Skip to main content

Umbrella menu

  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Preparing a Manuscript
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Fees
    • Journal Club
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Preparing a Manuscript
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Fees
    • Journal Club
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
ARTICLE

Glutamate Receptor Activity Is Required for Normal Development of Tectal Cell Dendrites In Vivo

Indrani Rajan and Hollis T. Cline
Journal of Neuroscience 1 October 1998, 18 (19) 7836-7846; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-19-07836.1998
Indrani Rajan
1Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hollis T. Cline
1Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Relationship between dendritic arbor development and glutamatergic synaptic maturation. Neurons with dendritic branch lengths <200 μm have AMPA/NMDA ratios <1. Neurons with dendritic branch lengths >200 μm have AMPA/NMDA ratios >1.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    APV slows dendritic arbor growth over 24 hr. Time-lapse in vivo confocal images of DiI-labeled tectal neurons imaged at 24 hr intervals. Images in the top rowof each set (0h) were collected at 0 hr, before drug treatment. Images in the bottom row of each set (24h) were collected 24 hr after exposure to rearing solution (CONTROL) or APV, as indicated. Three neurons from each group are shown in order of increasing dendritic branch tip numbers at the initial image from left toright.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Quantification of the effect of 24 hr APV and CNQX exposure on dendritic growth rate. Increase in TDBL over 24 hr in control, APV-treated, or CNQX-treated neurons. Thenumber of cells observed (n) under each condition is shown. *p < 0.05.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Matrix of changes in dendritic arbor morphology as a function of branch dynamics. A prototypical neuron is shown at thetop. Possible changes in TDBL are shown fromleft to right and branch tip number fromtop to bottom. Neuronal morphology can change from the prototype, without any apparent change in branch tip number or branch length or by increasing or decreasing branch length, branch tip number, or both.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    APV blocks dendritic arbor growth over 4 hrin vivo. Time-lapse in vivo confocal images of DiI-labeled tectal neurons imaged at 4 hr intervals. Four cells are shown in order of increasing dendritic branch tip number at the first image from left to right. Thetop row of each set (0h) of images was collected at the beginning of the experiment before drug treatment. Thebottom row of each set (4h) of images was collected after 4 hr in rearing solution (CONTROL) or 100 μm APV.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    NMDA receptor blockade slows dendritic arbor development in simple neurons. Time-lapse in vivoconfocal images of four DiI-labeled tectal neurons from control animals or animals exposed to 100 μm APV, 20 μmCNQX, or 1 μm TTX. Images in the top rowof each set (0h) were collected before drug treatment. Images in the bottom row of each set (4h) were collected after 4 hr in rearing solution (CONTROL) or drug solution, as indicated. Control neurons show increases in branch length and dynamic changes in the branch tip numbers and arrangement. Cells from the treated animals show only modest morphological changes. Growth cones are represented by dotted outlines.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Quantification of effect of activity blockade on dendritic arbor development. A, Growth rate over 4 hr in control cells and cells from animals exposed to APV, CNQX, or TTX.Number of cells observed (n) for each condition in A also applies to C andD. B, Scatterplots of changes in dendritic branch length for each neuron under the four conditions. Rate of branch tip additions (C) and retractions (D) for control and drug-treated neurons over 4 hr. E, Scatterplots of changes in dendritic branch tip number for each neuron under the four conditions. *p < 0.05.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Color-coded drawings reveal arbor dynamics. Composite line drawings were obtained by superimposing the drawings from the 4 hr time point onto the 0 hr time point. The stable branches of the arbor are shown in black, branch additions and extensions in green, and branch retractions inred. Control neurons show more branch length additions compared with retractions. APV-treated neurons show fewer additions than controls.

  • Fig. 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 9.

    APV selectively decreases branch extension. Dendritic branch length increase (A) and decrease (B) of the arbor for control and drug-treated neurons. Numbers of cells (n) for each condition are shown above the bar inA. *p < 0.001.

  • Fig. 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 10.

    APV and CNQX slow dendritic arbor development in more complex neurons. Time-lapse in vivo confocal images of four DiI-labeled tectal neurons from either control animals or animals exposed to 100 μm APV or 20 μmCNQX. Images in the top row of each set (0h) were collected before drug treatment. Images in thebottom row of each set (4h) were collected after 4 hr in rearing solution (Control) or drug solution, as indicated. Control neurons show modest increases in branch length and branch tip numbers and arrangement. Cells from APV- and CNQX-treated animals show decreased morphological changes. Growth cones are represented bydotted outlines.

  • Fig. 11.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 11.

    NMDA R and AMPA R maintain dendritic arbor structure in complex neurons. A, Growth rate over 4 hr in complex neurons from control animals and those exposed to APV or CNQX. Numbers of cells observed (n) for each condition are shownabove the corresponding bars. Growth rates of each APV and control neuron (B) normalized to its initial TDBL. Simple cells show relatively greater growth rates than complex cells. Note that APV-treated neurons with TDBL <200 μm show lower growth rates than control cells. *p < 0.05.

  • Fig. 12.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 12.

    Summary of effects of activity blockade on dendritic arbor dynamics in vivo. The glutamate receptor blockers affect different features of the dynamic dendritic growth at different stages of neuronal development. A prototypical simple cell under normal conditions increases in TDBL over 4 hr by adding more branch length and branch tips than it retracts. APV blocks dendritic growth by decreasing the rate of branch additions and decreasing branch extensions. The dendritic arbor of a prototypical complex cell is less dynamic than that of simple cells. Both APV and CNQX decreased the dendritic branch length in complex neurons. *** indicates statistically significant changes; — indicates no significant change.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Dendritic arbor parameters in control and drug-treated simple neurons over 4 hr

    TreatmentTDBL (μm) 0 hrTDBL (μm) 4 hrBranch tips 0 hrBranch tips 4 hrStable branch length (μm)
    Control (n = 17)109  ± 13158  ± 209.1  ± 111.8  ± 1.969  ± 9
    APV 100 μm(n = 24)102  ± 1092  ± 8***7.1  ± 0.76.2  ± 0.8***69  ± 9
    CNQX 20 μm(n = 17)117  ± 12159  ± 286.3  ± 0.77.8  ± 1.269  ± 6
    TTX 1 μm(n = 30)113  ± 9133  ± 129.0  ± 0.78.9  ± 1.166  ± 7
    • ***p < 0.01 relative to control value.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Dendritic arbor parameters in control and drug-treated complex neurons over 4 hr

    TreatmentTDBL (μm) 0 hrTDBL (μm) 4 hrBranch tips 0 hrBranch tips 4 hr
    Control (n = 20)346  ± 29379  ± 3625.9  ± 3.727.3  ± 3.8
    APV 100 μm (n = 18)398  ± 39383  ± 4328  ± 2.323.2  ± 2
    CNQX 20 μm (n = 18)400  ± 28376  ± 3322.6  ± 1.622.3  ± 2.1
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 18 (19)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 18, Issue 19
1 Oct 1998
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Glutamate Receptor Activity Is Required for Normal Development of Tectal Cell Dendrites In Vivo
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Glutamate Receptor Activity Is Required for Normal Development of Tectal Cell Dendrites In Vivo
Indrani Rajan, Hollis T. Cline
Journal of Neuroscience 1 October 1998, 18 (19) 7836-7846; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-19-07836.1998

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Glutamate Receptor Activity Is Required for Normal Development of Tectal Cell Dendrites In Vivo
Indrani Rajan, Hollis T. Cline
Journal of Neuroscience 1 October 1998, 18 (19) 7836-7846; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-19-07836.1998
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • NMDA receptor
  • dendrite growth
  • in vivoimaging
  • activity-dependent
  • Xenopus development
  • retinotectal

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Neural Correlates of Competing Fear Behaviors Evoked by an Innately Aversive Stimulus
  • Calcium Influx via L- and N-Type Calcium Channels Activates a Transient Large-Conductance Ca2+-Activated K+Current in Mouse Neocortical Pyramidal Neurons
  • Distinct Developmental Modes and Lesion-Induced Reactions of Dendrites of Two Classes of Drosophila Sensory Neurons
Show more ARTICLE
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2021 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.