domains in area 17 of a strabismic cat. Autoradiographs of flat-mounted sections from the unfolded left (A) and right (B) hemispheres of cat C2, the right eye of which had been stimulated with moving horizontal (0°) bars.A, The black frame indicates the injection sites within the representation of the central visual field in area 17 close to the 17/18 border. The cortical representation of the optical disk in the posterior third of area 17 (arrow) is devoid of 2-DG labeling (contralateral to the stimulated eye). B, Transcallosally labeled cells were found in the region of area 17 (black frame) that corresponds topographically to the injected area in the contralateral hemisphere. Cortical coordinates: A, anterior;L, lateral. Scale bar, 2 mm.

Verification of the ocular dominance of injection sites

The ocular dominance of the injection sites was deduced from the cortical autoradiographs. In addition, the laminar distribution of retrogradely labeled cells was analyzed in the LGN as described previously (Löwel and Singer, 1992). Distributions were determined in the left LGN of cats C1, C2, C3, C5, and CC and in the right LGN of cats C4, C6, and CN (see Table 1). In strabismic cats C1–C5, the majority of labeled neurons were located in medial lamina C (posterior sections) and in lamina A (anterior sections), sparing lamina A1. In cases C4 red and C6 green, >40% of the cells were found in lamina A1. These injections were considered as not eye-specific and discarded from further analysis. The injection C6/red was also discarded, because we had reasons to doubt that the injection was confined to a single orientation domain and to area 17. Spillover to area 18 was suggested by the observation that 87% of the labeled geniculate neurons were in lamina C. The injections in cat CC labeled neurons preferentially in geniculate lamina A1, indicating that they were located within territories of the nonstimulated left eye. In cat CN both the red and green injections led to retrograde labeling in all laminae, indicating injections of territories receiving input from both eyes. Retrogradely labeled neurons were found mainly in the central coronal sections of the LGN and were always located near the medial edges of both laminae A and C. This indicates that injections were located in the central visual field representation of area 17 within a few degrees above and below the horizontal meridian (Kaas et al., 1972) and close to the vertical meridian (Sanderson, 1971). In addition, a considerable fraction of cells (22.5–63.7%) was labeled in lamina C. Because the contribution of lamina C to the projection to area 17 increases toward the 17/18 border (Holländer, 1977), this is further confirmation that the injections were located close to the vertical meridian.

Functional topography of intrinsic horizontal connections in area 17

An example of the labeling pattern in a strabismic cat after two cortical injections, targeted at the center of two neighboring domains dominated by the same eye and preferring horizontal contours, is illustrated in Figure 3B. Connections extended up to 5 mm from the injection sites. Comparison of the pattern of labeled cells with the corresponding 2-DG autoradiographs (Fig.3A) showed that neurons labeled from both injection sites were located predominantly within territories that had the same ocular dominance and orientation preference (labeled regions) as cells at the injection sites (Fig. 3C). In some experiments, neurons filled with red microspheres were found within the column that had been injected with green beads and vice versa, indicating some reciprocity of the connections between columns. In addition, neurons labeled with red and neurons labeled with green beads were occasionally colocalized in the same columns. Another example of an injection in domains preferring an orientation of 45° is shown in Figure4.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Topographic relations between intrinsic horizontal connections and monocular orientation domains in area 17 of cat C5 (green). A, Enlarged detail of the 2-DG autoradiograph around the injection site. B, Patchy distribution of retrogradely labeled cells within the same region. Neurons labeled with fluorescein beads (n = 534) are represented bygreen dots; the injection site is indicated by thegreen triangle. C, Superposition ofA and B with the help of three landmarks (see Fig. 1A). D, Superposition of labeled neurons on the contrast-enhanced autoradiograph. Note that the cells are predominantly localized in the 2-DG-labeled domains (dark areas) and thus in regions having similar eye (left) and orientation preferences (45°) as the injection site. Abbreviations are as in Figure 1. Scale bar, 1 mm.

For quantification of the topographic relationship between the patterns of retrogradely labeled neurons and 2-DG-labeled monocular orientation columns, the autoradiographs were subject to a thresholding procedure (see Materials and Methods) to obtain sharp boundaries between active and inactive regions. On average, 55.9 ± 7.3% of the retrogradely labeled neurons were located in the active zones, i.e., in domains having the same eye and orientation preferences as the injection sites, irrespective of whether injections were placed in domains of the deviated (C4 and C5) or nondeviated eye (C1–C3). Figure5 shows the corresponding data for normal cat CN. The red injection of cat CN, which was located in a horizontal orientation column with no eye specification, revealed that 56.0% of the retrogradely labeled neurons were localized in the respective iso-orientation domains. This percentage is similar to that found in strabismic cats. By contrast, only 20.8% of the neurons labeled from an injection of a vertical domain (green beads) were located in columns with preferences for horizontal contours.

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Superposition of retrogradely labeled neurons and 2-DG-labeled horizontal orientation columns in normal cat CN.A, An injection of red microspheres was made in a column of neurons preferring horizontal contours. Of the labeled neurons, 54.6% (n = 414) are localized in iso-orientation domains. B, Distribution after an injection of green microspheres in a column preferring vertical contours. Only 22% of the labeled cells (n = 360) are localized in the labeled horizontal orientation domains. Scale bar, 1 mm. Abbreviations are as in Figure 1.

Figure 6 summarizes the results from nine injections in strabismic cats and two injections in a normal cat before pooling the data, demonstrating that cell densities in the labeled and nonlabeled compartments do not overlap. Statistical analysis of distributions resulting from individual experiments (Table 2) confirmed that cell densities in columns sharing the ocular dominance and orientation preference of the injection site were significantly higher and, in case of cat CN (green), lower than expected from a random distribution (χ2 test, p < 0.001).

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Box plot summarizing the normalized distributions of labeled neurons (cell densities) within injected area 17 for all analyzed sections (strabismic cats, n = 49; normal cat, red injection, n = 5; green injection, n = 5) of nine injections in strabismic cats and two injections in a normal cat. Distributions are calculated on a 100% scale: the sum of labeled neurons (density) withinblack (2-DG-labeled) and white nonlabeled compartments adds to 100%. Ordinate, Normalized density of cells in the respective compartment in percent. Thehorizontal line within each boxrepresents the mean. The 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles of these distributions are displayed as horizontal lines. Outliers below the 10th and above the 90th percentiles are plotted as open circles. Note that the distributions in the two compartments do not overlap.

In normal cat CC both injections were localized in domains dominated by the left eye with no further orientation preference specification, and retrogradely labeled neurons did not show any significant preference for ocular dominance territories (see also Löwel and Singer, 1992). Averaged across sections, 59.9% (green) and 54.1% (red) of the labeled cells were found within the domains dominated by the same eye as the injection site, which covered 50% of area 17.

Functional topography of interhemispheric connections

In one normal (CC) and three strabismic (C2, C3, and C5) animals, injections were located close to the vertical meridian within area 17 and labeled callosally projecting neurons. Retrogradely filled cells were observed in the topographically corresponding parts of the contralateral hemispheres. Neurons were found in 7–12 consecutive sections, 550–800 μm from the cortical surface, which corresponds to lower layer III and layer IV. In accordance with previous observations (Innocenti and Caminiti, 1980), callosally projecting neurons seemed larger than neurons with intrinsic connections. The zone containing callosal neurons in the strabismic cats comprised on average 4.3 ± 1.6 iso-orientation columns and extended on average 3 ± 0.52 mm from the 17/18 border into area 17.

Superposition of the callosal cell patterns with the 2-DG labeled domains revealed that retrogradely labeled neurons are located preferentially in columns that have the same ocular dominance and orientation preference as the injection site in the contralateral hemisphere (Fig. 7). On average 60.4 ± 11.8% of the retrogradely labeled neurons were located within the autoradiographically labeled monocular iso-orientation domains. The callosal cell distributions across eye dominance and orientation domains were very similar to the distributions on the ipsilateral side and differed maximally by ±6.5% per injection (see Table 3). In three of six cases (C2, green and red; C3, green), the bias for neurons to be located within domains with the same functional properties was highly significant (p < 0.005). In case C5 (green), however, this bias did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05), although the ratios between cells in labeled and unlabeled domains were very similar to those in the ipsilateral hemisphere of the same animal, in which the bias was highly significant. We attribute this lack of statistical significance to the small number of labeled callosal neurons. The same explanation holds with all likelihood for the lower level of significance (p < 0.01) in cases C3 (red) and C5 (red). No differences were noted between distributions resulting from injections in domains of the normal (C2 and C3) and deviated (C5) eye. Thus, in strabismic cats, not only tangential intracortical but also callosal connections link predominantly territories that share the same ocular dominance and orientation preference, irrespective of whether the territories are dominated by the normal or the deviated eye.

Fig. 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

Topographic relations between transcallosally labeled neurons and monocular orientation domains in right area 17 of cats C2 (A) and C3 (B). Superposition of retrogradely labeled neurons (green dots) and the monocular 2-DG patterns evoked by right eye stimulation with horizontal contours. Note that neurons are preferentially confined to the 2-DG-labeled columns (dark regions). Because of the relatively low density of callosally projecting neurons, cells from six (A,n = 88) and five (B,n = 104) adjacent sections were summed and superimposed on the corresponding 2-DG autoradiographs.A, Enlarged detail of the area indicated by theblack frame in Figure 2B. Scale bar, 1 mm. Abbreviations are as in Figure 1.

The distributions of transcallosally labeled neurons in normal cat CC failed to show a preference for ocular dominance domains (but seeOlavarria, 1996). On average 60.9% of the retrogradely labeled neurons were located within domains activated by the left eye, which in this case covered 50% of the cortical surface rather than 30%, because the cat had experience with all orientations.

DISCUSSION

Methodological considerations

For quantitative analysis, the autoradiographs of the cats stimulated monocularly with a single orientation were subject to a thresholding procedure that restricted domains controlled by the same eye and preferring the same orientation to 30% of the cortical surface. This threshold was selected because the gray value histograms of all investigated autoradiographs showing orientation columns in both strabismic and normal cats had their turning point at this particular value (see Materials and Methods). Assuming that the neuronal population in strabismic cats is split into two equally large monocular populations and that orientation preferences are distributed equally, the defined area (30%) is likely to include neurons with orientation preferences that differ by as much as 45° from the orientation of the grating used for activation. Moreover, labeled domains might contain some binocular neurons, because in cats with divergent squint about 7% of the neurons remain responsive to both eyes (Kalil et al., 1984). Because in normal cats most neurons are binocular, the defined area of 30% in cat CN should include orientation preferences in a range of 27°.

It has been shown previously that orientation maps as revealed with the 2-DG method or with optical imaging reflect precisely the topology of electrophysiologically determined orientation columns (Schoppmann and Stryker, 1981; Grinvald et al., 1986). Our present results confirm the perfect match between the activation patterns obtained with optical imaging and the 2-DG technique (data not shown).

We based our superpositions on the 2-DG rather than the optical-imaging maps, because this allowed for a direct correlation between cell locations and columnar patterns in the same flat-mounted sections, circumventing problems related to distortion and shrinkage of sections attributable to histological procedures.

Layout of monocular iso-orientation domains in strabismic cats

The 2-DG maps provide direct evidence that squint had caused the expected disruption of cortical binocularity because, in contrast to normally reared cats (Löwel and Singer, 1993a), there was a consistent lack of labeling at the representation of the optic disk in the hemisphere contralateral to the stimulated eye (Löwel and Singer, 1992, 1993b). No obvious differences were noted, however, between the 2-deoxyglucose patterns evoked by stimulation of either the deviated or the nondeviated eye. This is consistent with electrophysiological evidence from strabismic cats, which suggests that neurons driven from the normal and deviated eyes have similar and normal orientation tuning (Hubel and Wiesel, 1965; Freeman and Tsumoto, 1983; Kalil et al., 1984; Sengpiel et al., 1994).

Intrinsic connections

In the strabismic cats, on average 56% of the labeled neurons were located in territories sharing the ocular dominance and orientation preference of the injection site. Because these regions occupied only 30% of the cortical surface, this suggests that the tangential connections have preserved their tendency to interconnect preferentially domains with similar orientation preference, although they had segregated into eye-specific subnetworks because of squint (Löwel and Singer, 1992). The selectivity for iso-orientation domains is comparable to that described for horizontal connections in area 17 of normally raised cats (CN red, 60.4%) and macaque monkeys (Gilbert and Wiesel, 1989; Malach et al., 1993). The quantitative analysis of Malach et al. (1993) showed that 66% of the interconnected neurons in area 17 share preferences for orientations that differ by less than ±45°. This value cannot be compared directly with our results, because we investigated the joint probability (pODOR) of connections to link neurons that have the same ocular dominance (OD) andorientation preference (OR). In strabismic cats connections had a probability to be eye-specific (pOD) of 86 ± 5% (Löwel and Singer, 1992). Based on this value it is possible to estimate the probability of additional orientation selectivity (pOR) according to the formulapOR =pODOR/pOD. This yields a pOR value of 70% for our animals. Thus, the tendency of intrinsic connections to link neurons with similar orientation preference is at least as high in strabismic cats as it is in monkey V1, suggesting that squint had not interfered with this feature.

This finding is compatible with the notion that the selection criterion for the stabilization of tangential connections is the correlation among the responses of interconnected neurons (Löwel and Singer, 1992). Because monocular vision is unimpaired in strabismic animals, correlations among neurons dominated by the same eye are expected to be the same as in normal cats.

This of course does not exclude the possibility that the initial layout of connections gets specified by experience-independent factors such as biochemical markers (Meinhard and Gierer, 1980; Edelman and Cunningham, 1990) and for self-generated, patterned activity (for recent review, see Katz and Shatz, 1996). The basic organization of orientation maps (Chapman et al., 1996; Goedecke and Bonhoeffer, 1996; Ruthazer and Stryker, 1996) and of both intrinsic and callosal connections (Chalupa and Dreher, 1991) specified before visual experience becomes effective and supports further refinement of connectivity patterns. Thus,Aggoun-Zouaoui et al. (1996) have reported a columnar ingrowth of callosal axons into the cortex already toward the end of the first postnatal week. These authors encountered difficulties in relating these initial immature structures to the adult terminal columns and assume a vision-dependent validation process that goes in parallel with the formation and elongation of branches and further synaptogenesis.

Callosal connections

The present results revealed striking similarities between the organization of tangential intrinsic and transcallosal connections. The only difference was that the selectivity of callosal connections with respect to eye dominance and orientation domains was statistically less significant than that of intrinsic connections. However, this was not attributable to reduced selectivity but to the smaller sample size. Callosal fibers interconnect neurons sharing the same ocular dominanceand orientation preference with almost similar selectivity as the intrinsic connections, so that they seem to be equally susceptible to the effects of squint. This agrees with previous suggestions that interhemispheric and intrahemispheric connections serve similar functions and should therefore be organized similarly (Hubel and Wiesel, 1967; Innocenti, 1986). However, because of the weaker statistics the possibility needs to be considered that callosal connections are more heterogeneous than intrinsic connections and that subpopulations of callosal fibers obey other rules.

Earlier studies on callosal projections of sensory, motor, and association areas in several species described rather heterogeneous columnar patterns with “column” diameters ranging from 200 to 1000 μm (for review, see Innocenti, 1986; i.e., for striate cortex, Berman and Payne, 1983; Voigt et al., 1988; Payne and Siwek, 1991; Houzel et al., 1994; extrastriate cortex, Segraves and Rosenquist, 1982).

Evidence indicates that the columnar pattern of callosal connections in the primary auditory cortex is related to “ear dominance bands” (Imig and Brugge, 1978), but the functional significance of the columnar pattern of visual callosal projections remained unclear, although a relation to orientation columns (Innocenti, 1986;Voigt et al., 1988; Houzel et al., 1994), ocular dominance bands (Payne and Siwek, 1991; Olavarria, 1996), and cytochrome oxidase-positive patches (Boyd and Matsubara, 1994) had been suggested.

The present data agree with the physiological evidence that callosal connections link cells with receptive fields that have similar positions and matching orientation and direction preferences (Berlucchi and Rizzolatti, 1968; Lepore and Guillemot, 1982; Blakemore et al., 1983; Lepore et al., 1986). Callosal connections are not only contributing to the formation of ipsilaterally extending receptive fields, but they also synchronize the responses of neurons located in the two hemispheres (Engel at al., 1991; Munk et al., 1995). The strongest and most precise synchronization (“T peak”) occurs for responses of neurons that have overlapping receptive fields and similar orientation preferences (Engel et al., 1991; Nowak et al., 1995), which is in agreement with the topology of callosal connections revealed in the present study.

In young kittens, callosally projecting neurons are not confined to the representation of the vertical meridian but distribute across the entire area 17 (Innocenti et al., 1977; Innocenti and Caminiti, 1980). Early strabismus, monocular deprivation, and short periods of binocular deprivation interfere with the developmental process that eventually confines the callosal projection zone to the vertical meridian, so that callosally projecting neurons come to occupy a broader strip along the 17/18 border (Innocenti and Frost, 1979; Berman and Payne, 1983;Elberger et al., 1983). Our data (see Table 3) do not allow us to determine whether this had also occurred in the present experiments, because there are not enough control data from normal cats with comparably small injections. However, our results indicate that callosal connections are influenced by strabismus and in exactly the same way as the tangential intracortical connections. They came to link selectively territories dominated by the same eye (but see Olavarria, 1996). Thus, the development of the interhemispheric pathway is likely to be governed by similar experience-dependent organizing principles as described previously for the long-range intracortical connections; neurons exhibiting decorrelated activation patterns lose their corticocortical connections.

Footnotes

  • We thank E. Raulf and M. Sum for excellent technical assistance, M. Stephan for programs, the staff of the animal house for excellent animal care, the darkroom team for photographs, and R. Ruhl for preparing illustrations. We are also grateful to R. Galuske, J.-C. Houzel, and P. Roelfsema for helpful discussion.

    Correspondence should be addressed to Kerstin E. Schmidt, Max-Planck-Institut für Hirnforschung, Abteilung Neurophysiologie, Deutschordenstraße 46, D-60528 Frankfurt AM, Germany.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Aggoun-Zouaoui D,
    2. Kiper DC,
    3. Innocenti GM
    (1996) Growth of callosal terminal arbors in primary visual areas of the cat. Eur J Neurosci 8:1132–1148.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Albus K
    (1979) 14C-Deoxyglucose mapping of orientation subunits in the cat’s visual cortical areas. Exp Brain Res 37:609–613.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Allman J,
    2. Miezin F,
    3. McGuiness E
    (1985) Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons. Annu Rev Neurosci 7:407–430.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Berlucchi G,
    2. Rizzolatti G
    (1968) Binocularly driven neurons in visual cortex of split-chiasm cats. Science 159:308–310.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Berman N,
    2. Payne BR
    (1983) Alterations in connections of the corpus callosum following convergent and divergent strabismus. Brain Res 274:201–212.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Blakemore C,
    2. Tobin EA
    (1972) Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the cat’s visual cortex. Exp Brain Res 15:439–440.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Blakemore C,
    2. Diao Y,
    3. Pu M,
    4. Wang Y,
    5. Xiao Y
    (1983) Possible functions of interhemispheric connections between visual cortical areas in the cat. J Physiol (Lond) 337:331–348.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Bolz J,
    2. Gilbert CD
    (1990) The role of horizontal connections in generating long receptive fields in the cat visual cortex. Eur J Neurosci 1:263–268.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Bonhoeffer T,
    2. Grinvald A
    (1993) The layout of iso-orientation domains in area 18 of cat visual cortex: optical imaging reveals a pinwheel-like organization. J Neurosci 13:4157–4180.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Boyd J,
    2. Matsubara J
    (1994) Tangential organization of callosal connectivity in the cat’s visual cortex. J Comp Neurol 347:197–210.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Callaway EM,
    2. Katz LC
    (1990) Emergence and refinement of clustered intrinsic connections in cat striate cortex. J Neurosci 10:1134–1153.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Callaway EM,
    2. Katz LC
    (1991) Effects of binocular deprivation on the development of clustered horizontal connections in cat striate cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:745–749.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Chalupa LM,
    2. Dreher B
    (1991) High precision systems require high precision “blueprints”: a new view regarding the formation of connections in the mammalian visual system. J Cogn Neurosci 3:209–219.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    1. Chapman B,
    2. Stryker MP,
    3. Bonhoeffer T
    (1996) Development of orientation preference maps in ferret primary visual cortex. J Neurosci 16:6443–6453.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Cynader M,
    2. Lepore F,
    3. Guillemot JP
    (1981) Inter-hemispheric competition during postnatal development. Nature 290:139–140.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Darian-Smith C,
    2. Gilbert CD
    (1994) Axonal sprouting accompanies functional reorganization in adult striate cortex. Nature 368:737–740.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Edelman GM,
    2. Cunningham BA
    (1990) Place-dependent cell adhesion, process retraction, and spatial signaling in neural morphogenesis. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 55:303–318.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Elberger A,
    2. Smith EL,
    3. White JM
    (1983) Spatial dissociation of visual inputs alters the origin of the corpus callosum. Neurosci Lett 35:19–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Engel AK,
    2. König P,
    3. Kreiter AK,
    4. Singer W
    (1991) Interhemispheric synchronization of oscillatory neuronal responses in cat visual cortex. Science 252:1177–1179.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Eysel UT,
    2. Crook JM
    (1990) GABA-induced remote inactivation reveals cross-orientation inhibition in the cat striate cortex. Exp Brain Res 80:626–630.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Eysel UT,
    2. Wörgötter F,
    3. Pape H-C
    (1987) Local cortical lesions abolish lateral inhibition in the cat striate cortex. Exp Brain Res 68:606–612.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Fisken RA,
    2. Garey LJ,
    3. Powell TPS
    (1975) The intrinsic, association and commissural connections of area 17 of the visual cortex. Philos Trans R Soc Lond [Biol] 272:487–536.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Freeman B,
    2. Löwel S,
    3. Singer W
    (1987) Deoxyglucose mapping in the cat visual cortex following carotid artery injection and cortical flat-mounting. J Neurosci Methods 20:115–129.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Freeman RD,
    2. Tsumoto T
    (1983) An electrophysiological comparison of convergent and divergent strabismus in the cat: electrical and visual activation of single cortical cells. J Neurophysiol 49:238–253.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Galuske RAW,
    2. Singer W
    (1996) The origin and topography of long range intrinsic projections in cat visual cortex: a developmental study. Cereb Cortex 6:417–430.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Gilbert CD,
    2. Wiesel TN
    (1983) Clustered intrinsic connections in cat visual cortex. J Neurosci 3:1116–1133.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  26. ↵
    1. Gilbert CD,
    2. Wiesel TN
    (1985) Intrinsic connectivity and receptive field properties in visual cortex. Vision Res 25:365–374.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Gilbert CD,
    2. Wiesel TN
    (1989) Columnar specificity of intrinsic horizontal connections in cat visual cortex. J Neurosci 9:2432–2442.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Gilbert CD,
    2. Wiesel TN
    (1992) Receptive field dynamics in primary visual cortex. Nature 356:150–152.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Gödecke I,
    2. Bonhoeffer T
    (1996) Development of identical orientation maps for two eyes without common visual experience. Nature 379:251–254.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Gray CM,
    2. König P,
    3. Engel AK,
    4. Singer W
    (1989) Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties. Nature 338:334–337.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Grinvald A,
    2. Lieke E,
    3. Frostig RD,
    4. Gilbert CD,
    5. Wiesel TN
    (1986) Functional architecture of cortex revealed by optical imaging of intrinsic signals. Nature 324:361–364.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Halasz P,
    2. Martin PR
    (1984) A microcomputer based system for semi-automatic analysis of histological sections. Proc R Microsc Soc 19:312.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Hata Y,
    2. Tsumoto T,
    3. Sato H,
    4. Tamura H
    (1991) Horizontal interactions between visual cortical neurons studied by cross-correlation analysis in the cat. J Physiol (Lond) 441:593–614.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Heinen SJ,
    2. Skavenski AA
    (1991) Recovery of visual responses in foveal V1 neurons following bilateral foveal lesions in adult monkey. Exp Brain Res 83:670–674.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Holländer H
    (1977) The projection from the lateral geniculate nucleus onto the visual cortex in the cat. A quantitative study with horseradish peroxidase. J Comp Neurol 173:519–536.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Horsley V,
    2. Clarke RH
    (1908) The structure and functions of the cerebellum examined by a new method. Brain 31:45–124.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. ↵
    1. Houzel J-C,
    2. Milleret C,
    3. Innocenti G
    (1994) Morphology of callosal axons interconnecting areas 17 and 18 of the cat. Eur J Neurosci 6:898–917.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Hubel DH,
    2. Wiesel TN
    (1965) Binocular interaction in striate cortex of kittens reared with artificial squint. J Neurophysiol 28:1041–1059.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Hubel DH,
    2. Wiesel TN
    (1967) Cortical and callosal connections concerned with the vertical meridian of visual fields in the cat. J Neurophysiol 30:1561–1573.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Imig TJ,
    2. Brugge JF
    (1978) Sources and terminations of callosal axons related to binaural and frequency maps in primary auditory cortex of the cat. J Comp Neurol 182:637–660.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Innocenti GM
    (1986) General organization of callosal connections in the cerebral cortex. in Cerebral cortex, Vol 5, eds Peters A, Jones EG (Plenum, New York), pp 291–353.
  40. ↵
    1. Innocenti GM,
    2. Caminiti R
    (1980) Postnatal shaping of callosal connections from sensory areas. Exp Brain Res 38:381–394.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Innocenti GM,
    2. Frost DO
    (1979) Effects of visual experience on the maturation of the efferent system to the corpus callosum. Nature 280:231–234.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Innocenti GM,
    2. Fiore L,
    3. Caminiti R
    (1977) Exuberant projection into the corpus callosum from the visual cortex of newborn cats. Neurosci Lett 4:237–242.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Kaas JH,
    2. Guillery RW,
    3. Allman JM
    (1972) Some principles of organization in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. Brain Behav Evol 6:253–299.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Kaas JH,
    2. Krubitzer LA,
    3. Chino YM,
    4. Langston AL,
    5. Polley EH,
    6. Blair N
    (1990) Reorganization of retinotopic cortical maps in adult mammals after lesions of the retina. Science 248:229–231.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Kalil RE,
    2. Spear PD,
    3. Langsetmo A
    (1984) Response properties of striate cortex neurons in cats raised with divergent or convergent strabismus. J Neurophysiol 52:514–537.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Katz LC,
    2. Iarovici DM
    (1990) Green fluorescent latex microspheres: a new retrograde tracer. Neuroscience 34:511–520.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Katz LC,
    2. Shatz CJ
    (1996) Synaptic activity and the construction of cortical circuits. Science 274:1133–1138.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. Katz LC,
    2. Burkhalter A,
    3. Dreyer WJ
    (1984) Fluorescent latex microspheres as a retrograde neuronal marker for in vivo and in vitro studies of visual cortex. Nature 310:498–500.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Kisvárday ZF,
    2. Eysel UT
    (1992) cellular organization of reciprocal patchy networks in layer III of cat visual cortex (area 17). Neuroscience 46:275–286.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. König P,
    2. Engel AK,
    3. Löwel S,
    4. Singer W
    (1993) Squint affects synchronization of oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex. Eur J Neurosci 5:501–508.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Lepore F,
    2. Guillemot J-P
    (1982) Visual receptive field properties of cells innervated through the corpus callosum in the cat. Exp Brain Res 46:413–424.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Lepore F,
    2. Ptito M,
    3. Guillemot J-P
    (1986) The role of the corpus callosum in midline fusion. in Two hemispheres—one brain, eds Lepore F, Ptito M, Jasper HH (Alan R Liss, New York), pp 211–229.
  53. ↵
    1. Livingstone MS,
    2. Hubel DH
    (1984) Specificity of intrinsic connections in primate visual cortex. J Neurosci 4:2830–2835.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. ↵
    1. Löwel S
    (1994) Ocular dominance column development: strabismus changes the spacing of adjacent columns in cat visual cortex. J Neurosci 14:7451–7468.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    1. Löwel S,
    2. Singer W
    (1992) Selection of intrinsic horizontal connections in the visual cortex by correlated neuronal activity. Science 255:209–212.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    1. Löwel S,
    2. Singer W
    (1993a) Monocularly induced 2-deoxyglucose patterns in the visual cortex and lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat: 1. Anaesthetized and paralyzed animals. Eur J Neurosci 5:846–856.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Löwel S,
    2. Singer W
    (1993b) Monocularly induced 2-deoxyglucose patterns in the visual cortex and lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat: 2. Awake animals and strabismic animals. Eur J Neurosci 5:857–869.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Löwel S,
    2. Freeman B,
    3. Singer W
    (1987) Topographic organization of the orientation column system in large flat-mounts of the cat visual cortex: a 2-deoxyglucose study. J Comp Neurol 255:401–415.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Luhmann HJ,
    2. Martinez-Millan L,
    3. Singer W
    (1986) Development of horizontal intrinsic connections in cat striate cortex. Exp Brain Res 63:443–448.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Luhmann HJ,
    2. Singer W,
    3. Martinez-Millan L
    (1991) Horizontal interactions in cat striate cortex: I. Anatomical substrate and postnatal development. Eur J Neurosci 2:358–368.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  61. ↵
    1. Lund RD,
    2. Mitchell DE,
    3. Henry GH
    (1978) Squint-induced modification of callosal connections in cats. Brain Res 144:169–172.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Malach R,
    2. Amir Y,
    3. Harel M,
    4. Grinvald A
    (1993) Relationship between intrinsic connections and functional architecture revealed by optical imaging and in vivo targeted biocytin injections in primate striate cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:10469–10473.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    1. Malach R,
    2. Tootell RBH,
    3. Malonek D
    (1994) Relationship between orientation domains, cytochrome oxidase stripes, and intrinsic horizontal connections in squirrel monkey area V2. Cereb Cortex 4:151–165.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Meinhard M,
    2. Gierer A
    (1980) Generation and regeneration of sequences of structures during morphogenesis. J Theor Biol 85:429–450.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Morrone MC,
    2. Burr DC,
    3. Maffei L
    (1982) Functional implications of cross-orientation inhibition of cortical visual cells. I. Neurophysiological evidence. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] B216:335–354.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Munk MHJ,
    2. Nowak LG,
    3. Nelson JI,
    4. Bullier J
    (1995) The structural basis of cortical synchronization. 2. Effects of cortical lesions. J Neurophysiol 74:2401–1414.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Nelson JI,
    2. Frost BJ
    (1978) Orientation-selective inhibition from beyond the classical receptive field. Exp Brain Res 139:359–365.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  68. ↵
    1. Nowak LG,
    2. Munk MJH,
    3. Nelson JI,
    4. James AC,
    5. Bullier J
    (1995) The structural basis of cortical synchronization. 1. Three types of interhemispheric coupling. J Neurophysiol 74:2379–2400.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Olavarria JF
    (1996) Visual callosal fibers link cortical columns dominated by the same eye in the cat. Soc Neurosci Abstr 22:491.
    OpenUrl
  70. ↵
    1. Olson CR,
    2. Freeman RD
    (1978) Development of eye alignment in cats. Nature 271:446–447.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Payne BR,
    2. Siwek DF
    (1991) Visual-field map in the callosal recipient zone at the border between areas 17 and 18 in the cat. Vis Neurosci 7:221–236.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. Price DJ
    (1986) The postnatal development of clustered intrinsic connections in area 18 of the visual cortex in kittens. Dev Brain Res 24:31–38.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  73. ↵
    1. Rockland KS
    (1985) Anatomical organization of primary visual cortex (area 17) in the ferret. J Comp Neurol 241:225–236.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Rockland KS,
    2. Lund JS
    (1982) Widespread periodic intrinsic connections in the tree shrew visual cortex. Science 215:1532–1534.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  75. ↵
    1. Rockland KS,
    2. Lund JS
    (1983) Intrinsic laminar lattice connections in primate visual cortex. J Comp Neurol 216:303–318.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. ↵
    1. Ruthazer ES,
    2. Stryker MP
    (1996) The role of activity in the development of long-range horizontal connections in area 17 of the ferret. J Neurosci 16:7253–7269.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  77. ↵
    1. Sanderson KJ
    (1971) The projection of the visual field to the lateral geniculate and medial interlaminar nuclei in the cat. J Comp Neurol 143:101–118.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Schoppmann A,
    2. Stryker MP
    (1981) Physiological evidence that the 2-deoxyglucose method reveals orientation columns in cat visual cortex. Nature 293:574–576.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Schwarz C,
    2. Bolz J
    (1991) Functional specificity of a long-range connection in cat visual cortex: a cross-correlation study. J Neurosci 11:2995–3007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  80. ↵
    1. Segraves MA,
    2. Rosenquist AC
    (1982) The distribution of cells of origin of callosal projections in cat visual cortex. J Neurosci 2:1079–1089.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  81. ↵
    1. Sengpiel F,
    2. Blakemore C,
    3. Kind PC,
    4. Harrad R
    (1994) Interocular suppression in visual cortex of strabismic cats. J Neurosci 14:6855–6871.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  82. ↵
    1. Shatz CJ,
    2. Lindström TN,
    3. Wiesel TN
    (1977) The distribution of afferents representing the right and the left eyes in the cat’s visual cortex. Brain Res 131:103–116.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    1. Sherman SM
    (1972) Development of interocular alignment in cats. Brain Res 37:187–203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  84. ↵
    1. Singer W
    (1981) Topographic organization of orientation columns in the cat visual cortex. A deoxyglucose study. Exp Brain Res 44:431–436.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  85. ↵
    1. Singer W
    (1993) Synchronization of cortical activity and its putative role in information processing and learning. Annu Rev Physiol 55:349–374.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. ↵
    1. Singer W,
    2. Tretter F
    (1976) Unusually large receptive fields in cats with restricted visual experience. Exp Brain Res 26:171–184.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  87. ↵
    1. Sireteanu R,
    2. Singer W,
    3. Fronius M,
    4. Greuel JM,
    5. Best J,
    6. Fiorentini A,
    7. Bisti S,
    8. Schiavi C,
    9. Campos E
    (1993) Eye alignment and cortical binocularity in strabismic kittens: a comparison between tenotomy and recession. Vis Neurosci 10:541–549.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ts’o D,
    2. Gilbert CD
    (1988) The organization of chromatic and spatial interactions in the primate striate cortex. J Neurosci 8:1712–1727.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  88. ↵
    1. Ts’o D,
    2. Gilbert CD,
    3. Wiesel TN
    (1986) Relationships between horizontal interactions and functional architecture in cat striate cortex as revealed by cross-correlation analysis. J Neurosci 6:1160–1170.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  89. ↵
    1. Voigt T,
    2. LeVay S,
    3. Stamnes MA
    (1988) Morphological and immunocytochemical observations in the visual callosal projections in the cat. J Comp Neurol 272:450–460.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. ↵
    1. von Grünau MW
    (1979) The role of maturation and visual experience in the development of eye alignment in cats. Exp Brain Res 37:41–47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 17 (14)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 17, Issue 14
15 Jul 1997
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Functional Specificity of Long-Range Intrinsic and Interhemispheric Connections in the Visual Cortex of Strabismic Cats
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Functional Specificity of Long-Range Intrinsic and Interhemispheric Connections in the Visual Cortex of Strabismic Cats
Kerstin E. Schmidt, Dae-Shik Kim, Wolf Singer, Tobias Bonhoeffer, Siegrid Löwel
Journal of Neuroscience 15 July 1997, 17 (14) 5480-5492; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-14-05480.1997

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Functional Specificity of Long-Range Intrinsic and Interhemispheric Connections in the Visual Cortex of Strabismic Cats
Kerstin E. Schmidt, Dae-Shik Kim, Wolf Singer, Tobias Bonhoeffer, Siegrid Löwel
Journal of Neuroscience 15 July 1997, 17 (14) 5480-5492; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-14-05480.1997
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • long-range intracortical connections
  • callosal connections
  • experience-dependent development
  • optical imaging
  • area 17
  • strabismus

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.