Abstract
The cellular mechanisms by which neuronal nicotinic cholinergic receptors influence many aspects of physiology and pathology in the neocortex remain primarily unknown. Whole-cell recordings and single-cell reverse transcription (RT)-PCR were combined to analyze the effect of nicotinic receptor agonists on different types of neurons in acute slices of rat neocortex. Nicotinic receptor agonists had no effect on pyramidal neurons and on most types of interneurons, including parvalbumin-expressing fast spiking interneurons and somatostatin-expressing interneurons, but selectively excited a subpopulation of interneurons coexpressing the neuropeptides vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and cholecystokinin. This excitation persisted in the presence of glutamate, GABA, and muscarinic receptor antagonists and in the presence of tetrodotoxin and low extracellular calcium, suggesting that the depolarization was mediated through the direct activation of postsynaptic nicotinic receptors. The responses were blocked by the nicotinic receptor antagonists dihydro-β-erythroidine and mecamylamine and persisted in the presence of the α7 selective nicotinic receptor antagonist methyllycaconitine, suggesting that the involved nicotinic receptors lacked the α7 subunit. Single-cell RT-PCR analysis indicated that the majority of the interneurons that responded to nicotinic stimulation coexpressed the α4, α5, and β2 nicotinic receptor subunits. Therefore, these results provide a role for non-α7 nicotinic receptors in the selective excitation of a subpopulation of neocortical interneurons. Because the neocortical interneurons expressing VIP have been proposed previously to regulate regional cortical blood flow and metabolism, these results also provide a cellular basis for the neuronal regulation of cortical blood flow mediated by acetylcholine.
- single-cell PCR
- neuropeptides
- calcium-binding proteins
- methyllycaconitine
- dihydro-β-erythroidine
- acetylcholine
- mecamylamine
Nicotinic receptors are implicated in many important functions of the mammalian neocortex, including memory formation (Granon et al., 1995) and neuronal regulation of regional cerebral blood flow (Gitelman and Prohovnik, 1992; Uchida et al., 1997), as well as cortical pathologies such as Alzheimer’s disease (Whitehouse et al., 1988; Newhouse et al., 1997), epilepsy (Steinlein et al., 1995), and Tourette’s syndrome (Sanberg et al., 1997, 1998). The cellular basis for the effects of nicotinic receptor stimulation is currently unknown but lies within its effects on the complex interactions between the excitatory glutamatergic pyramidal neurons and the inhibitory interneurons.
A variety of different neuronal nicotinic receptor subunits have been cloned and named α2–α9 and β2–β4 (Elgoyhen et al., 1994; Le Novere and Changeux, 1995). Classically, two broad subfamilies of nicotinic receptors have been characterized in neurons according to their sensitivity to α-bungarotoxin. Subunits α7 and α8 form a family of α-bungarotoxin-sensitive channels (Couturier et al., 1990), whereas subunits α2–α6 combine with subunits β2–β4 to produce α-bungarotoxin-insensitive channels (Sargent, 1993). In situ hybridization studies indicate that only α3, α4, α5, α7, and β2 subunits are expressed in the rat neocortex (Wada et al., 1989, 1990; Lena and Changeux, 1997). In this structure as in other brain areas, functional studies have suggested that α7 nicotinic receptors present on the axonal terminals of excitatory neurons modulate the release of glutamate (Vidal and Changeux, 1993;McGehee et al., 1995; Gray et al., 1996; Role and Berg, 1996; Gil et al., 1997). In contrast, the functional role of non-α7 nicotinic receptors, which are also widely expressed in the neocortex, is still unknown (Sivilotti and Colquhoun, 1995). In rodents, neocortical pyramidal cells are not directly depolarized by nicotinic agonists (Vidal and Changeux, 1993; Gil et al., 1997) (but see Roerig et al., 1997), suggesting that these non-α7 nicotinic receptors may be expressed by interneurons. Despite the general use of GABA as a neurotransmitter, neocortical interneurons are widely heterogeneous in terms of morphological, physiological, and biochemical characteristics (McCormick et al., 1985; Kubota et al., 1994; Thomson and Deuchars, 1994; Kawaguchi, 1995; Angulo et al., 1997; Cauli et al., 1997; Porter et al., 1998; Xiang et al., 1998). Therefore, the stimulation of different types of neocortical interneurons can produce a large variety of functional outcomes. In the present work, we examined pyramidal and nonpyramidal neurons of rat neocortical slices for responsiveness to nicotinic receptor agonists to determine the neuronal types excited by nicotinic receptor stimulation and the nicotinic receptors involved. Responsive neurons were then identified using electrophysiological and molecular criteria. The results indicate that nicotinic receptor stimulation in the neocortex selectively excites an interneuronal population coexpressing vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and cholecystokinin (CCK) through the activation of nicotinic receptors containing α4, α5, and β2 subunits.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The procedures for preparation of the brain slices and whole-cell recordings of visualized neurons have been described previously (Cauli et al., 1997; Porter et al., 1998). In brief, Wistar rats (13–36 postnatal days) were anesthetized with a mixture of xylazine (14 mg/kg) and ketamine (65 mg/kg) and killed by decapitation. Parasagittal sections (300-μm-thick) of cerebral cortex were prepared. The slices were incubated at room temperature (20–25°C) in artificial CSF (ACSF) containing (in mm): NaCl 121.0, KCl 2.5, NaH2PO4 1.25, CaCl22, MgCl2 1, NaHCO3 26, glucose 20, and pyruvate 5, which was bubbled with a mixture of 95% O2 and 5% CO2. Slices were transferred to a chamber and perfused at 1–2 ml/min with ACSF (34°C).
Neurons were recorded in layers II, III, and V of the motor cortex using the whole-cell configuration of the patch-clamp technique. Patch pipettes (3–5 MΩ), pulled from borosilicate glass, were filled with 8 μl of internal solution containing (in mm): K gluconate 144, MgCl2 3, EGTA 0.2, and HEPES 10, pH 7.2 (285/295 mOsm). All membrane potential values obtained with this solution were corrected for the junction potential of −11 mV. TheI–V relationship of the 1,1-dimethyl-4-phenyl-piperazinium iodide (DMPP)-induced currents was measured with an internal solution containing (in mm): CsGluconate 117, CsCl 12, HEPES 10, EGTA 0.2, and MgCl2 3, pH 7.2. The firing behavior of the neurons was tested by applying depolarizing current pulses at a membrane potential of −71 mV. Action potential discharges were recorded using the current-clamp fast mode of the Axopatch 200A amplifier (Axon instruments, Foster City, CA). Only cells with a resting membrane potential more negative than −50 mV were analyzed. In current-clamp and voltage-clamp experiments, the signals were filtered, respectively, at 5 and 1 kHz, digitized at 10–20 kHz, saved to a personal computer, and analyzed off-line with Acquis1 software (Gérard Sadoc, Gif/Yvette, France). The series resistance was not compensated but was monitored throughout the experiments. DMPP (100–500 μm) and acetylcholine (100 μm) in ACSF were applied by pressure from a large pipette onto the recorded neuron. All reported values are expressed as the mean ± SD of the mean. Antagonists were added directly to the bathing solution.
At the end of the recording, the content of the cell was aspirated under visual control into the recording pipette and expelled into a test tube, where reverse transcription (RT) was performed in a final volume of 10 μl (Lambolez et al., 1992). The two steps of multiplex PCR were performed essentially as described previously (Ruano et al., 1995). The cDNAs present in 10 μl of the reverse transcription reaction were first amplified simultaneously using the primer pairs described previously (Cauli et al., 1997). Taqpolymerase (2.5 U; Perkin-Elmer, Emeryville, CA) and 10 pmol of each of the primers were added to the buffer supplied by the manufacturer (final volume of 100 μl), and 20 cycles (94°C, 30 sec; 60°C, 30 sec; 72°C, 35 sec) of PCR were run. Second rounds of PCR were then performed using 2 μl of the first PCR product as template. In this second round, each cDNA was individually amplified using its specific primer pair by performing 35 PCR cycles. Each individual PCR reaction (10 μl) was then run on a 1.5% agarose gel using Φx174 digested by HaeIII as molecular weight markers and stained with ethidium bromide. To identify the PCR products, PCR-generated fragments obtained from each cell were transferred onto Hybond N+ (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL). The Southern blots were probed with specific oligonucleotides (Cauli et al., 1997) using the ECL 3′-oligo labeling and detection kit (Amersham) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
To amplify the neuronal nicotinic receptor subunits by RT-multiplex PCR, the two steps of PCR were performed as described above using the following sets of primers (from 5′ to 3′, the numbers in brackets indicate the initial and final positions of the PCR primers): α2 (GenBank accession number L10077): sense [158–175], antisense [440–457]; α3 (GenBank accession number L32621): sense [44–66], antisense [242–264]; α4 (GenBank accession number L31620): sense [347–366], antisense [591–611]; α5 (GenBank accession numberJ05231): sense [1203–1222], antisense [1470–1493]; α6 (GenBank accession number L08227): sense [127–148], antisense [474–493]; α7 (GenBank accession number L31619): sense [36–53], antisense [385–404]; β2 (GenBank accession number L31622): sense [197–215], antisense [504–522]; β3 (GenBank accession numberJ04636): sense [220–239], antisense [539–559]; and β4: sense CTGCTATGAAGGGGTGAACATT, antisense CCGTCCTCCGTCC TGGG.
The predicted sizes of the PCR products were (in base pairs) α2 (300), α3 (221), α4 (265), α5 (291), α6 (367), α7 (369), β2 (326), β3 (340), and β4 (347). The efficiency of this RT-multiplex PCR protocol was tested on 2 ng of whole-brain total RNA (see Fig. 4A). The identity of the PCR-generated fragments were confirmed by restriction analysis (data not shown) and by Southern blot analysis (data not shown) using the following set of specific sense oligoprobes labeled with AlkPhos Direct labeling and detection kit (Amersham) according to manufacturer’s instructions (from 5′ to 3′, the numbers in brackets indicate the initial and final positions of the oligoprobes): α3, [ 112–132]; α4, [ 511–532]; α5, [ 1294–1315]; α7, [ 123–134]; and β2, [ 477–468]. Genomic DNA amplifications, which sometimes occurred when the nucleus was harvested, could be easily differentiated from cDNA amplification by a size criterion. Indeed, for each primer pair, the sense and antisense primers were positioned on two different exons.
6-Cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX) and 2-amino-5-phosphonovalerate (d-APV) were obtained from Tocris Cookson (Bristol, UK). Picrotoxin, atropine, mecamylamine, and DMPP were obtained from Sigma (St Louis, MO). Acetylcholine, methyllycaconitine (MLA), and dihydro-β-erythroidine were obtained from Research Biochemicals (Natick, MA).
RESULTS
Selective nicotinic excitation of subtypes of neocortical interneurons
To identify the neuronal targets of nicotine, pyramidal neurons and interneurons in rat neocortical slices were first visually identified with infrared video microscopy, recorded in whole-cell configuration, and classified as irregular-spiking (IS) interneurons, regular-spiking nonpyramidal (RSNP) neurons, fast-spiking (FS) interneurons, or pyramidal neurons according to their action potential firing behavior (McCormick et al., 1985; Kawaguchi, 1995; Cauli et al., 1997) (Fig. 1A–E,left column). Then, the sensitivity of these different types of neocortical neurons to the local pressure application of the selective nicotinic cholinergic receptor agonist DMPP (100–500 μm) was tested.
Distinct electrophysiologically identified types of neocortical interneurons are excited by nicotinic receptor stimulation. The current-clamp recordings shown in the left column of each panel illustrate the voltage responses exhibited by an IS interneuron (A), two RSNP interneurons (B, C), an FS interneuron (D), and a pyramidal neuron (E) in response to hyperpolarizing and depolarizing current injections. The arrowhead inA denotes the presence of low-threshold Ca2+ spikes. In the right column of each panel are the responses of the same five neurons to the local pressure application of 100 μm DMPP (1 sec). Action potentials in the right column are truncated because of the sampling rate. The arrows indicate the beginning of the DMPP applications. The membrane potentials were adjusted to −71 mV.
In response to depolarizing pulses of current, IS interneurons typically exhibited an initial burst of action potentials, followed by discharges of action potentials at an irregular frequency (Fig.1A, left). The majority of IS interneurons (77%; 17 of 22) were depolarized by DMPP sufficiently to reach action potential threshold and fired bursts of spikes (Fig.1A, right). As shown in the example, some IS interneurons (4 of 22 neurons) exhibited low-threshold Ca2+ spikes at the end of a hyperpolarizing current pulse (Fig. 1A, arrowhead).
RSNP neurons exhibited continuous discharges of action potentials with varying amounts of frequency adaptation accompanied by decreases in action potential amplitude (Fig.1B,C). Within our sample of RSNP neurons, 63 of 100 interneurons responded to the nicotinic agonist (Fig. 1B, right), whereas 37% did not respond (Fig. 1C, right). The majority of the DMPP-sensitive RSNP interneurons (94%; 59 of 63) did not exhibit low-threshold Ca2+ spikes.
FS interneurons were characterized by their fast action potentials discharged at high frequencies with little frequency adaptation or decrease in action potential amplitude (Fig. 1D,left). The majority (92%; 12 of 13) of FS interneurons were not affected by the application of DMPP (Fig. 1D,right).
The majority of these interneurons were recorded in layers II/III of the motor cortex. Twenty-two interneurons (7 FS and 15 RSNP neurons) were analyzed in layer V, among which only three RSNP neurons responded to DMPP.
Pyramidal neurons typically fired action potentials of longer duration, lower frequency, and with more frequency adaptation than interneurons (Fig. 1E, left). Consistent with previous reports (Vidal and Changeux, 1993; Gil et al., 1997), none of the pyramidal neurons (n = 12) recorded in layers II/III and V were directly depolarized by the application of DMPP. Although, DMPP induced a slight depolarization of some pyramidal neurons, these responses were blocked by glutamatergic and GABAergic receptor antagonists (see below), indicating that they were a result of presynaptic effects of DMPP (Fig. 1E,right). These results indicate that IS interneurons and a subpopulation of RSNP neurons are selectively activated by nicotinic stimulation.
Neocortical interneurons excited by nicotinic receptor stimulation express VIP and CCK
Neocortical interneurons can also be classified by the presence of the three calcium-binding proteins calretinin, calbindin, and parvalbumin, and the four neuropeptides VIP, somatostatin, CCK, and neuropeptide Y (Kubota et al., 1994; Kawaguchi, 1995; Cauli et al., 1997). Ninety-six interneurons (12 FS, 13 IS, and 71 RSNP neurons) that had been tested for sensitivity to DMPP were analyzed by single-cell RT-PCR to detect the presence of mRNAs encoding the above calcium binding proteins and neuropeptides, as well as the two isoforms of the GABA-synthesizing enzyme, glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65 and GAD67) (Cauli et al., 1997). The agarose gels of the RT-PCR products for the two RSNP neurons described in Figure 1, Band C, are shown in Figure 2,A and B, respectively. GAD65 and GAD67 mRNAs were detected in both interneurons. The RSNP neuron that was excited by DMPP also expressed VIP, CCK, and calretinin mRNAs (Fig.2A). In contrast, the mRNAs for somatostatin, neuropeptide Y, calbindin, and calretinin were detected in the DMPP-insensitive neuron (Fig. 2B). All 96 neocortical interneurons examined expressed one or both isoforms of GAD, indicating that they were inhibitory interneurons. Eighty-one of the interneurons analyzed by single-cell RT-PCR were in layers II/III, and 15 interneurons were in layer V. In the population of DMPP-sensitive interneurons (9 IS, 1 FS, and 48 RSNP neurons), the most widely detected markers were VIP and CCK, which were expressed, respectively, by 51 and 45 of the 58 interneurons (Fig. 2C). VIP and CCK were coexpressed in 41 of the interneurons. In contrast, VIP and CCK were only detected in 8 and 15 of the 38 DMPP-insensitive interneurons (Fig. 2D). The majority of the insensitive interneurons expressed calbindin (26 neurons) and somatostatin (27 neurons). Therefore, the majority of the two populations of interneurons excited by nicotinic agonists, IS neurons and a fraction of RSNP neurons, coexpressed VIP and CCK.
The majority of neocortical interneurons excited by nicotinic receptor stimulation coexpress VIP and CCK.A, B, Agarose gels of the PCR products obtained from the two RSNP interneurons described in Figure 1,B and C, respectively. The two interneurons expressed GAD65, GAD67, and calretinin (CR) mRNAs. The cell shown in A also expressed VIP and CCK, whereas the cell in B expressed calbindin (CB), neuropeptide Y (NPY), and somatostatin (SS). Neither of these two cells expressed parvalbumin (PV). The identity of all products was confirmed by Southern blot analysis. C,D, These graphs illustrate the percentage of DMPP-sensitive (n = 58) and DMPP-insensitive (n = 38) interneurons that expressed each of the markers detected by single-cell RT-PCR. The number of interneurons in each group is given in parentheses above thebars. The filled portions indicate the fraction of interneurons in each group that coexpressed VIP.
Direct stimulation of somatodendritic nicotinic receptors
To confirm that the responses to DMPP were caused by the direct activation of the interneurons and not by presynaptic effects of nicotinic receptor stimulation, the AMPA/kainate receptor antagonist CNQX (10 μm), the NMDA receptor antagonistd-APV (50 μm), the GABAA receptor antagonist picrotoxin (100 μm), and the muscarinic receptor antagonist atropine (5 μm) were added to the bathing solution. In the presence these receptor antagonists, 100 μm DMPP still depolarized neocortical interneurons sufficiently to discharge action potentials (data not shown) and, in voltage-clamp experiments, the currents induced by DMPP exhibited an inward rectification at depolarized potentials, with no current being detected at positive potentials (n = 5) (Fig.3A). The DMPP-mediated currents also persisted when synaptic transmission was blocked with a bathing solution containing 0.5 mm Ca2+, 4 mm Mg2+, and 1 μmtetrodotoxin (n = 3; data not shown). These results indicate that the nicotinic receptor agonist directly activated the neocortical interneurons, probably through the stimulation of somatodendritic nicotinic receptors.
Rectification and pharmacology of responses to nicotinic receptor activation in neocortical interneurons.A, In voltage clamp, 100 μm DMPP induced inward currents (inset) in an interneuron with a peakI–V relationship that showed inward rectification.B, The currents induced by 100 μm DMPP in an interneuron were antagonized by 500 nmdihydro-β-erythroidine (DHβE). After washing out dihydro-β-erythroidine, the DMPP-induced current partially recovered (Wash) and was almost abolished by 2 μmmecamylamine (MEC). The arrows indicate the beginning of the 1 sec pressure applications of DMPP.C, The DMPP-induced current in a neocortical interneuron (Control) was only slightly reduced by the application of 10 nm MLA. The remaining current was almost completely abolished by 500 nm dihydro-β-erythroidine (DHβE). D, In current clamp, the application of 100 μm acetylcholine (Ach) depolarized an interneuron and induced a discharge of action potentials. Action potentials are truncated because of the sampling rate. E, In the same interneuron recorded in voltage clamp, acetylcholine induced an inward current (Control,bottom trace) that was blocked by 500 nmdihydro-β-erythroidine (DHβE, top trace). All responses (A–E) were recorded in the presence of glutamatergic, GABAergic, and muscarinic receptor antagonists (see Results).
Interneuronal responses are mediated by non-α7 nicotinic receptors
Because neuronal nicotinic responses mediated by receptors containing and lacking the α7 subunit are pharmacologically distinct, we examined the sensitivity of the nicotinic responses to the nicotinic receptor antagonists dihydro-β-erythroidine, mecamylamine, and MLA. Both dihydro-β-erythroidine and mecamylamine selectively block non-α7 nicotinic receptor, whereas MLA selectively blocks α7 nicotinic receptors (Alkondon and Albuquerque, 1993; Palma et al., 1996; Zoli et al., 1998). Perfusion of either dihydro-β-erythroidine (500 nm) or mecamylamine (2 μm) antagonized the currents mediated by 100 μm DMPP by an average of 80 ± 17 (n = 17) and 90 ± 7% (n = 14), respectively (Fig. 3B). In contrast, perfusion of MLA (10 nm) reduced the currents by only 30 ± 5% (n = 3). The remaining MLA-insensitive currents were sensitive to 500 nmdihydro-β-erythroidine (84 ± 16% block; n = 3) (Fig. 3C). The endogenous nicotinic receptor agonist acetylcholine (100 μm) also activated neocortical interneurons (n = 6), and the pharmacological profile of these responses was similar to that of DMPP-induced currents (Fig.3C). On the average, 86 ± 8% of the currents evoked by acetylcholine were reversibly antagonized by 500 nmdihydro-β-erythroidine (n = 5) (Fig. 3D), whereas 10 nm MLA reduced the currents by only 22 ± 2% (n = 3). These results indicated that DMPP and acetylcholine directly excite neocortical interneurons mainly through the activation of nicotinic receptors lacking the α7 subunit.
Nicotinic receptors subunits expressed by responsive interneurons
The nicotinic receptor subunits expressed in the rat neocortex are α3, α4, α5, α7 and β2 (Wada et al., 1989, 1990). Because various combinations of these subunits have been shown to form functional non-α7 nicotinic receptors (Papke et al., 1989; Boulter et al., 1990; Papke, 1993; Ramirez-Latorre et al., 1996), single-cell RT-PCR was used to determine which of these subunits were expressed in 17 interneurons that responded to DMPP. Consistent with the pharmacological data, single-cell RT-PCR analysis indicated that most of the interneurons that were excited by nicotinic agonists expressed the mRNAs for α4, α5, and β2 (Fig.4B,C). In contrast, the majority (10 of 17 interneurons) of the DMPP-sensitive neocortical interneurons did not express α7 subunits. Consistent within situ hybridization studies (Wada et al., 1989; 1990; Lena and Changeux, 1997), the mRNAs encoding α2, α6, β3, and β4 were not detected in any of the interneurons. The mRNAs encoding the nine nicotinic receptor subunits, however, could be simultaneously detected in 2 ng of total brain RNA (Fig. 4A).
Nicotinic receptor subunits expressed by neocortical interneurons sensitive to DMPP. A, Agarose gel electrophoresis of the products obtained from 2 mg of total brain RNA by an RT-PCR procedure designed to coamplify simultaneously the mRNAs encoding the α2, α3, α4, α5, α6, α7, β2, β3, and β4 subunits of nicotinic receptors. All nine nicotinic receptor subunits were detected. The faint bands in theβ2 and β3 lanes correspond to nonspecific amplifications. B, Agarose gel electrophoresis of the PCR products obtained from an RSNP interneuron that responded to DMPP applications in the presence of glutamatergic, GABAergic, and muscarinic receptor antagonists. Only the α4, α5, and β2 subunits were detected in this interneuron. Thefaint and heavy bands in theα2 and β2 lanes correspond to nonspecific amplifications. The identity of the PCR products was confirmed by Southern blot analysis. C, Number of DMPP-sensitive interneurons in which the mRNAs for the nicotinic receptor subunits were detected by single-cell RT-PCR (n = 17). Note that the majority of the tested interneurons expressed α4, α5, and β2 subunits.
DISCUSSION
Our results demonstrate that nicotinic agonists selectively excite two types of physiologically identified neocortical interneurons, IS and RSNP interneurons, both of which coexpress VIP and CCK. Unlike presynaptic nicotinic receptors modulating glutamate release in cortical areas (McGehee et al., 1995; Gil et al., 1997), nicotinic receptors located on the soma and/or the dendrites of neocortical VIP interneurons lack the α7 subunit.
Expression of functional non-α7 nicotinic receptors in the neocortex
Previous in situ hybridization studies indicate that α3, α4, α5, α7, and β2 subunits are expressed in the rat neocortex (Wada et al., 1989, 1990). The neocortical interneurons excited by nicotinic receptor stimulation predominately expressed the mRNAs for the α4, α5, and β2 subunits. Although the α7 subunit was detected in some of the VIPergic interneurons excited by DMPP, the majority of the responsive interneurons did not express this subunit. Accordingly, the pharmacological profile of the nicotinic responses was typical of non-α7 nicotinic receptors. The nicotinic currents in the neocortical interneurons were only slightly reduced by MLA, the selective antagonist of α7 nicotinic receptors (Palma et al., 1996). On the other hand, the responses to DMPP were blocked by dihydro-β-erythroidine and mecamylamine, two selective antagonists of non-α7 nicotinic receptors (Alkondon and Albuquerque, 1993; Zoli et al., 1998). Thus, the molecular and pharmacological data indicate that the nicotinic excitation of VIPergic interneurons is mediated by nicotinic receptors composed of α4, α5, and β2 subunits. In heterologous expression systems, functional channels are formed by the coexpression of α4 and β2 subunits (Papke et al., 1989; Boulter et al., 1990; Cooper et al., 1991; Luetje and Patrick, 1991; Papke, 1993) or by the coexpression of α4, α5, and β2 subunits (Ramirez-Latorre et al., 1996). The addition of the α5 subunit to channels composed of α4 and β2 increases the conductance of the channels (Ramirez-Latorre et al., 1996). In contrast, the expression of either of the three subunits alone, the coexpression of α4 and α5 subunits, or the coexpression of α5 and β2 subunits (Boulter et al., 1990; Ramirez-Latorre et al., 1996) does not form functional nicotinic receptors. Thus, the responsive interneurons apparently contain nicotinic receptors composed of α4 and β2 subunits and/or α4, α5, and β2 subunits.
Selective expression of postsynaptic nicotinic receptors by interneurons in cortical areas
Our results, together with previous observations (Vidal and Changeux, 1993; Jones and Yakel, 1997; Frazier et al., 1998; Xiang et al., 1998), suggest that somatodendritic nicotinic receptors are selectively expressed by interneurons and not by pyramidal neurons in the rat neocortex and hippocampus. There are, however, several differences in the expression of nicotinic receptors in the two structures. In the hippocampus, almost all of the interneurons tested responded to nicotinic stimulation apparently through α7-containing nicotinic receptors (Jones and Yakel, 1997; Frazier et al., 1998). In contrast, in the neocortex, only VIP- and CCK-expressing interneurons responded to nicotinic stimulation, and this excitation was mediated by the activation of non-α7 nicotinic receptors. A recent report indicates that, in the visual cortex, interneurons exhibiting low-threshold Ca2+ spikes are excited by nicotinic stimulation, whereas FS interneurons are insensitive to nicotinic stimulation (Xiang et al., 1998). Because the majority (90%; 77 of 85) of the neocortical interneurons excited by nicotinic stimulation in the present study did not exhibit low-threshold Ca2+spikes, the presence of low-threshold Ca2+ spikes does not appear to be the best marker of nicotinic-sensitive interneurons in the motor cortex. Finally, the expression of nicotinic receptors in the neocortex may differ among species, because in the ferret neocortex both pyramidal neurons and interneurons have been shown to express functional nicotinic receptors (Roerig et al., 1997).
Potential implications of nicotinic receptor-mediated excitation of interneurons expressing VIP and CCK
Nicotinic receptors are important for maintaining performance in a variety of cognitive tasks involving cortical areas (Changeux et al., 1998). In the neocortex, functional postsynaptic nicotinic receptors are selectively expressed by a subpopulation of interneurons coexpressing VIP and CCK. We and others have shown previously that VIP is expressed by subsets of bipolar and bitufted neocortical interneurons (Eckenstein and Baughman, 1984; Morrison et al., 1984;Cauli et al., 1997; Porter et al., 1998) and immunocytochemical data also indicates that CCK is often co-expressed with VIP in these interneurons (Papadopoulos et al., 1987; Kubota and Kawaguchi, 1997). Given the primarily columnarly restricted axonal arbors of interneurons expressing VIP and CCK (Hendry et al., 1983; Connor and Peters, 1984;Magistretti et al., 1984; Kawaguchi and Kubota, 1996; Porter et al., 1998), nicotinic receptor-mediated stimulation of these interneurons may provide a selective increase in the columnar inhibition involved in neocortical information processing (Xiang et al., 1998).
In addition, several lines of evidence suggest that VIP-expressing interneurons are involved in the regulation of regional cerebral blood flow and metabolism in the neocortex (Itakura et al., 1987; Yaksh et al., 1987; Magistretti, 1990). First, VIP-containing neuronal fibers are intimately associated with the intracortical blood vessels (Eckenstein and Baughman, 1984; Chédotal et al., 1994a, 1994b). Second, the application of VIP induces a dilatation of pial arteries (Yaksh et al., 1987). Third, the injection of VIP into the cortex increase the cerebral blood flow (Itakura et al., 1987). Fourth, VIP activates glycogenolysis in neocortical slices (Magistretti et al., 1981). Therefore, the nicotinic excitation of VIPergic interneurons reported in this study may be critical for locally increasing the energy supply in the neocortex during periods of increased neuronal activity. Furthermore, disorders in this homeostatic mechanism for balancing the energy supply with the energy demand may be involved in diseases associated with cholinergic deficits, as indicated by the finding that there is a decrease in cerebral glucose utilization and blood flow in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (Eberling et al., 1992; Swerdlow et al., 1994) that can be reversed by increasing cholinergic excitation (Wilson et al., 1991; Parks et al., 1996). The high level of expression of α5 subunits in VIP interneurons may confer a unique pharmacological profile to their nicotinic receptors (Yu and Role, 1998) that could be used to selectively excite this class of neocortical interneurons.
Footnotes
This work was supported by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and European Union Biotech Grants 960382 and 960589. J.T.P. was supported by a Human Frontier Science Program Organization fellowship. We thank Serge Charpak and Shaul Hestrin for insightful discussions, Samia Ben Ammou for technical assistance, and Elodie Christophe for her help during some experiments.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Etienne Audinat, Neurobiologie et Diversité Cellulaire, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7637, Ecole Supérieure de Physique et de Chimie Industrielles, 10 rue Vauquelin, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France.
Dr. Porter’s present address: Department of Anatomy, Box 9128, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506-9128.