Skip to main content

Umbrella menu

  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Preparing a Manuscript
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Fees
    • Journal Club
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Preparing a Manuscript
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Fees
    • Journal Club
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
ARTICLE

Leukemia Inhibitory Factor Is an Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Cytokine

Lisa R. Banner, Paul H. Patterson, Andrew Allchorne, Steve Poole and Clifford J. Woolf
Journal of Neuroscience 15 July 1998, 18 (14) 5456-5462; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-14-05456.1998
Lisa R. Banner
1Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul H. Patterson
1Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Allchorne
2Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, England,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steve Poole
3Division of Endocrinology, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, Herts EN6 3QG, England, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clifford J. Woolf
2Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, England,
4Department of Anesthesiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts 02129
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The mRNA for leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), a neuroimmune signaling molecule, is elevated during skin inflammation produced by intraplantar injection of complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA). Moreover, although LIF knock-out mice display normal sensitivity to cutaneous mechanical and thermal stimulation compared with wild-type mice, the degree of CFA-induced inflammation in mice lacking LIF is enhanced in spatial extent, amplitude, cellular infiltrate, and interleukin (IL)-1β and nerve growth factor (NGF) expression. Conversely, local injection of low doses of recombinant LIF diminishes mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity as well as the IL-1β and NGF expression induced by CFA. These data show that upregulation of LIF during peripheral inflammation serves a key, early anti-inflammatory role and that exogenous LIF can reduce inflammatory hyperalgesia.

  • pain
  • inflammation
  • edema
  • hyperalgesia
  • primary sensory neuron
  • analgesia

Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) is a neuropoietic cytokine involved in both the neural and immune responses to injury. Its levels are increased in a variety of animal and human inflammatory conditions (Perry et al., 1987; Alexander et al., 1994; Brown et al., 1994; Ulich et al., 1994; Benigni et al., 1996; Heyman et al., 1996; Weinhold and Ruther, 1997). Administration of LIF can suppress inflammatory signs in some cases (Alexander et al., 1994), for instance after intratracheal lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation (Ulich et al., 1994). LIF also increases corticosterone levels via the hypothalamo–pituitary–adrenal axis (Baba et al., 1998). Other evidence suggests, however, that it can also act as a proinflammatory cytokine. Exogenously added LIF induces acute phase protein expression (Ryffel, 1993; Mehlen et al., 1997) and stimulates the production of proinflammatory cytokines and monocyte chemoattractants (Alexander et al., 1994; Paglia et al., 1996; Shimon et al., 1997). Moreover, passive immunization against LIF protects mice against the lethal effects of endotoxin and blocks endotoxin-induced increases in serum interleukin-1 (IL-1) and IL-6 (Block et al., 1993), and injection of high concentrations of LIF into skin or joints can induce swelling and leukocyte invasion (Carroll et al., 1995; McKenzie et al., 1996).

In the nervous system, LIF mRNA levels dramatically increase soon after injury (Patterson, 1994; Kurek et al., 1996; Banner et al., 1997), and experiments with LIF null mutant mice demonstrate that LIF is required for some of the striking changes in neuronal gene expression that are characteristic of the injury response (Rao et al., 1993; Corness et al., 1996; Sun and Zigmond, 1996). Lack of LIF can also lead to premature neuronal death (Sendtner et al., 1996) and a diminished rate of immune cell influx after peripheral nerve injury (Patterson et al., 1997). LIF and its receptors (gp130) are abundantly expressed in pituitary cells, and LIF acts in a paracrine manner to regulate adrenocorticotrophin and growth hormone release (Lotz et al., 1992;Waring et al., 1992; Szepietowski et al., 1997).

Thus, although LIF appears to be a central regulator of inflammatory events and their interaction with the nervous system, there is contradictory evidence whether this cytokine is pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory. To help clarify these issues and to further probe interactions between the nervous and immune systems during the injury response, we have used both LIF knock-out mice and LIF injections in a well characterized, local inflammatory pain model, the intraplantar injection of complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) (Stein et al., 1988;Woolf et al., 1994, 1996; Safieh-Garabedian et al., 1995).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All animal procedures conformed with the requirements of either the British Home Office Animal Licensing Inspectorate or the Caltech Research Animal Care Committee.

Inflammation in rats. Experiments were performed on adult male Sprague Dawley rats (200–250 gm). A unilateral, acute inflammatory lesion was produced by an injection into the plantar surface of the hindpaw, under halothane anesthesia (2%), of 100 μl of CFA [1 mg/ml Mycobacterium tuberculosis (H37Ra, ATCC 25177, in 0.85 ml of paraffin oil and 0.15 ml of mannide monooleate; Sigma, St. Louis, MO)]. Thermal and mechanical sensitivity were tested as described previously in detail (Safieh-Garabedian et al., 1995; Woolf et al., 1996). Foot withdrawal on exposure to a hot plate (50°C) was used as an index of thermal sensitivity, whereas the mechanical threshold for eliciting a flexion withdrawal response was measured in grams, using calibrated monofilament Von Frey hairs (4.1–72 gm) as an index of mechanical sensitivity. Von Frey hairs were applied three times (0.5 Hz) at a right angle to the dorsum of the foot in ascending order of force until a withdrawal response was elicited on all three occasions. The order was then reversed, and lower-force hairs were applied. The threshold was defined as the lowest force hair that elicited a clear withdrawal response on each of the three applications. Paw diameters in millimeters were measured under terminal pentobarbital anesthesia (500 mg/kg, i.p.) using a micrometer gauge (Stanley) applied across the dorsoventral plane of the hindpaw in its midposition.

LIF null mutant mice. LIF-deficient mutant mice (Stewart et al., 1992) were maintained by mating within the original colony of the mutant strain or by back-crossing with the C57Bl6 parental strain. All of the data reported here on mutant mice come from the former matings. Null mutants were produced by mating heterozygotes or by mating null males with heterozygote females. Nulls, heterozygotes, and wild-type (WT) mice were compared as littermates. A PCR-based method was used to determine the genotype of the mice. Genomic DNA was isolated from tail biopsies and subjected to PCR amplification. Two DNA fragments were coamplified: a 192 bp LIF gene fragment and a 541 bp neomycin gene fragment. LIF WT mice contained only the LIF product (192 bp), the heterozygotes had both bands (192 and 541 bp), and the LIF-deficient mice had only the larger fragment (541 bp).

Inflammation in mice. CFA induced inflammation in LIF −/− and +/+ mice was produced as above, except that only 20 μl of CFA was injected. Mechanical sensitivity was measured using Von Frey hairs as above, and paw diameter was also measured as described above. The CFA injections into the mice were all made together at one sitting, and the tester was blinded to the genotype of the animals. Inflammatory cell infiltration was studied in paraformaldehyde-fixed, hematoxylin and eosin-stained skin sections. Cell types were quantified by counting neutrophils and mast cells from three animals of each genotype (three sections per animal). The number of polymorphonuclear neutrophils was determined by counting the number of cells with multilobed nuclei in a representative 100-μm-wide band from the outer edge of the epidermis to the inner edge of the dermis. Only cells with more than one nucleus per cell were taken as positive. Mast cells were quantified in a similar manner, counting only those cells that were of the appropriate size and contained obvious granules.

LIF mRNA measurements. Rat footpad skin was removed under deep terminal pentobarbital anesthesia, and total RNA was extracted by the acid–phenol method and RNase protection performed as described previously (Banner and Patterson, 1994). The intensity of the radioactive signal emitted by the LIF-protected fragment was compared with the glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH)-protected fragment as an internal control for the steady-state amount of RNA, and the values were expressed in arbitrary units. GAPDH mRNA was found not to change with injury.

IL-1 and NGF measurements. Under deep terminal pentobarbital anesthesia, samples of either rat or mouse hindpaw skin, sciatic nerve, and L4 and L5 dorsal root ganglia were dissected, weighed, and frozen on dry ice. The tissue was used for determination of IL-1β and NGF by ELISA, as described previously (Safieh-Garabedian et al., 1995). Results are expressed as nanograms per hindpaw to account for changes in weight of inflamed skin.

LIF administration. Recombinant human LIF (Preparation 93/562, 1 μg = 10,000 U; National Institute for Biological Standards and Control) was dissolved in saline at concentrations of 100 or 1000 ng/ml and injected into the rat hindpaw under halothane anesthesia (2%) in a volume of 100 μl.

Statistical analysis. All results are presented as mean ± SEM. Differences were calculated using Student’s or Welch’st test, ANOVA followed by Dunnet’s multiple-comparison test, or the Mann–Whitney U test, where appropriate.

RESULTS

LIF mRNA levels in inflamed skin

Six hours after induction of acute inflammation in the rat hindpaw by intraplantar injection of CFA, LIF mRNA levels were measured by an RNase protection assay and expressed as a ratio with GAPDH mRNA. This cytokine is elevated in the inflamed skin at this time (4.1 ± 1.8 ipsilateral, 2.8 ± 1.1 contralateral, from naive levels of 1.0; LIF/GAPDH ± SEM; n = 4), with a trend to a further increase at 48 hr (5.7 ± 2.1 ipsilateral, 1.4 ± 0.3 contralateral). A smaller, bilateral change occurred in the sciatic nerve (2.4 ± 1.1 ipsilateral, 1.9 ± 0.4 contralateral, from naive levels of 1.0; LIF/GAPDH ± SEM; n = 4; 6 hr after CFA).

Inflammation in LIF knock-out mice

To directly test whether LIF is required for either the development of or recovery from inflammation, we studied the effects of CFA injection in LIF knock-out mice. The general appearance and behavior of WT and LIF knock-out mice are quite similar, although the latter are slightly smaller (Stewart et al., 1992). There is, however, a very significant difference in the response of the two strains to CFA injection. Four hours after CFA administration, the hindpaws in the mutant mice were swollen on the entire dorsal and plantar surfaces, which differed with the degree of swelling in WT mice, which at this time point was restricted to the site of the injection. At 24 and 48 hr the swelling spread past the ankle and up the calf, and the entire plantar and dorsal skin of the foot was under marked tension and edematous. In WT littermates at these time points, inflammation was limited to the hindpaw, and even here it was much less prominent than in the −/− mice. The difference in dorsoventral paw diameter at 48 hr after CFA injection was quantified for the two strains and is presented in Figure 1. The mean percentage increase in paw diameter is more than twice as great in the LIF knock-out mice compared with WT mice (p < 0.01). Because the degree of swelling in the −/− mice was associated with a marked changes in the tension, compliance, fluid content, and thickness of the skin, a meaningful comparison of mechanical and thermal sensitivity between WT and −/− mice was not possible.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Several measures of inflammation after injection of CFA are strongly enhanced in LIF knock-out mice. The LIF knock-out mice display a significantly greater elevation of both IL-1β and NGF than the WT mice (p < 0.05;n = 5). IL-1β and NGF levels measured by ELISA are expressed as the ratio of the values obtained from the ipsilateral paw over the contralateral paw. Both WT (+/+) and LIF null mutant (−/−) mice were examined 48 hr after CFA injection in the ipsilateral paw. Swelling is expressed as the change in the dorsoventral paw diameter value from preinflamed levels in WT (+/+) and LIF (−/−) null mutant mice. The percent increase in the mutant mouse was substantially greater (p < 0.01, Mann–WhitneyU test) than in the WT mice. n = 12 for naive and WT; n = 6 for all other groups.

Another assay for inflammation involves quantification of cytokines and growth factors that are elevated under a variety of inflammatory conditions (Woolf et al., 1994, 1996; Safieh-Garabedian et al., 1995). We found that CFA injection induced a twofold elevation in IL-1β at 24 hr in WT mice (from naive levels of 564 ± 27 pg/hindpaw to 1068 ± 63 pg/ipsilateral hindpaw and 526 ± 21 pg/contralateral hindpaw; n = 5). In LIF knock-out mice, however, the IL-1β levels at 48 hr after CFA were 1712 ± 364 pg/ipsilateral hindpaw and 226 ± 53 pg/contralateral hindpaw; (n = 5). When the data are expressed as a ratio of the levels in the inflamed (ipsilateral) to noninflamed (contralateral) hindpaws at 48 hr, CFA induces a twofold rise in IL-1β in the WT mice and a ninefold rise in the mutant mice (Fig. 1). A similar difference was detected for NGF levels in the hindpaw, with a significantly greater ratio in mutant versus WT animals (Fig. 1). At 48 hr, NGF levels in WT mice were 94.6 ± 10 pg/ipsilateral hindpaw and 40.8 ± 12.8 pg/contralateral hindpaw (n = 5), whereas in mutant mice the levels were 186 ± 46 pg/ipsilateral hindpaw and 49.3 ± 21 pg/contralateral hindpaw; (n = 5).

Analysis of the thickness and cellular infiltrates in WT and LIF mutant mice reinforced these findings. Staining of skin sections 48 hr after CFA revealed not only a much thicker dermis in the mutants, but many more densely stained neutrophils (Fig.2). This difference was quantified by counting cells in nine sections from three animals of each genotype. The LIF mutant mice had 4.8-fold more neutrophils in the inflamed dermis than WT littermates (+/+, 40.2 ± 7.1; −/−, 190.0 ± 15.1; n = 9). When expressed as neutrophil density (per 100 μm2), the mutants had more than twice as many cells as the WT mice (+/+, 8.6 ± 0.2; −/−, 20.8 ± 1.5;p < 0.005). The mutants also had greater than twofold more mast cells than the WT mice.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Adjuvant-induced inflammation produces a greater immune cell infiltration in LIF mutant (−/−) than in WT (+/+) mice. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the footpad skin, 48 hr after CFA injection, reveals a much thicker dermis (top) in the −/− compared with +/+ mice. Bottom panels reveal that this difference is attributable to more polymorphonuclear neutrophils (arrowhead) in the dermis of −/− compared with +/+ mice. Scale bar: top panels; 200 μm; bottom panels, 20 μm.

Effects of exogenous LIF

The greater inflammatory response to CFA in mice lacking LIF suggests an anti-inflammatory role for this cytokine. To test this directly, we injected LIF into the rat hindpaw 10 min before CFA injection. Injection of 10 ng of LIF into the hindpaw (spread over plantar and dorsal surfaces) had no detectable effect on CFA-induced inflammation, as measured by behavioral sensitivity, paw diameter, NGF, and IL-1β levels (n = 5; data not shown). Hindpaw injection of 100 ng of LIF before CFA did, however, have a marked effect. Both mechanical and thermal sensitivity in the early phase of inflammation were substantially reduced (Fig.3). Maximal LIF-induced analgesia in both assays was observed 3 hr after CFA injection (p< 0.001). An effect of LIF on thermal sensitivity was also apparent at 48 hr (p < 0.01). Thus, injection of LIF at a single time point has significant consequences for the subsequent rate and extent of pain associated with inflammation. The timing of the injection was important. In rats with preestablished CFA-induced inflammation (48 hr), injection of 100 ng of LIF into the inflamed hindpaw failed to modify the mechanical or thermal sensitivity tested 1, 3, and 6 hr after the LIF injections; (n = 5; data not shown).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Administration of LIF to the paw reduces and/or delays the mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity caused by CFA. LIF (100 ng total) was injected into the plantar and dorsal surfaces of the hindpaw 10 min before CFA injection, and the sensitivity to mechanical and thermal stimuli was measured as described in Materials and Methods. Thermal hyperalgesia at 1 and 3 hr is significantly reduced by LIF (***p < 0.001), and the difference is maintained at 48 hr (**p < 0.01). Mechanical sensitivity, which begins to appear at 3 hr, is also attenuated at that time (***p < 0.001). n = 6 for each data point.

LIF injections at 50 and 100 ng had little effect on baseline mechanical or thermal sensitivity in the absence of inflammation (Fig.4), but at 500 ng a significant thermal hyperalgesia was present 3 and 6 hr after the high-dose injection (Fig.4).

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Intraplantar injection of LIF at 50, 100, and 500 ng into the paw of noninflamed rats failed to modify mechanical sensitivity. The highest dose (500 ng) did, however, significantly decrease thermal response latency at 3 and 6 hr after injection (*p <0.05; **p < 0.01).n = 4 for each data point.

Consistent with its analgesic effects, LIF injection reduced the induction of IL-1β and NGF stimulated by CFA (Fig.5). Injection of LIF did not, however, suppress paw swelling; 3 hr after CFA treatment, the dorsoventral paw diameter increased by 28 ± 6% (n = 4), whereas in the LIF (100 ng) + CFA group this increase was 25 ± 4% (n = 4), even though there was reduced hypersensitivity at this time. No difference in paw diameter was detected in these animals 24 and 48 hr after CFA alone or CFA with 100 ng of LIF.

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Intraplantar injection of LIF reduces the inflammation-induced elevation in IL-1β and NGF 3 hr after CFA administration. Preadministration of 100 ng of LIF into the plantar and dorsal surfaces of the hindpaw before CFA injection reduces the elevation in IL-1β levels by 60% and NGF levels by 50%.n = 4; *p < 0.05 CFA versus naive; #p < 0.05 CFA + 100 ng of LIF versus CFA.

DISCUSSION

Inflammation is a complex, multifactoral process involving cell infiltration, release of cytokines, growth factors, and inflammatory mediators by inflammatory and damaged cells, as well as altered blood flow, capillary permeability, and changes in pain sensitivity (Liles and van Voorhis, 1995; Watkins et al., 1995; Dinarello, 1996). A challenge is to try to identify which signal molecules produced during inflammation directly or indirectly act on sensory neurons. Although much emphasis has been rightly placed on the sequence of changes that generate inflammatory pain hypersensitivity, it is clear that compensatory mechanisms suppressing inflammation and pain may also be recruited during and after the initial insult. Our data indicate that LIF is a major, anti-inflammatory molecule produced during cutaneous inflammation. That is, the absence of endogenous LIF leads to a large potentiation of the inflammatory response, and raising LIF levels through a single injection counters several of the acute effects of CFA.

Inflammatory edema has both neurogenic and non-neurogenic components, the latter being the consequence of the direct action of inflammatory mediators on the vasculature and capillary permeability, whereas the former are attributable to an efferent function of sensory neurons releasing vasoactive neuropeptides as part of the axon reflex (Barnes, 1996; Lynn et al., 1996). Although it is not clear which component is exaggerated in the LIF knock-out mice, the failure of exogenous LIF to reduce swelling while diminishing IL-1β and NGF levels indicates an early divergence of the inflammatory pathways involved. This finding suggests that further investigation of LIF effects on these pathways will prove fruitful. High doses of LIF (1 μg) are reported to produce swelling in the goat radiocarpal joint (Carroll et al., 1995), and injection of >100 ng of LIF directly into the ear pinnae of mice increases ear thickness, although by a much smaller extent than a 250-fold lower dose of IL-1α (McKenzie et al., 1996). It is possible that these proinflammatory effects of LIF are attributable to a biphasic dose dependence, such that anti-inflammatory effects are seen at lower doses. On the other had, the effects of high concentrations of LIF may be mediated through binding to receptors for other members of this cytokine family, all of which use the gp130 signal-transducing subunit (Stahl and Yancopoulos, 1994). The same issues are raised by a report that injection of a high dose (1 μg) of LIF into noninflamed juvenile rats (12 d old) induces a prolonged hypersensitivity to mechanical stimulation (Thompson et al., 1996). We did not observe any effect on mechanical sensitivity with lower doses of LIF (up to 500 ng) in footpad injections in noninflamed adult rats. Either the dose or the age of the animals may account for this difference. We did find, though, a hyperalgesic action of LIF but only at a high dose (500 ng). Thus, caution is needed in interpreting the proinflammatory effects of high concentrations of exogenous LIF, which may have pharmacological actions that differ from those of endogenous LIF. This interpretation is supported by our results with the LIF knock-out animals.

Inflammatory pain is the consequence of changes in the sensitivity of sensory nerve endings (peripheral sensitization), as well as changes in sensory neuron phenotype and synaptic transmission in the spinal cord (central sensitization) (Woolf, 1983; Levine and Taiwo, 1994; Reeh, 1994). Multiple inflammatory mediators, including bradykinin, hydrogen ions, histamine and other amines, ATP, and prostaglandins, interact synergistically to increase transduction sensitivity of high-threshold nociceptors by phosphorylating sodium channels (Gold et al., 1996). It has recently become apparent that inflammation results in the upregulation of NGF (Donnerer et al., 1992) and that this induces peripheral sensitization by direct and indirect means (Lewin et al., 1994). NGF induction also modifies the phenotype of TrkA-expressing nociceptor neurons (Leslie et al., 1995; Neumann et al., 1996). Neutralization or sequestration of NGF has profound analgesic actions on experimental inflammation (Lewin et al., 1994; Woolf et al., 1994;McMahon et al., 1995) whereas administration of NGF induces pain hypersensitivity (Lewin et al., 1993). NGF expression during inflammation is the consequence of upregulation of both IL-1β and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) (Woolf et al., 1996, 1997). The fact that recombinant LIF suppresses both IL-1β and NGF upregulation after inflammation and that deletion of LIF results in an amplified induction of these proteins points to a role for LIF in regulating the cytokine cascade at an early stage. It is noteworthy that LIF appears to have different actions in chondrocytes in which it increases IL-1, IL-6, and IL-8 levels (Shimon et al., 1997). Although the cellular target for LIF action in skin remains to be determined, LIF presumably exerts its anti-inflammatory effect via the Jak–STAT pathway (Stahl and Yancopoulos, 1994). This could lead to the blockade of the transcription or release of a proinflammatory cytokine such as IL-1 (Figs. 1, 5B) or to the release of an endogenous anti-inflammatory agent such as IL-1 receptor antagonist (Dinarello, 1996). Regarding potential upstream activators of LIF, TNF-α induces LIF in dermal cultures (Campbell et al., 1993).

LIF mediates diverse functions in the developing and adult organism. Our findings show that LIF can be a protective cytokine, which is induced early during inflammation and which suppresses the expression of cytokines and growth factors that contribute to the inflammatory response and pain. These results suggest the opportunity for development of novel anti-inflammatory and analgesic targets such as gp130 and LIF receptor agonists.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by the Medical Research Council (C.J.W.), the Wellcome Trust (C.J.W.), the Human Frontiers Science Program (C.J.W.), the National Institutes of Health National Research Service Award (L.R.B.), and the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke (P.H.P.).

    Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Clifford J. Woolf, Neural Plasticity Research Group, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Building 149, 13th Street, Charlestown, MA 02129.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Alexander HR,
    2. Billingsley KG,
    3. Block MI,
    4. Fraker DL
    (1994) D-factor/leukemia inhibitory factor: evidence for its role as a mediator in acute and chronic inflammatory disease. Cytokines 6:589–596.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Baba H,
    2. Kohno T,
    3. Okamoto M,
    4. Goldstein PA,
    5. Shimoji K,
    6. Yoshimura M
    (1998) Muscarinic facilitation of GABA release in substantia gelatinosa of the rat spinal dorsal horn. J Physiol (Lond) 508:83–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Banner LR,
    2. Patterson PH
    (1994) Major changes in the expression of the mRNAs for CDF/LIF and its receptor following injury to adult peripheral nerves and ganglia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:7109–7113.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Banner LR,
    2. Moayeri NN,
    3. Patterson PH
    (1997) Leukemia inhibitory factor is expressed in astrocytes following cortical injury. Exp Neurol 147:1–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Barnes PJ
    (1996) Neuroeffector mechanisms: the interface between inflammation and neuronal responses. J Allergy Clin Immunol 98:S73–S81.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Benigni F,
    2. Fantuzzi G,
    3. Sacco S,
    4. Sironi M,
    5. Possi P,
    6. Dinarello CA,
    7. Sipe JD,
    8. Poli V,
    9. Cappelletti M,
    10. Paonessa G,
    11. Pennica D,
    12. Panryotatos N,
    13. Ghezzi P
    (1996) Six different cytokines that share GP130 as a receptor subunit induce serum amyloid A and potentiate the induction of interleukin-6 and the activation of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis by interleukin-1. Blood 87:1851–1854.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Block MI,
    2. Berg M,
    3. McNamara MJ,
    4. Norton JA,
    5. Fraker DL,
    6. Alexander HR
    (1993) Passive immunization of mice against D factor blocks lethality and cytokine release during endotoxemia. J Exp Med 178:1085–1090.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Brown MA,
    2. Metcalf D,
    3. Gough NM
    (1994) Leukemia inhibitory factor and interleukin 6 are expressed at very low levels in the normal adult mouse and are induced by inflammation. Cytokines 6:300–309.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Campbell IK,
    2. Waring P,
    3. Novak U,
    4. Hamilton JA
    (1993) Production of leukemia inhibitory factor by human articular chondrocytes and cartilage in response to interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor α. Arthritis Rheum 36:790–794.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Carroll GJ,
    2. Bell MC,
    3. Chapman HM,
    4. Mills JN,
    5. Robinson WF
    (1995) Leukemia inhibitory factor induces leukocyte infiltration and cartilage proteoglycan degradation in goat joints. J Interferon Cytokine Res 15:567–573.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Corness J,
    2. Shi T-J,
    3. Xu Z-Q,
    4. Brulet P,
    5. Hokfelt T
    (1996) Influence of leukemia inhibitory factor on galanin/GMAP and neuropeptide Y expression in mouse primary sensory neurons after axotomy. Exp Brain Res 112:79–88.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Dinarello CA
    (1996) Biological basis for interleukin-1 in disease. Blood 87:2095–2147.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Donnerer J,
    2. Schuligoi R,
    3. Stein C
    (1992) Increased content and transport of substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide in sensory nerves innervating inflamed tissue: evidence for a regulatory function of nerve growth factor in vivo. Neuroscience 49:693–698.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Gold MS,
    2. Reichling DB,
    3. Schuster MJ,
    4. Levine JD
    (1996) Hyperalgesic agents increase a tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ current in nociceptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:1108–1112.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Heyman D,
    2. L’Her E,
    3. Nguyen J-M,
    4. Raher S,
    5. Canfrere I,
    6. Coupey L,
    7. Fixe P,
    8. Chailleux S,
    9. De Grotte D,
    10. Praloran V,
    11. Godard A
    (1996) Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) production in pleural effusions: comparison with production of IL-4, IL-8, IL-10, and macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF). Cytokines 8:410–416.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Kurek JB,
    2. Austin L,
    3. Cheema SS,
    4. Bartlett PF,
    5. Murphy M
    (1996) Upregulation of leukemia inhibitory factor and interleukin-6 in transected sciatic nerve and muscle following denervation. Neuromuscul Disord 6:105–114.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Leslie TA,
    2. Emson PC,
    3. Dowd PM,
    4. Woolf CJ
    (1995) Nerve growth factor contributes to the upregulation of GAP-43 and preprotachykinin A mRNA in primary sensory neurons following peripheral inflammation. Neuroscience 67:753–761.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Levine JD,
    2. Taiwo YO
    (1994) Inflammatory pain. in Textbook of Pain, eds Wall PD, Melzack R (Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh), pp 45–56.
  19. ↵
    1. Lewin GR,
    2. Ritter AM,
    3. Mendell LM
    (1993) Nerve growth factor-induced hyperalgesia in the neonatal and adult rat. J Neurosci 13:2136–2148.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Lewin GR,
    2. Rueff A,
    3. Mendell LM
    (1994) Peripheral and central mechanisms of NGF-induced hyperalgesia. Eur J Neurosci 6:1903–1912.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Liles WC,
    2. van Voorhis WC
    (1995) Review: nomenclature and biological significance of cytokines involved in inflammation and the host immune response. J Infect Dis 172:1573–1580.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Lotz M,
    2. Moats T,
    3. Villiger PM
    (1992) Leukemia inhibitory factor is expressed in cartilage and synovium and can contribute to the pathogenesis of arthritis. J Clin Invest 90:888–896.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Lynn B,
    2. Schutterle S,
    3. Pierau FK
    (1996) The vasodilator component of neurogenic inflammation is caused by a special subclass of heat-sensitive nociceptors in the skin of the pig. J Physiol (Lond) 494:587–593.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. McKenzie RC,
    2. Paglia D,
    3. Kondo S,
    4. Sauder DN
    (1996) A novel endogenous mediator of cutaneous inflammation: leukemia inhibitory factor. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 76:111–114.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. McMahon SB,
    2. Bennett DLH,
    3. Priestley JV,
    4. Shelton DL
    (1995) The biological effects of endogenous NGF in adult sensory neurones revealed by a trkA IgG fusion molecule. Nat Med 1:774–780.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Mehlen P,
    2. Hickey E,
    3. Weber LA,
    4. Arrigo A-P
    (1997) Large unphosphorylated aggregates as the active form of hsp27 which controls intracellular reactive oxygen species and glutathione levels and generates a protection against TNFα in NIH-3T3-ras cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 241:187–192.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Neumann S,
    2. Doubell TP,
    3. Leslie TA,
    4. Woolf CJ
    (1996) Inflammatory pain hypersensitivity mediated by phenotypic switch in myelinated primary sensory neurones. Nature 384:360–364.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Paglia D,
    2. Kondo S,
    3. Ng K-M,
    4. Sauder DN,
    5. McKenzie RC
    (1996) Leukemia inhibitory factor is expressed by normal human keratinocytes in vitro and in vivo. Br J Dermatol 134:817–823.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Patterson PH
    (1994) Leukemia inhibitory factor, a cytokine at the interface between neurobiology and immunology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:7833–7835.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Patterson PH,
    2. Kou S-Y,
    3. Sugiura S,
    4. Lahav R,
    5. Banner LR
    (1997) LIF coordinates neuronal and inflammatory responses to nerve injury. Soc Neurosci Abstr 23:997.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Perry GW,
    2. Burmeister DW,
    3. Grafstein B
    (1987) Fast axonally transported proteins in regenerating goldfish optic axons. J Neurosci 7:792–806.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Rao MS,
    2. Sun Y,
    3. Escrary JL,
    4. Perreau J,
    5. Tresser S,
    6. Patterson PH,
    7. Zigmond RE,
    8. Brulet P,
    9. Landes SL
    (1993) Leukemia inhibitory factor mediates an injury response but not a target-directed developmental transmitter switch in sympathetic neurons. Neuron 11:1175–1185.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Reeh PW
    (1994) Chemical excitation and sensitization of nociceptors. in Cellular mechanisms of sensory processing, NATO ASI series, Cell biology, vol 79, ed Urban L (Springer, Berlin), pp 119–131.
  34. ↵
    1. Ryffel B
    (1993) Pathology induced by leukemia inhibitory factor. Int Rev Exp Pathol 34:69–72.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Safieh-Garabedian B,
    2. Poole S,
    3. Allchorne A,
    4. Winter J,
    5. Woolf CJ
    (1995) Contribution of interleukin-1β to the inflammation-induced increase in nerve growth factor levels and inflammatory hyperalgesia. Br J Pharmacol 115:1265–1275.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Sendtner M,
    2. Gotz R,
    3. Holtman B,
    4. Escary J-L,
    5. Masu Y,
    6. Carroll P,
    7. Wolf E,
    8. Brem G,
    9. Brulet P,
    10. Thoenen H
    (1996) Cryptic physiological trophic support of motoneurons by LIF revealed by double gene targeting of CNTF and LIF. Curr Biol 6:686–694.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Shimon I,
    2. Yan X,
    3. Ray DW,
    4. Melmed S
    (1997) Cytokine-dependent gp130 receptor subunit regulates human fetal pituitary adrenocorticotropin hormone and growth hormone secretion. J Clin Invest 100:357–363.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Stahl N,
    2. Yancopoulos GD
    (1994) The tripartite CNRF receptor complex: activation and signaling involves components shared with other cytokines. J Neurobiol 25:1454–1466.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Stein C,
    2. Millan MJ,
    3. Herz A
    (1988) Unilateral inflammation of the hindpaw in rats as a model of prolonged noxious stimulation: alterations in behavior and nociceptive thresholds. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 31:445–451.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. ↵
    1. Stewart CL,
    2. Kaspar P,
    3. Brunet LJ,
    4. Bhatt H,
    5. Gadi I,
    6. Kontgen F,
    7. Abbondanzo SJ
    (1992) Blastocyst implantation depends on maternal expression of leukemia inhibitory factor. Nature 359:76–79.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Sun Y,
    2. Zigmond RE
    (1996) Leukemia inhibitory factor induced in the sciatic nerve after axotomy is involved in the induction of galanin in sensory neurons. Eur J Neurosci 8:2213–2220.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Szepietowski JC,
    2. McKenzie RC,
    3. Keohane SG,
    4. Walker C,
    5. Aldridge RD,
    6. Hunter JA
    (1997) Leukemia inhibitory factor: induction in the early phase of allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 36:21–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Thompson SWN,
    2. Dray A,
    3. Urban L
    (1996) Leukemia inhibitory factor induces mechanical allodynia but not thermal hyperalgesia in the juvenile rat. Neuroscience 71:1091–1094.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Ulich TR,
    2. Fann M-J,
    3. Patterson PH,
    4. Williams JH,
    5. Samal B,
    6. Del Castillo J,
    7. Yin S,
    8. Guo K,
    9. Remick DG
    (1994) Intratracheal injection of LPS and cytokines. V. LPS induces expression of LIF and LIF inhibits acute inflammation. Am J Physiol 267:442–446.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. Waring P,
    2. Wycherley K,
    3. Cary D,
    4. Nicola N,
    5. Metcalf D
    (1992) Leukemia inhibitory factor levels are elevated in septic shock and various inflammatory body fluids. J Clin Invest 90:2031–2037.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Watkins LR,
    2. Maier SF,
    3. Goehler LE
    (1995) Immune activation: the role of proinflammatory cytokines in inflammation, illness responses and pathological pain states. Pain 63:289–302.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Weinhold B,
    2. Ruther U
    (1997) Interleukin-6-dependent and -independent regulation of the human C-reactive protein gene. Biochem J 327:425–429.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. Woolf CJ
    (1983) Evidence for a central component of postinjury pain hypersensitivity. Nature 306:686–688.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Woolf CJ,
    2. Safieh-Garabedian B,
    3. Ma Q-P,
    4. Crilly P,
    5. Winter J
    (1994) Nerve growth factor contributes to the generation of inflammatory sensory hypersensitivity. Neuroscience 62:327–331.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Woolf CJ,
    2. Ma Q-P,
    3. Allchorne A,
    4. Poole S
    (1996) Peripheral cell types contributing to the hyperalgesic action of nerve growth factor in inflammation. J Neurosci 16:2716–2723.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Woolf CJ,
    2. Allchorne A,
    3. Safieh-Garabedian B,
    4. Poole S
    (1997) Cytokines, nerve growth factor and inflammatory hyperalgesia: the contribution of tumor necrosis factor α. Br J Pharmacol 121:417–424.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 18 (14)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 18, Issue 14
15 Jul 1998
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Leukemia Inhibitory Factor Is an Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Cytokine
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Leukemia Inhibitory Factor Is an Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Cytokine
Lisa R. Banner, Paul H. Patterson, Andrew Allchorne, Steve Poole, Clifford J. Woolf
Journal of Neuroscience 15 July 1998, 18 (14) 5456-5462; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-14-05456.1998

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Leukemia Inhibitory Factor Is an Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Cytokine
Lisa R. Banner, Paul H. Patterson, Andrew Allchorne, Steve Poole, Clifford J. Woolf
Journal of Neuroscience 15 July 1998, 18 (14) 5456-5462; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-14-05456.1998
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • pain
  • inflammation
  • edema
  • hyperalgesia
  • primary sensory neuron
  • analgesia

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Salicylate Induces Tinnitus through Activation of Cochlear NMDA Receptors
  • Calcium Influx via L- and N-Type Calcium Channels Activates a Transient Large-Conductance Ca2+-Activated K+Current in Mouse Neocortical Pyramidal Neurons
  • Visuomotor Behaviors in Larval Zebrafish after GFP-Guided Laser Ablation of the Optic Tectum
Show more ARTICLE
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2021 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.