Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
ARTICLE

Maternal Deprivation Effect on the Infant’s Neural Stress Markers Is Reversed by Tactile Stimulation and Feeding But Not by Suppressing Corticosterone

Helga J.J. van Oers, E. Ronald de Kloet, Tara Whelan and Seymour Levine
Journal of Neuroscience 1 December 1998, 18 (23) 10171-10179; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-23-10171.1998
Helga J.J. van Oers
1Department of Psychology, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716-2577, and
2Division of Medical Pharmacology, Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, University of Leiden, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Ronald de Kloet
2Division of Medical Pharmacology, Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, University of Leiden, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tara Whelan
1Department of Psychology, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716-2577, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Seymour Levine
1Department of Psychology, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716-2577, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

After 24 hr of maternal deprivation, significant elevations in ACTH and the naturally occurring glucocorticoid corticosterone (CORT) are observed during the stress-hyporesponsive period. The deprived pups also showed in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) a marked increase of stress-induced c-fos mRNA and a reduction of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) mRNA; in hippocampal CA1, a reduction of the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) and GR was observed. Here, we examined whether these changes are reversed by (1) preventing the elevations of CORT characteristic for the 11-d-old deprived pups by administering the synthetic glucocorticoid dexamethasone (DEX); or (2) reinstating some aspects of maternal behavior. The pups were either (1) left undisturbed, (2) stroked, or (3) stroked and episodically fed by cheek cannulation. At postnatal day 12, peripheral and neural stress markers were measured. Nondeprived animals served as controls.

Experiment 1 demonstrates that although CORT was kept low by DEX, the central effects on CORT receptors, CRH, and c-fos mRNA were still present, except for MR in hippocampal CA1. Experiment 2 shows that stroking alone prevented the stress-induced rise in ACTH andc-fos mRNA and in the reduction in CRH and MR mRNA. In pups that were fed and stroked, CORT and GR mRNA resembled nondeprived controls. In conclusion, the changes in peripheral endocrine responses and in the brain cannot be attributed to the effect of elevated CORT concentrations, which are characteristic of the maternally deprived neonate. However, reinstating some components of the dams’ nurturing behavior can reverse the effects evoked by maternal deprivation.

  • maternal deprivation
  • stress
  • brain
  • corticosterone
  • dexamethasone
  • corticosteroid receptors
View Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 18 (23)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 18, Issue 23
1 Dec 1998
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Maternal Deprivation Effect on the Infant’s Neural Stress Markers Is Reversed by Tactile Stimulation and Feeding But Not by Suppressing Corticosterone
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Maternal Deprivation Effect on the Infant’s Neural Stress Markers Is Reversed by Tactile Stimulation and Feeding But Not by Suppressing Corticosterone
Helga J.J. van Oers, E. Ronald de Kloet, Tara Whelan, Seymour Levine
Journal of Neuroscience 1 December 1998, 18 (23) 10171-10179; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-23-10171.1998

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Maternal Deprivation Effect on the Infant’s Neural Stress Markers Is Reversed by Tactile Stimulation and Feeding But Not by Suppressing Corticosterone
Helga J.J. van Oers, E. Ronald de Kloet, Tara Whelan, Seymour Levine
Journal of Neuroscience 1 December 1998, 18 (23) 10171-10179; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-23-10171.1998
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Deprivation procedure
    • Sampling procedure
    • Probes
    • In situ hybridization
    • Computer-assisted imaging analysis
    • Data analysis
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • maternal deprivation
  • stress
  • brain
  • corticosterone
  • dexamethasone
  • corticosteroid receptors

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Salicylate Induces Tinnitus through Activation of Cochlear NMDA Receptors
  • Visuomotor Behaviors in Larval Zebrafish after GFP-Guided Laser Ablation of the Optic Tectum
  • Developmental Increase in Vesicular Glutamate Content Does Not Cause Saturation of AMPA Receptors at the Calyx of Held Synapse
Show more ARTICLE
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.