Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
ARTICLE

Small Changes in Ambient Temperature Cause Large Changes in 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-Induced Serotonin Neurotoxicity and Core Body Temperature in the Rat

Jessica E. Malberg and Lewis S. Seiden
Journal of Neuroscience 1 July 1998, 18 (13) 5086-5094; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-13-05086.1998
Jessica E. Malberg
1University of Chicago, Department of Pharmacological and Physiological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois 60637
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lewis S. Seiden
1University of Chicago, Department of Pharmacological and Physiological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois 60637
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The amphetamine derivative 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is a drug of abuse and has been shown to be neurotoxic to 5-HT terminals in many species. MDMA-engendered neurotoxicity has been shown to be affected by both ambient temperature and core body temperature. We now report that small (2°C) changes in ambient temperature produce changes in core temperature in MDMA-treated rats, but the same changes in ambient temperature do not affect core temperature of saline-treated animals. Furthermore, increases in core temperature of MDMA-treated animals increase neurotoxicity. Rats were given MDMA (20 or 40 mg/kg) or saline and placed in an ambient temperature of 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, or 30°C using a novel temperature measurement apparatus that controls ambient temperature ±0.5°C. Two weeks after MDMA treatment, the rats were killed, and regional 5-HT and 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid levels were analyzed as a measure of neurotoxicity. Rats treated with MDMA at 20 and 22°C showed a hypothermic core temperature response. Treatment with MDMA at 28 and 30°C produced a hyperthermic response. At ambient temperatures of 20–24°C, neurotoxicity was not observed in the frontal cortex, somatosensory cortex, hippocampus, or striatum. At ambient temperatures of 26–30°C, neurotoxicity was seen and correlated with core temperature in all regions examined. These data indicate that ambient temperature has a significant affect on MDMA neurotoxicity, core temperature, and thermoregulation in rats. This finding has implications on both the temperature dependence of the mechanism of MDMA neurotoxicity and human use because fatal hyperthermia is associated with MDMA use in humans.

  • MDMA
  • amphetamine
  • core body temperature
  • ambient temperature
  • neurotoxicity
  • 5-HT
  • thermoregulation

3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is a substituted amphetamine that is abused (Steele et al., 1994) and has been shown to be neurotoxic to the 5-HT system in a number of species (Commins et al., 1987b; Schmidt, 1987). Evidence indicating MDMA neurotoxicity includes decreases in tryptophan hydroxylase (Stone et al., 1988), decreases in 5-HT and 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid (5-HIAA) levels (Schmidt et al., 1986), decreases in 5-HT uptake sites (Battaglia et al., 1988), and evidence of 5-HT terminal degeneration (Commins et al., 1987b; O’Hearn et al., 1988).

A current line of research is the relationship between core body temperature (CORE TEMP) and neurotoxicity engendered by MDMA and other amphetamines. Nash et al. (1988) first reported that MDMA-treated rats became hyperthermic. It was shown later that prevention of MDMA-induced hyperthermia prevents neurotoxicity, and that many drugs that protect against MDMA-induced neurotoxicity lower the CORE TEMP of the animals (Farfel and Seiden, 1995a; Malberg et al., 1996). Farfel et al. (1995b)have correlated protection against MDMA- and methamphetamine (METH)-induced neurotoxicity with a decrease in CORE TEMP, indicating that cooling of the body and prevention of MDMA- or METH-induced hyperthermia prevents neurotoxicity.

The ambient temperature (AMB TEMP) during MDMA or METH administration also affects CORE TEMP and neurotoxicity (Ali et al., 1994; Miller and O’Callaghan, 1994). A cold AMB TEMP produces hypothermia in both MDMA- and METH-treated rats and protects against MDMA- and METH-induced neurotoxicity (Bowyer et al., 1993, 1994). The converse also occurs; administration of MDMA in a warm environment increases CORE TEMP (Gordon et al., 1991), and METH-treated rats show increased neurotoxicity at higher AMB TEMPs (Bowyer et al., 1994).

This increase or decrease in CORE TEMP as determined by AMB TEMP indicates that MDMA may compromise thermoregulatory ability, i.e., the ability to maintain a normal CORE TEMP. This is of clinical interest because lethalities or complications caused by MDMA are often accompanied by hyperthermia (Henry, 1992; McCann et al., 1996). Because MDMA is often taken at “rave parties,” where dancing takes place in a warm environment (Green et al., 1995), this strongly suggests that the affect of MDMA on thermoregulation extends to humans in these circumstances (McCann et al., 1996).

To date, no precise study of the interaction between temperature and MDMA-induced neurotoxicity has been performed. Two major difficulties in performing these studies are the precise control of AMB TEMP and noninvasive measurement of CORE TEMP, because handling the rats can affect core temperature up to 1°C (Gordon, 1993). To address these problems, we developed a novel temperature measurement apparatus that (1) maintains AMB TEMP ±0.5°C and (2) measures CORE TEMP once per minute using a noninvasive technique.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the interaction of AMB TEMP, CORE TEMP, and MDMA-induced 5-HT neurotoxicity. Twenty or 40 mg/kg MDMA was administered to rats in controlled AMB TEMPs of 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, and 30°C; 2 weeks later, regional brain 5-HT and 5-HIAA levels were analyzed to assess neurotoxicity. A preliminary presentation of this work has been made in abstract form (Malberg and Seiden, 1996).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

One hundred forty-six male Holtzman (Madison, WI) rats were used, each weighing ∼250–300 gm at time of injection. Rats were group-housed (four to five per cage) in plastic cages with a room temperature of 22–24°C, except on the drug injection days, when they were housed individually in the temperature measurement apparatus at different AMB TEMPs (see Temperature measurement apparatus and Experimental procedure below). Throughout the experiment, rats had access to food (Teklab Diet) and water ad libitum and were maintained on a 12 hr light/dark cycle. Housing and experimental treatment of the rats were in accordance with National Institutes of Health guidelines.

Drugs

(±)-3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine HCl was obtained from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. Ketamine and xylazine were obtained from Abbott Labs (Chicago, IL). All chemicals used were of analytical grade. Drug dosages are expressed as the weight of the salt, and drugs were dissolved in 0.9% NaCl.

Temperature measurement apparatus

A novel temperature measurement chamber was developed. This consists of an arrangement of components (computer, computer interface cards, AMB TEMP and CORE TEMP temperature sensors, housing chamber, and Visual Basic software) that forms an integrated system to perform the following functions: (1) measure and maintain a constant AMB TEMP (any temperature from 5 to 45°C, ±0.5°C) using a feedback system that monitors AMB TEMP on a minute-to-minute basis; and (2) measure CORE TEMP once per minute in freely moving animals.

The temperature chambers are modified refrigerators (0.20 cubic meters) that have a 1-inch-thick Plexiglas window in the door to allow observation of the rats and to keep the light/dark cycle in synchrony with rat housing light sources. The rat is unrestrained and allowed to move freely within a cage (20.3 cm wide, 15.2 cm high, and 16.5 cm deep) inside the chamber. The cage is large enough to allow the rat to circle, rear, and show exploratory locomotion. The cage has a hardware cloth (1.3 cm mesh) floor, top, and back wall to ensure air flow within the cage and has a Plexiglas door and side walls. Each refrigerator has been modified so that in addition to a compressor to cool the chamber, there is also a strip heater and a fan to ensure that the AMB TEMP is even throughout the chamber. A thermistor to record AMB TEMP is mounted in the chamber 10.2 cm from the rat cage. To measure CORE TEMP, a temperature-sensitive transmitter (Minimitter Co., Sunriver, OR) that emits an AM radio signal proportional to the CORE TEMP of the rat is implanted in the peritoneal cavity of the rat. Four AM radios (Radio Shack) surrounding the outside of the rat cage receive signals from the transmitter.

The heating and cooling elements, thermistor, and CORE TEMP radio receivers are interfaced to a standard microcomputer (33 MHz, 386 DX), which has an analog-to-digital interface allowing the environmental and CORE TEMPs to be recorded. Both CORE TEMP and AMB TEMP readings are recorded once per second and then averaged to produce one reading per minute.

The computer also has digital output lines that turn the compressor or heater off and on inside the chamber. To maintain AMB TEMP, the heating or cooling is turned on or off as necessary to maintain the desired AMB TEMP ±0.5°C. This monitoring of AMB TEMP is done every minute. In addition to monitoring AMB TEMP, the software can also be programmed to prevent the rat from reaching lethal hyperthermia. If the rat CORE TEMP increases over a certain temperature point (set by the experimenter), the AMB TEMP decreases until the rat CORE TEMP drops below that point. The entire system is run by a novel Visual Basic computer program. Eight temperature chambers are used and run independently of each other, allowing up to eight different experiments to be run at the same time.

The use of minimitters to measure rat CORE TEMP has been demonstrated as valid and reliable (Dilsaver et al., 1992). The minimitters have a resolution of ±0.01°C (Clement et al., 1989).

Surgery

To implant the CORE TEMP transmitters, rats were anesthetized with ketamine (0.6 mg/ml; 1 ml/kg) and xylazine (100 mg/ml; 0.33 ml/kg) and were given supplemental 1 ml injections of ketamine as needed. A midline cut was made in the peritoneum, and a sterilized transmitter was inserted into the peritoneal cavity, as described by Farfel and Seiden (1995a). Rats were allowed a minimum of 3 d to recover from the surgeries before drug injections.

Experimental procedure

Parametric experiment: effect of different AMB TEMPs on CORE TEMP and neurotoxicity. At 9:00 A.M., rats were placed in the temperature measurement chamber at an AMB TEMP of 24°C (the usual AMB TEMP in the laboratory) for a baseline CORE TEMP measurement and to prevent any hyperthermia induced by exploratory locomotion from interfering with the effects of the drug. After 1 hr, the AMB TEMP was set at one of the following: 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, or 30°C. Once the chamber reached the desired AMB TEMP, rats were given a subcutaneous injection of MDMA (20 or 40 mg/kg) or saline (SAL; 1 ml/kg). The rats remained at that AMB TEMP for 24 hr after the injection. After 24 hr, the rats were returned to their group-housing conditions. Two weeks after the injection, the rats were killed by decapitation, and the following regions were dissected, as described by Sabol et al. (1996): frontal cortex, somatosensory cortex, hippocampus, and striatum. Tissue sections were stored in liquid nitrogen until ready for neurochemical analysis.

Heating experiment: effect of hyperthermia on neurotoxicity.In a separate experiment to investigate the effect of hyperthermia on 5-HT, 5-HIAA, dopamine (DA), homovanillic acid (HVA), dihydroxyphenyl acetic acid (DOPAC), and norepinephrine (NE) levels, saline-treated rats were placed in the temperature chamber at 24°C for 1 hr to establish a baseline CORE TEMP. The AMB TEMP was then either increased to 40°C or remained at 24°C. The rats remained at that AMB TEMP (24 or 40°C) for 8 hr. For rats exposed to 40°C AMB TEMP, we prevented lethality by keeping the rat CORE TEMP at ≤41°C. This maximum CORE TEMP was chosen because it has been reported that a CORE TEMP over 41.3°C in amphetamine-treated rats produces lethal hyperthermia and heatstroke (Bowyer et al., 1994). To keep rat CORE TEMP at ≤41°C, the AMB TEMP was kept at 40°C unless the rat CORE TEMP exceeded 41°C. At that point, the AMB TEMP was automatically decreased until the rat CORE TEMP was <41°C. When the rat was <41°C CORE TEMP, the AMB TEMP was again increased to 40°C. Two weeks after this treatment, rats were killed by decapitation, and the frontal cortex and somatosensory cortex were dissected as described above.

Neurochemical assays

5-HT, 5-HIAA, DA, HVA, DOPAC, and NE in the various rat brain regions were assayed by HPLC with electrochemical detection (HPLC-EC) according to the method of Sabol et al. (1996) and Kotake (1985).

Core temperature analysis

The CORE TEMP data were quantified by using an area under the curve analysis. For each rat, a CORE TEMP versus time graph was generated, and the area between each CORE TEMP versus time curve andy = 0 was calculated using a trapezoidal area under the curve analysis. In this way, the CORE TEMP response of each rat could be quantified and assigned a number value so that the CORE TEMP data could be analyzed using inferential statistics. This area under the curve value was denoted as the “total CORE TEMP” response for each rat. The CORE TEMP responses for all rats in each experimental group (n = 8) were summed together so that statistical analysis could be performed. This area under the curve value more accurately reflects the CORE TEMP changes over time for all the groups as opposed to using the mean CORE TEMP for each group (Clement et al., 1989; Dilsaver et al., 1990).

Statistics

For neurotoxicity data, differences were determined by ANOVA followed by a Tukey post hoc test (Instat for Macintosh computers, GraphPad). For the CORE TEMP analysis, two-way ANOVA for repeated measures was used to compare treatment groups (SuperAnova). Single-time point comparisons between groups were made using a Tukeypost hoc test. Statistical significance was considered to bep < 0.05 unless indicated otherwise.

RESULTS

Parametric experiment: effects of MDMA and different AMB TEMPs on rat CORE TEMP

Each rat was given SAL or MDMA (20 or 40 mg/kg) at one of six different AMB TEMPs of 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, or 30°C. For all rats, a 1 hr baseline CORE TEMP was recorded. In that time, the average CORE TEMP was 37.8 ± 0.05°C. After the baseline hour the AMB TEMP was adjusted, and animals were injected with MDMA or SAL in the different AMB TEMPs.

There were no effects on CORE TEMP in any of the SAL-treated rats at any of the six different AMB TEMPs. The average CORE TEMP for all SAL-treated rats (n = 48) was 37.3 ± 0.07°C for the entire 24 hr spent in the temperature measurement apparatus. This indicates that AMB TEMPs of 20–30°C do not affect the CORE TEMP of SAL-treated animals. In contrast, MDMA-treated animals had a markedly different CORE TEMP profile in different AMB TEMPs. MDMA administration in AMB TEMPs of 20 and 22°C produced a hypothermia compared with SAL controls. MDMA administration in AMB TEMPs of 28–30°C produced a hyperthermia compared with SAL controls (Table1; Fig.1A–F). Both SAL- and MDMA-treated rats returned to a CORE TEMP of 37.5 ± 0.01°C by 11 hr (660 min) after the MDMA was injected. For this reason, all figures and statistical analysis of the CORE TEMP results include only the first 11 hr of the experiment.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Maximum and minimum CORE TEMP and area-under-the-curve (AUC) values for all treatment groups 10 hr after injection

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

CORE TEMP versus time responses for rats treated at AMB TEMP of 20 (A), 22 (B), 24 (C), 26 (D), 28 (E), and 30°C (F) for 660 min (11 hr) after injection. All rats were injected at time 0 with 1 ml/kg SAL, 20 mg/kg MDMA, or 40 mg/kg MDMA at the indicated AMB TEMP. Rats were placed in the temperature-controlled chamber for 1 hr before injection for baseline measurements. n = 8 for all experimental groups. All values are mean ± SEM.

The effects of incrementally higher AMB TEMPs on CORE TEMPs can be readily seen for each dose (Fig.2A,B). Taken together, these data indicate that small (2°C) changes in AMB TEMP affect the CORE TEMP of the rat and that the ability of the rats to thermoregulate is impaired when given 20 or 40 mg/kg MDMA.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Summary of CORE TEMP versus time responses for all rats treated with either 20 mg/kg MDMA (A) or 40 mg/kg MDMA (B) at different AMB TEMPs (20, 22, 24, 26, 28, and 30°C).

Effects of different AMB TEMPs on MDMA-induced 5-HT neurotoxicity

The effect of different AMB TEMPs on MDMA-induced neurotoxicity is shown in Figures 3 and4. In this experiment, decreases in 5-HT and 5-HIAA levels were measured as indicators of neurotoxicity; we have found this to be a reliable marker of MDMA neurotoxicity (Lew et al., 1996; Sabol et al., 1996).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

5-HT levels from all experimental groups 2 weeks after MDMA or SAL injections. *p < 0.05 compared with the SAL group at that AMB TEMP. All tissue weights are expressed in nanograms per milligrams of wet tissue weight. n= 8 for all experimental groups. All values are mean ± SEM. In the hippocampus, a significant effect of treatment was obtained at AMB TEMPs of 26°C (F = 6.09; p < 0.01), 28°C (F = 11.32; p < 0.005), and 30°C (F = 31.13;p < 0.001). In somatosensory cortex, a significant effect of treatment was obtained at AMB TEMPs of 26°C (F = 8.46; p < 0.005), 28°C (F = 8.80; p < 0.01), and 30°C (F = 9.37; p < 0.01). In frontal cortex, a significant effect of treatment was obtained at AMB TEMPs of 26°C (F = 4.23;p < 0.05), 28°C (F = 3.95;p < 0.05), and 30°C (F = 8.77; p < 0.05). In striatum, a significant effect of treatment was obtained at 26°C (F = 6.02;p < 0.05), 28°C (F = 4.45;p < 0.02), and 30°C (F = 4.75; p < 0.05). See Results for percentage of depletions compared with control at each AMB TEMP.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

5-HIAA levels from all experimental groups 2 weeks after MDMA or SAL injections. *p < 0.05 compared with the SAL group at that AMB TEMP. All tissue weights are expressed in nanograms per milligram of wet tissue weight. n= 8 for all experimental groups. All values are mean ± SEM. In the hippocampus, a significant effect of treatment was obtained at AMB TEMPs of 24°C (F = 3.70; p < 0.05), 26°C (F = 6.47; p < 0.01), 28°C (F = 4.86; p < 0.05), and 30°C (F = 7.80; p< 0.005). In somatosensory cortex, a significant effect of treatment was obtained at AMB TEMPs of 24°C (F = 9.81;p < 0.005), 28°C (F = 4.67;p < 0.05), and 30°C (F = 5.32; p < 0.05). In frontal cortex, a significant effect of treatment was obtained at AMB TEMPs 24°C (F = 6.52; p < 0.01), 26°C (F = 5.34; p < 0.05), 28°C (F = 6.91; p < 0.01), and 30°C (F = 4.67; p < 0.05). In striatum, a significant effect of treatment was obtained at 26°C (F = 5.24; p < 0.005), 28°C (F = 14.39; p < 0.001), and 30°C (F = 7.79; p < 0.01). See Results for percentage of depletions compared with control at each AMB TEMP.

There were no significant depletions of 5-HT at AMB TEMPs of 20, 22, or 24°C in any of the brain regions examined. As AMB TEMP increased above 24°C, significant depletions were seen, with higher AMB TEMPs inducing greater depletions. At 26°C, there were significant depletions of 5-HT compared with control in the frontal cortex (87% of control) (p < 0.05 for all post hoctests), hippocampus (80%), and striatum (72%) in the 40 mg/kg group and in the somatosensory cortex in both the 20 and 40 mg/kg groups (90 and 82%, respectively) (see Figures 3 and 4 for Fvalues).

At 28°C, there were significant 5-HT depletions compared with control in the frontal cortex (75% of control) in the 40 mg/kg group. All other regions had depletions in both the 20 and 40 mg/kg group: somatosensory cortex, 80 and 66%, respectively; hippocampus, 75 and 65%, respectively; and striatum, 71 and 61%, respectively.

At 30°C, both the 20 kg and 40 mg/kg MDMA-treated groups had decreases in 5-HT levels compared with control in all regions examined: somatosensory cortex, 70 and 65%, respectively; hippocampus, 58 and 42%, respectively; frontal cortex, 63 and 70%, respectively; and striatum, 74 and 66%, respectively.

The 5-HIAA level data were very similar to the 5-HT levels data; treatment at 20 and 22°C AMB TEMP produced no changes in 5-HIAA levels, and higher AMB TEMPs produced decreases in 5-HIAA levels. The one difference was that at 24°C, 5-HIAA levels were affected, whereas 5-HT levels were not affected until the AMB TEMP reached 26°C. At 24°C AMB TEMP, there was a significant decrease in 5-HIAA levels compared with control in the 40 mg/kg group in the frontal cortex (72.7% of control), somatosensory cortex (77%), and hippocampus (79%).

At 26°C AMB TEMP, the 40 mg/kg group showed significant depletions compared with 5-HIAA depletions to control in the frontal cortex (70% of control), hippocampus (79%), and striatum (64%).

Treatment at 28°C AMB TEMP produced decreases in 5-HIAA levels compared with control in the 40 mg/kg group in all regions: somatosensory cortex, 69% of control; hippocampus, 72%; frontal cortex, 70%; and striatum, 64%.

At 30°C AMB TEMP, both the 20 and 40 mg/kg MDMA-treated groups had significant decreases in 5-HIAA levels in all regions: somatosensory cortex, 70 and 73%, respectively; hippocampus, 58 and 56%, respectively; frontal cortex, 63 and 60%, respectively; and striatum, 54 and 70%, respectively.

These results clearly indicate that at 20–24°C, there is protection against MDMA-induced decreases in 5-HT levels, and at 20–22°C there is protection against 5-HIAA decreases. At 26–28°C there is increased neurotoxicity, and by 28–30°C all treatment groups are significantly affected. These results point to a large effect of AMB TEMP in determination of MDMA-induced neurotoxicity.

Correlation between AMB TEMP and neurotoxicity

Regression analysis was used to determine a correlation between the area under the curve and neurotoxicity (decrease in 5-HT and 5-HIAA levels) in all MDMA-treated animals. All regions had significant negative correlations (Table 2) for both 5-HT and 5-HIAA levels. These data indicate that as the CORE TEMP of animals treated with MDMA increases above a normal CORE TEMP, 5-HT and 5-HIAA levels decrease.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Correlation of CORE TEMP response and 5-HT or 5-HIAA levels

Lethality

In the parametric experiment, lethality was not prevented as it was in the heating experiment so that the percentage of lethality for each AMB TEMP-dose combination could be determined. In the 40 mg/kg 30°C AMB TEMP group, we obtained 20% lethality. This is less lethality than Gordon et al. (1991) obtained at the same AMB TEMP. This may be attributable to the fact that in our temperature measurement chamber, there was a constant movement of air because of the fan, so that any lethality attributable to additional humidity was attenuated in our temperature chamber.

Effect of hyperthermia on SAL-treated rats

Saline-treated rats in an AMB TEMP of 24°C had an average CORE TEMP of 37.4 ± 0.02°C, and saline-treated rats treated at an AMB TEMP of 40°C had an average CORE TEMP of 39 ± 0.08°C, with a peak CORE TEMP of 40.89°C. There was a significant difference (p < 0.0001) in CORE TEMP response between the rats treated at 24 and 40°C, indicating that an AMB TEMP of 40°C produces hyperthermia in SAL-treated rats. Twenty-four hours after the rats were placed in the temperature measurement apparatus, all rats had average CORE TEMPs of 37.5 ± 0.03°C.

There was no change in any neurotransmitter level (5-HT, 5-HIAA, DA, DOPAC, HVA, and NE) between the rats treated at 24 and 40°C AMB TEMP in all of the brain regions examined. In the interest of space, only the frontal cortex and somatosensory cortex data are shown (Fig.5A,B). This indicates that the significant CORE TEMP hyperthermia induced by a 40°C AMB TEMP causes no changes in neurotransmitter levels. This is in agreement with Wilkinson et al. (1991), who looked at pyrogen-induced fever on 5-HT levels and found no significant effect.

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

5-HT, 5-HIAA, DA, DOPAC, HVA, and NE levels from SAL-treated rats exposed to an AMB TEMP of 24 or 40°C for 8 hr. Frontal cortex (A) and somatosensory cortex levels (B) were obtained 2 weeks after exposure. All tissue weights are expressed in nanograms per milligram of wet tissue weight. n = 8 for all experimental groups. All values are mean ± SEM.  

This control experiment demonstrates that the changes in neurotransmitter levels seen in our MDMA experiment are not attributable to the CORE TEMP hyperthermia alone but are attributable to the CORE TEMP hyperthermia interacting with the MDMA. The hyperthermia itself does not cause depletions in neurotransmitter levels.

DISCUSSION

The main finding of this study is that a small (2°C) change in AMB TEMP produces marked changes in both CORE TEMP and MDMA-induced 5-HT neurotoxicity. Although previous studies (Gordon et al., 1991;Bowyer et al., 1994; Miller and O’Callaghan, 1994) have demonstrated that large changes in AMB TEMP affect CORE TEMP and neurotoxicity, the present study is the first to investigate the effect of small controlled changes in AMB TEMP. We demonstrate that MDMA disrupts thermoregulatory ability, and this in turn makes the CORE TEMP dependent on the AMB TEMP. The resulting changes in CORE TEMP affect MDMA-induced neurotoxicity. This study underscores the importance of a constant and controlled AMB TEMP in any experimental paradigm investigating MDMA neurotoxicity.

It can be seen that above 24°C degrees AMB TEMP, changes in AMB TEMP increase the neurotoxicity. We hypothesize that there is a critical AMB TEMP, which we term “break point,” below which protection is seen. Increases in AMB TEMP from this point increase MDMA-induced neurotoxicity. The break point for a single dose of 20 or 40 mg/kg MDMA seems to be 24°C, although most likely this break point is different for other MDMA doses and amphetamine analogs and may differ in different-sized animals and species.

It is of interest that at 24°C AMB TEMP, 5-HIAA levels are decreased, whereas 5-HT levels are not affected until 26°C AMB TEMP. It may be that the decrease in 5-HIAA levels near the break point is indicative of partial damage to cellular metabolism, although further research is needed to determine its extent and characterization.

MDMA and other amphetamines have been shown to disrupt thermoregulation in both rats and humans (Gordon et al., 1991; Dafters, 1995; McCann et al., 1996). The MDMA-induced loss of thermoregulation in rats has been shown to occur not only in neurotoxic doses (Gordon et al., 1991;Gordon and Fogelson, 1994) but also in non-neurotoxic doses (Dafters, 1994; Ainsworth et al., 1997). This has received much attention because of the number of MDMA-related fatalities that have involved hyperthermia and heatstroke (Henry, 1992; Dar and McBrien, 1996). Many, but not all, of these overdoses arise from MDMA use at rave parties (Green et al., 1995; McCann et al., 1996). The use of MDMA or other amphetamines combined with high AMB TEMP seen at rave parties and hyperthermia induced by dancing (Sternbach, 1991) may all contribute to the hyperthermia-associated problems with MDMA use.

The MDMA-induced hyperthermia has been theorized to be linked to the “serotonin syndrome” (Ames and Wirshing, 1993; Friedman, 1993). This syndrome consists of hyperthermia and other symptoms (Sternbach, 1991) and is thought to result from excess 5-HT at the 5-HT1A receptor (Ames and Wirshing, 1993; Sporer, 1995). Given that MDMA induces 5-HT release, it has been theorized that there is a link between MDMA-induced hyperthermia and serotonin syndrome (Kaskey, 1992; Ames and Wirshing, 1993; Friedman, 1993). This has been supported by studies in the rat in which 5-HT syndrome behaviors such as forepaw treading, head weaving, and a low body posture were induced by MDMA administration (Spanos and Yamamoto, 1989; Colado et al., 1993). These behaviors increased in intensity and duration of response with increasing doses of MDMA (Spanos and Yamamoto, 1989).

Our study indicates that MDMA-induced hyperthermia leads to neurotoxicity. We hypothesize that once MDMA enters the neuron via the 5-HT transporter (Rudnick and Wall, 1992), the hyperthermia would then affect and possibly increase the rate of reactions leading to MDMA-induced neurotoxicity. In support of this, we (Malberg et al., 1996) have shown that if MDMA is prevented from entering the 5-HT neuron by fluoxetine pretreatment, the rats still display hyperthermia, although no neurotoxicity is seen. Under these circumstances, the hyperthermia may be from MDMA stimulating 5-HT2A/Creceptors. DOI and M-CPP, selective agonists to 5-HT2A/Cand 5-HT2C receptors, respectively, have been shown to produce a hyperthermia (Mazzola-Pomietto et al., 1997), and MDMA has been shown to act as an agonist to 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors (Nash et al., 1994). This 5-HT2A/C-mediated hyperthermia could contribute to the neurotoxicity observed.

In contrast to hyperthermia increasing reactions leading to neurotoxicity, hypothermia may also protect by decreasing the rate of reactions leading to MDMA-induced neurotoxicity. A cold AMB TEMP has been shown to protect against neurotoxicity (Bowyer et al., 1993; Ali et al., 1994; Che et al., 1995), and many drugs that protect against neurotoxicity do so by lowering the rats’ CORE TEMP (Bowyer et al., 1994; Miller and O’Callaghan, 1994; Farfel and Seiden, 1995a,b;Malberg et al., 1996). Hypothermia has also been shown to be neuroprotective in other models of brain injury (Ginsberg et al., 1992). We hypothesize that hypothermia may slow down some of the reactions leading to METH-induced neurotoxicity. It is not currently known how the hypothermia is produced. In a cold AMB TEMP, the hypothermia may come from an MDMA-induced deficit in the thermoregulatory system that results in an inability to produce normal heat-conservation or heat-production responses, which would make an animal hypothermic. Further experiments are necessary to determine how and where MDMA would affect thermoregulatory responses.

There are several hypothesized mechanisms of neurotoxicity. For many of the reactions leading to neurotoxicity that have been experimentally investigated, hypothermia and hyperthermia may affect the rate of reactions. MDMA has been shown to bind to the 5-HT transporter (Rudnick and Wall, 1992). It is not known whether the CORE TEMP hypothermia or hyperthermia would affect in vivo binding of MDMA to the transporter. It has been shown, however, that plasma levels of MDMA are not affected by either a CORE TEMP hypothermia or hyperthermia (Colado et al., 1995) so that MDMA pharmacokinetics are not affected by changes in CORE TEMP.

Temperature has an affect on amphetamine-induced 5-HT and DA release, which may be important to neurotoxicity. Clausing et al. (1996) have shown using in vivo microdialysis that amphetamine-induced striatal DA levels correlate with maximum brain temperature, indicating that hyperthermia increases amphetamine-induced DA release. Conversely,Bowyer et al. (1992) have reported that a cold AMB TEMP, which lowers CORE TEMP, prevents METH-induced DA and 5-HT release. Changes in CORE TEMP, then, may affect the step of amphetamine-induced neurotransmitter release.

Free radical formation is hypothesized to be a major reaction leading to neurotoxicity (Halliwell, 1992; Cadet et al., 1994; Gudelsky, 1996). Therefore, the effect of CORE TEMP on the formation of free radicals may be a major point in preventing or increasing neurotoxicity. It has been shown that hypothermia prevents free radical formation; maintaining the brain at a hypothermic temperature prevents ischemia-induced 2,3- and 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid formation. Conversely, free radical formation is increased in rats with hyperthermic brain temperature (Globus et al., 1995; Kil et al., 1996). These results show that formation of hydroxyl radicals in the brain is a temperature-dependent process. In addition, CORE TEMP hypothermia could decrease and hyperthermia could increase free radical formation such as 6-OHDA, 5,7-DHT, and NO (Halliwell, 1992). At least some, if not all, of these free radicals are theorized to participate in amphetamine-induced neurotoxicity (Seiden and Vosmer, 1984; Commins et al., 1987a; Dawson et al., 1993; Cadet et al., 1994).

Activation of excitatory amino acids and Ca2+accumulation have been implicated in amphetamine-induced neurotoxicity (Sonsalla et al., 1989), and hypothermia may also prevent the accumulation of calcium ions. Hypothermia reduces glutamate and glycine release (Illievich et al., 1994) and Ca2+ accumulation and release (Corbett et al., 1990; Mitani et al., 1991), and this may contribute to hypothermic protection against neurotoxicity.

Kramer et al. (1995, 1997) have reported that MDMA induces translocation of the calcium- and phospholipid-dependent enzyme PKC and theorize that this prolonged kinase activation may contribute to the neurotoxicity. Interestingly, it has been reported that in hypothermic rats, ischemia-induced translocation of PKC was completely abolished (Cardell et al., 1991). This again points to hypothermia decreasing or preventing another neurotoxic reaction.

Another theory of neurotoxicity has been advanced by Carlsson (1993), who posits a feed-forward loop that is excited by amphetamines and causes continued release of neurotransmitter. This requires energy, and eventually the cell goes into ATP depletion and dies. Hypothermia may slow down this reaction; it has been shown that reduction of brain temperature significantly delays decreases in ATP throughout the hippocampus (Busto et al., 1987; Zeevalk and Nicklas, 1993). Therefore, hypothermic prevention of the ATP depletion may be another mechanism of protection against neurotoxicity.

In summary, this experiment used a novel temperature measurement apparatus to measure and control AMB TEMP and to measure CORE TEMP. We have shown that small (2°C) changes in AMB TEMP have a large affect on CORE TEMP neurotoxicity in MDMA-treated animals. At low AMB TEMPs hypothermia and protection against neurotoxicity is seen, and at high AMB TEMPs we report a hyperthermia that correlates with increased neurotoxicity. This is in line with clinical evidence indicating reduced thermoregulation and lethality from MDMA use and 5-HT syndrome, and we offer a hypothesis that the hypothermia and hyperthermia may be acting on one or more of the reactions leading to neurotoxicity.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by National Institute on Drug Abuse Grant DA00085. L.S.S. was supported by Research Scientist Award MH-105-62. We thank Georgetta Vosmer for technical assistance and advice.

    Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Lewis S. Seiden, University of Chicago, 947 East 58th Street, Department of Pharmacological and Physiological Sciences, Abbott 109, Chicago, IL 60637.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Ainsworth AM,
    2. Malberg JE,
    3. Seiden LS
    (1997) High and low doses of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) impair thermoregulatory ability in the rat. Soc Neurosci Abstr 2:1352.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Ali SF,
    2. Newport GD,
    3. Holson RR,
    4. Slikker W Jr.,
    5. Bowyer JF
    (1994) Low environmental temperatures or pharmacologic agents that produce hypothermia decrease methamphetamine neurotoxicity in mice. Brain Res 658:33–38.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Ames D,
    2. Wirshing WC
    (1993) Ecstasy, the serotonin syndrome, and neuroleptic malignant syndrome—a possible link [letter]? JAMA 269:869–870.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Battaglia G,
    2. Yeh SY,
    3. DeSouza EB
    (1988) MDMA-induced neurotoxicity: parameters of degeneration and recovery of brain serotonin neurons. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 29:269–274.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Bowyer JF,
    2. Tank AW,
    3. Newport GD,
    4. Slikker W Jr.,
    5. Ali SF,
    6. Holson RR
    (1992) The influence of environmental temperature on the transient effects of methamphetamine on dopamine levels and dopamine release in rat striatum. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 260:817–824.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Bowyer JF,
    2. Gough B,
    3. Slikker W Jr.,
    4. Lipe GW,
    5. Newport GD,
    6. Holson RR
    (1993) Effects of a cold environment or age on methamphetamine-induced dopamine release in the caudate putamen of female rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 44:87–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Bowyer JF,
    2. Davies DL,
    3. Schmued L,
    4. Broening HW,
    5. Newport GD,
    6. Slikker W Jr.,
    7. Holson RR
    (1994) Further studies of the role of hyperthermia in methamphetamine neurotoxicity. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 268:1571–1580.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Busto R,
    2. Dietrich WD,
    3. Globus MYT,
    4. Valdes I,
    5. Scheinberg P,
    6. Ginsberg MD
    (1987) Small differences in intraischmic brain temperature critically determine the extent of ischemic neuronal injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 7:729–738.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Cadet JL,
    2. Ali S,
    3. Epstein C
    (1994) Involvement of oxygen-based radicals in methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity: evidence from the use of CuZnSOD transgenic mice. Ann NY Acad Sci 738:388–391.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Cardell M,
    2. Boris-Moller F,
    3. Wieloch T
    (1991) Hypothermia prevents the ischemia-induced translocations and inhibition of protein kinase C in the rat striatum. J Neurochem 57:1814–1817.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Carlsson A (1993) Search for the neuronal circuitries and neurotransmitters involved in “positive” and “negative” schizophrenic symptomatology. Fidia Res Found Lect Ser 7.
  12. ↵
    1. Che S,
    2. Johnson M,
    3. Hanson GR,
    4. Gibb JW
    (1995) Body temperature effect on methylenedioxymethamphetamine-induced acute decrease in tryptophan hydroxylase activity. Eur J Pharmacol 293:447–453.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Clausing P,
    2. Bloom D,
    3. Newport GD,
    4. Holson RR,
    5. Slikker W Jr.,
    6. Bowyer JF
    (1996) Individual differences in dopamine release but not rotational behavior correlate with extracellular amphetamine levels in caudate putamen in unlesioned rats. Psychopharmacology 127:187–194.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Clement JG,
    2. Mills P,
    3. Brockway B
    (1989) Use of telemetry to record body temperature and activity in mice. J Pharmacol Methods 21:129–140.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Colado MI,
    2. Murray TK,
    3. Green AR
    (1993) 5-HT loss in rat brain following 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), pchloroamphetamine and fenfluramine administration and effects of chlormethiazole and dizocilpine. Br J Pharmacol 108:583–589.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Colado MI,
    2. Williams JL,
    3. Green AR
    (1995) The hyperthermic and neurotoxic effects of “Ecstasy” (MDMA) and 3,4 methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) in the Dark Agouti (DA) rat, a model of the CYP2D6 poor metabolizer phenotype. Br J Pharmacol 115:1281–1289.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Commins DL,
    2. Axt KJ,
    3. Vosmer G,
    4. Seiden LS
    (1987a) 5,6-Dihydroxytryptamine, a serotonergic neurotoxin is formed endogenously in the rat brain. Brain Res 403:7–14.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Commins DL,
    2. Vosmer G,
    3. Virus RM,
    4. Woolverton WL,
    5. Schuster CR,
    6. Seiden LS
    (1987b) Biochemical and histological evidence that methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is toxic to neurons in the rat brain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 241:338–345.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Corbett D,
    2. Evans S,
    3. Thomas C,
    4. Wang D,
    5. Jonas RA
    (1990) MK-801 reduced cerebral ischemic injury by inducing hypothermia. Brain Res 514:300–304.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Dafters RI
    (1994) Effect of ambient temperature on hyperthermia and hyperkinesis induced by 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA or “ecstasy”) in rats. Psychopharmacology 114:505–508.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Dafters RI
    (1995) Hyperthermia following MDMA administration in rats: effects of ambient temperature, water consumption and chronic dosing. Physiol Behav 58:877–882.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Dar KJ,
    2. McBrien ME
    (1996) MDMA induced hyperthermia: report of a fatality and review of current therapy. Intensive Care Med 22:995–996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Dawson VL,
    2. Dawson TM,
    3. Bartley DA,
    4. Uhl GR,
    5. Snyder SH
    (1993) Mechanisms of nitric oxide-mediated neurotoxicity in primary brain cultures. J Neurosci 13:2651–2661.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Dilsaver SC,
    2. Majchrzak MJ,
    3. Alessi NE
    (1990) Telemetric measurement of core temperature in pharmacological research: validity and reliability. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 14:591–596.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Dilsaver SC,
    2. Overstreet DH,
    3. Peck JA
    (1992) Measurement of temperature in the rat by rectal probe and telemetry yields compatible results. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 42:549–552.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Farfel GM,
    2. Seiden LS
    (1995a) Role of hypothermia in the mechanism of protection against serotonergic toxicity. I. Experiments using 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, dizocilpine, CGS19755 and NBQX. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 272:860–867.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Farfel GM,
    2. Seiden LS
    (1995b) Role of hypothermia in the mechanism of protection against serotonergic toxicity. II. Experiments with methamphetamine, p-chloroamphetamine, fenfluramine, dizocilpine and dextromethorphan. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 272:868–875.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Friedman R
    (1993) Ecstasy, the serotonin syndrome, and malignant hyperthermia–a possible link [reply to letter]? JAMA 269:269–270.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    1. Ginsberg MD,
    2. Sternau LL,
    3. Globus MY,
    4. Dietrich WD,
    5. Busto R
    (1992) Therapeutic modulation of brain temperature: relevance to ischemic brain injury. Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev 4:189–225.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Globus MY,
    2. Busto R,
    3. Lin B,
    4. Schnippering H,
    5. Ginsberg MD
    (1995) Detection of free radical activity during transient global ischemia and recirculation: effects of intraischemic brain temperature modulation. J Neurochem 65:1250–1256.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Gordon CJ
    (1993) Temperature regulation in laboratory animals. (Cambridge UP, New York).
  32. ↵
    1. Gordon CJ,
    2. Fogelson L
    (1994) Metabolic and thermoregulatory responses of the rat maintained in acrylic or wire-screen cages: implications for pharmacological studies. Physiol Behav 56:73–79.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Gordon CJ,
    2. Watkinson WP,
    3. O’Callaghan JP,
    4. Miller DB
    (1991) Effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine on autonomic thermoregulatory responses of the rat. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 38:339–344.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Green AR,
    2. Cross AJ,
    3. Goodwin GM
    (1995) Review of the pharmacology and clinical pharmacology of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA or “ecstasy”). Psychopharmacology 119:247–260.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Gudelsky GA
    (1996) Effect of ascorbate and cysteine on the 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine-induced depletion of brain serotonin. J Neural Transm 103:1397–1404.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. ↵
    1. Halliwell B
    (1992) Reactive oxygen species and the central nervous system. J Neurochem 59:1609–1623.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Henry JA
    (1992) Toxicity and deaths from 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (“ecstasy”). Lancet 340:384–387.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Illievich UM,
    2. Zornow MH,
    3. Choi KT,
    4. Strnat MA,
    5. Scheller MS
    (1994) Effects of hypothermia or anesthetics on hippocampal glutamate and glycine concentrations after repeated transient global cerebral ischemia. Anesthesiology 80:177–186.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Kaskey GB
    (1992) Possible interaction between an MAOI and “Ecstasy.” Am J Psychiatry 149:411–412.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Kil HY,
    2. Zhang J,
    3. Piantadosi CA
    (1996) Brain temperature alters hydroxyl radical production during cerebral ischemia/reperfusion in rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 16:100–106.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Kotake C,
    2. Heffner T,
    3. Vosmer G,
    4. Seiden LS
    (1985) Determination of dopamine, norepinephrine, serotonin and their major metabolic products in rat brain by reverse phase ion pair high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 22:85–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Kramer HK,
    2. Poblete JC,
    3. Azmitia EC
    (1995) 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (“Ecstasy”) promotes the translocation of protein kinase C (PKC): requirement of viable serotonin nerve terminals. Brain Res 680:1–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Kramer HK,
    2. Poblete JC,
    3. Azmitia EC
    (1997) Activation of protein kinase C (PKC) by 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) occurs through the stimulation of serotonin receptors and transporter. Neuropsychopharmacology 17:117–129.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Lew R,
    2. Sabol KE,
    3. Chou C,
    4. Vosmer GL,
    5. Richards J,
    6. Seiden LS
    (1996) Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-induced serotonin deficits are followed by partial recovery over a 52 week period. II. Radioligand binding and autoradiographic studies. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 276:855–865.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Malberg JE,
    2. Seiden LS
    (1996) 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) 5HT neurotoxicity is a function of ambient temperature and core body temperature in rats. Soc Neurosci Abstr 3:1916.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. Malberg JE,
    2. Sabol KE,
    3. Seiden LS
    (1996) Co-administration of MDMA with drugs that protect against MDMA neurotoxicity produces different effects on body temperature in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 278:258–267.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Mazzola-Pomietto P,
    2. Aulakh CS,
    3. Tolliver T,
    4. Murphy DL
    (1997) Functional subsensitivity to 5HT2A and 5HT2C receptors mediating hyperthermia following acute and chronic treatment with 5HT2A/2C receptor agonists. Psychopharmacology 130:144–151.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. McCann UD,
    2. Slate SO,
    3. Ricaurte GA
    (1996) Adverse reactions with 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA; “Ecstasy”). Drug Saf 15:107–115.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Miller DB,
    2. O’Callaghan JP
    (1994) Environment-, drug- and stress-induced alterations in body temperature affect the neurotoxicity of substituted amphetamines in the C57BL/6J mouse. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 270:752–760.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. Mitani A,
    2. Kadoya F,
    3. Kataoka K
    (1991) Temperature dependence of hypoxia-induced calcium accumulation in gerbil hippocampal slices. Brain Res 562:159–163.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Nash JF,
    2. Meltzer HY,
    3. Gudelsky GA
    (1988) Elevation of serum prolactin and corticosterone concentrations in the rat after the administration of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 245:873–879.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. Nash JF,
    2. Roth BL,
    3. Brodki JD,
    4. Nichols DE,
    5. Gudelsky GA
    (1994) Effect of the R(−) and S(+) isomers of MDA and MDMA on phosphotidylinositol turnover in cultured cells expressing 5HT2A and 5HT2C receptors. Neurosci Lett 177:111–115.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. O’Hearn E,
    2. Battaglia G,
    3. DeSouza EB,
    4. Kuhar MJ,
    5. Molliver ME
    (1988) Methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) and methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) cause selective ablation of serotonergic axon terminals in forebrain: immunocytochemical evidence for neurotoxicity. J Neurosci 8:2788–2803.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. ↵
    1. Rudnick G,
    2. Wall SC
    (1992) The molecular mechanism of “ecstasy” [3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA)]: serotonin transporters are targets for MDMA-induced serotonin release. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:1817–1821.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    1. Sabol KE,
    2. Lew R,
    3. Richards JB,
    4. Vosmer GL,
    5. Seiden LS
    (1996) Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-induced serotonin deficits are followed by partial recovery over a 52 week period. I. Synaptosomal uptake and tissue concentrations. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 276:846–854.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    1. Schmidt CJ
    (1987) Neurotoxicity of the psychedelic amphetamine, methylenedioxymethamphetamine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 240:1–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    1. Schmidt CJ,
    2. Wu L,
    3. Lovenberg W
    (1986) Methylenedioxymethamphetamine: a potentially neurotoxic amphetamine analogue. Eur J Pharmacol 124:175–178.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Seiden LS,
    2. Vosmer G
    (1984) Formation of 6-hydroxydopamine in caudate nucleus of the rat brain after a single large dose of methylamphetamine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 21:29–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Sonsalla PK,
    2. Nicklas WJ,
    3. Heikkila RE
    (1989) Role for excitatory amino acids in methamphetamine-induced nigrostriatal dopaminergic toxicity. Science 243:398–400.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. ↵
    1. Spanos LJ,
    2. Yamamoto BK
    (1989) Acute and subchronic effects of methylenedioxymethamphetamine [(±) MDMA] on locomotion and serotonin syndrome behavior in the rat. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 32:835–840.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Sporer KA
    (1995) The serotonin syndrome. Drug Saf 13:94–104.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Steele TD,
    2. McCann UD,
    3. Ricaurte GA
    (1994) 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA; “Ecstasy”): pharmacology and toxicology in animals and humans [review]. Addiction 89:539–551.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Sternbach H
    (1991) The serotonin syndrome. Am J Psychiatry 148:705–713.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Stone DM,
    2. Johnson M,
    3. Hanson GR,
    4. Gibb JW
    (1988) Role of endogenous dopamine in the central serotonergic deficits induced by 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 247:79–87.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    1. Wilkinson LO,
    2. Auerbach SB,
    3. Jacobs BL
    (1991) Extracellular serotonin levels change with behavioral state but not with pyrogen-induced hyperthermia. J Neurosci 11:2732–2741.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. ↵
    1. Zeevalk GD,
    2. Nicklas WJ
    (1993) Hypothermia, metabolic stress and NMDA-mediated excitotoxicity. J Neurochem 61:1445–1453.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 18 (13)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 18, Issue 13
1 Jul 1998
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Small Changes in Ambient Temperature Cause Large Changes in 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-Induced Serotonin Neurotoxicity and Core Body Temperature in the Rat
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Small Changes in Ambient Temperature Cause Large Changes in 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-Induced Serotonin Neurotoxicity and Core Body Temperature in the Rat
Jessica E. Malberg, Lewis S. Seiden
Journal of Neuroscience 1 July 1998, 18 (13) 5086-5094; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-13-05086.1998

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Small Changes in Ambient Temperature Cause Large Changes in 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-Induced Serotonin Neurotoxicity and Core Body Temperature in the Rat
Jessica E. Malberg, Lewis S. Seiden
Journal of Neuroscience 1 July 1998, 18 (13) 5086-5094; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-13-05086.1998
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • MDMA
  • amphetamine
  • core body temperature
  • ambient temperature
  • neurotoxicity
  • 5-HT
  • thermoregulation

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Emotion Processing in Chimeric Faces: Hemispheric Asymmetries in Expression and Recognition of Emotions
  • Gating of Hippocampal-Evoked Activity in Prefrontal Cortical Neurons by Inputs from the Mediodorsal Thalamus and Ventral Tegmental Area
  • Cytoskeletal and Morphological Alterations Underlying Axonal Sprouting after Localized Transection of Cortical Neuron AxonsIn Vitro
Show more ARTICLE
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.