Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
ARTICLE

G-Protein-Coupled Modulation of Presynaptic Calcium Currents and Transmitter Release by a GABAB Receptor

Tomoyuki Takahashi, Yoshinao Kajikawa and Tetsuhiro Tsujimoto
Journal of Neuroscience 1 May 1998, 18 (9) 3138-3146; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-09-03138.1998
Tomoyuki Takahashi
1Department of Neurophysiology, University of Tokyo Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo 113, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoshinao Kajikawa
1Department of Neurophysiology, University of Tokyo Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo 113, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tetsuhiro Tsujimoto
1Department of Neurophysiology, University of Tokyo Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo 113, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Presynaptic GABAB receptors play a regulatory role in central synaptic transmission. To elucidate their underlying mechanism of action, we have made whole-cell recordings of calcium and potassium currents from a giant presynaptic terminal, the calyx of Held, and EPSCs from its postsynaptic target in the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body of rat brainstem slices. The GABAB receptor agonist baclofen suppressed EPSCs and presynaptic calcium currents but had no effect on voltage-dependent potassium currents. The calcium current–EPSC relationship measured during baclofen application was similar to that observed on reducing [Ca2+]o, suggesting that the presynaptic inhibition generated by baclofen is caused largely by the suppression of presynaptic calcium influx. Presynaptic loading of the GDP analog guanosine-5′-O-(2-thiodiphosphate) (GDPβS) abolished the effect of baclofen on both presynaptic calcium currents and EPSCs. The nonhydrolyzable GTP analog guanosine 5′-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTPγS) suppressed presynaptic calcium currents and occluded the effect of baclofen on presynaptic calcium currents and EPSCs. Photoactivation of GTPγS induced an inward rectifying potassium current at the calyx of Held, whereas baclofen had no such effect. We conclude that presynaptic GABAB receptors suppress transmitter release through G-protein-coupled inhibition of calcium currents.

  • GABAB receptor
  • presynaptic inhibition
  • Gprotein
  • calcium currents
  • inwardly rectifying potassium currents
  • the calyx of Held
  • presynaptic recording

GABAB receptors are widely distributed in the presynaptic and postsynaptic membranes of vertebrate central neurons, and they modulate synaptic transmission by either suppressing transmitter release or hyperpolarizing postsynaptic cells (Thompson et al., 1993; Kaupmann et al., 1997). At neuronal somata, GABAB receptors are known to activate G-proteins, thereby enhancing inwardly rectifying potassium channels (Andrade et al., 1986; Sodickson and Bean, 1996) or suppressing calcium channels (Dolphin and Scott, 1987; Scholtz and Miller, 1991; Mintz and Bean, 1993). Compared with the wealth of information on the postsynaptic mechanism of GABAB receptors, much less is known about their presynaptic mechanism of action. In particular, it is not known whether the effector of presynaptic GABAB receptors is a potassium channel (Saint et al., 1990; Thompson and Gahwiler, 1992), a calcium channel (Scholtz and Miller, 1991; Pfrieger et al., 1994; Wu and Saggau, 1995; Dittman and Regehr, 1996, 1997), or exocytotic machinery downstream of calcium influx (Scanziani et al., 1992; Dittman and Regehr, 1996; Rohrbacher et al., 1997). Also, an involvement of G-proteins in GABAB receptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition remains to be directly demonstrated (Thompson et al., 1993). The calyx of Held is an ideal preparation for directly testing these issues using patch-clamp techniques (Forsythe, 1994; Borst et al., 1995; Takahashi et al., 1996). The presynaptic terminal possesses GABAB receptors as well as metabotropic glutamate receptors and adenosine receptors (Barnes-Davies and Forsythe, 1995). Here we demonstrate that the G-protein-coupled inhibition of calcium channels underlies the GABAB receptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preparation and solutions. Transverse slices of the superior olivary complex were prepared from 14- to 19-d-old Wistar rats killed by decapitation under halothane anesthesia. The medial nucleus of trapezoid body (MNTB) neurons and calyces were viewed with a 40×, 63× (Zeiss), or 60× (Olympus Optical, Tokyo, Japan) water immersion lens attached to an upright microscope (Axioskop, Zeiss). Each slice was perfused with artificial CSF (aCSF) containing 120 mmNaCl, 2.5 mm KCl, 26 mmNaHCO3, 1.25 mmNaH2PO4, 2 mmCaCl2, 1 mm MgCl2, 10 mm glucose, 0.5 mmmyo-inositol, 2 mm sodium pyruvate, 0.5 mm ascorbic acid, and 4 mm lactic acid, pH 7.4, with 5% CO2 and 95% O2. To isolate Ca2+ currents, 10 mm tetraethylammonium (TEA) chloride and 1 μmtetrodotoxin (TTX) were included in the aCSF. The postsynaptic patch pipette was filled with a solution (A) containing 97.5 mmpotassium gluconate, 32.5 mm KCl, 10 mm HEPES, 5 mm EGTA, and 1 mm MgCl2, pH adjusted to 7.4 with KOH.N-(2,6-diethylphenylcarbamoylmethyl)-triethyl-ammonium bromide (QX314, 5 mm) was included in the postsynaptic pipette solution to suppress action potential generation when aCSF did not contain TTX. For recording EPSCs, the aCSF routinely contained bicuculline (10 μm) and strychnine (0.5 μm) to block spontaneous inhibitory synaptic currents. For recording presynaptic calcium currents (IpCa), the presynaptic pipette was filled with a solution (B) containing 110 mm CsCl, 40 mm HEPES, 0.5 mm EGTA, 1 mmMgCl2, 2 mm ATP, 0.5 mm GTP, 12 mm Na2 phosphocreatinine, and 10 mm TEA, pH adjusted to 7.4 with CsOH. Presynaptic potassium currents were recorded with solution A. The presynaptic pipette solutions routinely contained 2 mm ATP (ATP-Mg salt), 12 mm phosphocreatinine, and 0.5 mm GTP, unless noted otherwise. For paired recordings 10 mm potassium glutamate or cesium glutamate (equimolar replacement of KCl or CsCl) was also included in the presynaptic pipette solution (Borst et al., 1995; Takahashi et al., 1996).

Recording and data analysis. Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were made from MNTB neurons, presynaptic calyces, or simultaneously from both structures (Takahashi et al., 1996). EPSCs were evoked at 0.1 Hz by extracellular stimulation of presynaptic axons near the midline of a slice with a bipolar platinum electrode (Barnes-Davies and Forsythe, 1995) in a relatively thick slice (250 μm) or by presynaptic action potentials or Ca2+currents elicited by a whole-cell pipette in thin slice (150 μm). The electrode resistances were 4–7 MΩ for the postsynaptic pipette and 6–10 MΩ for the presynaptic pipette. The series resistance of presynaptic recording was typically 10–20 MΩ and was compensated by 60–90%. Current or potential recordings were made with a patch-clamp amplifier (Axopatch 200B, Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA). Unless noted otherwise, records were low-pass-filtered at 2.5–20 kHz and digitized at 5–50 kHz by a CED 1401 interface (Cambridge Electronic Design). Leak currents were subtracted for presynaptic currents by a scaled pulse divided by n (P/N) protocol. The liquid junctional potential between the pipette solution and aCSF was +7.5 mV for solution A and +3.3 mV for solution B. The value of reversal potentials (see Fig. 6C) was corrected for these junction potentials.

Drug application. GABAB receptor agonists were bath-applied by switching superfusates by solenoid valves. Caged GTPγS [S-(DMNPE-caged) GTPγS; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR] was applied at 38 μm into calyces by dialysis from whole-cell pipettes. Care was taken to protect the compound from short wavelength light during this procedure. A flash of light was given from a mercury lamp light source (50 W) through a filter (360 ± 20 nm) by opening a shutter for a given period (2–4 sec). Application of the light flash without loading caged compound had no effect on the synaptic transmission or IpCa under normal experimental conditions, although an excessive illumination sometimes induced a transient potentiation of IpCa or an increase in the frequency of spontaneous synaptic currents. Experiments were carried at room temperature (22–26°C).

RESULTS

Presynaptic inhibition mediated by GABAB receptors at the calyx of Held

A single extracellular stimulation evoked a large and rapidly decaying EPSC in a principal cell of the medial nucleus of trapezoid body (MNTB) under whole-cell voltage clamp. As reported previously (Barnes-Davies and Forsythe, 1995), bath-application of the GABAB receptor agonist baclofen suppressed EPSCs in a reversible manner (Fig.1A). This baclofen effect was detectable at 0.2 μm, increased dose-dependently, and reached a maximal at ∼20 μm (Fig.1B). Similarly, the inhibitory transmitter GABA suppressed EPSCs (Fig. 1). The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of baclofen was estimated from the dose–response curve to be 0.8 μm, whereas that for GABA was 10 μm (Fig. 1B). Thus baclofen was about 10 times more potent than GABA in inhibiting EPSCs at this synapse. The inhibitory effects of both baclofen and GABA were largely attenuated by the GABAB receptor antagonist CGP35348 (100 μm) (Fig. 1A), indicating that the effects of baclofen and GABA were indeed mediated by the GABAB receptor.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Inhibitory effects of GABAB receptor agonists on EPSCs. EPSCs were evoked by extracellular stimulation.A (top row), Reversible inhibition of EPSCs by baclofen (2 μm) and attenuation of the baclofen effect by CGP35348 (100 μm) in an MNTB neuron.Bottom row, Inhibitory effect of GABA (20 μm) and its attenuation by CGP35348 in another MNTB neuron. The magnitude of inhibition by CGP35348 on the effect of baclofen and GABA was 82.8 ± 2.3% (n = 3) and 60.7 ± 11% (n = 3), respectively.B, Dose-dependent suppression of EPSCs by baclofen and GABA. Cumulative dose-dependent effects of baclofen (top) and GABA (bottom) on the amplitude of EPSCs recorded from MNTB neurons. Sample records from individual MNTB neurons are shown in the inset. Calibration: 2 nA, 10 msec. The curves fitted to data points derived from the following equation: magnitude of inhibition (%) = maximal inhibition (%)/[1 + (IC50/agonist concentration)n]. For baclofen and GABA, maximal inhibition was 82.0 and 90.8%, IC50 was 0.77 and 9.97 μm, and Hill coefficient (n) was 0.90 and 1.21, respectively. Magnitude of EPSC suppression by 20 μm baclofen was 80.1 ± 2.6% at the cumulative-dose application (n = 4), which was not significantly different (p = 0.13; Student’s t test) from that at the single-dose application (72.5 ± 4.3%;n = 8).

Involvement of G-proteins in GABAB receptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition

An EPSC was evoked by a presynaptic action potential in a simultaneous whole-cell recording from the calyx of Held and a target MNTB cell (Fig. 2A). Baclofen suppressed the EPSC without affecting the presynaptic action potential. The magnitude of suppression of EPSCs by baclofen (20 μm) was 78.5 ± 0.71% (mean ± SEM;n = 4 cells), which was comparable with that for the extracellularly evoked EPSCs (Fig. 1 and legend). The presynaptic action potential had a peak amplitude of 90.5 ± 12 mV and a half-width of 0.76 ± 0.19 msec (n = 4 calyces), which remained at 99.0 ± 2.4% and 113 ± 25%, respectively, during baclofen application. Baclofen had no effect on the presynaptic membrane potential or conductance (see below).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Baclofen-induced suppression of EPSCs is blocked by GDPβS. Simultaneous presynaptic and postsynaptic recordings at the calyx–MNTB synapse. EPSCs were evoked by action potentials elicited by a depolarizing current pulse (2–10 msec) applied to a calyx through a whole-cell patch pipette. The postsynaptic holding potential was −70 mV. A, Reversible suppression of EPSCs by baclofen (20 μm). B, Blocking effect of GDPβS (tri-lithium salt, 3 mm) in the pipette on baclofen-induced suppression of EPSCs (a, b). A lower concentration of GDPβS (0.2 mm) did not prevent the effect of baclofen (data not shown). After the pipettes were retracted, a second paired recording was made from the same structures with a presynaptic pipette containing GTP (0.5 mm) instead of GDPβS. Baclofen clearly suppressed the EPSCs (c, d), which gradually recovered after washout (e). Complete recovery of EPSCs took 5–10 min (Fig. 7). When LiCl (9 mm) was included in the presynaptic pipette the baclofen effect was not attenuated (not shown). The amplitudes of EPSCs were normalized against the mean of the first seven (with GDPβS) or six (with GTP) data points before baclofen application in each experiment; the data point represents means and the error bars represent SEMs derived from paired recording experiments at three different synapses. Vertical calibration scales indicate 80 mV for presynaptic membrane potentials (A and B) and 1.25 nA (A) or 0.6 nA (B) for EPSCs. Scale bars, 10 msec.

To directly address an involvement of presynaptic G-proteins in the action of baclofen, the GDP analog guanosine-5′-O-(2-thiodiphosphate) (GDPβS, 3 mm) was included in the presynaptic whole-cell pipette. In this condition, baclofen no longer suppressed EPSCs (102 ± 2.6%;n = 4 pairs) (Fig. 2B). After the whole-cell pipette containing GDPβS was retracted, another paired recording was made again at the same synapse, this time with a presynaptic pipette solution containing GTP. Baclofen clearly suppressed EPSCs by 67 ± 14% (n = 3 pairs after GDPβS washout) (Fig. 2B). Thus presynaptic GDPβS blocked the effect of baclofen in a reversible manner. Similarly, when the nonhydrolyzable GTP analog guanosine 5′-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTPγS, 200 μm) was included in the presynaptic whole-cell pipette, baclofen had no effect on EPSCs (105 ± 7.6%; n = 3 pairs; data not shown). These results indicate that the effect of baclofen on EPSCs is indeed presynaptic and that G-proteins are involved in the GABAB receptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition.

Inhibition of presynaptic calcium currents by baclofen

To identify an effector of the presynaptic GABABreceptor, we first examined whether presynaptic calcium currents (IpCa) could be modulated by baclofen. As illustrated in Figure3A, baclofen slowed activation kinetics of IpCa and reduced its amplitude. When measured at the peak of the control current (1.3 msec from onset) at −10 mV, the magnitude of IpCa suppression was 38.0 ± 3.8% (n = 6). The baclofen-induced suppression of IpCa was not associated with a shift in the current–voltage (I–V) relationship (Fig. 3C). As shown in Figure 3A,B, after a 10 msec depolarizing pulse (to −10 mV) IpCa deactivated exponentially with a fast time constant (0.14 ± 0.03 msec;n = 8). Baclofen had no effect on this deactivation time constant (0.14 ± 0.05 msec after baclofen). This suggests that baclofen has little effect on the presynaptic Ca2+ channel open time. These characteristics of the baclofen-induced inhibition of IpCa are similar to those reported for somatic Ca2+ currents (Dolphin and Scott, 1987;Scholtz and Miller, 1991; Mintz and Bean, 1993; Lambert and Wilson, 1996).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Suppression of presynaptic Ca2+currents by baclofen. The calyx was voltage-clamped at −80 mV, and IpCa was evoked by a 10 msec depolarizing pulse. In this experiment, [Ca2+]o was reduced to 1 mm to allow better voltage-clamp performance.A, IpCa induced in a calyx by a depolarizing voltage step to −10 mV in the absence and presence of baclofen (20 μm, superimposed). B, The tail currents are normalized at the peak and superimposed. C, Current–voltage relationships of IpCa before (open circles) and after (filled circles) baclofen application. Mean values ± SEMs obtained from six calyces are shown.

To study further the involvement of G-proteins in the baclofen-induced suppression of IpCa, caged GTPγS (38 μm) was loaded into a calyx through a whole-cell patch pipette (Fig.4A). After it was confirmed that baclofen reversibly suppressed IpCa (a–c), a flash of ultraviolet light (UV, 340–380 nm) was applied for 2–4 sec (arrow) to induce a photo-release of the caged GTPγS compound. After the flash, IpCa gradually diminished in amplitude and slowed in its rising phase (c, d). After IpCa amplitude reached a steady level, a second application of baclofen no longer attenuated IpCa (d, e). In agreement with this result, when GTPγS (200 μm) was included in the presynaptic whole-cell pipette, IpCa exhibited a similarly slow rise, and baclofen had no significant effect on the current amplitude (99.8 ± 1.6%;n = 4) (Fig. 4B). When GDPβS (3 mm) was included in the pipette, IpCa had a normal rise time, but baclofen was again ineffective on IpCa (96.9 ± 1.2%;n = 5) (Fig. 4C). These results indicate that the inhibitory effect of baclofen on the presynaptic calcium current is mediated by G-proteins.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Block of baclofen-induced IpCa suppression by GTPγS or GDPβS. A, Occlusion of baclofen effect by GTPγS. IpCa was evoked in a calyx by a 20 msec depolarizing step from −70 mV to −13 mV. Baclofen (20 μm) suppressed IpCa, which recovered partially (a–c, superimposed). After a light flash given at an arrow for 2 sec, IpCa diminished gradually (c, d). A second application of baclofen after the flash had no effect on IpCa (d, e). Essentially the same result was obtained in two other calyces. B,C, Little effect of baclofen on IpCa (evoked by a 20 msec depolarizing pulse from −80 mV to −10 mV) was observed in the presence of GTPγS (200 μm, B) or GDPβS (3 mm, C) in the presynaptic pipette.B and C are from different calyces. A similar result was obtained in another calyx for each case.

Lack of baclofen effect on presynaptic potassium currents

We next examined whether baclofen might modulate potassium currents. Voltage-dependent outward potassium currents were evoked by depolarizing a presynaptic terminal in the presence of TTX (1 μm) (Forsythe, 1994). As illustrated in Figure5, the potassium current before and after baclofen application was nearly identical at all voltages examined. Thus, GABAB receptors do not seem to be coupled with voltage-gated potassium channels at the presynaptic terminal.

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Lack of baclofen effect on voltage-gated potassium currents. Inset, Outward potassium currents evoked by 20 mV depolarizing steps from the holding potential of −80 mV to +20 mV in the presence of TTX before (left) and after (middle) baclofen (20 μm) application. The superimposed traces before and after baclofen application overlapped almost completely (right). The amplitude of the potassium current was normalized against the value at 0 mV and mean ± SEMs of five calyces before (open circles) and after (filled triangles) baclofen application are plotted against membrane potential.

In neuronal somata, baclofen enhances inwardly rectifying potassium currents by activating G-proteins (Andrade et al., 1986; Sodickson and Bean, 1996). We examined whether baclofen might similarly enhance the inward rectifying potassium current at the presynaptic terminal. As illustrated in Figure6A, baclofen applied at −70 mV holding potential had no effect on the holding current or the membrane conductance (98.5 ± 1.8%; n = 9) measured by a ramp command voltage pulse (Fig. 6C). The inwardly rectifying potassium current is known to be blocked by a low concentration of Ba2+ (Hagiwara et al., 1978). Bath-application of Ba2+ (100 μm) caused a small inward current accompanied by a slight decrease in membrane conductance (to 84.5 ± 4.6%; n = 6) (Fig. 6A), suggesting that the inwardly rectifying channels might weakly contribute to the resting conductance of the presynaptic terminal. After a calyx was loaded with caged GTPγS, photo-release of GTPγS by a flash (Fig. 6B,arrow) induced a prominent outward current accompanied by an increase in membrane conductance. After the outward current reached a steady level, subsequent application of Ba2+ (100 μm) largely abolished this current. When Ba2+ was washed out, the outward current gradually recovered, with an increase in membrane conductance (not shown). The Ba2+-sensitive current induced by GTPγS was extracted as a difference current before and after the Ba2+ application (Fig. 6B,a and b). This current rectified inwardly and reversed at −92 ± 1.1 mV (n = 4) close to the theoretical potassium equilibrium potential (99.5 mV; Fig.6C, arrow), indicating that it is a G-protein-activated inwardly rectifying potassium current (GIRK) (Kubo et al., 1993). Thus GIRK is present in the presynaptic terminal but cannot be activated by GABAB receptors.

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Effects of baclofen and GTPγS on presynaptic holding current and membrane conductance. A calyx was voltage-clamped at the holding potential of −70 mV, and a ramp command voltage from −50 to −130 mV (C, top left) was applied every 20 sec.A, Baclofen (20 μm) had no effect on the holding current or input conductance. Ba2+ (100 μm) caused a slight inward current associated with a decrease in conductance in the same calyx. B, In another calyx, photo-release of GTPγS by a UV flash (arrow) induced an outward current accompanied by an increase in input conductance. This current was suppressed by Ba2+(100 μm, b). Application of the light flash without loading caged compound had no effect on the holding current or membrane conductance. The outward current was not observed after GTPγS photolysis with the Cs+-based internal solution for IpCa recordings (Fig. 4A).C, Currents (a, b, bottom) corresponding to a command voltage (top) after photolysis of caged GTPγS compound before (a) and after (b) application of Ba2+.Right, Ba2+-sensitive current extracted as a difference current (a–b).Arrow indicates theoretical equilibrium potential for potassium ions calculated from the internal and external potassium activities. The difference current between before and after photolysis had a similar reversal potential, but inward rectification was less prominent (data not shown). Membrane potential was corrected for the liquid junction potential between the external and internal solution (+7.5 mV) for this current–voltage relationship. The data in this figure were low-pass-filtered at 100 Hz and sampled at 1 kHz.

Similar to Ba2+, extracellular Cs+ blocks inwardly rectifying potassium currents (Hagiwara et al., 1976; Sodickson and Bean, 1996) as well as the inwardly rectifying cationic currents Ih (Halliwell and Adams, 1982; Takahashi, 1990). Bath-application of Ba2+ or Cs+ (both at 1 mm) had no effect on EPSCs evoked extracellularly (Fig.7). Baclofen applied in the presence of Ba2+ or Cs+ suppressed EPSCs to a similar extent as in control: 72.5 ± 4.3% in control (n = 8), 72.6 ± 2.0% in Ba2+(n = 4), and 74.8 ± 1.5% in Cs+ (n = 4), respectively. These results suggest further that neither GIRK nor Ihis involved in the GABAB receptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition at the calyx–MNTB synapse.

Fig. 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

Effect of external Ba2+ and Cs+ on GABAB receptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition. EPSCs were evoked in MNTB principal cells by extracellular stimulation. A, Baclofen-induced suppression of EPSCs was similar before and after Ba2+ application (1 mm). EPSCs before, during baclofen application (20 μm), and after washout are superimposed on top in the absence (left) and presence (right) of Ba2+. Note the small polysynaptic EPSC component observed at the decay of monosynaptic EPSC. B, Baclofen suppressed EPSCs similarly in the absence and presence of external Cs+ (1 mm). EPSCs before and after baclofen application are superimposed on top in the absence (left) and presence (right) of Cs+. A andB are from different cells.

Lack of contribution of exocytotic machinery to GABABreceptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition

To examine whether the exocytotic process downstream of Ca2+ influx is involved in GABABreceptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition, we made simultaneous pre- and postsynaptic recordings and compared the IpCa–EPSC relationship between two conditions: first after baclofen application and then after reduction of [Ca2+]o (Takahashi et al., 1996). When baclofen was applied, EPSCs diminished concomitantly with IpCa (Fig. 8A,i, ii). Similarly, when [Ca2+]o was reduced by replacement with [Mg2+]o, both EPSCs and IpCa were diminished in parallel (Fig. 8A,iii, iv). When the IpCa–EPSC relations were plotted for data obtained after baclofen application and after [Ca2+]o reduction, the two relationships largely overlapped with each other (Fig.8B). At the seven synapses examined, the slope in the regression lines after baclofen application was similar to that after [Ca2+]o reduction (Fig.8B, inset) (no significant difference in paired t test). The result was essentially the same when the charge instead of the peak amplitude for IpCa and EPSCs was compared. Thus, the baclofen-induced suppression of EPSCs can be explained mostly by a reduction of IpCa.

Fig. 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 8.

Comparison of IpCa–EPSC relationships during baclofen application and [Ca2+]oreduction. Paired recording from a calyx and its target cell.A, Effects of baclofen (20 μm; i, ii) and [Ca2+]o reduction (iii, iv) on IpCa (Pre) and EPSCs (Post). IpCa was evoked by 1 msec depolarizing command pulse from −70 mV to −10 mV. Records before and after baclofen application or [Ca2+]o reduction are superimposed on top row. B, Double logarithmic plot of IpCa–EPSC relation during baclofen application (filled circles with a dotted regression line) and [Ca2+]o reduction (open circles with a solid regression line). Data points above 90% in EPSC amplitude were excluded from these plots to minimize constrainment. The slope value was 2.29 for baclofen and 2.33 for [Ca2+]oreduction, respectively. Excluding the minimal point from each relationship had no significant effect on the slope values (2.15 and 2.09, respectively, for baclofen and [Ca2+]o reduction). Inset graph, The slope value of regression lines compared between [Ca2+]o reduction and baclofen application at seven synapses. No significant difference withp = 0.24 in paired t test. The mean slope value was 1.73 ± 0.17 for baclofen and 1.77 ± 0.17 for [Ca2+]o reduction, respectively.

DISCUSSION

Inhibition of calcium currents and transmission by GABAB receptor through G-protein

In this study, using paired whole-cell recordings from the brain stem giant presynaptic terminal and postsynaptic cell, we have demonstrated that presynaptic GABAB receptors are linked through G-proteins to Ca2+ channels, thereby suppressing transmitter release. The IpCa at the calyx–MNTB synapse is almost exclusively P-type at the age range examined (Forsythe et al., 1998). It is possible that βγ complex of heterotrimeric G-protein may interact with the α1A subunit, thereby suppressing P-type Ca2+ channel activity (De Waard et al., 1997). Such a membrane-delimited mechanism is consistent with our finding that the magnitude of the baclofen-induced suppression of EPSCs evoked via a presynaptic whole-cell pipette was similar to that of EPSCs evoked via an extracellular pipette. Thus diffusible intracellular messengers, likely to be washed out during whole-cell recording, may not be essentially involved in the baclofen-induced suppression of EPSCs. IpCa is also suppressed by a metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) agonist (Takahashi et al., 1996). It remains to be seen whether a common G-protein mediates the presynaptic inhibition by mGluRs and GABAB receptors.

Presynaptic potassium channels are not coupled with GABAB receptor

Presynaptic potassium conductances are thought to be important in the regulation of transmitter release (Augustine, 1990). The receptor-mediated inhibition of a potassium conductance is known to enhance synaptic efficacy in invertebrate nervous systems (Kandel and Schwartz, 1982). At mammalian neuronal somata, GABABreceptors potentiate transient potassium currents (Saint et al., 1990) or activate inwardly rectifying potassium currents through G-protein activation (Andrade et al., 1986; Sodickson and Bean, 1996). It has been postulated that an enhancement of presynaptic potassium currents may underlie GABAB receptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition (Saint et al., 1990; Thompson and Gahwiler, 1992). However, direct recordings from the calyx presynaptic terminals revealed that baclofen had no effect on the voltage-gated potassium currents or inwardly rectifying potassium currents. Furthermore, the inward rectifier channel blockers Ba2+ or Cs+ had no effect on the baclofen-induced inhibition of EPSCs. These results indicate that potassium conductances are not significantly involved in the GABAB receptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition at this fast excitatory synapse.

In our present study, Ba2+ had no effect on GABAB receptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition as reported at other central synapses (Allerton et al., 1989; Lambert at al., 1991;Thompson and Gahwiler, 1992; Hirata et al., 1995). Although Ba2+ was reported to inhibit the effect of baclofen on monosynaptic IPSCs in hippocampal CA3 cells (Thompson and Gahwiler, 1992), this was not confirmed in a study using another blocking agent of inward rectifying potassium channels (Lambert and Wilson, 1993). Furthermore, transgenic mice lacking a GIRK gene exhibited a normal magnitude of GABAB receptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition at hippocampal synapses (Luscher et al., 1997). Thus, so far there is no direct evidence to indicate an involvement of potassium conductances in the receptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition at mammalian central synapses.

At the calyx of Held, an inwardly rectifying potassium current could be activated by intracellular application of GTPγS but not by baclofen. This result may imply that the GABAB receptors and G-proteins coupled with GIRK are distinct from those coupled with voltage-gated calcium channels, as proposed previously on the basis of pharmacological differences between the presynaptic and postsynaptic effect of baclofen (Dutar and Nicoll, 1988). However, it is also possible that GIRK is localized outside of the functional domain of G-proteins coupled with GABAB receptors at the presynaptic nerve terminal.

Baclofen had no effect on presynaptic spike waveform being consistent with the lack of involvement of potassium conductance (also see Dittman and Regehr, 1996). Although baclofen suppressed the presynaptic calcium conductance, this was not apparent in the action potential waveform. This might be attributable to the large potassium conductance masking the calcium conductance. In fact, even after synaptic transmission was abolished by reducing [Ca2+]o, the presynaptic action potential waveform remained similar at this (our unpublished observation) and other synapses (Sabatini and Regehr, 1997).

The exocytotic machinery for evoked transmitter release is not affected by GABAB receptors

The IpCa–EPSC relationship during baclofen application was similar to that during reduction of [Ca2+]o. This suggests that the exocytotic machinery downstream of Ca2+ entry is not involved in GABAB receptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition at the calyx–MNTB synapse, as is the case for mGluR-mediated presynaptic inhibition (Takahashi et al., 1996). In the case of baclofen, similar conclusions were made from studies using Ca2+ indicators at hippocampal synapses (Wu and Saggau, 1995; Dittman and Regehr, 1997) (but see Dittman and Regehr, 1996). The direct involvement of the exocytotic machinery in receptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition has been postulated from the observation that baclofen suppressed the frequency of spontaneous miniature synaptic currents in a [Ca2+]o-independent manner (Scanziani et al., 1992; Rohrbacher et al., 1997). However, differential modulations of the frequency of miniature events and the amplitude of evoked synaptic responses by various manipulations are well known (Fu and Poo, 1991; Geppert et al., 1994; Cummings et al., 1996; Hori et al., 1996). A distinct mechanism may operate in the modulation of synchronous and asynchronous transmitter release.

In conclusion, this study has demonstrated G-protein-coupled modulation of presynaptic Ca2+ channels on activation of GABAB receptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition; neither potassium channels nor modulation of the exocytotic machinery downstream of Ca2+ influx plays a significant role. On binding a ligand, presynaptic GABAB receptors activate G-proteins and suppress Ca2+ currents, thereby reducing transmitter release. Given the wide distribution of presynaptic GABAB receptors at synapses throughout the nervous system, this mechanism would be of general application.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by the “Research for the Future” Program by The Japan Society for the Promotion of Sciences. We thank M. Farrant, I. D. Forsythe, T. Manabe, and K. Kobayashi for critically reading this manuscript. We are also grateful to R. Y. Tsien and V. Lev-Ram for their technical advice on the caged compound photolysis system and to Novartis Pharma (Basel, Switzerland) for the generous gift of CGP35348.

    Correspondence should be addressed to Tomoyuki Takahashi, Department of Neurophysiology, University of Tokyo Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo 113, Japan.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Allerton CA,
    2. Boden PR,
    3. Hill RG
    (1989) Actions of the GABAB agonist, (−)-baclofen, on neurones in deep dorsal horn of the rat spinal cord in vitro. Br J Pharmacol 96:29–38.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Andrade R,
    2. Malenka RC,
    3. Nicoll RA
    (1986) A G-protein couples serotonin and GABAB receptors to the same channels in hippocampus. Science 234:1261–1265.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Augustine GJ
    (1990) Regulation of transmitter release at the squid giant synapse by presynaptic delayed rectifier potassium current. J Physiol (Lond) 431:343–364.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Barnes-Davies M,
    2. Forsythe ID
    (1995) Pre- and postsynaptic glutamate receptors at a giant excitatory synapse in rat auditory brainstem slices. J Physiol (Lond) 488:387–406.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Borst JGG,
    2. Helmchen F,
    3. Sakmann B
    (1995) Pre- and postsynaptic whole-cell recordings in the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body of the rat. J Physiol (Lond) 489:825–840.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Cummings DD,
    2. Wilcox KS,
    3. Dichter MA
    (1996) Calcium-dependent paired-pulse facilitation of miniature EPSC frequency accompanies depression of EPSCs at hippocampal synapses in culture. J Neurosci 16:5312–5323.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. De Waard M,
    2. Liu H,
    3. Walker D,
    4. Scott VES,
    5. Gurnett CA,
    6. Campbell KP
    (1997) Direct binding of G-protein βγ complex to voltage-dependent calcium channels. Nature 385:446–450.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Dittman JS,
    2. Regehr WG
    (1996) Contributions of calcium-dependent and calcium-independent mechanisms to presynaptic inhibition at a cerebellar synapse. J Neurosci 16:1623–1633.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Dittman JS,
    2. Regehr WG
    (1997) Mechanism and kinetics of heterosynaptic depression at a cerebellar synapse. J Neurosci 17:9048–9059.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Dolphin AC,
    2. Scott RH
    (1987) Calcium channel currents and their inhibition by (−)-baclofen in rat sensory neurones: modulation by guanine nucleotides. J Physiol (Lond) 386:1–17.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Dutar P,
    2. Nicoll RA
    (1988) Pre- and postsynaptic GABAB receptors in the hippocampus have different pharmacological properties. Neuron 1:585–591.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Forsythe ID
    (1994) Direct patch recording from identified presynaptic terminals mediating glutamatergic EPSCs in the rat CNS, in vitro. J Physiol (Lond) 479:381–387.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Forsythe ID, Tsujimoto T, Barnes-Davies M, Cuttle MF, Takahashi T (1998) Inactivation of presynaptic calcium current contributes to synaptic depression at a fast central synapse. Neuron, in press.
  14. ↵
    1. Fu W-M,
    2. Poo M-M
    (1991) ATP potentiates spontaneous transmitter release at developing neuromuscular synapses. Neuron 6:837–843.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Geppert M,
    2. Goda Y,
    3. Hammer RE,
    4. Li C,
    5. Rosahl TW,
    6. Stevens CF,
    7. Sudhof TC
    (1994) Synaptotagmin 1: a major Ca2+ sensor for transmitter release at a central synapse. Cell 79:717–727.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Hagiwara S,
    2. Miyazaki S,
    3. Rosenthal NP
    (1976) Potassium current and the effect of cesium on this current during anomalous rectification of the egg cell membrane of a starfish. J Gen Physiol 67:621–638.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Hagiwara S,
    2. Miyazaki S,
    3. Moody W,
    4. Patlak J
    (1978) Blocking effects of barium and hydrogen ions on the potassium current during anomalous rectification in the starfish egg. J Physiol (Lond) 279:167–185.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Halliwell JV,
    2. Adams PR
    (1982) Voltage-clamp analysis of muscarinic excitation in hippocampal neurons. Brain Res 250:71–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Hirata K,
    2. Ohno-Shosaku T,
    3. Sawada S,
    4. Yamamoto C
    (1995) Baclofen inhibits GABAergic transmission after treatment with type-specific calcium channel blockers in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. Neurosci Lett 187:205–208.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Hori Y,
    2. Endo K,
    3. Takahashi T
    (1996) Long-lasting synaptic facilitation induced by serotonin in superficial dorsal horn neurones of the rat spinal cord. J Physiol (Lond) 492:867–876.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Kandel ER,
    2. Schwartz JH
    (1982) Molecular biology of learning: modulation of transmitter release. Science 218:433–443.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Kaupmann K,
    2. Huggel K,
    3. Heid J,
    4. Flor PJ,
    5. Bischoff S,
    6. Mickel SJ,
    7. McMaster G,
    8. Angust C,
    9. Bittiger H,
    10. Froestl W,
    11. Bettler B
    (1997) Expression cloning of GABAB receptors uncovers similarity to metabotropic glutamate receptors. Nature 386:239–246.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Kubo Y,
    2. Reuveny E,
    3. Slesinger PA,
    4. Jan YN,
    5. Jan LY
    (1993) Primary structure and functional expression of a rat G-protein-coupled muscarinic potassium channel. Nature 364:802–806.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Lambert NA,
    2. Wilson WA
    (1993) Discrimination of post- and presynaptic GABAB receptor-mediated responses by tetrahydroaminoacridine in Area CA3 of the rat hippocampus. J Neurophysiol 69:630–635.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Lambert NA,
    2. Wilson WA
    (1996) High-threshold Ca2+ currents in rat hippocampal interneurones and their selective inhibition by activation of GABAB receptors. J Physiol (Lond) 492:115–127.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lambert NA,
    2. Harrison NL,
    3. Teyler TJ
    (1991) Baclofen-induced disinhibition in area CA1 of rat hippocampus is resistant to extracellular Ba2+. Brain Res 547:349–352.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Luscher C,
    2. Jan LY,
    3. Stoffel M,
    4. Malenka RC,
    5. Nicoll RA
    (1997) G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying K+ channels (GIRKs) mediate postsynaptic but not presynaptic transmitter actions in hippocampal neurons. Neuron 19:687–695.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Mintz IM,
    2. Bean BP
    (1993) GABAB receptor inhibition of P-type Ca2+ channels in central neurons. Neuron 10:889–898.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Pfrieger FW,
    2. Gottmann K,
    3. Lux HD
    (1994) Kinetics of GABAB receptor-mediated inhibition of calcium currents and excitatory synaptic transmission in hippocampal neurons in vitro. Neuron 12:97–107.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Rohrbacher J,
    2. Jarolimek W,
    3. Lewen A,
    4. Misgeld U
    (1997) GABAB receptor-mediated inhibition of spontaneous inhibitory synaptic currents in rat midbrain culture. J Physiol (Lond) 500:739–749.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Sabatini BL,
    2. Regehr WG
    (1997) Control of neurotransmitter release by presynaptic waveform at the granule cell to Purkinje cell synapse. J Neurosci 17:3425–3435.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Saint DA,
    2. Thomas T,
    3. Gage PW
    (1990) GABAB agonists modulate a transient potassium current in cultured mammalian hippocampal neurons. Neurosci Lett 118:9–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Scanziani M,
    2. Capogna M,
    3. Gahwiler BH,
    4. Thompson SM
    (1992) Presynaptic inhibition of miniature excitatory synaptic currents by baclofen and adenosine in the hippocampus. Neuron 9:919–927.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Scholtz KP,
    2. Miller RJ
    (1991) GABAB receptor-mediated inhibition of Ca2+ currents and synaptic transmission in cultured rat hippocampal neurones. J Physiol (Lond) 444:669–686.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Sodickson DL,
    2. Bean BP
    (1996) GABAB receptor-activated inwardly rectifying potassium current in dissociated hippocampal CA3 neurons. J Neurosci 16:6374–6385.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Takahashi T
    (1990) Inward rectification in neonatal rat spinal motoneurones. J Physiol (Lond) 423:47–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Takahashi T,
    2. Forsythe ID,
    3. Tsujimoto T,
    4. Barnes-Davies M,
    5. Onodera K
    (1996) Presynaptic calcium current modulation by a metabotropic glutamate receptor. Science 274:594–597.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Thompson SM,
    2. Gahwiler BH
    (1992) Comparison of the actions of baclofen at pre- and postsynaptic receptors in the rat hippocampus in vitro. J Physiol (Lond) 451:329–345.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Thompson SM,
    2. Capogna M,
    3. Scanziani M
    (1993) Presynaptic inhibition in the hippocampus. Trends Neurosci 16:222–227.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Wu L-G,
    2. Saggau P
    (1995) GABAB receptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition in guinea-pig hippocampus is caused by reduction of presynaptic Ca2+ influx. J Physiol (Lond) 485:649–657.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 18 (9)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 18, Issue 9
1 May 1998
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
G-Protein-Coupled Modulation of Presynaptic Calcium Currents and Transmitter Release by a GABAB Receptor
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
G-Protein-Coupled Modulation of Presynaptic Calcium Currents and Transmitter Release by a GABAB Receptor
Tomoyuki Takahashi, Yoshinao Kajikawa, Tetsuhiro Tsujimoto
Journal of Neuroscience 1 May 1998, 18 (9) 3138-3146; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-09-03138.1998

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
G-Protein-Coupled Modulation of Presynaptic Calcium Currents and Transmitter Release by a GABAB Receptor
Tomoyuki Takahashi, Yoshinao Kajikawa, Tetsuhiro Tsujimoto
Journal of Neuroscience 1 May 1998, 18 (9) 3138-3146; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-09-03138.1998
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • GABAB receptor
  • presynaptic inhibition
  • Gprotein
  • calcium currents
  • inwardly rectifying potassium currents
  • the calyx of Held
  • presynaptic recording

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Calcium Influx via L- and N-Type Calcium Channels Activates a Transient Large-Conductance Ca2+-Activated K+Current in Mouse Neocortical Pyramidal Neurons
  • Netrin-1 Is a Chemorepellent for Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cells in the Embryonic Spinal Cord
  • Selective Enhancement of Synaptic Inhibition by Hypocretin (Orexin) in Rat Vagal Motor Neurons: Implications for Autonomic Regulation
Show more ARTICLE
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.