Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles

Action Potential-Dependent Regulation of Gene Expression: Temporal Specificity in Ca2+, cAMP-Responsive Element Binding Proteins, and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling

R. Douglas Fields, Feleke Eshete, Beth Stevens and Kouichi Itoh
Journal of Neuroscience 1 October 1997, 17 (19) 7252-7266; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-19-07252.1997
R. Douglas Fields
1National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Feleke Eshete
1National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beth Stevens
1National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kouichi Itoh
1National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Electrically evoked intracellular calcium concentration in the cell body of DRG neurons measured by calcium imaging with fura-2. Responses to 1, 6, 12, 18, 36, 54, and 90 action potentials at 10 Hz are shown, with the total calcium concentration–time integral indicated for each stimulus in brackets (nm min; A–G). A rapid increase in intracellular calcium and slower recovery after the stimulus is stopped are evident for all stimulus durations. A single action potential produces a small but detectable increase in [Ca2+]i in the cell body. The kinetics of calcium increase are well fit by a power function, using nonlinear regression (H–N) (see Table 1). The kinetics of recovery after the stimulus is terminated are well fit by a single exponential equation for stimulus durations <54 impulses (Q–U), but the recovery deviates from this function for longer bursts by having a longer sustained increase in intracellular calcium at ∼10 sec poststimulus (Table 1;arrow in insets to O,P). A double exponential function is required to adequately fit this slower recovery in the following 54 (P) and 90 (O) action potential bursts (see Table 1).

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Summary of pooled data from measurements on several neurons (mean and SEM) on the relation between action potential pattern and intracellular calcium transients. A, The peak concentration of intracellular calcium increases proportionately less for longer stimulus durations. This is consistent with the kinetics of calcium increase measured in single neurons, which follows a power function relation between action potential duration and calcium increase (Fig.1H–N) (n = 48 neurons, 6 neurons for each stimulus pattern). B, The calcium–time integral during one stimulus burst of 1–90 impulses. The integral calcium includes the increase in calcium from stimulation to recovery after the stimulus burst. The magnitude of the calcium–time integral for different burst durations is well fit by a linear regression to the duration of the burst (solid line= linear regression fit; dotted line = 95% confidence interval; n = 38 neurons).C, The total increase in calcium experienced during 30 min of stimulation. The comparison shown is for an equal number of impulses (540 impulses total during the 30 min stimulus) but delivered in 10 Hz bursts of 1, 6, 12, 18, 36, 54, and90 impulses and repeated at regular intervals (e.g., from one action potential every 3.3 sec to six bursts of 90 action potentials repeated every 5 min). Note that the total elevation in calcium experienced by the cell during the 30 min stimulus period (calcium–time integral) is relatively similar for stimulus bursts longer than ∼18 impulses (n = 38 neurons).

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Regulation of c-fos expression in response to different patterns of neural impulses. A, The effect of pulse train stimulation on c-fosexpression was studied by delivering the same number of impulses (540) in a 30 min period, but grouped into repeated bursts (10 Hz) of 1.8, 3.6, 5.4, and 9.0 sec, separated by 1, 2, 3, and 5 min interburst intervals, respectively. B, Expression ofc-fos mRNA was related inversely to the interval between bursts. This correlation held despite the countervailing increase in the duration of stimulus bursts (n = 31 cultures).C, Consistent with differences in c-fosmRNA in electrically stimulated cultures, Fos-β-galactosidase in DRG cultures from transgenic mice carrying the fos/LacZreporter gene decreases with increasing interburst intervals. The mean number of β-gal-positive neurons per microscope field is plotted for each culture. Means were determined from counts of neurons in 10 microscope fields in each culture, and differences in expression among the cultures stimulated with the four different impulse patterns were analyzed by ANOVA. The results indicate a highly significant difference among stimulus groups (p < 0.001;n = 15 cultures).

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Relation between electrically induced calcium transients and c-fos expression in response to different patterns of electrical stimulation. DRG neurons were stimulated with a total of 540 action potentials delivered in four different patterns for 30 min, as in Figure 3A, and the intracellular calcium transient was measured in the cell body by using ratiometric fluorescence imaging of cells loaded with the calcium indicator fura-2.A, D, G, J, The average calcium response of several neurons (n = 27, 35, 42, and 52 neurons) is shown in response to a single burst of stimulation at 10 Hz for different durations (1.8–9 sec). Higher peak calcium levels are reached after longer duration stimulus bursts, but the differences are small relative to the increase produced by a 1.8 sec burst (A vsJ). B, E, H, K, Long-term calcium recordings showing the average intracellular calcium levels in response to stimulus bursts repeated at different intervals (1–5 min). Note the full recovery of calcium to prestimulus levels after all stimulus patterns. C, F, I, L, Expression ofc-fos, measured by semiquantitative PCR (n = 31 cultures), does not correlate with the amplitude of the calcium transient but does correlate with the interval between stimulus bursts. This relation holds despite the countervailing differences in peak calcium produced by longer duration bursts.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    No differences in nuclear versus cytoplasmic calcium concentrations are seen by using confocal microscopy in response to action potential stimulation in mouse DRG neurons. Neurons were stimulated in multicompartment preparations with different burst durations (0.1–5 sec at 10 Hz) to stimulate calcium influx over a wide range of concentrations. The change in intracellular calcium was monitored by confocal microscopy along a line from the plasma membrane to the nucleus of each neuron, using ratiometric confocal microscopy in single line-scan mode in neurons loaded with the calcium indicator Indo-1. The intracellular calcium concentration in a region of interest adjacent to the plasma membrane and in the center of the nucleus is plotted. The points are well fit by linear regression with a slope of 1 (r2= 0.99;n = 14 test stimuli in six neurons from six cultures).

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    CREB phosphorylation at Ser-133 in response to electrical stimulation of different patterns. Phosphorylation was determined by nuclear staining using an antibody that recognizes CREB phosphorylated at Ser-133 (P-CREB). The intensity of immunocytochemical staining was quantified in the nucleus of stimulated cells by densitometry of digitized images on a scale of 0–255. All values were normalized to the mean intensity of nuclear staining in unstimulated cells (A). A 10 min incubation in 60 mm KCl caused a large increase in the number and intensity of nuclei staining for P-CREB (F), which is evident by the rightward shift in the histogram of nuclear staining intensities. After electrical stimulation, localization of P-CREB in the nucleus varies with different stimulus patterns (B–E). The highest levels of nuclear staining were produced by short bursts repeated frequently (1.8 sec at 10 Hz, every minute) (B) or longer duration bursts repeated infrequently (9 sec at 10 Hz, every 5 min) (E). The intermediate patterns of stimulation produced less CREB phosphorylation at Ser-133 (C, D). No change in nuclear staining was evident after any stimulus when an antibody that recognizes both the phosphorylated and dephosphorylated forms of the protein was used (A–E).

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Western blot analysis of phosphorylation and activation of CREB. The antibody used for immunocytochemical studies stained a single band on immunoblots, consistent with the molecular weight of CREB. After electrical stimulation (10 Hz for 10 min), an increased amount of P-CREB was detected, as compared with unstimulated controls (Cnt.). Stimulation did not change the total amount of CREB (detected with an antibody that recognized both phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated CREB).

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    The kinetics of changes in phosphorylated CREB in the nucleus of DRG neurons after electrical stimulation and comparison to MAPK. A, Stimulation at 1 or 10 Hz for 10 min caused a significant increase in CREB phosphorylation at Ser-133 (p < 0.001), with a greater increase in phosphorylation produced by higher stimulation frequency. Depolarization with 60 mm KCl induced a comparable increase in staining intensity (n = 589 neurons).B, The kinetics of CREB phosphorylation at Ser-133 are relatively rapid, with a significant increase detected after only 1 min of 10 Hz stimulation (p < 0.001). Near-maximal levels of CREB phosphorylation at Ser-133 are seen after 10 min of 10 Hz stimulation (n = 789).C, Dephosphorylation of CREB at Ser-133 followed slower kinetics than phosphorylation. Cells were stimulated at 10 Hz for 5 min to induce phosphorylation (poststimulus time = 0) and then fixed (P-CREB) or lysed (MAPK) between 1 and 25 min after the stimulus was stopped. Dephosphorylation was much more rapid for MAPK than for CREB. No significant dephosphorylation of CREB could be detected 1 min after the stimulus was terminated, but levels of MAPK phosphorylation were reduced by ∼50%. A small but sustained increase in P-CREB persisted 25 min after the 5 min stimulus was terminated (p < 0.001 relative to control; no significant difference between 5 and 10 min or 5 and 25 min; n = 1392 neurons) (p < 0.01 by ANOVA for MAPK;n = 17 dishes).

  • Fig. 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 9.

    Relation among c-fos expression, activation of CREB, and MAPK in response to different patterns of electrical stimulation. Expression of c-fos(A) did not correlate well with phosphorylation of CREB at Ser-133 (B). Phosphorylation of CREB was increased significantly after 30 min of 1.8 sec bursts repeated at 1 min intervals or 9 sec bursts repeated at 5 min, butc-fos expression was not increased in response to the latter stimulus. No increase in MAPK activation was observed in response to the stimulus that failed to induce expression ofc-fos (90/5). Phosphorylated CREB levels are summarized as the mean intensity of nuclear staining in DRG neurons ± SEM after electrical stimulation and normalized with respect to controls (n = 1547 neurons). C, In vivoactivation of the MAP kinase ERK1 was measured by Western immunoblotting, using the DAB detection method. Results are integrated intensity values normalized with respect to controls (mean ± SEM;n = 20 cultures).

  • Fig. 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 10.

    Time course of increase in CREB phosphorylation and MAPK activation in response to action potential bursts of 1.8 sec duration (10 Hz) repeated at 1 min intervals (18/1;filled symbols) and 9.0 sec duration repeated at 5 min intervals (90/5; open symbols) for 30 min. Neurons were analyzed just before the stimulus burst to estimate the residual increase in activation (t = 14.5 and 29.5 min) and compared with unstimulated controls (t = 0). A, Levels of CREB activation increase to near-maximal values in <14.5 min of stimulation with either stimulus pattern (18/1 = filled circles;90/5 = open triangles).B, A similar increase in MAPK activation with stimulus time is seen in response to stimulus bursts repeated at 1 min intervals (18/1 = filled circles). A single burst of stimulation at the end of the 30 min period of stimulation with these pulse patterns produces no further increase in CREB or MAPK activation (squares). A significant increase in P-CREB is produced from a single 10 sec burst of action potentials (arrow). A 9 sec burst increases MAPK activation significantly (open square; p < 0.05). Activation of MAPK was not sustained over 5 min interburst intervals, as shown by the failure to summate during the 30 min stimulus period (open circles; differences not significant comparing 0, 14, and 29.5 min). n = 1306 neurons in A and 42 cultures inB.

  • Fig. 11.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 11.

    Electrically induced expression ofc-fos is blocked by inhibitors of MAPK and CaM kinase. DRG neurons pretreated with 30 μm KN-62 (CaM kinase inhibitor), 50 μm PD098059 (MEK1 inhibitor), or both at the indicated concentrations for 1 hr showed no significant increase inc-fos mRNA levels after 30 min of electrical stimulation, as compared with controls (p = 0.53 by ANOVA). Stimulation was delivered in 1.8 sec bursts at 10 Hz, repeated at 1 min intervals (n = 22 dishes; *p < 0.003).

  • Fig. 12.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 12.

    MAPK activation in response to patterned action potentials. Activation of the ERK1 (p44) and ERK2 (p42) MAPK was determined in DRG neurons after eliciting a total of 540 impulses at 10 Hz in 1.8, 3.6, 5.4, and 9 sec bursts separated by 1, 2, 3, and 5 min intervals, respectively. The Western immunoblotting analysis was performed for activated MAPK after normalizing for total ERK1 by quantitative immunoblotting.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Parameter fits using nonlinear regression to electrically induced calcium transients in the cell bodies of DRG neurons after action potential stimulation at 10 Hz for various durations

    Number of action potentialsFitted parameter values
    abcde r2
    Calcium increase y = a + b tc
    10.60838.11.02––0.603
    6−1.001320.686––0.978
    123.631890.798––0.973
    18−15.12140.764––0.976
    36−16.62150.752––0.980
    54−47.12040.560––0.975
    90−91.82460.459––0.955
    Calcium recovery y = a + b exp (−t/c)
    1−12.036.03.60––0.484
    6−1.031191.69––0.966
    1231.02511.73––0.986
    1828.53001.96––0.984
    3629.34522.24––0.989
    5423.24602.71––0.9791-160
    9051.25042.99––0.9681-160
    Calcium recovery y = a + b exp (−ct) + d exp (−et)
    5424.44500.439 27.50.1030.981
    9027.64470.5451300.07890.987
    • y, Intracellular calcium; t, time; r2, regression coefficient.

    • ↵F1-160 A poor fit at approximately t = 10 sec because of sustained calcium increase.  

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 17 (19)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 17, Issue 19
1 Oct 1997
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Action Potential-Dependent Regulation of Gene Expression: Temporal Specificity in Ca2+, cAMP-Responsive Element Binding Proteins, and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Action Potential-Dependent Regulation of Gene Expression: Temporal Specificity in Ca2+, cAMP-Responsive Element Binding Proteins, and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling
R. Douglas Fields, Feleke Eshete, Beth Stevens, Kouichi Itoh
Journal of Neuroscience 1 October 1997, 17 (19) 7252-7266; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-19-07252.1997

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Action Potential-Dependent Regulation of Gene Expression: Temporal Specificity in Ca2+, cAMP-Responsive Element Binding Proteins, and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling
R. Douglas Fields, Feleke Eshete, Beth Stevens, Kouichi Itoh
Journal of Neuroscience 1 October 1997, 17 (19) 7252-7266; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-19-07252.1997
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • CREB phosphorylation
  • calcium
  • c-fos
  • signal transduction
  • activity-dependent plasticity
  • LTP
  • MAP kinase
  • SRE

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.