Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
ARTICLE

Glial Contribution to Glutamate Uptake at Schaffer Collateral–Commissural Synapses in the Hippocampus

Dwight E. Bergles and Craig E. Jahr
Journal of Neuroscience 1 October 1998, 18 (19) 7709-7716; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-19-07709.1998
Dwight E. Bergles
1Vollum Institute, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon 97201
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Craig E. Jahr
1Vollum Institute, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon 97201
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Temperature-dependent changes in astrocyte transporter currents. A, Outside-out patch removed from an astrocyte located in stratum radiatum of area CA1. Solid lines in A and B are the control responses recorded at room temperature, and dotted linesare the responses of the same patch recorded at 36°C.Inset, Response at 36°C has been scaled to that in control and shown at a faster time base to illustrate the time course of the two responses. B, Response of a different patch to d-aspartate (10 mm). Tracesare illustrated as in A. Traces are averages of 8–12 consecutive responses recorded at −90 mV. KSCN-based internal solution. The open tip response above eachtrace indicates the duration of the agonist application.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Recovery time course ofl-glutamate-evoked transporter currents. A,B, l-glutamate (10 mm) was applied for 30 msec to an outside-out patch from an astrocyte and then reapplied for 20 msec after a variable delay, at both 24°C (top traces) and 36°C (bottom traces).Traces are averages of six consecutive responses recorded at −90 mV. KSCN-based internal solution. C, Summary plot of the ratio of the peak amplitude of the second pulse (P2) over the peak amplitude of the control response (P1) for recordings made at both 24°C (n = 4) and 36°C (n = 11). The four patches used to measure the recovery at 24°C were also used to measure the recovery at 36°C.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Recovery time course ofd-aspartate-evoked transporter currents. A,B, d-aspartate (10 mm) was applied to an outside-out patch from astrocytes for 30 msec and then reapplied for 20 msec after a variable delay, at both 24°C (top traces) and 36°C (bottom traces).Traces are averages of five consecutive responses recorded at −90 mV. KSCN-based internal solution. C, Summary plot of the ratio of the peak amplitude of the second pulse (P2) over the peak amplitude of the control response (P1) for recordings made at both 24°C (n = 4) and 36°C (n = 10). The four patches used to measure the recovery at 24°C were also used to measure the recovery at 36°C.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Temperature-dependent changes in evoked responses.A, Synaptically activated transporter current (STC) recorded from a stratum radiatum astrocyte.Vm = −96 mV. K-methanesulfonate-based internal solution. B, AMPA receptor-mediated EPSCs recorded from a CA1 pyramidal neuron. Vm = −80 mV. Cs-methanesulfonate-based internal solution. C, Field EPSPs (fEPSP) recorded in stratum radiatum of area CA1. A–C, Solid lines are the responses recorded at room temperature, and the dotted lines are the responses recorded at 36°C.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Transporter currents are not associated with EPSCs in CA1 pyramidal neurons. The ionotropic glutamate receptor antagonists NBQX (10 μm) and d,l-CPP (10 μm) completely blocked evoked responses, at both 24°C and 36°C. The brief inward current observed in NBQX and CPP is attributable to the increased amplitude and slower decay of the stimulus artifact at 36°C. Vm = −90 mV. ACSF contained picrotoxin (100 μm) and SR-95531 (5 μm). KSCN-based internal solution.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Transporter currents are not detected in pyramidal cell patches. A, Outside-out patch from a CA1 pyramidal neuron. l-glutamate (10 mm) activates inward (Vm = −90 mV) and outward (Vm = 90 mV) (A1 ) currents that are completely blocked by NBQX (10 μm), GYKI-52466 (25 μm), and d,l-CPP (10 μm) (A2 ). B,l-glutamate (10 mm) activates transporter currents in outside-out patches from CA1 astrocytes (B1 ), which were not affected by NBQX (10 μm), GYKI-52466 (25 μm), andd,l-CPP (10 μm) (B2 ). Responses were recorded at −90 mV and +90 mV, as in A. All solutions contained 20 μmglycine. Traces are averages of 8–12 consecutive responses. A KSCN-based internal solution was used for both recordings.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 18 (19)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 18, Issue 19
1 Oct 1998
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Glial Contribution to Glutamate Uptake at Schaffer Collateral–Commissural Synapses in the Hippocampus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Glial Contribution to Glutamate Uptake at Schaffer Collateral–Commissural Synapses in the Hippocampus
Dwight E. Bergles, Craig E. Jahr
Journal of Neuroscience 1 October 1998, 18 (19) 7709-7716; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-19-07709.1998

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Glial Contribution to Glutamate Uptake at Schaffer Collateral–Commissural Synapses in the Hippocampus
Dwight E. Bergles, Craig E. Jahr
Journal of Neuroscience 1 October 1998, 18 (19) 7709-7716; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-19-07709.1998
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • glutamate transporter
  • astrocyte
  • GLT-1
  • GLAST
  • EAAC1
  • hippocampus
  • CA1

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Emotion Processing in Chimeric Faces: Hemispheric Asymmetries in Expression and Recognition of Emotions
  • Gating of Hippocampal-Evoked Activity in Prefrontal Cortical Neurons by Inputs from the Mediodorsal Thalamus and Ventral Tegmental Area
  • Cytoskeletal and Morphological Alterations Underlying Axonal Sprouting after Localized Transection of Cortical Neuron AxonsIn Vitro
Show more ARTICLE
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.