Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
ARTICLE

μ-Opioid Peptides Inhibit Thalamic Neurons

Jennifer Brunton and Serge Charpak
Journal of Neuroscience 1 March 1998, 18 (5) 1671-1678; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-05-01671.1998
Jennifer Brunton
1Department of Physiology, University Medical Center, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland, and
2Laboratoire de Physiologie, Ecole Supérieure de Physique et de Chimie Industrielles, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité de Recherche Associée 2054, 75005 Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Serge Charpak
1Department of Physiology, University Medical Center, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland, and
2Laboratoire de Physiologie, Ecole Supérieure de Physique et de Chimie Industrielles, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité de Recherche Associée 2054, 75005 Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Opioidergic inhibition of neurons in the centrolateral nucleus of the thalamus was investigated using an in vitro thalamic slice preparation from young rats. The μ-opioid receptor agonistd-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,glycinol5-enkephalin (DAMGO) evoked a hyperpolarization and decrease in input resistance that was reversible, concentration-dependent, and persisted in the presence of tetrodotoxin. Application of the specific μ-receptor antagonist Cys2,Tyr3,Orn5,Pen7-amide blocked this response. The respective δ- and κ-opioid receptor agonists, (d-Pen2,d-Pen5)-enkephalin and (±)-trans-U-50488 methanesulfonate had no effect. Voltage-clamp experiments showed that DAMGO activated an inwardly rectifying potassium conductance (GKIR) characterized by rectification at hyperpolarized potentials that increased in elevated extracellular potassium concentrations, a complete block by Ba2+(1 mm), and a voltage-dependent block by Cs+. The extent of μ-opioid inhibition in other thalamic nuclei was then investigated. Widespread inhibition similar to that seen in the centrolateral nucleus was observed in a number of sensory, motor, intralaminar, and midline nuclei. Our results suggest that the net action of opioids would depend on their source: exogenous (systemically administered) opiates inhibiting the entire thalamus and favoring the shift of cell firing from tonic to bursting mode; and endogenously released opioids acting on specific thalamic nuclei, their release depending on the origin of the presynaptic input.

  • μ-opioids
  • inhibition
  • thalamus
  • intralaminar nuclei
  • centrolateral nucleus
  • inwardly rectifying potassium conductance
  • cesium

The classical pain pathway from peripheral nociceptors to the thalamus is conveyed principally by neurons of the spinothalamic tract. These neurons are functionally characterized as nociceptive specific or nonspecific (wide dynamic range), can receive convergent somatic and visceral inputs, and project to two groups of thalamic nuclei: the ventrobasal and posterior complex and the centrolateral nucleus (CLN) (Applebaum et al., 1979; Giesler et al., 1981; Brüggemann et al., 1994; Craig et al., 1994). Neurons of the ventrobasal nucleus and posterior complex process and transmit the discriminative aspects of pain, and their response properties reflect the stimulus characteristics (Peschanski et al., 1980; Simone et al., 1993; Apkarian and Shi, 1994). The response properties of centrolateral neurons and their spinothalamic afferents (large, overlapping receptive fields and slower conduction velocities) indicate that the CLN is poorly suited to this task. It has therefore been suggested that the CLN processes signals associated with the affective properties of pain (Giesler et al., 1981; Nakahama et al., 1981;Peschanski et al., 1981; Jones, 1985).

Several lines of evidence suggest that the activity of thalamic neurons, specifically those associated with the transmission of pain signals, are modulated by opiates and opioids. First, anatomical studies have demonstrated the presence of the three opioid peptide precursors proenkephalin, prodynorphin, and proopiomelanocortin as well as opioid ligand binding sites and receptor mRNA transcripts throughout the thalamus (Fallon and Leslie, 1986; Merchenthaler et al., 1986;Mansour et al., 1987, 1994; Nahin, 1988; Loughlin et al., 1995). Furthermore, opiates and opioids modulate thalamic nociceptive cell activity. In the ventrobasal complex, the neuronal response to a noxious stimulus is reduced by morphine and μ-receptor agonists injected intravenously, whereas spontaneous cell firing and responses to innocuous stimuli are unaffected (Shigenaga and Inoki, 1976; Benoist et al. 1986). Intravenous morphine similarly reduces nociceptive responses of medial thalamic (including CLN) cells (Nakahama et al. 1981), but when locally injected, it depresses only the affective response to painful stimuli, whereas the motor response (tail flick) remains intact (Yeung et al., 1978, Carr and Bak, 1988).

These results prompted us to systematically analyze the role of opioid peptides in the thalamus. In the present study, we have examined the postsynaptic effects of opioids, focusing our attention primarily on the CLN. We subsequently analyzed the extent of opioidergic inhibition in the thalamus to determine whether it is restricted to thalamic nuclei implicated in the processing of pain. Using current- and voltage-clamp techniques in thalamic slices of young rats, we found that CLN neurons were inhibited by opioid peptides, an effect that was mediated by an increase in potassium conductance. Surprisingly, the result could be extended to many other sensory, motor, association, and intralaminar nuclei.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preparation of thalamic slices. Coronal thalamic slices were prepared from young Wistar and Sprague Dawley rats (12–23 d) of both sexes. Rats were anesthetized with a ketamine and xylazine solution (100 and 16 mg/kg, i.p., respectively) before decapitation. The skull was opened, and the brain was excised and placed in cold (4°C) oxygenated physiological solution containing (in mm): NaCl 126, KCl 2.7, NaH2P041.25, MgCl2 1, CaCl2 2, NaHC0326.0, glucose 10, and pyruvic acid 5. A block of thalamic tissue was prepared by making the following cuts: two transversal (one rostral to the optic chiasm and one caudal to the mamillary body), two parasaggital (lateral to the reticular nucleus), and one horizontal (dorsal to the third ventricle). We cut 400 μm coronal slices using a vibratome (Campden Instruments, Sileby, UK), and stored them submerged in oxygenated solution in a small vial for 1 hr. For recording, slices were transferred to a chamber perfused (2 ml/min) with heated physiological solution (30–35°C).

Electrophysiological recordings and cell staining.Whole-cell current-clamp and voltage-clamp recordings of membrane properties were obtained using borosilicate pipettes (2–5 MΩ resistance) filled with (in mm): MgCl2 2, HEPES 10, K-gluconate 140, KCl 10, ATP-Mg 2, GTP-Tris 0.2 and neurobiotin (2 mg/ml). For recordings using tetraethylammonium (TEA+) or Cs+ as the main permeant ion, TEA-acetate or Cs-gluconate was substituted for K-gluconate. Thalamic cells were patched under visual control, using an infrared-sensitive video camera (Hamamatsu, Hamamatsu-City, Japan), and recordings were performed using an Axoclamp 200A amplifier (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA) and a microcomputer equipped with pCLAMP software (Axon Instruments). Data were digitized (Neurocorder DR-890; Neuro Data Instruments Corp., Delaware Water Gap, PA) and stored on videotape. Potential values were corrected for the junction potential (11 mV) during analysis. In voltage-clamp recordings, whole-cell capacitance and series resistance were compensated and monitored throughout the experiment; recording was continued only if the series resistance did not exceed 20 MΩ. Drugs, TTX, and potassium channel blockers were applied by bath perfusion. At the end of the experiment, slices were fixed in a phosphate buffer solution (0.1 m, pH 7.4) containing 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.1% glutaraldehyde. Within 2–3 d, slices were incubated in an avidin–biotin complex solution (Vectastain ABC kit; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame CA) and further processed to reveal neurobiotin-labeled cells (Horikawa and Armstrong, 1988). To determine the location of the recorded cells within the thalamus, thin sections (60 μm) were cut from each slice and mounted on gelatin-coated slides. The sections were counterstained with cresyl violet to aid in defining the thalamic nuclei. The location of each labeled cell was determined using the atlas The Rat Brain in Sterotaxic Coordinates, second edition (Paxinos and Watson, 1986). Camera lucida reconstructions were made for each neurobiotin-injected cell.

Chemicals. The opioid peptide agonistsd-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,glycinol5-enkephalin (DAMGO), (d-Pen2,d-Pen5)-enkephalin (DPDPE), and the μ-opioid receptor antagonist Cys2, Tyr3, Orn5, Pen7-amide (CTOP) were purchased from Bachem (Basel, Switzerland); the κ-opioid receptor agonist, (±)-trans-U-50488 methanesulfonate, was purchased from Research Biochemicals International (Natick, MA); TTX was purchased from Latoxan (Rosnans, France); and the neurobiotin and avidin–biotin complex was purchased from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA).

RESULTS

A total of 221 thalamic neurons were recorded: 155 were located in the CLN, and 66 were located throughout most of the remaining thalamic nuclei. Most of the cells (197 of 221) were inhibited by opioids, whereas the remaining cells showed no response. Our first analysis (pharmacological and electrophysiological) was aimed primarily at the CLN.

Membrane properties of centrolateral neurons

Centrolateral (CL) neurons studied in detail (n = 28) had a mean ± SEM resting potential of −72.5 ± 5.9 mV. The input resistance of these cells ranged from 100 to 300 MΩ, and values generally decreased in older animals. Firing properties of a typical CL neuron in our system, held at −60 and −82 mV, are shown in Figure 1A. The firing pattern of CL neurons, and indeed all of the thalamic neurons that were recorded, presented two distinctive characteristics: membrane rectification at hyperpolarized potentials and a powerful low-threshold calcium spike. The inward rectification at hyperpolarized potentials was both immediate and time-dependent, although the time-dependent rectification (produced by the activation of the hyperpolarization-activated cation current,Ih) was relatively weak. The immediate rectification was most likely attributable to the activation of an inwardly rectifying potassium current, IKIR (see below). Large hyperpolarizing pulses applied at resting potential were followed by the activation of a low-threshold calcium spike, crowned by three to six action potentials (Fig. 1A,left). This low-threshold spike pattern was also seen when cells were depolarized from more negative potentials (Fig.1A, right) and is characteristic of the burst firing mode of thalamic relay neurons, which switch to tonic (action potential) firing mode at depolarized potentials (Jahnsen and Llinás, 1984).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

μ-Opioid receptor agonists inhibit centrolateral neurons. A, Firing properties of a typical centrolateral neuron, held at −60 (left) and −82 mV (right). B1, Current-clamp experiment (same cell as in A) in which application of DAMGO (2.5 μm) provoked a hyperpolarization and decrease in input resistance. The respective δ- and κ-opioid receptor agonists, DPDPE and U50488 (2.5 μm), had no effect.Inset, Membrane potential response to the current protocol, a series of alternating pulses of ±0.1 nA. At the peak of the response to DAMGO, the cell was manually clamped at resting potential. Note the decrease in membrane voltage deflection in response to current pulses. The effect is direct (it remains in the presence of TTX, 1 μm) and reversible. B2, Expansion of the voltage trace in B1, at points1 and 2, shows that the cell shifts from tonic to burst firing mode (characterized by a low-threshold calcium spike) on application of DAMGO. C, The response to DAMGO is blocked by CTOP (1 μm), an antagonist selective for the μ-opioid receptor.

Pharmacological characterization of opioidergic inhibition of centrolateral neurons

We first compared the action of DAMGO, DPDPE, and U50488, respective agonists selective for the μ-, δ-, and κ-opioid receptor types. Current-clamp experiments (n = 11) showed that cells in the CLN hyperpolarize in response to DAMGO (2.5 μm, applied for 30 sec). The hyperpolarization was reversible and was accompanied by a decrease in input resistance, as reflected by the decrease in voltage deflection in response to constant current pulses (Fig. 1B1). Application of DPDPE and U50488 (also 2.5 μm for 30 sec) had no effect (n = 11). The response to DAMGO persisted in TTX (1 μm; n = 25) and in a low-calcium, high-magnesium solution (0.2 and 5 mm, respectively;n = 3, data not shown), suggesting that the effect was direct (Fig. 1B1, bottom). An expansion of the voltage trace in Figure 1B1shows that the cell shifts from tonic to burst firing mode (characterized by a low-threshold calcium spike) on activation of μ-opioid receptors (Fig. 1B2). This effect was mimicked by the μ-receptor agonist morphine (0.1 mm;n = 4) (data not shown) and blocked by the selective μ-receptor antagonist CTOP (1 μm; n = 3) (Fig. 1C).

All further experiments were performed in the presence of 1 μm TTX. The response to DAMGO was concentration-dependent, first appearing at a concentration of 2.5 × 10−8m. Both the size of the hyperpolarization and the change in input resistance increased with DAMGO concentration (Fig.2A, left). An average dose–response curve (from four cells, held at −60 mV) was constructed using the ratio of the voltage deflection in response to a constant current pulse in control to the same voltage deflection at the peak of the DAMGO effect (ΔVCONTROL/ΔVDAMGO); the membrane potential was manually clamped at resting potential (Fig.2A, right). A 23% decrease in input resistance was measured at the EC50 (2.5 × 10−7m).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

The response to DAMGO is concentration-dependent and reverses near EK. A,left, Effect of increasing concentrations of DAMGO (Vm = −60 mV). Hyperpolarizing pulses (−0.1 nA) were applied every 4 sec. Inset (right,top), Expanded trace (see A,left) of the membrane potential response to the current pulse in control (a) and in DAMGO (b). Below is a dose–response curve from four centrolateral neurons. The decrease in input resistance is measured as ΔVa/ΔVb (see inset). Error bars indicate SEM. The EC50 was at ∼2.5 × 10−7m. B,left, The reversal potential of the current activated by DAMGO was determined by studying the effect at various membrane potentials. The effect reverses at approximately −97 mV. A similar value (−93 mV) was obtained at the intersection of current–voltage plots taken in control (circles) and at the peak of the response to DAMGO (squares, right).

Ionic basis of μ-opioidergic inhibition

The mean reversal potential of the effect, determined in current-clamp experiments (in TTX, n = 15) was −98.0 ± 6.3 mV, suggesting the involvement of a potassium conductance. The reversal potential was determined either by taking the intersection of the current–voltage curves in control and at the peak of the DAMGO response (Fig. 2B, right) or by applying DAMGO while holding the cell at various membrane potentials (Fig. 2B, left). Similar values were obtained by both methods.

The involvement of potassium was further investigated in voltage-clamp experiments in which the extracellular potassium concentration was increased from 2.7 to 5.4 and 10.8 mm (n = 10, 6, and 3; Fig. 3B). The current activated by DAMGO, IDAMGO, was obtained by subtracting voltage-clamp current traces obtained in control from those at the peak of the effect (as in Fig. 3A,bottom). A plot of the voltage dependency ofIDAMGO was then obtained by plotting the early peak current amplitude, taking care to avoid contamination by the more slowly activating Ih. The reversal potential ofIDAMGO, extrapolated from current–voltage curves, shifted with [K+]EXT (−92.3 ± 1.3, −76.2 ± 2.6, and −60.0 ± 4.1 mV, respectively; the expected shift in EK at 30°C resulting from a twofold increase in extracellular potassium of +18 mV), demonstrating that IDAMGO is indeed carried by potassium (Fig.3B). The slope of the best-fit line connecting the points was 53.1.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

IDAMGO demonstrates properties of an inwardly rectifying potassium current.A, top, Voltage-clamp data showing thatIDAMGO rectifies and that its rectification increases with extracellular potassium concentration (2.7, 5.4, and 10.8 mm; squares, circles, and triangles, respectively).IDAMGO was obtained by subtracting the current traces in response to voltage steps in control from those at the peak of the response (bottom). B, The reversal potential of IDAMGO shifts with increasing extracellular potassium concentration. Data were taken from 10, 6, and 3 cells, respectively. C, Steady-state current traces (Vh = −60 mV) show that the outward current activated by DAMGO is blocked partially by cesium (2 mm) and completely by barium (1 mm). D, Voltage-clamp data showing that the cesium block ofIDAMGO([Cs+]EXT = 0 μm,open squares; 250 μm,circles; 500 μm, upright triangles; 1 mm, inverse triangles) is both concentration- and voltage-dependent. The extracellular potassium concentration for this experiment was 7 mm.

Characterization of IDAMGO

Because μ-opioids have been shown to activate an inwardly rectifying potassium conductance (GKIR) in other CNS structures, we examined the voltage dependency ofIDAMGO, its dependence on extracellular K+ concentration, and its sensitivity to the K+ channel blockers Ba2+ and Cs+. In voltage-clamp recordings (with extracellular TTX, 1 μm, and TEA, 10 mm),IDAMGO rectified at hyperpolarized potentials, and its voltage dependency varied with extracellular potassium concentration (2.7, 5.4, and 10.8 mm; n = 16). IDAMGO is plotted for one cell at all three concentrations (Fig. 3A, top), with the voltage-clamp pulses shown below (Fig. 3A,bottom). Inward rectification was modest in 2.7 mm K+EXT and robust in 5.4 and 10.8 mm K+EXT. It should be noted that the large values of IKIR obtained in 10.8 mm external potassium may induce some error in voltage estimation attributable to series resistance (10 MΩ). In several cells (n = 7, not shown),IDAMGO showed no voltage dependence. It is likely that in at least some cells a leak current is also increased, as with adenosine activation of a K+ conductance, which shows no obvious voltage dependency (Pape, 1992).

We then tested the sensitivity of IDAMGO to the potassium channel blockers cesium and barium. Figure 3Cillustrates two different experiments in which the outward current is blocked partially by Cs+ (2 mm;top) and completely by Ba2+ (1 mm; bottom). The mean decrease inIDAMGO in the presence of barium (1 mm) and cesium (2 mm) was 95.9 ± 2.8% (n = 6) and 66.5 ± 20.3% (n = 6), respectively. Analysis of voltage-clamp ramp and pulse protocol data indicated that IDAMGO was blocked across the complete voltage range by 1 mm Ba2+. The block by Cs+, however, appeared to be voltage-dependent and was studied further. Figure 3D shows an experiment in which IDAMGO was blocked by cesium in a concentration- and voltage-dependent manner, the block increasing at hyperpolarized potentials. Both the inward-rectifying properties and the block of IDAMGO by cesium and barium are consistent with μ-opioid activation of GKIR.

In the course of experiments, it was also noted that both cadmium and nickel (0.5–1 mm) reversibly blocked the activation ofIDAMGO (data not shown). The block by Ni2+ was studied further (n = 3). In voltage-clamp experiments with 7 mm external potassium, 10 mm TEA, and 1 μm TTX, it was noted that on application of nickel (1 mm), IKIRwas substantially blocked and was no longer activated on application of a large hyperpolarizing voltage step. Application of DAMGO no longer had an effect on IKIR, and at −60 mV, no outward current was seen. It is unlikely that the block ofIDAMGO by nickel is mediated by calcium, because responses to DAMGO were recorded when 10 mm BAPTA was added to the intracellular solution (n = 4).

Opioid modulation of Ih?

Finally, we investigated the effect of DAMGO on the hyperpolarization-activated cation current, Ih. When the potassium response was blocked by adding 1 mmBa2+ to the bath, hyperpolarizing pulses across the activation range of Ih showed no change in amplitude after the application of DAMGO (n = 3).

Distribution of μ-opioidergic inhibition in the thalamus

Thalamic cells located in the principal relay, midline, and intralaminar nuclei were tested in the presence of TTX for their sensitivity to DAMGO. Cells located in the nucleus reticularis were investigated in another paper (Brunton and Charpak, 1997). Current-clamp experiments were conducted as shown in Figure 1 (DAMGO, 2.5 μm, applied for 10–30 sec). The location of cells injected with neurobiotin was identified in thin cresyl violet-stained sections. Of a total of 66 cells recorded throughout the thalamus, 59 were sensitive to μ-opioids. Thirty-four cells were successfully marked and located. Of those marked, all but three cells showed a positive response (a hyperpolarization) to DAMGO. Of these, one each was recorded in the anterior dorsal, laterodorsal, and ventromedial nuclei. Positive responses were recorded from labeled cells located in the following nuclei: paraventricular, anterior and posterior (PVA, PVP) (n = 1 and 1, respectively); mediodorsal, central (MDC) (n = 3); mediodorsal, lateral (MDL) (n = 1); anterior, ventral, dorsal, and medial (AV, AD, and AM) (n = 1, 1, and 1, respectively); paracentral, (n = 3); centromedial (CM) (n = 3); paracentral–ventrolateral border (n = 3); laterodorsal, dorsomedial and ventrolateral (LDDM, LDVL) (n = 2, 1, and 1, respectively, on the LDDM–LDVL border); reuniens (Re) (n = 1); ventrolateral (VL) (n = 4); ventromedial (VM) (n = 1); ventroposterior, medial and lateral (VPM and VPL) (n = 2); and dorsal lateral geniculate (DLG) (n = 1). A schematic representation of μ-opioid-sensitive nuclei is shown in Figure 4, along with camera lucida (300×) reconstructions of selected neurobiotin-injected cells (for clarity only one cell is shown for each nucleus). Coronal thalamic slices are shown in anterior–posterior order (Fig. 4,middle), with dots marking the relative position of the cells within each nucleus. Detailed analysis of morphology was not undertaken, but cell bodies were ovoid or polygonal, 15–30 μm in diameter, with 5–10 primary dendrites branching close to the cell body, producing dendritic fields that had either radial, tufted, or asymmetric patterns (Sawyer et al., 1989;Tömböl et al., 1990).

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

μ-Opioids inhibit cells in many thalamic nuclei. Camera lucida drawings of neurobiotin-labeled μ-opioid-sensitive cells and their corresponding locations are indicated. Coronal thalamic slices are shown in anterior to posterior order. AM, Anteromedial nucleus; AV, anteroventral nucleus;CL, centrolateral nucleus; CM, centromedial nucleus; DLG, dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus; LDDM, laterodorsal nucleus, dorsomedial;LDVL, laterodorsal nucleus, ventrolateral;LDVM, laterodorsal nucleus, ventromedial;MDC, mediodorsal nucleus, central; MDL, mediodorsal nucleus, lateral; PVA, paraventricular nucleus, anterior; PVP, paraventricular nucleus, posterior; Ren, reuniens nucleus; VL, ventrolateral nucleus; VM, ventromedial nucleus;VPL, ventroposterior nucleus, lateral;VPM, ventroposterior nucleus, medial. Drawings adapted from Paxinos and Watson (1986).

DISCUSSION

This study examines opioidergic inhibition in the centrolateral nucleus of the thalamus. Activation of μ-opioid receptors results in an increase of an inwardly rectifying potassium conductance on the postsynaptic membrane, hyperpolarizing the cell and shifting its firing pattern from tonic to burst firing. Widespread μ-opioidergic inhibition was then demonstrated in many other relay, intralaminar, and midline nuclei.

Membrane properties of centrolateral neurons

Firing properties of CLN neurons were similar to those reported elsewhere (Jahnsen and Llinas, 1984), displaying two modes of firing: tonic and bursting, generating either trains of action potentials or low-threshold calcium spikes, as well as voltage- and time-dependent rectification at hyperpolarized potentials. Some important differences were noted. Ih was much weaker in our preparation than that reported in the adult guinea pig (McCormick and Pape, 1990), most closely resembling the Ihreported in the auditory thalamus of the young rat (Tennigkeit et al., 1996). It was similarly uncovered when leak and hyperpolarization-activated K+ currents were blocked by extracellular barium. The difference from Ihin the adult rat and guinea pig is likely attributable to developmental changes, because the cells recorded were in good condition (had high input resistances), and developmental changes inIh have been reported (Ramoa and McCormick, 1994; Pirchio et al., 1997). Rectification at hyperpolarized potentials was immediate, indicative of the activation ofGKIR (Hille, 1992; Tennigkeit, 1996). Indeed, this rectification increased when the extracellular potassium concentration was increased. Cells with exceptionally high intraburst frequencies, as in the large-cell region of the CLN in the adult cat (Steriade et al., 1993), were not observed in our preparation.

Characterization of opioid inhibition

Similar inhibition by opioids has been shown in a number of CNS structures, its mechanism being the modulation of a potassium conductance through the activation of G-protein-coupled receptors (Yoshimura and North, 1983; North et al., 1987; Williams et al., 1988). Inhibition through activation of the same potassium conductance has been observed with other neurotransmitters, such as serotonin, adenosine, acetylcholine, noradrenaline, and GABA (Andrade et al., 1986; Christie and North, 1988; North, 1989; Pape, 1992). Calcium channels are another common target of μ-opioids (Hescheler et al., 1987; Schroeder et al., 1991; Seward et al., 1991), and inhibition of calcium entry in thalamic ventrobasal neurons has already been reported (Formenti et al., 1995).

Characterization of IDAMGO

Inwardly rectifying potassium channels are a common target of G-protein-coupled receptors and have been localized in the soma and dendrites of thalamic cells of the rat (Williams et al., 1988; North, 1989; Ponce et al., 1996). Furthermore, colocalization of these channels with μ-opioid receptors in several thalamic nuclei has been observed (Bausch et al., 1995). GKIR is characterized by a voltage dependence that increases steeply at hyperpolarized potentials and is dependent on [K+]EXT, fast activation, and sensitivity to barium and cesium (Hagiwara et al., 1976, 1978; Hille, 1992).

The block of IDAMGO by cesium was consistent with the blockage of GKIR reported elsewhere, depending on both membrane voltage and extracellular cesium concentration (Hagiwara et al., 1976; Argibay et al., 1983; Sodickson and Bean, 1996). Nickel blocked the low-threshold calcium spike but also reversibly blockedGKIR and its activation by DAMGO. Nickel blockade of GKIR activation by adenosine has been reported previously, although an effect on unstimulatedGKIR was not demonstrated (see Alzheimer and ten Bruggencate, 1991).

μ-Opioid modulation of Ih

The hyperpolarization-activated cation current,Ih, is another target of G-protein-coupled receptors (Pape and McCormick, 1989). In thalamic cells, Ih is coupled both positively and negatively to G-proteins activated by the transmitters noradrenaline, serotonin, and histamine (positively coupled), and adenosine (negatively coupled), which shift the voltage range of its activation in the depolarizing or hyperpolarizing direction through a cAMP-dependent mechanism (McCormick, 1992; Pape, 1992). This modulation of Ih has been found to control oscillatory activity, particularly sleep spindles (Bal and McCormick, 1996; Lee and McCormick, 1996). Opioid inhibition of forskolin-activatedIh has been demonstrated in guinea pig nodose ganglion neurons (Ingram and Williams, 1994), but in agreement with their results, μ-opioids had no effect on unstimulatedIh in our preparation. Therefore, it appears that opioid modulation of Ih in the thalamus may differ from that of other neurotransmitters. It is also possible that cellular components necessary for Ih regulation were washed out by dialysis of the intracellular solution.

Distribution of μ-opioid inhibition in the thalamus

Autoradiographic and mRNA studies have shown that opioid ligand binding sites and receptor mRNA transcripts are differentially distributed in the thalamus, with a dense and widespread concentration of μ receptors, a moderate and discrete localization of κ receptors (mainly in midline nuclei), and almost no δ receptors (Mansour et al., 1987, 1994).

The consistent response of centrolateral neurons to μ-opioids begged the question of the specificity of the response and the extent of opioid sensitivity in other nuclei of the thalamus. Was sensitivity confined to pathways regulating pain, or did it extend to areas processing other sensory modalities and motor information? We found that μ-opioids inhibited cells in relay, intralaminar, and midline nuclei throughout the thalamus, indicating that their action is widespread. However, because receptor densities in several nuclei such as the ventrobasal nuclei have been reported to be quite low, it is possible that the proportion of opioid nonresponsive cells is higher. Equally, the κ agonist should be more extensively tested in the midline nuclei, where receptor densities are greater (Mansour et al., 1987, 1994).

To date, in vivo studies have demonstrated opioid inhibition of cell firing in response to a variety of painful stimuli in the medial, ventrolateral, lateral, and ventrobasal nuclei and to both painful and rewarding stimuli in the CLN (Nakahama et al., 1981;Benoist et al., 1986; Carr and Bak, 1988). Furthermore, opioids appear to discriminate between nociceptive and non-nociceptive stimuli, blocking one but not the other. Our results in both young and adult rats (data not shown) suggest that if this discrimination occurs in the thalamus, it must occur at a presynaptic location.

At the postsynaptic level, morphine injected intravenously is likely to hyperpolarize not only thalamic relay cells but also thalamic reticular and cortical neurons, which influence thalamocortical activity. Thus, in the latter case, for instance, the tendency of thalamic cells to fire in bursts would be counteracted by a disinhibition of cortical excitatory inputs. As a result, it is difficult to reconcile the analgesic effect of morphine with in vitro thalamic burst activity, particularly because burst activity is associated with pain caused by deafferentation in spinal patients (Lenz et al., 1994).

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by Swiss National Science Foundation Grant 31-39658.93 and a Foreign Government Award (France) to J.B. We thank Danielle Machard for technical assistance.

    Correspondence should be addressed to Serge Charpak, Laboratoire de Physiologie, ESPCI, 10 rue Vauquelin, 75005 Paris, France.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Alzheimer C,
    2. ten Bruggencate G
    (1991) Postsynaptic inhibition by adenosine in hippocampal CA3 neurons: Co2+-sensitive activation of an inwardly rectifying K+ conductance. Pflügers Arch 419:288–295.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Andrade R,
    2. Malenka RC,
    3. Nicoll RA
    (1986) A G protein couples serotonin and GABAB receptors to the same channels in hippocampus. Science 234:1261–1264.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Apkarian AV,
    2. Shi T
    (1994) Squirrel monkey lateral thalamus. I. Somatic nociresponsive neurons and their relation to spinothalamic terminals. J Neurosci 14:6779–6795.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Applebaum AE,
    2. Leonard RB,
    3. Kenshalo DR,
    4. Martin RF,
    5. Willis WD
    (1979) Nuclei in which functionally identified spinothalamic tract neurons terminate. J Comp Neurol 188:575–586.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Argibay JA,
    2. Dutey P,
    3. Ildefonse M,
    4. Ojeda C,
    5. Rougier O,
    6. Tourneur Y
    (1983) Block by Cs of K current iK1 and of carbachol induced K current iCch in frog atrium. Pflügers Arch 397:295–299.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Bal T,
    2. McCormick DA
    (1996) What stops synchronized thalamocortical oscillations? Neuron 17:297–308.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Bausch SB,
    2. Patterson TA,
    3. Ehrengruber MU,
    4. Lester HA,
    5. Davidson N,
    6. Chavkin C
    (1995) Colocalization of mu opioid receptors with GIRK1 potassium channels in the rat brain: an immunocytochemical study. Receptors Channels 3:221–241.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Benoist JM,
    2. Kayser V,
    3. Gacel G,
    4. Zajac JM,
    5. Gautron M,
    6. Roques B,
    7. Guilbaud G
    (1986) Differential depressive action of two μ and δ opioid ligands on neuronal responses to noxious stimuli in the thalamic ventrobasal complex of rat. Brain Res 39:49–56.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Brüggemann J,
    2. Shi T,
    3. Apkarian AV
    (1994) Squirrel monkey lateral thalamus. II. Viscerosomatic convergent representation of urinary bladder, colon, and esophagus. J Neurosci 14:6796–6814.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Brunton J,
    2. Charpak S
    (1997) Heterogeneity of cell firing properties and opioid sensitivity in the thalamic reticular nucleus. Neuroscience 78:303–307.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Carr KD,
    2. Bak TH
    (1988) Medial thalamic injection of opioid agonists: μ-agonist increases while κ-agonist decreases stimulus thresholds for pain and reward. Brain Res 441:173–184.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Christie MJ,
    2. North RA
    (1988) Agonists at μ-opioid, M2-muscarinic and GABAB-receptors increase the same potassium conductance in rat lateral parabrachial neurones. Br J Pharmacol 95:896–902.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Craig AD,
    2. Bushnell MC,
    3. Zhang ET,
    4. Blomquist A
    (1994) A thalamic nucleus specific for pain and temperature sensation. Nature 372:770–773.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Fallon JH,
    2. Leslie FM
    (1986) Distribution of dynorphin and enkephalin peptides in the rat brain. J Comp Neurol 249:293–336.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Formenti A,
    2. Arrigoni E,
    3. Martina M,
    4. Taverna S,
    5. Avanzini G,
    6. Mancia M
    (1995) Calcium influx in rat thalamic relay neurons through voltage-dependent calcium channels is inhibited by enkephalin. Neurosci Lett 201:21–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Giesler GJ,
    2. Yezierski RP,
    3. Gerhart KD,
    4. Willis WD
    (1981) Spinothalamic tract neurons that project to medial and/or lateral thalamic nuclei: evidence for a physiologically novel population of spinal cord neurons. J Neurophysiol 46:1285–1308.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Hagiwara S,
    2. Miyazaki S,
    3. Rosenthal NP
    (1976) Potassium current and the effect of cesium on this current during anomalous rectification of the egg cell membrane of a starfish. J Gen Physiol 67:621–638.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Hagiwara S,
    2. Miyazaki S,
    3. Moody W,
    4. Patlak J
    (1978) Blocking effects of barium and hydrogen ions on the potassium current during anomalous rectification in the starfish egg. J Physiol (Lond) 279:167–185.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Hescheler J,
    2. Rosenthal W,
    3. Trautwein W,
    4. Schultz G
    (1987) The GTP-binding protein, Go,regulates neuronal calcium channels. Nature 325:445–447.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Hille B
    (1992) Ionic channels of excitable membranes, Ed 2. (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA).
  21. ↵
    1. Horikawa K,
    2. Armstrong WE
    (1988) A versatile means of intracellular labelling: injection of biocytin and its detection with avidin conjugates. J Neurosci 25:1–11.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Ingram SL,
    2. Williams JT
    (1994) Opioid inhibition of Ih via adenylyl cyclase. Neuron 13:179–186.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Jahnsen H,
    2. Llinás R
    (1984) Electrophysiological properties of guinea-pig thalamic neurones: an in vitro study. J Physiol (Lond) 349:205–226.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Jones EG
    (1985) The thalamus. (Plenum, New York).
  25. ↵
    1. Lee K,
    2. McCormick DA
    (1996) Abolition of spindle oscillations by serotonin and norepinephrine in the ferret lateral geniculate and perigeniculate nuclei in vitro. Neuron 17:309–321.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Lenz FA,
    2. Kwan HC,
    3. Martin R,
    4. Tasker R,
    5. Richardson RT,
    6. Dostrovsky JO
    (1994) Characteristics of somatotopic organization and spontaneous neuronal activity in the region of the thalamic principal sensory nucleus in patients with spinal cord transection. J Neurophysiol 72:1570–1587.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Loughlin SE,
    2. Leslie FM,
    3. Fallon JH
    (1995) Endogenous opioid systems. in The rat nervous system, ed Paxinos G (Academic, San Diego), pp 975–1001.
  28. ↵
    1. Mansour A,
    2. Khachaturian H,
    3. Lewis ME,
    4. Akil H,
    5. Watson SJ
    (1987) Autoradiographic differentiation of mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors in the rat forebrain and midbrain. J Neurosci 7:2445–2464.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Mansour A,
    2. Fox CA,
    3. Burke S,
    4. Meng F,
    5. Thompson RC,
    6. Akil H,
    7. Watson SJ
    (1994) Mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptor mRNA expression in the rat CNS: an in situ hybridization study. J Comp Neurol 350:412–438.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. McCormick DA
    (1992) Neurotransmitter actions in the thalamus and cerebral cortex and their role in neuromodulation of thalamocortical activity. Prog Neurobiol 39:337–388.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. McCormick DA,
    2. Pape HC
    (1990) Properties of a hyperpolarization-activated cation current and its role in rhythmic oscillation in thalamic relay neurones. J Physiol (Lond) 431:291–318.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Merchenthaler I,
    2. Maderdrut JL,
    3. Altschuler RA,
    4. Petrusz P
    (1986) Immunocytochemical localization of proenkephalin-derived peptides in the central nervous system of the rat. Neuroscience 17:325–348.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Nahin RL
    (1988) Immunocytochemical identification of long ascending, peptidergic lumbar spinal neurons terminating in either the medial or lateral thalamus in the rat. Brain Res 443:345–349.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Nakahama H,
    2. Shima K,
    3. Aya K,
    4. Kisara K,
    5. Sakurada S
    (1981) Antinociceptive action of morphine and pentazocine on unit activity in the nucleus centralis lateralis, nucleus ventralis lateralis and nearby structures of the cat. Pain 10:47–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. North RA
    (1989) Drug receptors and the inhibition of nerve cells. Br J Pharmacol 98:13–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. North RA,
    2. Williams JT,
    3. Surprenant A,
    4. Christie MJ
    (1987) μ and δ receptors belong to a family of receptors that are coupled to potassium channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:5487–5491.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Pape HC
    (1992) Adenosine promotes burst activity in guinea-pig geniculocortical neurones through two different ionic mechanisms. J Physiol (Lond) 447:729–753.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Pape HC,
    2. McCormick DA
    (1989) Noradrenaline and serotonin selectively modulate thalamic burst firing by enhancing a hyperpolarization-activated cation current. Nature 340:715–718.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Paxinos G,
    2. Watson C
    (1986) The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates, Ed 2. (Academic, Sydney).
  40. ↵
    1. Peschanski M,
    2. Guilbaud G,
    3. Gautron M,
    4. Besson JM
    (1980) Encoding of noxious heat messages in neurons of the ventrobasal thalamic complex of the rat. Brain Res 197:401–413.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Peschanski M,
    2. Guilbaud G,
    3. Gautron M
    (1981) Posterior intralaminar region in rat: neuronal responses to noxious and nonnoxious cutaneous stimuli. Exp Neurol 72:226–238.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Pirchio M,
    2. Turner JP,
    3. Williams SR,
    4. Asprodini E,
    5. Crunelli V
    (1997) Postnatal development of membrane properties and δ oscillations in thalamocortical neurons of the cat dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. J Neurosci 17:5428–5444.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. Ponce A,
    2. Bueno E,
    3. Kentros C,
    4. Vega-Saenz de Miera E,
    5. Chow A,
    6. Hillman D,
    7. Chen S,
    8. Zhu L,
    9. Wu MB,
    10. Wu X,
    11. Rudy B,
    12. Thornhill WB
    (1996) G-protein-gated inward rectifier K+ channel proteins (GIRK1) are present in the soma and dendrites as well as in nerve terminals of specific neurons in the brain. J Neurosci 16:1990–2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Ramoa AS,
    2. McCormick DA
    (1994) Developmental changes in electrophysiological properties of LGNd neurons during reorganization of retinogeniculate connections. J Neurosci 14:2089–2097.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Sawyer SF,
    2. Young SJ,
    3. Groves PM
    (1989) Quantitative golgi study of anatomically identified subdivisions of motor thalamus in the rat. J Comp Neurol 286:1–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Schroeder JE,
    2. Fischbach PS,
    3. Zheng D,
    4. McCleskey EW
    (1991) Activation of μ opioid receptors inhibits transient high- and low-threshold Ca2+ currents, but spares a sustained current. Neuron 6:13–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Seward E,
    2. Hammond C,
    3. Henderson G
    (1991) μ-Opioid-receptor-mediated inhibition of the N-type calcium-channel current. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 244:129–135.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Shigenaga Y,
    2. Inoki R
    (1976) Effect of morphine on single unit responses in ventrobasal complex (VB) and posterior nuclear group (PO) following tooth pulp stimulation. Brain Res 103:152–156.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Simone DA,
    2. Hanson ME,
    3. Bernau NA,
    4. Pubols BH
    (1993) Nociceptive neurons of the raccoon lateral thalamus. J Neurophysiol 69:318–328.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Sodickson DL,
    2. Bean BP
    (1996) GABAB receptor-activated inwardly rectifying potassium current in dissociated hippocampal CA3 neurons. J Neurosci 16:6374–6385.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Steriade M,
    2. Curró Dossi R,
    3. Contreras D
    (1993) Electrophysiological properties of intralaminar thalamocortical cells discharging rhythmic (∼40 Hz) spike-bursts at ∼1000 Hz during waking and rapid eye movement sleep. Neuroscience 56:1–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Tennigkeit F,
    2. Schwarz DWF,
    3. Puil E
    (1996) Mechanisms for signal transformation in lemniscal auditory thalamus. J Neurophysiol 76:3597–3608.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Tömböl T,
    2. Bentivoglio M,
    3. Macchi G
    (1990) Neuronal cell types in the thalamic intralaminar central lateral nucleus of the cat. Exp Brain Res 81:491–499.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Williams JT,
    2. North RA,
    3. Tokimasa T
    (1988) Inward rectification of resting and opiate-activated potassium currents in rat locus coeruleus neurons. J Neurosci 8:4299–4306.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    1. Yeung JC,
    2. Yaksh TL,
    3. Rudy TA
    (1978) Effect on the nociceptive threshold and EEG activity in the rat of morphine injected into the medial thalamus and the periaqueductal grey. Neuropharmacol 17:525–532.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Yoshimura M,
    2. North RA
    (1983) Substantia gelatinosa neurones hyperpolarized in vitro by enkephalin. Nature 305:529–530.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 18 (5)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 18, Issue 5
1 Mar 1998
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
μ-Opioid Peptides Inhibit Thalamic Neurons
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
μ-Opioid Peptides Inhibit Thalamic Neurons
Jennifer Brunton, Serge Charpak
Journal of Neuroscience 1 March 1998, 18 (5) 1671-1678; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-05-01671.1998

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
μ-Opioid Peptides Inhibit Thalamic Neurons
Jennifer Brunton, Serge Charpak
Journal of Neuroscience 1 March 1998, 18 (5) 1671-1678; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-05-01671.1998
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • μ-opioids
  • inhibition
  • thalamus
  • intralaminar nuclei
  • centrolateral nucleus
  • inwardly rectifying potassium conductance
  • cesium

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Intracranially Administered Anti-Αβ Antibodies Reduce β-Amyloid Deposition by Mechanisms Both Independent of and Associated with Microglial Activation
  • Neural Correlates of Competing Fear Behaviors Evoked by an Innately Aversive Stimulus
  • Distinct Developmental Modes and Lesion-Induced Reactions of Dendrites of Two Classes of Drosophila Sensory Neurons
Show more ARTICLE
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.