Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
ARTICLE

Myosin Iβ Is Located at Tip Link Anchors in Vestibular Hair Bundles

Peter S. Steyger, Peter G. Gillespie and Richard A. Baird
Journal of Neuroscience 15 June 1998, 18 (12) 4603-4615; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-12-04603.1998
Peter S. Steyger
1R. S. Dow Neurological Sciences Institute, Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital, Portland, Oregon 97209, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter G. Gillespie
2Department of Physiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard A. Baird
1R. S. Dow Neurological Sciences Institute, Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital, Portland, Oregon 97209, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Recent studies have suggested that myosin Iβ mediates the adaptation of mechanoelectrical transduction in vestibular hair cells. An important prediction of this hypothesis is that myosin Iβ should be found in the side insertional plaque, an osmiophilic hair bundle structure that anchors tip links and is thought to house the adaptation motor. To determine whether myosin Iβ was situated properly to perform adaptation, we used immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopy with the monoclonal antibody mT2 to examine the distribution of myosin Iβ in hair bundles of the bullfrog utricle. Although utricular hair cells differ in their rates and extent of adaptation [Baird RA (1994) Comparative transduction mechanisms of hair cells in the bullfrog utriculus. II. Sensitivity and response dynamics to hair bundle displacement. J Neurophysiol 71:685–705.], myosin Iβ was present in all hair bundles, regardless of adaptation kinetics. Confirming that, nevertheless, it was positioned properly to mediate adaptation, myosin Iβ was found at significantly higher levels in the side insertional plaque. Myosin Iβ was also present at elevated levels at the second tip link anchor of a hair bundle, the tip insertional plaque, found at the tip of a stereocilium. These data support myosin Iβ as the adaptation motor and are consistent with the suggestion that the motor serves to restore tension applied to transduction channels to an optimal level, albeit with different kinetics in different cell types.

  • vestibular
  • hair cell
  • myosin
  • adaptation
  • mechanosensory transduction
  • stereocilia

Hair cells of the bullfrog’s vestibular otolith organs respond to gravity, vibration, and linear acceleration. Saccular hair cells detect with particular sensitivity substrate-borne vibration (Lewis et al., 1982); to ensure optimal sensitivity to their favored stimulus, most cells adapt rapidly to static stimuli (Eatock et al., 1987). By contrast, the utricle responds to both static gravitational and dynamic linear acceleration; accordingly, this organ has several hair cell types, each with a characteristic rate and extent of adaptation (Lewis and Li, 1975;Baird, 1994a,b).

An elastic gating spring controls mechanically sensitive transduction channels of hair cells (Corey and Hudspeth, 1983). The best candidate for this spring is the tip link, an extracellular filament that connects adjacent stereocilia along the axis of sensitivity of a hair cell (Pickles et al., 1984; Furness and Hackney, 1985; Assad et al., 1991). A tip link terminates in osmiophilic structures at the kinociliary side of a stereociliary tip and along the side of the adjacent stereocilium (Furness and Hackney, 1985). The structure at the upper end of the tip link, the side insertional plaque, probably houses the adaptation motor, a force-producing mechanism hypothesized to encompass a cluster of myosin molecules. In this view, myosin molecules respond to changes in gating spring tension and intracellular Ca2+ by moving the insertional plaque along the stereociliary cytoskeleton, restoring tension to near the original level (Howard and Hudspeth, 1987a,b; Assad and Corey, 1992; Jaramillo and Hudspeth, 1993; Hudspeth and Gillespie, 1994; Gillespie and Corey, 1997).

Although it may operate on different time scales in different hair cell types, adaptation optimizes the tension applied to transduction channels (Howard et al., 1988). For maximal sensitivity to low-frequency stimuli, transduction channels should be poised at the point of maximum slope on the tension–open probability curve, a two- or three-state Boltzmann relation (Corey and Hudspeth, 1983; Hudspeth, 1992). Alternatively, cells responding to high-frequency stimuli should circumvent low-pass membrane filtering by positioning channels where the slope of the curve changes most rapidly (Hudspeth, 1983). Because several piconewtons must be applied through a gating spring before the open probability of a transduction channel reaches either of these positions (Hudspeth, 1992), a mechanism that applies force at rest to gating springs must be a universal feature of sensitive hair cells. Although the adaptation motor applies resting tension and effects adaptation to sustained stimuli, other mechanisms of adaptation also may function simultaneously (Ricci and Fettiplace, 1997).

Thirteen myosin transcripts are expressed in the bullfrog saccule (Solc et al., 1994). Although myosin Iβ, VI, and VIIa reside in hair bundles (Gillespie et al., 1993; Hasson et al., 1997), only myosin Iβ is situated appropriately to mediate adaptation. To test more definitively whether myosin Iβ could be the adaptation motor, we sought to determine whether it was located within or near the side insertional plaque. Because the adaptation motor should be a universal feature in sensitive hair cells, an adaptation motor myosin should be found in all hair cells, regardless of adaptation kinetics. Hair cells of widely ranging adaptation kinetics contained myosin Iβ, and in all cell types this isozyme was associated with tip link anchors, the expected position of the adaptation motor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials. Nonimmune antisera, proteolytic enzymes, and reagents used in fixatives and immunochemical buffers were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO), unless otherwise stated. Rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin was purchased from Sigma or Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). Biotinylated horse anti-mouse secondary antibodies and rhodamine-conjugated streptavidin were obtained, respectively, from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA) and Amersham (Arlington Heights, IL). Donkey γ-globulin was purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch (West Grove, PA), Tween 20 from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA), Immobilon P from Millipore (Bedford, MA), and sulfosuccinimidyl-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-propionate (sulfo-SHPP) from Pierce (Rockford, IL). We obtained alkaline phosphatase-coupled goat anti-mouse secondary antibodies from Southern Biotechnology (Birmingham, AL) and 3-(4-methoxyspiro{1,2-dioxetane-3,2′-(5′-chloro)tricyclo[3.3.1.13,7]decan}-4-yl)phenyl phosphate (CSPD) from Tropix (Bedford, MA). Cell-Tak was purchased from Collaborative Biomedical Products, Becton Dickinson (Bedford, MA). Formaldehyde, glycol methacrylate (JB4), Fluoromount, and Aquamount were obtained from Polysciences (Warrington, PA). Electron microscopy supplies, including gold-conjugated antibodies and glutaraldehyde, osmium tetroxide, propylene oxide, Eponate 12, and uranyl acetate, were purchased from Ted Pella (Redding, CA).

Dissection of the utricular macula. Healthy adult bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) were anesthetized with 0.2% 3-aminobenzoic acid ethyl ester (MS-222), immersed in crushed ice, and decapitated. The lower jaw was removed, and the utricular maculae were dissected from the membranous labyrinth in chilled, oxygenated HEPES-buffered saline (HBS) containing (in mm): 110 Na+, 2 K+, 4 Ca2+, 120 Cl−, 3d-glucose, and 5 HEPES, pH 7.25. Utricular maculae were immersed for 30–45 min in oxygenated HBS containing 50 μg/ml subtilisin Carlsberg (Sigma protease type XXIV) to loosen the otolith membrane; then the digested remains of the otolith membrane were removed with gentle mechanical agitation.

Actin and myosin Iβ labeling. To visualize filamentous actin, we fixed utricular maculae for 2 hr with 4% formaldehyde in 0.1m phosphate buffer, pH 7.25, rinsed them in phosphate buffer, and incubated them for 30 min with 0.5% Triton X-100 and 5 μm rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin in PBS (0.09% NaCl in 0.02 m phosphate buffer, pH 7.8). Phalloidin-labeled maculae were mounted in Fluoromount in depression slides and were observed with fluorescence microscopy.

The visualization of myosin Iβ required an abbreviated fixation protocol to preserve myosin Iβ antigenicity. In these experiments the utricular maculae were fixed for 15 min with 3% formaldehyde in 0.1m phosphate buffer, rinsed in PBS, and permeabilized for 10 min in 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS. Nonspecific binding sites were blocked by immersion of the tissue for 30 min in 5% normal horse serum and 1% bovine serum albumin in PBS (PBS + 1% BSA). Utricular maculae then were incubated for 1 hr in blocking solution containing 10 μg/ml mT2 (also known as M2; Wagner et al., 1992), a mouse monoclonal antibody raised against bovine adrenal myosin Iβ, and were rinsed in PBS + 1% BSA. For fluorescence microscopy, bound primary antibodies were detected by indirect immunolabeling. Utricular maculae were incubated for 30 min with biotinylated horse anti-mouse antibodies (1:100 in PBS + 1% BSA), were washed several times with PBS + 1% BSA, and were incubated with streptavidin conjugated with Texas Red (1:100 in PBS + 1% BSA). In some experiments the utricular maculae were embedded in glycol methacrylate (JB4), serially sectioned at 7 μm; individual cross sections were observed with fluorescence microscopy.

For immunocytochemical controls, primary antibody was replaced with (1) nonimmune mouse serum or (2) primary antibody preadsorbed for 30 min with a synthetic peptide containing the epitope for mT2, located within the tail region of frog myosin Iβ (PVVKYDRKGYKPRRRQLLLT; Metcalf, 1996).

Fluorescence microscopy. Whole-mount maculae and macular cross sections were examined through rhodamine or Texas Red filter sets (Chroma Technology, Brattleboro, VT), using 40× (numerical aperture, 0.9) or 63× (numerical aperture 1.25) oil-immersion Zeiss Plan Apo objectives in a Zeiss Standard 16 microscope (Oberkochen, Germany). Low-power photomicrographs of phalloidin-labeled maculae or myosin Iβ immunoreactivity were taken with T-Max film (Kodak, Rochester, NY) exposed at 400 or 1600 ASA. For images at higher magnifications, we obtained video images of labeled material via a cooled CCD video camera (model 72, Dage-MTI, Michigan City, IN). Gain and black level controls were set identically for both control and experimental samples. Individual video images were integrated for 50–150 msec to increase sensitivity and averaged 64–128 times with an image acquisition board (Imagraph, Precision Monoscan, Natick, MA) to reduce noise. Resultant video images were corrected with a defocused background image and were adjusted for optimal brightness and contrast.

Hair bundle isolation and immunoblotting. Utricular hair bundle isolation used methods similar to those developed for the frog saccule (Gillespie and Hudspeth, 1991). After dissection and adhesion to a Cell-Tak-coated isolation chamber, utricles were incubated for 15 min with 50 μg/ml subtilisin Carlsberg to assist in otolith membrane removal. To improve recovery of small bundles, we subsequently incubated utricles for 20 min with 5 mm sulfo-SHPP, using the conditions described in Gillespie and Hudspeth (1991) for labeling with N-hydroxysuccinimide derivatives. If the sulfo-SHPP step was eliminated, bundle recovery was restricted mainly to the large striolar bundles (“striola-rich bundles”). Utricles then were immersed in 3% molten methoxylated agarose (Sigma type VIIA) at 34°C for 3 min and subsequently were cooled at 4°C for 10–15 min. After the agarose formed a firm gel, the maculae were removed mechanically, leaving the hair bundles embedded in agarose. Recoveries of isolated hair bundles were estimated visually (Gillespie and Hudspeth, 1991).

For immunofluorescence the isolated hair bundles, embedded in agarose, were fixed for 15 min with 1% formaldehyde in 0.1 mphosphate buffer, permeabilized for 15 min with 0.5% Triton-X 100, and blocked for 30 min with 4 μg/ml hemoglobin, 250 μg/ml donkey γ-globulin, and 0.1% Tween 20 in PBS. Hair bundles were incubated overnight with 20 μg/ml primary antibodies in blocking solution. To demonstrate specificity, we included a 50–100 μmconcentration of the mT2 epitope peptide in the control samples. After being washed with 0.1% Tween 20 in PBS, the hair bundles were incubated for 1 hr with 10 μg/ml Cy5-conjugated donkey anti-mouse and 200 nm rhodamine–phalloidin, rinsed in PBS, and mounted with Aquamount. Then the hair bundles were observed with a Zeiss LSM 410 confocal microscope, using 543 nm and 633 nm HeNe lasers and Zeiss C-Apo 40× (numerical aperture, 1.2) water-immersion or Zeiss Plan Apo 100× (numerical aperture, 1.4) oil-immersion objectives.

SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. Dissected agarose blocks containing hair bundles were heated with SDS-PAGE sample buffer, and samples were separated on 10% acrylamide, low cross-linker SDS gels (Yamoah and Gillespie, 1996; Hasson et al., 1997). To allow for estimation of recovery, we ran on the same gels samples of recombinant frog myosin Iβ, expressed in insect cells, using a baculovirus expression vector (S. Jean and P. Gillespie, unpublished data). Proteins were transferred to Immobilon P in a solution containing 5% methanol and 10 mm 3-(cyclohexylamino)-1-propane sulfonic acid (CAPS), pH 11 (Hasson et al., 1997). Hemoglobin was included in samples and in the gel-incubation solution to facilitate the transfer of small amounts of bundle protein (Gillespie and Gillespie, 1997). Immunoblots were blocked for 2 hr with 5% Amersham Liquid Block in PBS and then were incubated for an additional 2 hr with 10 μg/ml mT2 in the blocking solution. In early experiments we used biotinylated goat anti-mouse secondary antibodies and streptavidin–alkaline phosphatase, both diluted 1:1000, to detect bound antibody. To avoid the detection of endogenously biotinylated macular proteins, we used alkaline phosphatase-coupled goat anti-mouse secondary antibodies, diluted 1:1000, in later experiments. Chemiluminescence development used CSPD and methods described previously (Gillespie and Hudspeth, 1991). Myosin Iβ was quantified by scanning autoradiograms and comparing the optical density of an unknown with that of purified myosin Iβ standards.

Transmission electron microscopy. Utricular maculae, fixed with formaldehyde as described above, were permeabilized for 10 min in 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS, blocked for 30 min with 5% normal horse serum in PBS + 1% BSA, and were incubated for 1 hr with the primary antibody at 10 μg/ml. After being washed, tissue-bound antibodies were localized by incubating maculae for an additional hour with PBS + 1% BSA containing secondary antibodies conjugated to 3–5 nm gold particles. Maculae were washed and then post-fixed for 1 hr with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS and for 1 hr with 1% osmium tetroxide in PBS. Maculae were dehydrated through an ascending ethanol series and were passaged through 1:1 ethanol/propylene oxide, 100% propylene oxide, and 1:1 Eponate 12 resin/polypropylene oxide. After maculae were infiltrated with three changes of Eponate 12 resin, resin blocks were polymerized at 60°C, trimmed, and sectioned with an ultramicrotome (MT2B, DuPont Sorvall, Wilmington, DE). Silver–gold serial sections (60–70 nm) were collected on colloidin-coated nickel slot grids, counterstained with uranyl acetate, and examined in a Zeiss 10C/A transmission electron microscope at accelerating voltages of 60 or 80 kV.

Control organs were treated during the primary antibody incubation step with blocking solution containing (1) no primary antibody, (2) nonimmune mouse serum, or (3) mT2 preadsorbed with the mT2-epitope peptide. For preadsorption, 500 μm peptide in PBS was mixed for 30 min with 100 μg/ml mT2; then this solution was diluted 1:10 before use.

Morphometric analyses. Photographic negatives of individual stereocilia containing both tip and side insertional plaques were enlarged to a total magnification of 100,000×. The tip and side plaques were defined, respectively, as the electron-dense regions located at the stereociliary tip and adjacent to a distinct notch in the nonkinociliary side of the stereociliary membrane. Although these structures anchor tip links, because of the harsh conditions required for preembedding immunoelectron microscopy, tip links were observed only rarely. Quantitative analysis of gold particle labeling was performed only on negatives of stereocilia possessing both tip and side plaques. After identifying on a section a stereocilium that contained tip and side plaques, we ensured that this stereocilium was not analyzed on adjacent sections also. Using a 10× loupe eyepiece, we then verified the shape and diameter of presumptive gold particles on photographic prints and, using transparent overlays, placed a dot over each identified gold particle. Clusters of gold particles were included in our analysis only when individual particles within a cluster could be discerned and counted. For publication, photographic negatives were scanned digitally, and image brightness and contrast were adjusted to optimize the visualization of gold particles and stereociliary structures.

The distribution of gold particles was measured after each stereocilium was divided with spatial bins. To create these bins, we bisected the stereocilium along its longitudinal midline into kinociliary and nonkinociliary halves. Starting at the stereociliary tip, pairs of bins in spatial register, extending 200 nm along the length of a stereocilium, were placed adjacent to each other across the midline. Gold particles therefore were counted within bins that each encompassed one-half of a stereocilium horizontally and 200 nm longitudinally.

Our initial analysis suggested that gold particles were located preferentially in bins containing the tip or side insertional plaques. To test this hypothesis further, we counted the number of gold particles located within a series of 75 nm square bins, centered on the side plaque and continuing apically and basally on the nonkinociliary side of the stereociliary shaft. A control analysis was performed on the kinociliary side of the stereociliary shaft, using bins in spatial register with those on the nonkinociliary side. Paired bins extended to a point ∼200 nm below the tip plaque. In addition, to compare the amount of gold immunoreactivity immediately surrounding the tip and side plaques, we counted the number of gold particles located within a 100 nm diameter arc centered on these structures. We then determined the average gold particle density by dividing the number of gold particles by the area of each arc contained within the stereocilium.

Statistical procedures. Unless otherwise stated, statistical comparisons of morphometric data were based on a one-way ANOVA. Where appropriate, post hoc pairwise multiple comparisons were performed with the Tukey multiple comparison test, adjusting, when necessary, for unequal group sizes.

RESULTS

Phalloidin labeling of utricular hair bundles

We examined the distribution of myosin Iβ in hair bundles of the bullfrog’s utricle. To visualize utricular hair bundles, we labeled bullfrog utricles with rhodamine–phalloidin. At low magnification, phalloidin labeling clearly revealed the shape of the sensory epithelium and the presence of the striola, a characteristic curved band of larger hair bundles, near the abneural edge of the macula (Fig.1A). At higher magnifications (Fig. 1B) we could visualize the shape and size of individual hair bundles and could observe circumferential actin belts, which circumscribe hair cells at the level of the adherens junctions. As previously described (Baird, 1994a,b), cells within the striola generally had larger bundles and were packed less densely than hair cells in the surrounding medial and lateral extrastriolar regions. Within the striola, hair cells abruptly reversed their bundle polarization about a line located near the lateral edge of the striolar region (dashed line, Fig. 1B). Hair cells in the inner striolar rows immediately adjacent to this line were smaller and less densely packed than those in the adjacent outer striolar rows. This pattern of hair bundles coincides with the known distribution of hair cells with differing adaptation kinetics: Type C and Type F hair cells in the outer striolar rows adapt rapidly, Type C and Type E hair cells in the inner striolar rows adapt more slowly, and Type B hair cells in the medial and lateral extrastriolar regions display little or no adaptation over a time scale of several seconds (Baird, 1992, 1994b).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Isolation and protein analysis of utricular hair bundles. A, Rhodamine–phalloidin labeling of hair bundles in the whole-mount utricle. B, Rhodamine–phalloidin labeling, at higher magnification, of the striola and surrounding medial and lateral extrastriolar regions. Thedotted line marks the reversal of hair bundle polarization, dividing the striola into the medial and the lateral zones. MES, Medial extrastriola; MS, medial striola; LS, lateral striola; LES, lateral extrastriola; O, outer striolar rows;I, inner striolar rows. C, Rhodamine–phalloidin labeling of hair bundles isolated with sulfo-SHPP. D, Protein immunoblot labeled with mT2, a monoclonal antibody against myosin Iβ. mT2 labeled bands at the expected molecular mass of myosin Iβ. Utricular bundles, Hair bundles from ∼14 utricular equivalents;Utricular macula, total protein from one utricular macula; Saccular macula, total protein from one saccular macula; rMIβ, 50 pg of recombinant myosin.E, Rhodamine–phalloidin labeling of hair bundles isolated without sulfo-SHPP treatment. Note the relative paucity of extrastriolar hair bundles. F, Protein immunoblot labeled with mT2 of bundles from striola-rich (without sulfo-SHPP) and whole utricle (with sulfo-SHPP) preparations. Striola-rich bundles, Hair bundles extracted without sulfo-SHPP treatment from ∼15 utricular equivalents; Utricular bundles,hair bundles extracted with sulfo-SHPP treatment from ∼7 utricular equivalents. Scale bars: 150 μm in A,C, E; 20 μm in B.

Hair bundle isolation and myosin Iβ immunoblotting

To identify and localize myosin Iβ within utricular hair bundles, we used the monoclonal antibody mT2 (also known as M2; Wagner et al., 1992). The specificity of mT2 for myosin Iβ has been confirmed by epitope-mapping studies, which localized high-affinity antibody binding to a 12-amino-acid region with no more than four identical amino acids in any other known myosin I (Metcalf, 1996). In some experiments described below, we used a synthetic peptide containing this region to demonstrate the specificity of mT2 labeling.

To isolate utricular hair bundles and confirm that these bundles contain myosin Iβ, we adapted the “twist-off” isolation used to purify hair bundles from the bullfrog’s saccule (Gillespie and Hudspeth, 1991). The undulating shape of the utricle and the large number of small hair bundles introduced challenges that had not been faced with saccular hair bundle isolation. Because utricles did not adhere well to the Cell-Tak-coated experimental chamber, we used an agarose that remained molten at 34°C for an extended period of time; this extra time allowed us to reposition utricles that had detached from the bottom of the chamber during agarose irrigation. In addition, to isolate the small extrastriolar hair bundles that constituted the majority of utricular bundles, we found it necessary to modify surface amino groups with the water-soluble N-hydroxysuccinimide sulfo-SHPP. We also took advantage of the poor recovery of extrastriolar hair bundles when we were not using sulfo-SHPP to isolate hair bundles preferentially from the striolar region. Although the mechanism of action of sulfo-SHPP modification is unknown, this reagent also enhances the recovery of saccular hair bundles (P. Gillespie, unpublished data). When sulfo-SHPP was used, recoveries of utricular hair bundles ranged from 50 to 100%, comparable to recoveries of saccular hair bundles.

Phalloidin labeling of isolated utricular hair bundles in agarose with (Fig. 1C) or without (Fig. 1E) sulfo-SHPP treatment revealed that the distinctive distribution patterns of striolar and extrastriolar hair bundles were retained after isolation and closely corresponded to those seen in intact maculae (Fig.1A). In particular, the striolar and extrastriolar regions were identified easily, and the smaller, more dispersed hair bundles of the inner striola rows were distinguished readily from the larger hair bundles of the outer striolar rows (Fig.1B,C).

Using mT2, we found that purified utricular hair bundles contained myosin Iβ in substantial amounts (Fig. 1D). Hair bundle myosin Iβ comigrated with myosin Iβ from whole saccular macula and from whole utricular macula at ∼105 kDa, the migration position for myosin Iβ in low cross-linker polyacrylamide gels (Fig.1D). Other bands, seen in addition to the myosin Iβ monomer, were observed only sporadically. Utricular hair bundle myosin Iβ migrated slightly faster than recombinant frog myosin Iβ, which was ∼3 kDa larger because of its N-terminal fusion partner. By quantitative immunoblotting, we estimated that the hair bundles of one utricle contained 22 ± 10 pg of myosin Iβ. Although this value is considerably larger than that for saccular hair bundles (3 pg;Gillespie et al., 1993), conversion by the relative number of bundles per organ (Baird and Schuff, 1994) and the average number of stereocilia per bundle (Baird, 1994a) indicates that the amount of myosin Iβ per stereocilium is only approximately fourfold greater in the utricle. There was approximately fourfold more myosin Iβ per utricular equivalent of bundles in the entire utricle preparation than in the striola-rich preparation (Fig. 1F) (data not shown). These results demonstrate that mT2 detects myosin Iβ in utricular hair bundles.

Confirming that myosin molecules were present in utricular hair bundles, photoaffinity labeling of utricular bundle proteins with [α-32P]UTP and vanadate (Gillespie et al., 1993) identified proteins of 105 and 230 kDa, probably myosin Iβ and myosin VIIa (Hasson et al., 1997) (data not shown).

Fluorescence microscopy

When we used mT2 to label intact utricular maculae, we found that immunofluorescence corresponding to myosin Iβ was present in utricular hair bundles throughout the striola (Fig.2B) and the surrounding medial (Fig. 2A) and lateral (Fig. 2C) extrastriolar regions. Myosin Iβ was also present in supporting cell apices (data not shown), as previously reported for the saccule (Gillespie et al., 1993). Close examination of whole-mount utricles and resin-embedded cross sections (Fig. 2D) indicated that striolar and extrastriolar hair bundles were labeled in their entirety. Hair bundles in the inner striolar rows, primarily belonging to cells with slow adaptation kinetics (Baird, 1992, 1994b), were labeled less intensely than bundles of nonadapting Type B hair cells in extrastriolar regions (Fig. 2A,C,D) and bundles of rapidly adapting hair cells in outer striolar rows (Fig.2B,D). In control experiments in which primary antibodies were omitted (data not shown), replaced with nonimmune mouse serum (Fig. 2E), or preadsorbed with mT2-epitope peptide (Fig. 2G), no immunoreactivity was visible in utricular hair bundles (compare Fig. 2, E and F;G and H). Under each of these control conditions, only weak, nonspecific reactivity was visible within the macula, usually within blood vessels.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Immunofluorescence localization of myosin Iβ in utricular hair cells. A–C, mT2 labeling in whole-mount utricles. A, Medial extrastriolar region (MES). B, Striola. Arrowsmark the borders between the inner striolar (IS) rows and the medial (left) and lateral (right) outer striolar (OS) rows. Note that hair bundles in the inner striolar rows are labeled less intensely than those in the extrastriolar regions and outer striolar rows. C, Lateral extrastriolar region (LES). D, mT2 labeling in a cross section of the utricular macula. Large arrows mark the medial (left) and lateral (right) edges of the striola region; small arrows mark the borders between the inner striolar rows and the medial (left) and lateral (right) outer striolar rows. Note that immunoreactivity occurs throughout extrastriolar and outer striolar hair bundles and that inner striolar hair bundles (asterisks) are immunolabeled less intensely than hair bundles in the extrastriolar and outer striolar rows. E–H, Control experiments. Fluorescence (E, G) and differential interference contrast (DIC; F, H) images of medial extrastriolar hair bundles were obtained after mT2 was replaced with nonimmune mouse serum (E, F) or preadsorbed with a synthetic peptide derived from the tail region of bullfrog myosin Iβ (G, H). Note that fluorescence was abolished under both control conditions. Scale bars: 50 μm in A–D; 25 μm inE–H.

We also examined the distribution of myosin Iβ in hair bundles isolated from the utricular macula. When agarose-embedded utricular hair bundles were double-labeled for filamentous actin (Fig.3A) and myosin Iβ (Fig.3B), generally similar labeling patterns were observed with the two reagents. One exception, however, was that the inner striolar bundles of slowly adapting hair cells contained less myosin Iβ than bundles in the outer striolar rows, derived primarily from rapidly adapting hair cells (Fig. 3B). Z-series projections taken at different focal planes indicated that myosin Iβ immunoreactivity was present throughout the length of all hair bundles. Confirming that the antibody recognized myosin Iβ, the synthetic mT2 peptide reduced nearly completely the mT2 labeling (Fig.3C,D). When higher magnification pseudo-color images of rhodamine–phalloidin (red) and mT2 (green) labeling were combined digitally, hair bundles with both filamentous actin and myosin Iβ labeling appeared yellow-brown (Fig. 3E). Hair bundles in the inner striola, with strong filamentous actin labeling and little myosin Iβ immunoreactivity, appeared red. Modest amounts of Cy5 fluorescence not associated with hair bundles were also present; this signal (green in Fig. 3E) corresponded to mT2 binding to the agarose gel or structures trapped within it.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Immunofluorescence localization of myosin Iβ in isolated utricular hair bundles. A–D, Isolated agarose-embedded utricular hair bundles were double-labeled with rhodamine–phalloidin (A, C) and mT2 (B, D). Hair bundles in all regions contain filamentous actin; hair bundles in the inner striolar contain less myosin Iβ than do bundles in the outer striolar rows and surrounding extrastriolar regions (B). When mT2 was preadsorbed with a synthetic peptide derived from the tail region of bullfrog myosin Iβ, negligible immunoreactivity was seen in utricular hair bundles. D, E, Superimposed high power pseudo-color images of hair bundles labeled with rhodamine–phalloidin (red) and mT2 (green). Hair bundles with both filamentous actin and myosin Iβ labeling appear yellow-brown; hair bundles in the inner striolar rows with strong actin labeling and weak myosin Iβ labeling appear red; antibody reactivity unassociated with hair bundles appears green. Scale bars: 50 μm in A–D; 10 μm inE.

Transmission electron microscopy

To confirm the localization of myosin Iβ obtained from immunofluorescence experiments and to refine its localization by using the higher resolution afforded by immunoelectron microscopy, we used a preembedding procedure, using secondary antibodies conjugated with 3–5 nm gold particles. Control experiments, including omission of the primary antibody, substitution of the primary antibody with nonimmune mouse serum, or preadsorption of the primary antibody with synthetic myosin peptides, showed that nonspecific immunoreactivity was negligible (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Immunoelectron microscopy controls. Few gold particles were observed when mT2 was preadsorbed with a synthetic peptide derived from the tail region of bullfrog myosin Iβ (A, B) or replaced with nonimmune serum (C) or blocking serum (D). Scale bars: 100 nm in A–D.

mT2 gave a robust labeling of utricular cells, particularly hair cells. Gold particles corresponding to myosin Iβ were observed in the microvilli of hair cells and supporting cells (data not shown) and in the cell apices and stereocilia of extrastriolar (arrowheads, Fig. 5) and striolar (arrowheads, Fig. 6) hair cells. In stereocilia, gold particles were located preferentially close to the cell membrane, throughout the length of each stereocilium (Figs. 5B–D, 6B,C). Gold particles were observed at the ankle region at the stereociliary base, particularly at the junction where the stereociliary membrane meets with the apical membrane of the hair cell (arrowheads, Fig. 5B). Gold particles also were found along the stereociliary rootlet within the cuticular plate (arrow, Fig. 5B).

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Immunoelectron microscopic localization of myosin Iβ in extrastriolar hair cells. Shown are the locations of side insertional plaques (A, C,D, arrows) and gold immunoreactivity (B–D) in medial extrastriolar Type B hair bundles. Note the presence of gold particles in the stereociliary rootlet (B, small arrow), ankle region (B, arrowheads), side plaques (C, D, arrowheads), and stereociliary tips (C, D,arrowheads). In D, there are 40 counted gold particles, but only three are indicated at the tipsof the arrowheads. As an example, thearrowhead on the top right of the panel is pointing to a single gold particle; in addition, there are two clearly identifiable particles immediately below this one. To theright of those two particles is a cluster that would not be included in the particle count because of the difficulty in discerning the number of particles present. Images were obtained at accelerating voltages of 60 kV (A–C) or 80 kV (D). Scale bars: 500 nm in A; 200 nm in B; 100 nm in C,D.

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Immunoelectron microscopic localization of myosin Iβ in striolar hair cells. Shown are the locations of side insertional plaques (large arrows, A–C) and gold immunoreactivity (B, C) in stereocilia from an outer striolar Type C hair bundle. Note the presence of gold particles at the tip and side plaques (arrowheads, B, C). All images were obtained at an accelerating voltage of 60 kV. Scale bars: 500 nm in A; 100 nm in B,C.

If myosin Iβ is the adaptation motor of the hair cell, then this myosin should be associated with the osmiophilic structure at the upper end of the tip link, the side insertional plaque, which is thought to house the motor molecules. We observed gold particles in and around the side plaques in both extrastriolar (arrowheads, Fig. 5C,D) and striolar (arrowheads, Fig.6B,C) hair cells. In addition, gold particles frequently were found on the second osmiophilic structure associated with tip links, the tip insertional plaque. This structure is located on the kinociliary side of each stereociliary tip, at the base of a tip link; like the side plaque, the tip plaque may contain structures that are important for transduction and adaptation. Gold particles were observed more frequently around the interior edges of the plaques rather than within them and also frequently were observed immediately above and below the side plaques.

The small gold particles used in this study were difficult to see on negatives of stereociliary sections without further magnification. When higher accelerating voltages were used (80 kV), gold particles were easier to distinguish, but the opacity of the tip and side plaques decreased (Fig. 5D). Larger gold particle sizes did not work with our protocol; this protocol nonetheless was preferred because of the greater ultrastructural preservation as compared with that obtained with protocols that used greater concentrations of or longer exposure to detergent.

Morphometric analysis

To confirm that myosin Iβ was located in the side and tip insertional plaques at levels significantly higher than adjacent areas, we sectioned stereocilia parallel to the plane of symmetry of the bundle and counted gold particles along the stereociliary shaft. We only examined sections that contained both a side and a tip plaque. Within the 64 individual stereocilia from 19 hair bundles that met this criterion, we counted the number of gold particles in rectangular bins paired across the midline of each stereocilium (Fig.7A). In our initial analysis we used pairs of bins that began at stereociliary tips and continued in 200 nm increments basally toward the stereociliary rootlet. Each pair of bins included one from the kinociliary side of a stereocilium and one from the nonkinociliary side.

Fig. 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

Morphometric analysis of myosin Iβ localization, using coarse spatial bins. A, Schematic diagram of rectangular sampling grid with typical location of tip and side insertional plaques. B, Percentage of stereocilia with tip plaques located in the indicated bins. The tip plaque was always located in the apical-most kinociliary bin. C, Mean number and SD of gold particles found in each 200 nm kinociliary bin.D, Percentage of stereocilia with side plaques located in the indicated bins. The location of the side plaque on the nonkinociliary side was variable. E, Mean number and SD of gold particles found in each 200 nm nonkinociliary bin.

The mean number of gold particles per bin was greatest near the stereociliary tip and decreased significantly in more basal locations (Fig. 7C,E). This trend was most apparent on the kinociliary side of stereocilia, the side at which the tip plaque was always found (Fig. 7B).

On the nonkinociliary side of the stereocilium, the mean number of gold particles was greatest in the second bin from the tip and decreased for successively basal bins (Fig. 7E). The less striking concentration of gold particles in any particular nonkinociliary bin appeared to be attributable to the variable location of the side plaque relative to the tips of the stereocilia. The side plaque was located in the second bin from the tip in only 50% of stereocilia; the remaining side plaques were located mainly in more basal locations (Fig.7D). This was particularly true for inner striolar hair bundles, in which >75% of stereocilia had side plaques located 400 nm or more from the stereociliary tip.

For each stereocilium we compared the number of gold particles in bins containing tip plaques, bins containing side plaques, and bins without a plaque (Table 1). The overall gold immunoreactivity in Type F hair bundles was significantly greater than in other hair bundle types (p < 0.001). In addition, the number of gold particles in extrastriolar and outer striolar hair bundles was significantly greater than in inner striolar hair bundles (p < 0.05), confirming our immunofluorescence observations.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Number of gold particles in 200 nm rectangular bins

The number of gold particles located in bins containing either a tip or a side plaque, regardless of hair bundle location or morphology, was significantly higher than in bins not containing a plaque (p < 0.0001) (Table 1). With the exception of inner striolar hair bundles (p > 0.10), this observation was true for hair bundles in different macular regions and for different hair bundle types (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the number of gold particles between membrane-only bins at the same level of the stereocilium on kinociliary and nonkinociliary sides (p > 0.40).

To test more directly the hypothesis that gold immunoreactivity was associated with the side insertional plaque, we examined the distribution of gold particles in and around the plaque, using small square bins (Fig. 8A). These bins, 75 × 75 nm, were similar in size to the side plaque, which had a mean diameter of 76 ± 13 nm [n = 64 bins]. As a control, similar bins were used to examine gold particles on the kinociliary side; the number of gold particles per bin on the kinociliary side was essentially constant (p > 0.10 for all pairwise combinations; Table2). There was also no significant difference between the number of gold particles in kinociliary bins and the outermost basal (p > 0.10) or apical (p > 0.05) nonkinociliary bin. Regardless of hair bundle location or morphology, the number of gold particles on the nonkinociliary side was greatest in the bin containing the side plaque and systematically decreased in bins located basally or apically to the density (Fig. 8C). The number of gold particles in the bin containing the side plaque was significantly greater than in the outermost basal (p < 0.05) and apical (p < 0.002) bins. This significance was increased greatly when the centralmost bin was pooled with the bins located above and below it and the pooled bins were compared with the apical or basal outermost three bins (p < 0.0001), confirming our initial observation that gold immunoreactivity was located immediately adjacent to as well as within the side osmiophilic density.

Fig. 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 8.

Morphometric analysis of myosin Iβ localization, using fine spatial bins. A, Schematic diagram of 75 nm square sampling grid with typical location of tip and side insertional plaques. B, Mean number and SD of gold particles located in each bin on the kinociliary side. There was no significant difference in the number of gold particles between any two pairs of bins on the kinociliary side of the stereocilium (p > 0.10). C, Mean number and SD of gold particles located in each bin on the nonkinociliary side. On this side the number of gold particles in the bin containing the side plaque was significantly greater than that in basal or apical bins located >200 nm from the side plaque (p < 0.05).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Number of gold particles in 75 nm square bins

To compare the overall gold immunoreactivity in the immediate vicinity of the tip and side insertional plaques, we determined the density of gold particles located within arcs of 100 nm diameter, centered on the tip and side plaques. In the 64 stereocilia that were examined in this study, the gold particle density within 100 nm of the center of the side plaque (1.7 ± 0.5 gold particles per 1000 square nanometers) was significantly greater than the density within 100 nm of the center of the tip plaque (0.9 ± 0.4 particles per 1000 square nanometers) (p < 0.05) and greater than the control value density (0.7 ± 0.4 per 1000 square nanometers) (p < 0.01). The gold particle density of the tip plaque was not significantly different from the control arc.

DISCUSSION

Morphologically distinct hair cells in the bullfrog utricle differ in their rates and extent of adaptation (Baird, 1994a,b). Recent biochemical, pharmacological, and immunocytochemical studies suggest that myosin Iβ is responsible for the adaptation of mechanoelectrical transduction current in vestibular otolith hair cells (Gillespie et al., 1993; Walker and Hudspeth, 1996; Yamoah and Gillespie, 1996;Burlacu et al., 1997; Garcia et al., 1997; Hasson et al., 1997). Here, we demonstrate that utricular hair cells of widely varying adaptation kinetics contain myosin Iβ throughout their hair bundles. In addition, we demonstrate significant concentrations of myosin Iβ within the insertional plaques that anchor the tip links, providing more compelling evidence that myosin Iβ is the adaptation motor. Although the the rate of adaptation in utricular hair cells ranges from milliseconds to more than several seconds, all utricular hair cells nevertheless contain myosin Iβ molecules properly placed to perform adaptation.

Myosin Iβ in utricular stereocilia

To determine the specificity of mT2 for myosin Iβ in utricular hair bundles, we adapted previously published methods for bundle isolation (Gillespie and Hudspeth, 1991). By adding sulfo-SHPP, a water-soluble primary amine-reactive labeling reagent, we improved substantially the recovery of utricular hair bundles. Protein immunoblotting of purified hair bundles with mT2 demonstrated that the antigen recognized by this antibody is similar in mass to myosin Iβ in other frog tissues or expressed in insect cells. These results show that the antibody labels myosin Iβ selectively, justifying its use in immunolabeling experiments.

Myosin Iβ in the side insertional plaque

In the distal region of each stereocilium, regardless of hair bundle morphology and, hence, adaptation kinetics, myosin Iβ immunoreactivity was found within and adjacent to the insertional plaques at the stereociliary tip and on the side of the stereocilium near the tip of the adjacent, shorter stereocilium (see Figs. 5-8). These structures correspond with the insertion points of the tip links (Furness and Hackney, 1985). Gold particles were found at higher density within 200 nm of each tip insertional plaque and within 75 nm of each side insertional plaque, as compared with adjacent membrane areas.

Localization at the side insertional plaque lends further support to the hypothesis that myosin Iβ is the myosin isozyme responsible for adaptation. Myosin molecules are likely to constitute the adaptation motor of the hair cell, which is thought to reside in or near the side plaque (Corey and Assad, 1992; Hudspeth and Gillespie, 1994; Gillespie and Corey, 1997). Our results coincide well with localization, using a different antibody against myosin Iβ, both with preliminary results (Hasson et al., 1997) and with a statistical analysis of gold particle location within serial section reconstructions of several hair bundles (Garcia et al., 1997; D. Corey, personal communication). Although another immunoelectron microscopic investigation failed to find a correlation between myosin Iβ location and the side plaque (Metcalf, 1998), the labeling density encountered in that study appeared too low to draw meaningful statistical conclusions. The immunoelectron microscopy data obtained so far, therefore, show that myosin Iβ is concentrated where the adaptation motor is thought to be located and, hence, support its proposed role as the active component of the adaptation motor.

Gold immunoreactivity corresponding to myosin Iβ near the side insertional plaque was observed most frequently around the plaque, rather than within it. One view of the side plaque is that it contains 50–100 tightly packed myosin molecules (Hudspeth and Gillespie, 1994;Gillespie and Corey, 1997); with such a structure, antibodies may be excluded sterically from the central regions of aldehyde-fixed plaques. Alternatively, myosin Iβ may not form the side plaque as previously suggested. Instead, the central core of the plaque could be constituted of other, unknown molecules, with myosin Iβ hovering around the periphery of the plaque.

Myosin Iβ within the stereocilia

In addition to its concentration in insertional plaques, we also found myosin Iβ at the membrane along the stereociliary shaft and adjacent to the apical membrane over the cuticular plate. Myosin Iβ also was observed in the ankle region, where each stereocilium tapers as its rootlet enters the cuticular plate. Occasional myosin Iβ immunoreactivity was associated with the rootlet within the cuticular plate. The rootlets might serve as a track for initiating myosin Iβ movement into stereocilia; alternatively, myosin Iβ might participate in cross-linking rootlet actin filaments to the cuticular plate, as hypothesized for myosin VI (Hasson et al., 1997).

The majority of myosin Iβ molecules at stereociliary tips was associated with the tip insertional plaque, at the lower end of the tip link. If the transduction apparatus is symmetric, with channels and motors at either end of a tip link (Denk et al., 1995), myosin Iβ would be expected at this position, although it should not play an active role in adaptation. Other myosin Iβ molecules may be found at stereociliary tips because of the dynamic nature of the transduction apparatus (Zhao et al., 1996); recycled or unused adaptation motor myosin molecules may accumulate at the ends of their actin tracks. Not all myosin Iβ is at distal regions of the stereocilia, however; some mechanism must exist to shuttle motor molecules back to the soma or to degrade them at stereociliary tips.

Modification of adaptation rate in utricular hair cells

Our experiments indicate that gross inequities in myosin Iβ distribution cannot account for the range of adaptation kinetics seen in utricular hair cells. If hair cells have similar amounts of myosin Iβ within their adaptation motors, despite differing adaptation kinetics, how do these different cell types regulate their adaptation rates? Several explanations can account for these differences.

The rate of adaptation depends on both the force applied to the adaptation motor and on the concentration of Ca2+felt by the motor (Assad and Corey, 1992), as well as on the number of myosin molecules in an adaptation motor and on their kinetic and mechanical properties (Gillespie and Corey, 1997). Although increasing the number of myosin molecules per adaptation motor could reduce the rate of slipping adaptation, we saw no correlation between myosin Iβ immunoreactivity in side insertional plaques and the adaptation rate of the utricular hair cell types.

Differences in adaptation rate also could arise from variations in the concentration or association kinetics of mobile Ca2+buffers (Ricci and Fettiplace, 1997). Utricular hair cells contain the mobile Ca2+ buffers calbindin, calretinin, calmodulin, parvalbumin, and S-100 (Baird et al., 1997). Cells with high levels of Ca2+ buffers should adapt more slowly than those with lower amounts. Although variations in Ca2+ buffer distribution are seen within the bullfrog utricle (Baird et al., 1997), it seems unlikely that these variations could account for the differences seen in the adaptation rate.

Adaptation kinetics also might be affected by the concentration of calmodulin, a critical regulator of myosin Iβ (Barylko et al., 1992;Zhu et al., 1996), including myosin Iβ of the hair bundle (Walker and Hudspeth, 1996). Detectable calmodulin immunoreactivity is absent from nonadapting extrastriolar hair cells within the utricle (Baird et al., 1997). Although myosin Iβ is present in these hair cells, the diminished calmodulin concentration in these cells may limit the myosin activity. Different permutations of myosin Iβ and Ca2+ binding proteins could be responsible for the range of adaptation kinetics seen in different utricular hair cell types. Because additional mechanisms may account for the variability of adaptation, however, further investigation certainly will be required to establish definitively why adaptation rates vary in these cell types.

Universality of the adaptation motor

Our results confirm that myosin Iβ is present in all utricular hair cells, even those that do not adapt appreciably to sustained displacements. This apparent discrepancy may reflect different time scales of adaptation in different hair cell types. The central role of adaptation is to ensure that the tension applied to gating springs is optimal so that transduction channels can respond sensitively to displacements (Howard and Hudspeth, 1987b; Howard et al., 1988). For example, although type B hair cells do not adapt to stimuli as long as 2 sec (Baird, 1994b), myosin Iβ is present at the side insertional plaque of type B hair cells in amounts comparable to amounts in other hair cell types. Instead, the presence of an active motor molecule may account for type B cells being on their displacement–response relation at rest near the steepest and, hence, most sensitive point (Baird, 1994b), a position that should require the substantial application of force to gating springs (Hudspeth, 1992). Rather than being used to reset the transduction apparatus on a time scale of tens of milliseconds, myosin Iβ (and the adaptation motor) may operate on a much slower time scale in type B cells, presumably with similar Ca2+ feedback. Although precluding rapid adaptation, a slow time scale for the adaptation motor would ensure that these cells nevertheless could detect small stimuli.

Nonadapting hair cells of the bullfrog utriculus are unlikely to be exceptional in possessing the motor molecule responsible for adaptation without also exhibiting rapid adaptation. Setting resting gating spring tension should be a universal requirement for hair cells, and the adaptation motor is well suited to perform this role. We suspect that even hair cells of the mammalian cochlea, which exhibit little or no adaptation (Géléoc et al., 1997) (but see also Kros et al., 1992), also will use such a motor and will be found to have myosin Iβ located near their tip link anchors.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Grants DC03028 (P.S.S.), DC02368 (P.G.G.), and DC02040 (R.A.B.) and funds from the Oregon Lions Sight and Hearing Foundation (R.A.B.). P.G.G. is a Pew Scholar in the Biomedical Sciences.

    Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Peter S. Steyger, Oregon Hearing Research Center, Oregon Health Sciences University, 3181 Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97201.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Assad JA,
    2. Corey DP
    (1992) An active motor model for adaptation by vertebrate hair cells. J Neurosci 12:3291–3309.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Assad JA,
    2. Shepherd GMG,
    3. Corey DP
    (1991) Tip-link integrity and mechanical transduction in vertebrate hair cells. Neuron 7:985–994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Baird RA
    (1992) Morphological and electrophysiological properties of hair cells in the bullfrog utriculus. Ann NY Acad Sci 656:12–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Baird RA
    (1994a) Comparative transduction mechanisms of hair cells in the bullfrog utriculus. I. Responses to intracellular current. J Neurophysiol 71:666–684.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Baird RA
    (1994b) Comparative transduction mechanisms of hair cells in the bullfrog utriculus. II. Sensitivity and response dynamics to hair bundle displacement. J Neurophysiol 71:685–705.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Baird RA,
    2. Schuff NR
    (1994) Peripheral innervation patterns of vestibular nerve afferents in the bullfrog utriculus. J Comp Neurol 342:279–298.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Baird RA,
    2. Steyger PS,
    3. Schuff NR
    (1997) Intracellular distributions and putative functions of calcium-binding proteins in the bullfrog vestibular otolith organs. Hear Res 103:85–100.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Barylko B,
    2. Wagner MC,
    3. Reizes O,
    4. Albanesi JP
    (1992) Purification and characterization of a mammalian myosin I. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:490–494.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Burlacu S,
    2. Tap WD,
    3. Lumpkin EA,
    4. Hudspeth AJ
    (1997) ATPase activity of myosin in hair bundles of the bullfrog’s sacculus. Biophys J 72:263–271.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Corey DP,
    2. Assad JA
    (1992) Transduction and adaptation in vertebrate hair cells: correlating structure with function. in Sensory transduction, eds Corey DP, Roper SD (Rockefeller UP, New York), pp 326–342.
  11. ↵
    1. Corey DP,
    2. Hudspeth AJ
    (1983) Kinetics of the receptor current in bullfrog saccular hair cells. J Neurosci 3:962–976.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Denk W,
    2. Holt JR,
    3. Shepherd GM,
    4. Corey DP
    (1995) Calcium imaging of single stereocilia in hair cells: localization of transduction channels at both ends of tip links. Neuron 15:1311–1321.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Eatock RA,
    2. Corey DP,
    3. Hudspeth AJ
    (1987) Adaptation of mechanoelectric transduction in hair cells of the bullfrog’s sacculus. J Neurosci 7:2821–2836.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Furness DN,
    2. Hackney CM
    (1985) Cross-links between the stereocilia in the guinea pig cochlea. Hear Res 18:177–188.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Garcia JA,
    2. Yee AG,
    3. Hasson T,
    4. Gillespie PG,
    5. Corey DP
    (1997) Localization of myosin Iβ in frog saccular hair cells using confocal and immunoelectron microscopy. ARO Midwinter Meeting Abstr 20:233.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Géléloc GSG,
    2. Lennan GWT,
    3. Richardson GP,
    4. Kros CJ
    (1997) A quantitative comparison of mechanoelectrical transduction in vestibular and auditory hair cells of neonatal mice. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 264:611–621.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Gillespie PG,
    2. Corey DP
    (1997) Myosin and adaptation by hair cells. Neuron 19:955–958.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Gillespie PG,
    2. Gillespie SKH
    (1997) Improved electrophoresis and transfer of picogram amounts of protein with hemoglobin. Anal Biochem 246:239–245.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Gillespie PG,
    2. Hudspeth AJ
    (1991) High-purity isolation of bullfrog hair bundles and subcellular and topological localization of constituent proteins. J Cell Biol 112:625–640.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Gillespie PG,
    2. Wagner MC,
    3. Hudspeth AJ
    (1993) Identification of a 120 kd hair-bundle myosin located near stereociliary tips. Neuron 11:581–594.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Hasson T,
    2. Gillespie PG,
    3. MacDonald RB,
    4. Garcia J,
    5. Zhao Y-D,
    6. Yee AG,
    7. Mooseker MS,
    8. Corey DP
    (1997) Unconventional myosins in inner-ear sensory epithelia. J Cell Biol 137:1287–1307.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Howard J,
    2. Hudspeth AJ
    (1987a) Mechanical relaxation of the hair bundle mediates adaptation in mechanoelectrical transduction by the bullfrog’s saccular hair cell. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:3064–3068.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Howard J,
    2. Hudspeth AJ
    (1987b) Adaptation of mechanoelectrical transduction in hair cells. in Sensory transduction, eds Hudspeth AJ, MacLeish PR, Margolis FL, Wiesel TN (Fondation pour l’Etude du Système Nerveux Central et Périphérique, Geneva), pp 138–145.
  24. ↵
    1. Howard J,
    2. Roberts WM,
    3. Hudspeth AJ
    (1988) Mechanoelectrical transduction by hair cells. Annu Rev Biophys Chem 17:99–124.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Hudspeth AJ
    (1983) Transduction and tuning by vertebrate hair cells. Trends Neurosci 6:366–369.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    1. Hudspeth AJ
    (1992) Hair-bundle mechanics and a model for mechanoelectrical transduction by hair cells. in Sensory transduction, eds Corey DP, Roper SD (Rockefeller UP, New York), pp 357–370.
  27. ↵
    1. Hudspeth AJ,
    2. Gillespie PG
    (1994) Pulling strings to tune transduction: adaptation by hair cells. Neuron 12:1–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Jaramillo F,
    2. Hudspeth AJ
    (1993) Displacement–clamp measurement of the forces exerted by gating springs in the hair bundle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:1330–1334.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Kros CJ,
    2. Rüsch A,
    3. Richardson GP
    (1992) Mechanoelectrical transducer currents in hair cells of the cultured neonatal mouse cochlea. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 249:185–193.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Lewis ER,
    2. Li CW
    (1975) Hair cell types and distributions in the otolithic and auditory organs of the bullfrog. Brain Res 83:35–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. Lewis ER,
    2. Baird RA,
    3. Leverenz EL,
    4. Koyama H
    (1982) Inner ear: dye injection reveals peripheral origins of specific sensitivities. Science 215:1641–1643.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Metcalf AB (1996) Molecular characterization of amphibian myosin I, a candidate for the hair bundle’s adaptation motor. PhD thesis, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
  33. ↵
    1. Metcalf AB
    (1998) Immunolocalization of myosin Iβ in the hair cell’s hair bundle. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 39:159–165.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Pickles JO,
    2. Comis SD,
    3. Osborne MP
    (1984) Cross-links between stereocilia in the guinea pig organ of Corti, and their possible relation to sensory transduction. Hear Res 15:103–112.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Ricci A,
    2. Fettiplace R
    (1997) The effects of calcium buffering and cyclic AMP on mechanoelectrical transduction in turtle auditory hair cells. J Physiol (Lond) 501:111–124.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Solc CK,
    2. Derfler BH,
    3. Duyk GM,
    4. Corey DP
    (1994) Molecular cloning of myosins from the bullfrog saccular macula: a candidate for the adaptation motor. Aud Neurosci 1:63–75.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Wagner MC,
    2. Barylko B,
    3. Albanesi JP
    (1992) Tissue distribution and subcellular localization of mammalian myosin I. J Cell Biol 119:163–170.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Walker RG,
    2. Hudspeth AJ
    (1996) Calmodulin controls adaptation of mechanoelectrical transduction by hair cells of the bullfrog’s sacculus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:2203–2207.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. Yamoah EN,
    2. Gillespie PG
    (1996) Phosphate analogs block adaptation in hair cells by inhibiting adaptation-motor force production. Neuron 17:523–533.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Zhao YD,
    2. Yamoah EN,
    3. Gillespie PG
    (1996) Regeneration of broken tip links and restoration of mechanical transduction in hair cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:15469–15474.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Zhu T,
    2. Sata M,
    3. Ikebe M
    (1996) Functional expression of mammalian myosin Iβ: analysis of its motor activity. Biochemistry 35:513–522.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 18 (12)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 18, Issue 12
15 Jun 1998
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Myosin Iβ Is Located at Tip Link Anchors in Vestibular Hair Bundles
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Myosin Iβ Is Located at Tip Link Anchors in Vestibular Hair Bundles
Peter S. Steyger, Peter G. Gillespie, Richard A. Baird
Journal of Neuroscience 15 June 1998, 18 (12) 4603-4615; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-12-04603.1998

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Myosin Iβ Is Located at Tip Link Anchors in Vestibular Hair Bundles
Peter S. Steyger, Peter G. Gillespie, Richard A. Baird
Journal of Neuroscience 15 June 1998, 18 (12) 4603-4615; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-12-04603.1998
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • vestibular
  • hair cell
  • myosin
  • adaptation
  • mechanosensory transduction
  • stereocilia

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Single-Cell Microarray Analysis in Hippocampus CA1: Demonstration and Validation of Cellular Heterogeneity
  • Heme Oxygenase-2 Protects against Lipid Peroxidation-Mediated Cell Loss and Impaired Motor Recovery after Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Gene Microarrays in Hippocampal Aging: Statistical Profiling Identifies Novel Processes Correlated with Cognitive Impairment
Show more ARTICLE
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.