Abstract
The noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist phencyclidine (PCP) has psychotomimetic properties in humans and activates the frontal cortical dopamine innervation in rats, findings that have contributed to a hyperdopaminergic hypothesis of schizophrenia. In the present studies, the effects of the enantiomers of 3-amino-1-hydroxypyrrolid-2-one (HA966) on PCP-induced changes in monoamine metabolism in the forebrain of rats and monkeys were examined, because HA966 has been shown previously to attenuate stress- or drug-induced activation of dopamine systems. In rats, PCP (10 mg/kg, i.p.) potently activated dopamine (DA) turnover in the medial prefrontal cortex (PFC) and nucleus accumbens. Serotonin utilization was also increased in PFC. Pretreatment with either R-(+)HA966 (15 mg/kg, i.p.) or S-(−)HA966 (3 mg/kg, i.p.) partially blocked PCP-induced increases in PFC DA turnover, whereas neither enantiomer altered the effect of PCP on DA turnover in the nucleus accumbens or the PCP-induced increases in serotonin turnover in PFC. PCP (0.3 mg/kg, i.m.) exerted regionally selective effects on the dopaminergic and serotonergic innervation of the monkey frontal cortex, effects blocked by pretreatment with S-(−)HA966 (3 mg/kg, i.m.). Importantly, these data demonstrate that in the primate, PCP has potent effects on dopamine transmission in the frontal cortex, a brain region thought to be dysfunctional in schizophrenia. In addition, a role for S-(−)HA966 as a modulator of cortical monoamine transmission in primates is posited.
The dopaminergic innervation of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) is highly responsive to stress and psychomotor stimulants (Deutch and Roth, 1990; Horger and Roth, 1995; Roth and Elsworth, 1995). Mild stress selectively increases dopamine (DA) turnover and release in the PFC (Thierry et al., 1976). Likewise, psychomotor stimulants such as amphetamine (During et al., 1987), cocaine (Sorg and Kalivas, 1993), opiates (Kim et al., 1986), Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Bowers and Morton, 1994; Jentsch et al., 1997), and noncompetitive antagonists of the NMDA receptor such as phencyclidine (PCP) increase the release and turnover of DA in the PFC and nucleus accumbens (NAc). Serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine utilization are also increased in these areas by PCP (Deutch et al., 1987; Bowers and Morton, 1994; Hondo et al., 1994).
PCP has profound psychotomimetic effects in normal humans (Luby et al., 1959; Javitt and Zukin, 1991) and can precipitate psychotic episodes in schizophrenic subjects (Ital et al., 1967; Javitt and Zukin, 1991). PCP-induced dysregulation of the mesocortical DA innervation may be relevant to these schizophreniform effects, because dopaminergic dysfunction in the PFC has been hypothesized in schizophrenia (Robbins, 1990; Grace, 1991; Deutch, 1992). As such, pharmacological manipulation of the effects of PCP on mesocortical DA systems may be relevant to the treatment of PCP psychosis and schizophrenia.
The effects of mild stress on frontal cortical DA transmission can be blocked by anxiolytic benzodiazepine (BZ) agonists (Fadda et al., 1978;Lavielle et al., 1978; Reinhard et al., 1982) and, as with mild stress, the effects of PCP on mesotelencephalic DA neurons can be blocked by diazepam (Bowers and Hoffman, 1989; Bowers and Morton, 1992), suggesting that the PCP-induced mesoprefrontal DA response may be sensitive to modulation as is the PFC DA increase evoked by mild stress.
Investigations in this lab have shown that like BZ agonists, 3-amino-1-hydroxypyrrolid-2-one (HA966) can modulate the mesotelencephalic DA systems. R-(+)HA966, a strychnine-insensitive glycine site partial agonist/functional NMDA receptor antagonist, can block increases in PFC but not NAc DA turnover induced by restraint stress (Morrow et al., 1993), conditioned fear (Goldstein et al., 1994), and the BZ receptor inverse agonist FG7142 (Horger et al., 1996;Murphy et al., 1996c). Similarly, S-(−)HA966, a γ-butyrolactone-like substance (Singh et al., 1990), potentially acting at GABABor γ-hydroxybutyrate receptors, prevents increases in PFC DA utilization induced by restraint stress, conditioned fear (Morrow et al., 1995), and FG7142 (Murphy et al., 1996c). Finally, we have recently shown that both enantiomers of HA966 can prevent the increases in PFC DA turnover induced by Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Jentsch et al., 1997). S-(−)-HA966 appears to be approximately 5 to 10 times more potent than R-(+)-HA966 in reducing hyperdopaminergic states induced by stress, FG7142, or Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol.
In the present study, we examined the effects of both R-(+)- and S-(−)HA966 on phencyclidine-induced changes in DA and 5-HT turnover in the PFC, NAc, and striatum (STR) of rats. In particular, we investigated the effects of doses of each enantiomer that when given alone, had no significant effect on basal DA levels or turnover. In addition, we extended these findings to the monkey brain to examine whether the effects of PCP and S-(−)HA966 are conserved in the primate brain, the more extensive and intricate mesoprefrontal DA system of which is more relevant to human neurobiology. Our findings indicate that acute PCP administration markedly activates DA turnover in the PFC of rats and monkeys and that this increase is attenuated by pretreatment S-(−)HA966 in both species.
Portions of this work have been presented in abstract form.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals. Forty male Sprague Dawley CAMM rats (Charles River Labs, Portage, MI) and 10 young adult male African green monkeys (Cercopithecus sabaeus aethiops) of the St. Kitts Biomedical Research Facility (St. Kitts, West Indies) were used as subjects. All subjects were maintained under conditions consistent with USDA standards and the National Institutes of Health “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.” In addition, all protocols were approved by the appropriate institutional animal care and use committees.
The rats were maintained on a 12 hr light/dark cycle, with the light phase being 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. Food and water was provided ad libitum. St. Kitts monkeys were housed individually in standard primate squeeze cages in an open but covered facility under daylight conditions. Monkeys were fed monkey chow and fruit supplements and had water available ad libitum.
Drugs. Phencyclidine hydrochloride (Research Biochemicals, Natick, MA) was administered at a dose of 10 mg/kg (rats) or 0.3 mg/kg (monkeys) in sterile saline. Both enantiomers of HA966 were provided through the National Institute of Mental Health Synthesis Program (courtesy of Research Biochemicals). R-(+)HA966 (15 mg/kg) and S-(−)HA966 (3 mg/kg) were delivered in saline 15 min before PCP administration. All injections were given at a volume of 1 ml/kg intraperitoneally (rats) or 0.1 ml/kg intramuscularly (monkeys). In all cases, vehicle treatments represented an injection of an equivalent volume of sterile saline.
Biochemistry. All rats weighed 250–275 gm at the time of death. Killing was performed during the animals’ light phase. Rats were killed by rapid decapitation 1 hr after PCP administration. The brains were quickly removed, and brain regions were dissected out on a thermostatically chilled platform. Samples were immediately frozen on dry ice and stored at −70°C until assayed.
Monkeys, weighing 2.0–4.0 kg at the time of death, were anesthetized with an overdose of sodium pentobarbital (75 mg/kg) 1 hr after PCP administration. At the loss of corneal reflex, the subjects were perfused transcardially with ice-cold heparinized saline until the effluent ran clear. The brain was removed, sliced in 4 mm coronal sections, and regionally dissected on a thermostatically controlled platform according to Figure 1. Tissues were frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen and then stored at −70°C until assay.
Tissues were prepared with dihydroxybenzylamine as an internal standard for catechols and N-methyl 5-HT as an internal standard for the indoles. Samples were homogenized in 400 μl of ice-cold 0.1m perchloric acid and centrifuged at 17600 ×g, and the supernate was analyzed directly with HPLC using electrochemical detection with a glassy carbon electrode at +0.7 V (BAS, West Lafayette, IN) and a reversed-phase column (3 μm C18 beads, 100 Å diameter, 10 cm length; BAS, West Lafayette, IN). Pellets were analyzed for protein content according to Lowry et al. (1951).
Mobile phase used for HPLC was an 8% solution of acetonitrile containing 0.6% tetrahydrofuran, 0.1% diethylamine, 0.025 mm EDTA, 2.3 mm 1-octane-sulfonic acid, 30 mm sodium citrate, and 13.7 mm sodium dihydrogen phosphate, final pH 3.1.
Measurements of turnover were made as the ratio of tissue concentration (in nanograms per milligram protein) of the primary metabolite DOPAC, homovanillic acid, or 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid to the parent amine (DA and 5-HT).
Statistics. Statistical analysis was performed on a Macintosh IIcx running Statview II (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA). ANOVA and unpaired Student’s t test were used where appropriate. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS
PCP stimulates monoamine utilization in rodent and primate brain
PCP (10 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly increased turnover of DA in the PFC (T = −6.15; df = 14; p < 0.001) and NAc (T = −7.47; df = 15;p < 0.001) of rats 1 hr after administration (Fig.2). This alteration in DA turnover is indicative of changes in DOPAC levels, because no significant alteration in DA concentrations was noted after PCP administration (Table1). Likewise, 5-HT turnover was increased after PCP administration in the PFC (Fig. 3) and STR (Fig. 3); 5-HT turnover was not measured in the NAc.
Similarly, PCP (0.3 mg/kg, i.m.) significantly increased DA turnover, without significantly altering DA concentrations (Table2), in several regions of the primate frontal cortex (Fig. 4). Significant increases in DA metabolism after PCP administration were observed in the dorsolateral PFC (Walker’s area 46: T = −2.35; df = 8; p = 0.047); medial PFC (Brodmann’s area 9: T = −2.53; df = 9; p = 0.032); lateral orbital cortex (Brodmann’s area 12: T = −6.47; df = 4;p = 0.003); and prelimbic cortex (Brodmann’s area 33 and adjacent ventral cortex: T = −4.64; df = 2;p = 0.043). In contrast, there was no significant activation of DA utilization in the anterior cingulate cortex (Brodmann’s area 24) or in any subcortical area studied (Fig. 4) including the NAc, caudate, and putamen.
As with the regionally selective activation of frontal cortical DA systems by PCP, 5-HT utilization was significantly increased only in the monkey frontal cortex after PCP administration (Fig.5). Significant increases in 5-HT metabolism were evident in the dorsolateral PFC (T = −2.47; df = 8; p = 0.039), prelimbic cortex (T = −3.30; df = 3; p = 0.046), and concentrations in ng/mg protein ± SEM.anterior cingulate (T = −4.8; df = 3; p = 0.017). Interestingly, no significant increases in 5-HT utilization in the NAc, caudate, or putamen were observed after PCP administration.
R-(+)- and S-(−)HA966 ameliorate PCP-stimulated increases in DA turnover in rat brain
Neither enantiomer of HA966 caused any significant changes in basal concentrations of DA (Table 1) or DA utilization (Fig. 2) in any brain area studied, either alone or in combination with PCP, indicating that changes in DA turnover are dependent on metabolite concentrations. Hence, the isomers of HA966, at the doses studied presently, are without apparent effect on basal function of DA systems in rat brain.
Both R-(+)- and S-(−)HA966 partially ameliorated the stimulatory effects of PCP on DA utilization in the PFC (Fig. 2). R-(+)HA966 caused a small but significant attenuation of PCP’s effects in the PFC (T = 2.38; df = 15; p = 0.032), whereas S-(−)HA966 produced a greater blockade of the PCP effect in the same area (T = 3.04; df = 13;p = 0.010). In contrast, neither enantiomer had a significant effect on PCP-induced increases in DA turnover in the NAc (Fig. 2). Likewise, consistent with HA966 having selective effects on DA systems in rat brain, neither enantiomer significantly reversed the effect of PCP on 5-HT utilization in the rat PFC or STR (Fig. 3).
PCP-induced activation of DA utilization in primate brain is blocked by S-(−)HA966
Results with S-(−)HA966 pretreatment in the primate parallel those obtained in the rodent. Increases in DA metabolism in the frontal cortex after PCP administration were completely blocked by pretreatment with S-(−)HA966 (Fig. 4). This effect was apparent in the dorsolateral prefrontal (T = 2.64, df = 10; p = 0.025), medial prefrontal (T = 3.45; df = 11;p = 0.005); lateral orbital (T = 6.93; df = 4; p = 0.002), and prelimbic cortices (T = 5.25; df = 3; p = 0.014). The effect of S-(−)HA966 on DA turnover was dependent on changes in HVA concentrations, because no significant effect of cotreatment with S-(−)HA966 and PCP on DA concentrations was observed (Table 2).
Unlike its effect in the rat, S-(−)HA966 was able to block increases in 5-HT turnover in the dorsolateral prefrontal (T = 2.32, df = 10; p = 0.042), prelimbic (T = 3.26; df = 4; p = 0.031), and anterior cingulate cortices (T = 5.09; df = 3;p = 0.015) induced by PCP in the primate (Fig. 5).
DISCUSSION
This study confirms previous reports that PCP activates DA metabolism in the PFC and NAc of rats (Deutch et al., 1987; Bowers and Morton, 1994). In addition, this report demonstrates that PCP has potent effects on monoamine transmission in the primate forebrain, exerting regionally selective effects on the DA and 5-HT innervations for the frontal cortex but sparing subcortical systems. These data suggest that the monoaminergic innervation of the monkey frontal cortex is regulated by a unique set of pharmacological influences.
Previous studies suggest that R-(+)HA966 can alter the activating effects of PCP on PFC and NAc DA utilization in the rat (Bristow et al., 1993). In contrast, we find that at doses that have no effect on basal DA concentrations or turnover, R-(+)HA966 can only partially attenuate the PCP-induced increases in PFC DA. In contrast, S-(−)HA966 does not significantly alter basal DA levels but more completely blocks the effects of PCP on PFC DA metabolism at an effective dose that is one fifth that of R-(+)HA966. Neither enantiomer was found to block the increases in NAc DA turnover stimulated by PCP. These data agree with previous reports that R-(+)HA966 can block increases in PFC, but not NAc, DA turnover induced by stress (Morrow et al., 1993; Goldstein et al., 1994).
In addition, S-(−)HA966 can completely block the effects of PCP on DA and 5-HT turnover in the monkey frontal cortex. Interestingly, primates appear to be relatively resistant (or at least as sensitive as rodents) to the sedative effects of S-(−)HA966 on a milligrams per kilograms basis. In a pilot behavioral study, a dose of 3 mg/kg, i.m., was the highest dose that did not produce significant sedation in the monkey. We have observed previously that 3 mg/kg, i.p., is the threshold for producing sedation in the rat. This low ratio of effective doses for rodents to primates is unusual but similar to that observed for γ-hydroxybutyrate (our unpublished observations).
Selective effects of HA966 on DA systems in rodent, but not primate, brain
The results of the current experiment suggest that the isomers of HA966 selectively modulate the activity of the rodent mesotelencephalic DA systems, because HA966 was unable to block the stimulatory effects of PCP on 5-HT turnover. This is supported additionally by reports that HA966 is unable to prevent the increases in 5-HT turnover induced by conditioned fear (Goldstein et al., 1994) or norepinephrine turnover induced by Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Jentsch et al., 1997). Thus, it appears that in the rat, HA966 exerts regionally and neurochemically selective effects on stimulated states of frontal cortical DA turnover.
The effects of S-(−)HA966 on DA and 5-HT turnover in the primate brain appear less selective for DA neurons, because we observed significant attenuation of PCP-induced increases in 5-HT turnover in the monkey brain. The substrate of this difference between rodents and primates is not clear; however, it may point to differences in the receptor-level regulation of brainstem monoaminergic neurons in the two species.
PCP and HA966 alter the electrophysiology of midbrain DA neurons
The effects of PCP on PFC and NAc DA turnover and release may be directly related to the increases in midbrain DA neuron burst firing elicited by PCP. DA neurons in areas A9 (substantia nigra pars compacta) and A10 [ventral tegmental area (VTA)] of the ventral mesencephalon perform in two alternate modes: tonic firing or burst firing (Grace and Bunney, 1984a,b). Population burst firing has been associated with increased DA release in terminal fields relative to tonic firing mode (Gonon, 1988; Bean and Roth, 1991). Therefore, PCP’s ability to increase burst firing in subsets of A10 DA neurons (Raja and Guyenet, 1980; Freedman and Bunney, 1984; French, 1994) may be directly related to increased DA turnover and release in the terminal fields of the mesocorticolimbic DA systems after PCP administration.
R-(+)HA966, a glycine site/NMDA antagonist, reduces spontaneous burst firing in A10 DA neurons (McMillen et al., 1992). VTA DA neurons are regulated by a tonic, excitatory NMDAergic mechanism; local application of NMDA, but not kainate or quisqualate, to the VTA induces increased burst firing in DA neurons, whereas application of AP-5, but not CNQX, reduces spontaneous burst firing in the same neurons (Chergui et al., 1993). In addition, the excitatory amino acid antagonist kynurenate, which acts as an antagonist of the NMDA glycine modulatory site, prevents burst firing in midbrain DA neurons (Grenhoff et al., 1988; Wu et al., 1994). The competitive NMDA antagonist CPP prevents burst firing in VTA DA neurons induced by PCP (French, 1992). Taken together, this evidence suggests that the firing pattern of VTA DA neurons is preferentially modulated by NMDA-sensitive glutamate receptors and that, paradoxically, NMDA antagonism can prevent PCP-induced activation of DA neurons.
There is evidence that R-(+)HA966 is having its effect on NMDA receptors directly in the VTA. Recent biochemical studies have shown that intra-VTA infusions of R-(+)HA966 can block the stimulatory effects of both restraint stress and the anxiogenic β-carboline FG7142 on PFC DA turnover (Morrow et al., 1993; Murphy et al., 1996c).
S-(−)HA966 also acts to regularize midbrain DA neuronal activity at low doses, while terminating impulse flow and increasing DA levels in terminal fields at high doses (Mocsary and Roth, 1994; Shepard et al., 1996; Grobaski et al., 1997). The pharmacological mechanism by which this action occurs is, unfortunately, unclear; however, it may be that S-(−)HA966 acts through a GABAB or γ-hydroxybutyrate receptor mechanism. We have, however, observed that γ-hydroxybutyrate (via its lactone precursor) does not block the PCP-induced increases in rodent forebrain DA turnover (our unpublished observations), suggesting that S-(−)HA966’s γ- hydroxybutyrate-like properties are not relevant in this paradigm. In addition, recent electrophysiological examinations suggest that a GABAB mechanism is likely not involved in S-(−)HA966’s rate-suppressing effects on midbrain DA neurons in vivo (Grobaski et al., 1997). We await additional examinations of the pharmacological mechanism(s) of action of this potent regulator of DA function.
Implications for pharmacological regulation of DA systems in primate brain
Despite several decades of research into the pharmacological regulation of midbrain DA neurons in the rat brain, relatively little is known about the mechanisms controlling DA systems in the primate brain. The present study suggests that several findings in the rodent brain extend to the primate. First, it seems that the DAergic innervation of the frontal cortex in both species is subject to differential pharmacological regulation compared with that innervating such subcortical structures as the NAc, caudate, and putamen, because in the monkey, PCP only increased DA turnover in the frontal cortex. Second, S-(−)HA966 is able to prevent PCP-induced increases in frontal cortical DA turnover in the primate brain as it does in the rat.
In addition to these similarities, there are differences between rodents and primates. Most notably is the fact that a significant increase in DA turnover in the rat NAc was observed after PCP administration, whereas there was no such effect in the primate NAc. In addition, S-(−)HA966 was able to block the increase in 5-HT metabolism in primate brain, whereas it had no effect on the 5-HT increases induced by PCP in rodent brain. These differences and similarities urge future examinations of the biochemical pharmacology of the ascending monoamine systems in primate brain, because the implications for regulation of DA function in the human brain have relevance to numerous psychiatric and neurological disorders.
Relevance to psychiatric disorders
PCP and the PCP analog ketamine induce schizophreniform symptoms in normal humans and cause profound worsening of symptoms in schizophrenics (Luby et al., 1962; Javitt and Zukin, 1991; Krystal et al., 1994). At least a portion of these symptoms, the profound cognitive impairments exhibited after PCP or ketamine administration, may be related to a hyperdopaminergic state of the PFC. Increased DA transmission in the PFC induced by a pharmacological stressor, FG7142, impairs cognitive functioning in rats and primates (Murphy et al., 1996a), and a hyperdopaminergic substrate has also been observed to underlie the cognitive-impairing effects of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Jentsch et al., 1997) and ketamine and MK-801 (Verma and Moghaddam, 1996). As such, a hyperactive mesoPFC DA system may be the neurochemical correlate of the impaired working memory and negative symptoms of subjects given PCP, and HA966 may prove to be a pharmacological therapy for alleviating this dysfunction.
Footnotes
This work was supported in part by U.S. Public Health Service Grants MH-14092 (R.H.R.) and MH-00643 (D.E.R.), the Scottish Rite Schizophrenia Research Program, N.M.J., U.S.A. (J.D.J.), and the Axion Research Foundation. We thank Mark Brittan, Yufang Pan, and the staff of the St. Kitts Biomedical Research Foundation for their expert technical assistance.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Robert H. Roth, Department of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, P.O. Box 208066, New Haven, CT 06520-8066.