Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
ARTICLE

Enhancement of AMPA-Mediated Current after Traumatic Injury in Cortical Neurons

Paulette B. Goforth, Earl F. Ellis and Leslie S. Satin
Journal of Neuroscience 1 September 1999, 19 (17) 7367-7374; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-17-07367.1999
Paulette B. Goforth
1Departments of Pharmacology/Toxicology and Physiology, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Earl F. Ellis
1Departments of Pharmacology/Toxicology and Physiology, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leslie S. Satin
1Departments of Pharmacology/Toxicology and Physiology, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Overactivation of ionotropic glutamate receptors has been implicated in the pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury. Using an in vitro cell injury model, we examined the effects of stretch-induced traumatic injury on the AMPA subtype of ionotropic glutamate receptors in cultured neonatal cortical neurons. Recordings made using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique revealed that a subpopulation of injured neurons exhibited an increased current in response to AMPA. The current–voltage relationship of these injured neurons showed an increased slope conductance but no change in reversal potential compared with uninjured neurons. Additionally, the EC50 values of uninjured and injured neurons were nearly identical. Thus, current potentiation was not caused by changes in the voltage-dependence, ion selectivity, or apparent agonist affinity of the AMPA channel. AMPA-elicited current could also be fully inhibited by the application of selective AMPA receptor antagonists, thereby excluding the possibility that current potentiation in injured neurons was caused by the activation of other, nondesensitizing receptors. The difference in current densities between control and injured neurons was abolished when AMPA receptor desensitization was inhibited by the coapplication of AMPA and cyclothiazide or by the use of kainate as an agonist, suggesting that mechanical injury alters AMPA receptor desensitization. Reduction of AMPA receptor desensitization after brain injury would be expected to further exacerbate the effects of increased postinjury extracellular glutamate and contribute to trauma-related cell loss and dysfunctional synaptic information processing.

  • glutamate
  • traumatic brain injury
  • AMPA receptor
  • desensitization
  • excitotoxicity
  • cortex

It is commonly accepted that secondary or delayed neuronal damage after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is triggered, in part, by a disruption of ionic homeostasis. Substantial evidence implicates the activation of ionotropic glutamate receptors as a component of the biochemical cascade leading to abnormal neuronal function and secondary neuronal damage (Hayes et al., 1988;Faden et al., 1989; Bernert and Turski, 1996; Turski et al., 1998). Activation of ionotropic glutamate receptor channels, classified as NMDA receptors, kainate receptors, and AMPA receptors (Mayer and Westbrook, 1987; Collingridge and Lester, 1989), results in Na + and K+ flux through all three receptor–channel subtypes, as well as Ca2+ influx via NMDA channels and certain subtypes of AMPA channels (Iino et al., 1990). Overactivation of NMDA and non-NMDA glutamate receptors results in neuronal injury and cell death in vitro (Rothman and Olney, 1986; Choi, 1987; Choi et al., 1987; Koh et al., 1990). Thus, excitotoxicity has been suggested as a contributing factor in the secondary pathology of TBI. This is supported by evidence demonstrating that extracellular glutamate levels are elevated after neurotrauma in vivo (Katayama et al., 1990; Palmer et al., 1993; Zauner et al., 1996), which would provide an abundant source of stimulatory agonist with which to activate these receptors. Furthermore, the administration of glutamate receptor antagonists before or after injury has been found to be neuroprotective in different models of neurotrauma, further supporting the excitotoxicity hypothesis (Hayes et al., 1988; Faden et al., 1989;Bernert and Turski, 1996; Turski et al., 1998).

In addition to the possibility that trauma-induced elevations in excitatory amino acids may excessively stimulate glutamate receptors, we previously found that mechanical deformation of cells can also directly alter the properties of glutamate receptors (Zhang et al., 1996). Using a unique in vitro cell injury model (Ellis et al., 1995), we found a reduction of the voltage-dependent Mg2+ blockade of NMDA channels in mechanically injured neurons, which in turn led to elevated intracellular [Ca2+]i levels when these cells were challenged with exogenous NMDA (Zhang et al., 1996). In the current study, we used this cell injury model to examine the effects of mechanical injury on AMPA receptors. We report that mechanical injury also directly altered the AMPA receptors of cultured neonatal neurons, producing an enhancement of AMPA-mediated current that appears to be caused by decreased AMPA receptor desensitization. As for stretch-induced changes in NMDA receptors, this alteration would be expected to exacerbate the activation of glutamatergic receptors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell culture. Primary cultures of neuronal plus glial cells were prepared as described by McKinney et al. (1996) and used for all experiments. After decapitation, neocortices were isolated from 1- to 2-d-old Sprague Dawley rats (Zivic-Miller, Allison Park, PA). The neocortices were minced in saline, trypsinized (0.125%) for 10 min at 37°C, and then transferred to culture medium (DMEM containing 4.5 gm/l glucose supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/l streptomycin, and 2 mm,l-glutamine. The tissue was washed and dispersed by a series of triturations through Pasteur pipettes of decreasing diameter. The suspension was centrifuged for 10 min at 200 ×g. The pellet was removed, culture media was added, and the suspension was triturated twice. The final suspension was filtered using an 88 μm nylon sieve and diluted with DMEM. Cells were plated at a density of 106 per well on collagen-coated SILASTIC (Dow Corning, Midland, MI) membranes that formed the bottom of a six-well Flex plate (Flexcell International, McKeesport, PA). Cell cultures were incubated at 37°C in 95% air–5% CO2. After 2–3 d, culture medium was replaced with growth medium (DMEM, 30 mm glucose, 100 U/ml, 100 μg/ml penicillin/streptomycin, and 5% horse serum; no mitotic inhibitors were added). Cells were fed twice weekly and used after 10–16 d in vitro (DIV). The cultures consisted of neuronal and glial cells, which formed a confluent layer at 10–16 DIV.

Cell injury. Cells bathed in growth medium were injured as described by Ellis et al. (1995) with a model 94A cell injury controller (Commonwealth Biotechnology, Richmond, VA) at room temperature. A 50 msec pulse of compressed nitrogen deformed the SILASTIC membrane by 5.7 mm corresponding to a 31% stretch of the membrane and attached cells. This perturbation simulated mild, sublethal injury. After injury, cells were washed three times, and growth medium was replaced with external recording solution (see below). Control cells were treated identically with the exception that no injury was delivered. Experiments were performed from 10 min to 7 hr after injury, with the majority of recordings occurring between 30 min and 3.5 hr after injury.

Electrophysiology. Whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings were made with an Axopatch-1D amplifier (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA). Patch electrodes (4–12 MΩ) were pulled from borosilicate glass capillaries (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL) using a Flaming/Brown micropipette puller (Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA). Pyramidal neurons were visualized using an Olympus Opticals (Tokyo, Japan) IMT-2 inverted microscope. Currents were digitized using a Macintosh Centris 800 (Apple Computer, Cupertino, CA) or Motorola (Phoenix, AZ) StarMax 3000/180 equipped with an Instrutech (Great Neck, NY) ITC-16 computer interface and Pulse Control (Herrington and Bookman, 1994) and Igor (Wavemetrics, Lake Oswego, OR) software. Recordings were filtered at 1 kHz and digitized at 2–5 kHz. Data were stored on video cassette recorder tape using an Instrutech VR-10-B digital data recorder. Statistics are expressed as mean ± SEM. During voltage-clamp experiments, cells were maintained at a holding potential of −40 mV (−47 mV with correction for the liquid junction potential), and current–voltage (I–V) relationships were generated using a voltage ramp (−100 to +40 mV; 22.6 mV/sec). Measurements of membrane potential have been corrected for the liquid junction potential (7 mV). Capacitance was calculated by integrating the transient current response to a small hyperpolarizing voltage step. For voltage-clamp experiments, patch electrodes were filled with a solution containing (in mm): CsAsp 135, KCl 4, NaCl 2, EGTA 10, CaCl2 0.2, MgATP 2, NaGTP 0.6, and HEPES 10, pH 7.2. The external recording solution contained (in mm): NaCl 130, KCl 4, CaCl23, MgCl2 2, HEPES 10, glucose 11, and TTX 0.0005, pH 7.3. The osmolarity of these solutions was 285 mOsm. For current-clamp experiments, patch electrodes were filled with a solution containing (in mm): Kasp 135, KCl 5, NaCl 2, MgCl2 2, EGTA 1, CaCl2 0.2, and HEPES 10, pH 7.2. The external recording solution contained (in mm): NaCl 130, KCl 5, CaCl23, MgCl2 2, and HEPES 10, pH 7.2. The osmolarity of these solutions was 291 mOsm. Drugs used were AMPA, kainate, l-glutamic acid, andd(−)-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (d-APV) (Research Biochemicals, Natick, MA), 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX) (Tocris Cookson, Ballwin, MO), cyclothiazide (CTZ) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), and LY303070 (gift from Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN). AMPA, kainate, glutamate, andd-APV were dissolved in saline. CNQX, CTZ, and LY303070 were dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (final concentration 0.1 or 0.5%). All drugs were prepared as stock solutions (5–30 mm) and stored frozen. Solution changes were made with the use of a SF-77 Perfusion Fast-Step (Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT). Three adjacent square glass capillary tubes (600 μm width) were mounted on a manipulator and positioned within 100 μm of the neuronal cell body. Control and drug solutions were perfused through adjacent capillaries from independent reservoirs. Solutions were exchanged by laterally shifting the capillary tubes over the cell. Cells were continuously perfused with bath-applied standard external solution at a rate of 2.5 ml/min. All recordings were performed at room temperature.

RESULTS

A cell injury device delivered mechanical strain to 10-to 16-d-old rat cortical neurons cultured on a deformable SILASTIC membrane. A 50 msec pulse of compressed air deformed the membrane 5.7 mm, which corresponds to 31% stretch and simulates mild-to-moderate sublethal injury (Ellis et al., 1995). Using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique (Hamill et al., 1981), agonist-activated currents were recorded from control and injured pyramidal neurons. Drugs were locally applied using a rapid application system. Under these conditions, sustained application of 100 μm AMPA elicited whole-cell currents with both desensitizing and steady-state components in uninjured neurons (Fig. 1a). Rapid and profound desensitization is a characteristic of AMPA receptors and has been demonstrated in a variety of cell types after application of selective agonists (Kiskin et al., 1986; Trussell et al., 1988; Tang et al., 1989). After mechanical injury, 33.9% of the injured neurons displayed a marked increase in peak and steady-state AMPA current amplitude and either an apparent reduction or a complete loss of AMPA receptor desensitization (Fig. 1a). Mean steady-state current amplitudes increased from 180.8 ± 20.7 pA (n = 39) to 411.7 ± 43.8 (n = 59;p < 0.0001) pA for control and injured neurons, respectively. To determine whether these differences were caused by differences in cell size, currents were normalized by cell capacitance and expressed as current densities. Mean cell capacitance did not differ significantly between control and injured neurons: 49.8 ± 2.9 (n = 39) versus 57.0 ± 3.0 (n= 59; p > 0.05) pF. However, mean steady-state current density nearly doubled after mechanical injury: 6.8 ± 0.6 (n = 59) versus 3.6 ± 0.3 (n = 39; p < 0.0001) pA/pF.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Mechanical injury potentiates AMPA-elicited whole-cell current. a, Representative patch-clamp recordings of whole-cell currents elicited by the application of 100 μm AMPA (filled bar) for an uninjured neuron (left) and a stretch-injured neuron (right). Cells were voltage-clamped at −40 mV. Note differences in the scales used. The control neuron displayed both desensitizing and steady-state current components. In contrast, the injured neuron displayed increased current amplitude, as well as an apparent loss of desensitization. b, A subpopulation of injured neurons exhibit altered AMPA channel function in response to mechanical injury. Whole-cell currents were normalized by cell capacitance and expressed as current densities. Amplitude histograms of AMPA-elicited whole-cell steady-state current densities in uninjured neurons (left) and stretch-injured neurons (right). Mean steady-state current densities were 3.6 ± 0.3 pA/pF (n = 39) for uninjured neurons and 6.8 ± 0.6 pA/pF (n = 59) for injured neurons ( p < 0.0001; Student’st test). A subpopulation of stretch-injured neurons possessed steady-state current densities of 8 pA/pF; this is greater than two SDs from the mean steady-state current density of control neurons.

As shown in amplitude histograms of the steady-state AMPA current densities measured in control and injured cells (Fig. 1b), there was an enhancement of AMPA-activated current in a subpopulation of neurons after injury. We identified potentiated neurons as injured neurons possessing a steady-state current density of 8 pA/pF. This current density is greater than two SDs from the mean steady-state current density of control neurons. Potentiated injured neurons did not display any striking morphological differences at the light microscope level when compared with control or nonpotentiated injured neurons having control-type AMPA channels. The expression of AMPA channel alteration also did not appear to be influenced by the location of the cell on the SILASTIC substrate or by cell size. The mean cell capacitance of potentiated injured neurons (58.4 ± 4.4 pF; n = 20) did not differ significantly from either nonpotentiated injured neurons (56.3 ± 3.6 pF; n = 39) or control neurons (49.8 ± 2.9 pF ; n = 39; p > 0.05; ANOVA). There was no correlation between cell capacitance and steady-state AMPA current densities. The development of AMPA channel alteration did not appear to be time-dependent because there was no striking correlation between the time elapsed after injury and whether a cell displayed potentiated AMPA-elicited currents.

We next examined whether the potentiation of AMPA-elicited currents in injured neurons was mediated exclusively by AMPA receptors or whether it could reflect an enhanced contribution of non-AMPA receptor channels to the whole-cell current after injury. Although AMPA is mostly selective for the AMPA receptor, it may also act as a weak agonist for kainate receptors (Herb et al., 1992). We thus tested the sensitivity of AMPA-elicited currents to LY303070, a highly selective noncompetitive AMPA receptor antagonist to discriminate between AMPA and kainate receptor-mediated responses to AMPA (Bleakman et al., 1996). As shown in Figure 2, 30 μm LY303070 completely inhibited whole-cell steady-state currents activated by 100 μm AMPA in both control and injured neurons. Similar results were obtained with 50 μmCNQX, a competitive antagonist of non-NMDA ionotropic glutamate receptors (Honoré et al., 1988), which produced 86–100% inhibition of AMPA-elicited currents. These findings show that the steady-state currents activated by AMPA in cortical neurons are primarily, if not entirely, caused by the activation of AMPA receptors and not a separate pool of nondesensitizing receptors, including kainate receptors.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Potentiated current is completely inhibited by AMPA receptor antagonists. Representative patch-clamp recordings of whole-cell currents elicited by the application of 100 μmAMPA (filled bar), followed by 100 μm AMPA and 30 μm LY303070 (open bar) in an uninjured neuron (left) and potentiated stretch-injured neuron (right). Cells were voltage-clamped to −40 mV. LY303070 (30 μm) completely inhibited AMPA-mediated currents in both the uninjured and injured neurons.

We next investigated whether stretch injury increased the affinity of the AMPA receptor for AMPA, which could conceivably account for the enhanced current density observed after injury. As expected, concentration–response relationships for control and potentiated injured neurons revealed that the maximal steady-state current density, elicited by a saturating concentration of AMPA (100 μm), increased from 2.7 ± 0.7 pA/pF (n = 11) for control neurons to 12.5 ± 1.2 pA/pF (n = 8;p < 0.0001) for potentiated injured neurons (Fig.3). However, there was no significant difference in the AMPA concentration eliciting a half-maximal response in either the control or potentiated stretch-injured neurons. Thus, the EC50 for AMPA was 3.3 ± 0.7 μm (n = 11) for control neurons and 3.1 ± 0.4 μm (n = 8;p > 0.50) for stretch-injured neurons. This suggests that the apparent affinity of active AMPA receptors for AMPA is unaltered by stretch injury and cannot account for the increased current density observed after injury.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Mechanical injury does not alter the EC50 for AMPA. Concentration–response curves for uninjured (filled circles) and potentiated stretch-injured neurons (filled triangles) constructed from measurements of whole-cell steady-state current densities in response to AMPA concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 100 μm. Maximal steady-state current density increased from 2.7 ± 0.7 pA/pF for uninjured neurons (n = 11) to 12.5 ± 1.2 pA/pF for injured neurons (n = 8;p < 0.0001; unpaired Student’s ttest). The EC50 values did not differ significantly between uninjured neurons (3.3 ± 0.7 μm) and injured neurons (3.1 ± 0.4 μm; p > 0.50; unpaired Student’s t test). Inset, Concentration–response relationships have been normalized by the maximal response for each cell. Plotted are the means + SEM.

An additional possibility was that stretch injury increased steady-state current by altering the voltage dependence or ion selectivity of AMPA receptor channels. However, as shown in Figure4, the I–V relationships of control and potentiated injured cells obtained under voltage clamp did not change significantly with injury. Both curves exhibited similar nonrectifying properties, and the mean reversal potential obtained for control neurons (−0.6 ± 3.2 mV; n = 6) did not differ significantly from that for potentiated injured neurons (−0.5 ± 1.4 mV; n = 6; p > 0.10). These results suggest that voltage dependence and ion selectivity are not strikingly altered by stretch injury, but that the whole-cell conductance activated by AMPA is increased by injury.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Mechanical injury does not alter theI–V of the AMPA receptor channel. RepresentativeI–V curves of AMPA-mediated whole-cell currents in uninjured neurons (left) and potentiated stretch-injured neurons (right). Current amplitudes were measured in the presence and absence of 100 μm AMPA as membrane voltage was ramped from −100 to +40 mV (23 mV/sec). AMPA difference currents were normalized with respect to the current measured at −100 mV. Stretch injury did not alter the reversal potential (−0.6 ± 3.2 mV; n = 6; vs −0.5 ± 1.4 mV;n = 6; p > 0.1; control vs injured, respectively) or rectification properties of AMPA-mediated current.

We hypothesized that a change in receptor kinetics, namely a decrease in receptor desensitization, might underlie the potentiation of whole-cell currents in stretch-injured neurons. However, although the rate of AMPA receptor desensitization is known to be extremely rapid, reportedly ranging from 2 to 40 msec in neurons (Kiskin et al., 1986;Trussell et al., 1988; Tang et al., 1989), the speed with which we could apply agonists to our single neurons was limited (>50 msec). Thus, to further explore the role of desensitization using the whole-cell approach, we eliminated fast desensitization by the coapplication of 100 μm AMPA and 100 μmCTZ, a drug that selectively blocks AMPA receptor desensitization (Bertolino et al., 1993). When CTZ was coapplied with AMPA, current density did not differ between control neurons (31.4 ± 6.2 pA/pF;n = 10) and potentiated injured neurons (35.7 ± 6.9 pA/pF; n = 9; p > 0.50). Measurements of whole-cell currents in response to 100 μm AMPA alone, before the addition of CTZ, were recorded in 5 of the 10 control neurons and all 9 injured neurons (Fig.5). In these cells, 100 μm AMPA elicited significantly larger currents in injured neurons (10.6 ± 0.5 pA/pF) compared with control neurons (4.4 ± 0.7 pA/pF;p < 0.0001). However, coapplication of AMPA and CTZ to the same cells abolished the difference observed with AMPA alone, producing current densities of 41.6 ± 10.2 pA/pF (n = 5) and 35.7 ± 6.9 pA/pF (n = 9; p > 0.50) for control and injured neurons, respectively. Similar results were obtained when kainate was used as an agonist to activate AMPA receptors. Previous reports have suggested that kainate, at concentrations similar to that used for this study (200 μm), activates but does not desensitize AMPA receptors (Kiskin et al., 1986; Trussell et al., 1988; Tang et al., 1989; Patneau and Mayer, 1991; Jonas and Sakmann, 1992; Raman and Trussell, 1992). Kainate (200 μm) elicited whole-cell currents with minimal detectable desensitization, and the amplitudes of these currents did not differ significantly between control and injured neurons that did exhibit current potentiation in response to AMPA only (Fig. 5). Mean current density activated by 100 μm AMPA was 4.2 ± 0.6 pA/pF (n = 11) for control neurons and 12.5 ± 2.3 pA/pF (n = 6; p < .001), for injured neurons. The mean current densities activated by 200 μm kainate in the same cells were 19.2 ± 4.6 (n = 11) and 17.5 ± 4.3 (n = 6, p > 0.10) pA/pF, for control and injured neurons, respectively. Kainate-activated currents were also fully blocked by 30 μm LY303070, indicating the current was mediated by AMPA and not kainate receptors. Because the potentiation caused by stretch injury was abolished by conditions that minimized desensitization, the data in toto support the hypothesis that mechanical injury potentiates AMPA-mediated current by decreasing AMPA receptor desensitization.

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Blockade of AMPA receptor desensitization abolishes injury-induced current potentiation. a, Representative patch-clamp recordings of whole-cell currents activated by the application of 100 μm AMPA (filled bar) plus 100 μm CTZ (open bar) in an uninjured neuron (top left) and potentiated injured neuron (top right) or application of 200 μm kainate (filled bar) in an uninjured neuron (bottom left) and potentiated injured neuron (bottom right) show a lack of fast desensitization. Cells were voltage-clamped to −40 mV.b, Blockade of receptor desensitization by the coapplication of 100 AMPA μm plus 100 μmCTZ or the application of 200 μm kainate elicited whole-cell currents that did not differ between uninjured neurons and injured neurons displaying potentiated AMPA-elicited current.First four columns, Mean current density in response to 100 μm AMPA was 4.4 ± 0.7 (n = 5) and 10.6 ± 0.5 (n = 9) pA/pF for uninjured and injured cells, respectively (p < 0.0001; unpaired Student’s t test). In the same cells, mean current density in response to AMPA–CTZ application was 41.7 ± 10.2 (n = 5) and 35.7 ± 6.9 (n = 9) pA/pF for uninjured and injured neurons, respectively (p > 0.50; unpaired Student’st test). Last four columns, Mean current density in response to 100 μm AMPA was 4.2 ± 0.6 (n = 11) and 12.5 ± 2.3 pA/pF (n = 6) for uninjured neurons and injured neurons, respectively (p < 0.001; unpaired Student’s t test). In the same cells, mean current density in response to kainate application was 19.2 ± 4.6 and 17.5 ± 4.3 pA/pF for uninjured and injured cells, respectively (p > 0.05; unpaired Student’st test).

To test whether the changes in AMPA-elicited currents that we observed in voltage clamp were functionally relevant, we tested whether the application of the physiological AMPA agonist l-glutamate to control versus injured neurons differentially affected their electrical activity. Voltage responses elicited by 1 and 2.5 μm glutamate were recorded from control and injured neurons in current clamp (Fig.6a). External APV (20 μm) was included to block the possible contribution of NMDA receptors, whereas the contribution of AMPA receptor current to these voltage responses was quantified as the amount of depolarization that was LY303070 (30 μm) blockable. To distinguish potentiated from nonpotentiated injured neurons, whole-cell AMPA currents were measured in voltage clamp at the end of each experiment. LY303070-sensitive responses were then compared between control, potentiated, and nonpotentiated injured neurons (Fig. 6b).

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Electrical responses are larger in neurons having potentiated AMPA currents. a, Measurements of membrane potential in an uninjured neuron (top trace) and potentiated injured neuron (bottom trace) in response to the application of 2.5 μml-glutamate, followed by l-glutamate plus 30 μm LY303070, the selective AMPA receptor antagonist. APV (20 μm) was added to solutions to block the contribution of NMDA receptors. The resting membrane potential of the uninjured and injured neurons were −61.8 and −63.2 mV, respectively. For the control neuron, application of glutamate produced a smaller membrane depolarization (10.1 mV) that was relatively insensitive to LY303070 (2.6 mV blocked) and in this case no firing. For the injured neuron, glutamate produced a much larger depolarization (31.2 mV) that triggered prominent action potentials, and this depolarization was almost completely inhibited by LY303070 (27.9 mV blocked). b, Mean AMPA receptor-mediated depolarization for uninjured, nonpotentiated injured, and potentiated injured neurons. Membrane depolarization was significantly larger for potentiated injured neurons (20.6 ± 3.3 mV; n = 5) compared with control (4.1 ± 1.3 mV; n = 6) and nonpotentiated injured neurons (5.7 ± 2.7 mV; n = 7; p< 0.01; ANOVA).

The resting membrane potential of the cortical neurons before glutamate application was not significantly different between control cells (−58.4 ± 1.3 mV; n = 6), nonpotentiated injured cells (−57.7 ± 0.4 mV; n = 7), and potentiated injured cells (−59.1 ± 1.5 mV; n = 5;p > 0.50; ANOVA). As shown in Figure 6, the rapid application of 2.5 μm glutamate to injured neurons having potentiated AMPA currents produced pronounced membrane depolarization and prominent cell firing. In contrast, control or nonpotentiated neurons typically had much smaller responses to glutamate. The mean AMPA antagonist-sensitive membrane depolarization caused by 2.5 μm glutamate was 20.6 ± 3.3 mV (n = 5) for potentiated injured neurons, which was significantly larger than for control (4.1 ± 1.3 mV;n = 6) or nonpotentiated injured neurons (5.7 ± 2.7; n = 7; p < 0.01; ANOVA). Responses to 1 μm glutamate were minimal and did not differ significantly between the three groups.

Thus, the decreased desensitization and concomitant potentiation of AMPA-mediated current that we observed after mechanical injury resulted in the potentiation of glutamate-induced membrane depolarization and cell firing. These functional correlates may be important because CSF glutamate concentration is known to be elevated after in vivo TBI. (Katayama et al., 1990; Palmer et al., 1993; Zauner et al., 1996). Thus, the alterations we report here may contribute to increased glutamate excitotoxicity via the activation of potentiated AMPA receptors, if this mechanism is indeed operative in vivo.

DISCUSSION

The potentiation of AMPA current amplitude and a concomitant prolongation of AMPA receptor activation after mechanical injury would be expected to lead to elevated ionic influx in the face of increased glutamate concentration in the brain. This would be expected to produce ionic imbalances that may contribute to the secondary pathophysiology of TBI. Elevated cation influx would be expected to produce cell swelling and/or membrane depolarization with consequent Ca2+ entry via voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channels (VSCCs). Calcium influx via VSCCs or Ca2+-permeable AMPA channels may lead to elevated [Ca2+]i, which has been linked to neuronal dysfunction and death (McIntosh et al., 1998). The neurotoxic effects observed after excessive glutamate exposure and overactivation of NMDA and non-NMDA receptors are well documented (Rothman and Olney, 1986; Choi, 1987; Choi et al., 1987; Koh et al., 1990). Enhanced AMPA channel activity after mechanical injury would thus be expected to exacerbate the effects of the sustained elevation of extracellular glutamate observed after TBI or secondary ischemia (Benveniste et al., 1984; Katayama et al., 1990; Palmer et al., 1993;Zauner et al., 1996). In support of this, studies have shown that blockade of AMPA receptor desensitization via wheat germ agglutinin or CTZ application augments AMPA-mediated neurotoxicity in hippocampal, neocortical, and cerebellar Purkinje neurons (Zorumski et al., 1990;Jensen et al., 1998; Ohno et al., 1998).

Additionally, there is evidence suggesting that TBI results in compromised cellular metabolism (Vink et al., 1988; Dietrich et al., 1994), and, in our in vitro model, we have found that stretch injury causes an inhibition of the Na+/K+ ATPase because of an apparent decrease in metabolic energy (Tavalin et al., 1997). A reduction in Na+/K+ ATPase function would further amplify the ionic imbalance caused by increased Na+ influx via altered AMPA receptors, leading to a reduction in transmembrane ion gradients, cell swelling, and membrane depolarization, even after abnormal levels of extracellular glutamate are cleared.

Potentiation of AMPA receptor function could also result in dysfunctional neuronal synaptic communication under conditions of high extracellular glutamate and even after a return to normal glutamate levels. Although it remains unresolved whether AMPA receptor desensitization influences the amplitude and time course of individual synaptic events at all synapses (Kiskin et al., 1986; Trussell et al., 1988; Tang et al., 1989; Colquhoun et al., 1992; Silver et al., 1996;Arai and Lynch, 1998a), receptor desensitization has been shown to attenuate the responsiveness of AMPA receptors after repetitive stimulation (Arai and Lynch, 1998b). Additionally, in vitroinhibition of AMPA receptor desensitization by pharmacological agents enhances excitatory postsynaptic potentials–currents in a variety of neuronal preparations (Vyklicky et al., 1991; Pelletier and Hablitz, 1994; Boxall and Garthwaite, 1995). An indiscriminate increase in synaptic efficacy caused by the reduction of AMPA receptor desensitization could thus disrupt neuronal signaling and could conceivably contribute to the behavioral and cognitive deficits that develop after neurotrauma (McIntosh et al., 1989; Lyeth et al., 1990;Hamm et al., 1992).

How might mechanical injury modulate AMPA desensitization? Although we are actively pursuing studies designed to shed light on this question, such alteration could conceivably result from either a direct effect of mechanical deformation on the AMPA channel itself or through an indirect mechanism involving intracellular signaling molecules, which in turn target the channel.

As for the former class of mechanism, physical strain in this scenario would be directly transferred to the AMPA receptor channel itself and conceivably alter receptor desensitization. Because AMPA channels are known to be multimeric receptors (for review, see Hollmann and Heinemann, 1994; Dingledine et al., 1999) and because the rate of AMPA receptor desensitization appears to be determined at least in part by the particular subunit composition of the receptor and by specific extracellular domains (for review, see Dingledine et al., 1999), strain transferred during stretch injury might directly and irreversibly alter AMPA receptor kinetics by either disrupting the physical interactions between different AMPA receptor subunits or by distorting the microdomains within single subunits that are involved in mediating desensitization. In general support of this concept, it is widely held that mechanical deformation can activate or modulate certain ion channels, including, for example, stretch-activated ion channels (for review, see Hamill and McBride, 1996) and NMDA channels (Paoletti and Asher, 1994).

Additionally, it is possible that the neuronal cytoskeleton may serve as the major strain detector in mechanical injury, and, in this case, alterations in the linkages between the cytoskeleton and AMPA channels or associated proteins could conceivably change AMPA receptor function. Although we have not yet specifically investigated whether cytoskeletal integrity is compromised in the in vitro model system we used, there is ample evidence that the neuronal cytoskeleton is altered after TBI in vivo (Yaghmai and Povlishock, 1992; Povlishock and Pettus, 1996; Saatman et al., 1998).

Alternatively, mechanical stretch may indirectly alter AMPA receptor function by selectively activating intracellular second messenger systems, resulting in changes in the phosphorylation state of the AMPA channel. There is substantial evidence that AMPA receptors are targets for several protein kinases, including calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (Barria et al., 1997), PKC (Wang et al., 1994), and PKA (Greengard et al., 1991; Wang et al., 1991). Interestingly, protein kinase A, which potentiates the AMPA currents of cultured neurons through increases in channel open time and probability of opening (Greengard et al., 1991; Wang et al., 1991), has also been shown to reduce the desensitization of AMPA channels in horizontal cells of the perch retina (Hatt, 1999). However, it is not known whether PKA activity is altered after brain trauma.

Evidence in support of an indirect mechanism involving PKC activation was previously proposed by our laboratory to account for stretch-induced modulation of NMDA receptors in this same injury model (Zhang et al., 1996). Thus, we found that pretreatment of cortical neurons with the PKC inhibitor calphostin C partially abrogated injury-induced loss of Mg2+ block of the NMDA channel. This result was consistent with earlier reports that, in nodose neurons, Mg2+ block of NMDA receptors was decreased by PKC stimulation (Chen and Huang, 1992) and that mechanical strain activates specific PKC isoforms (Persson et al., 1995). Thus, it would seem feasible that mechanical injury could indirectly alter AMPA receptor desensitization through changes in channel phosphorylation. Because Weber et al. (1997) reported that intracellular [Ca2+] is elevated immediately after mechanical stretch of our mixed neuron–glia cultures, an early rise in cytoplasmic calcium could be an initiating signal in these cortical neurons or glia.

In summary, as previously reported for the NMDA subtype of ionotropic glutamate receptors, we have found that a substantial fraction of fast-desensitizing AMPA receptors are altered by mechanical injury in cortical neurons. This alteration is suggested to result in further overstimulation of brain excitatory pathways and increased vulnerability to neuronal dysfunction and neuronal death after mechanical trauma to the brain.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant NS 27214, National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke Grant 5 T32 NSO 7288–13, and a Center for Excellence Grant from the Commonwealth of Virginia. We thank Eli Lilly and Co. for providing LY303070; Karen Willoughby, Heather Sitterding, and Sallie Holt for technical assistance; and Dr. Donghai Huang-Fu for assistance with early experiments.

    Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Leslie S. Satin, Medical College of Virginia, Box 980524, Richmond, VA 23298-0524.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Arai A,
    2. Lynch G
    (1998a) The waveform of synaptic transmission at hippocampal synapses is not determined by AMPA receptor desensitization. Brain Res 799:230–234.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Arai A,
    2. Lynch G
    (1998b) AMPA receptor desensitization modulates synaptic responses induced by repetitive afferent stimulation in hippocampal slices. Brain Res 799:235–242.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Barria A,
    2. Muller D,
    3. Derkach V,
    4. Griffith LC,
    5. Soderling TR
    (1997) Regulatory phosphorylation of AMPA-type glutamate receptors by CaMKII during long-term potentiation. Science 276:2042–2044.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Benveniste H,
    2. Drejer J,
    3. Schousboe A,
    4. Diemer NH
    (1984) Elevation of the extracellular concentrations of glutamate and aspartate in rat hippocampus during transient cerebral ischemia monitored by intracerebral microdialysis. J Neurochem 43:1363–1374.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Bernert H,
    2. Turski L
    (1996) Traumatic brain damage prevented by the non-N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonist 2,3-dihydroxy-6-nitro-7-sulfamoylbenzo[f] quinoxaline. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:5235–5240.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Bertolino M,
    2. Baraldi M,
    3. Parenti C,
    4. Braghiroli D,
    5. DiBella M,
    6. Vicini S,
    7. Costa E
    (1993) Modulation of AMPA/kainate receptors by analogues of diazoxide and cyclothiazide in thin slices of rat hippocampus. Receptors Channels 1:267–278.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Bleakman D,
    2. Ballyk BA,
    3. Schoepp DD,
    4. Palmer AJ,
    5. Bath CP,
    6. Sharpe EF,
    7. Woolley ML,
    8. Bufton HR,
    9. Kamboj RK,
    10. Tarnawa I,
    11. Lodge D
    (1996) Activity of 2,3-benzodiazepines at native rat and recombinant human glutamate receptors in vitro: stereospecificity and selectivity profiles. Neuropharmacology 35:1689–1702.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Boxall AR,
    2. Garthwaite J
    (1995) Synaptic excitation mediated by AMPA receptors in rat cerebellar slices is selectively enhanced by aniracetam and cyclothiazide. Neurochem Res 20:605–609.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Chen L,
    2. Huang LY
    (1992) Protein kinase C reduces Mg2+ block of NMDA-receptor channels as a mechanism of modulation. Nature 356:521–523.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Choi DW
    (1987) Ionic dependence of glutamate neurotoxicity. J Neurosci 7:369–379.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Choi DW,
    2. Maulucci-Gedde M,
    3. Kriegstein AR
    (1987) Glutamate neurotoxicity in cortical cell culture. J Neurosci 7:357–368.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Collingridge GL,
    2. Lester RA
    (1989) Excitatory amino acid receptors in the vertebrate central nervous system. Pharmacol Rev 41:143–210.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Colquhoun D,
    2. Jonas P,
    3. Sakmann B
    (1992) Action of brief pulses of glutamate on AMPA/kainate receptors in patches from different neurones of rat hippocampal slices. J Physiol (Lond) 458:261–287.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Dietrich WD,
    2. Alonso O,
    3. Busto R,
    4. Ginsberg M
    (1994) Widespread metabolic depression and reduced somatosensory circuit activation following traumatic brain injury in rats. J Neurotrauma 11:629–640.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Dingledine R,
    2. Borges K,
    3. Bowie D,
    4. Traynelis SF
    (1999) The glutamate receptor ion channels. Pharmacol Rev 51:7–61.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Ellis EF,
    2. McKinney JS,
    3. Willoughby KA,
    4. Liang S,
    5. Povlishock JT
    (1995) A new model for rapid stretch-injury of cells in culture: characterization of the model using astrocytes. J Neurotrauma 12:325–339.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Faden AI,
    2. Demediuk P,
    3. Panter SS,
    4. Vink R
    (1989) The role of excitatory amino acids and NMDA receptors in traumatic brain injury. Science 344:798–800.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Greengard P,
    2. Jen J,
    3. Nairn AC,
    4. Stevens CF
    (1991) Enhancement of the glutamate response by cAMP-dependent protein kinase hippocampal neurons. Science 253:1135–1137.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Hamill OP,
    2. McBride DW Jr.
    (1996) The pharmacology of mechanogated membrane ion channels. Pharmacol Rev 48:231–252.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  20. ↵
    1. Hamill OP,
    2. Marty A,
    3. Neher E,
    4. Sakmann B,
    5. Sigworth FJ
    (1981) Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflügers Arch 391:85–100.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Hamm RJ,
    2. Dixon CE,
    3. Gbadebo DM,
    4. Singha AK,
    5. Jenkins LW,
    6. Lyeth BG,
    7. Hayes RL
    (1992) Cognitive deficits following traumatic brain injury by controlled cortical impact. J Neurotrauma 9:11–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Hatt H
    (1999) Modification of glutamate receptor channels: molecular mechanisms and functional consequences. Naturwissenschaften 86:177–186.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Hayes RL,
    2. Jenkins LW,
    3. Lyeth BG,
    4. Balster RL,
    5. Robinson SE,
    6. Clifton GL,
    7. Stubbins JF,
    8. Young HF
    (1988) Pretreatment with phencyclidine, an N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonist, attenuates long-term behavior deficits in the rat produced by traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 5:259–274.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Herb A,
    2. Burnashev N,
    3. Werner P,
    4. Sakmann B,
    5. Wisden W,
    6. Seeburg P
    (1992) The KA-2 subunit of excitatory amino acid receptors shows widespread expression in brain and forms ion channels with distantly related subuints. Neuron 8:775–785.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Herrington J,
    2. Bookman RJ
    (1994) Pulse control v4.3: Igor XOPs for patch clamp data acquisition. (University of Miami, Miami).
  26. ↵
    1. Hollmann M,
    2. Heinemann S
    (1994) Cloned glutamate receptors. Annu Rev Neurosci 17:31–108.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Honoré T,
    2. Davies SN,
    3. Drejer J,
    4. Fletcher EJ,
    5. Jacobsen P,
    6. Lodge D,
    7. Nielsen FE
    (1988) Quinoxalinediones: potent competitive non-NMDA glutamate receptor antagonists. Science 241:701–703.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Iino M,
    2. Ozawa S,
    3. Tsuzuki K
    (1990) Permeation of calcium through excitatory amino acid receptor channels in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. J Physiol (Lond) 424:151–165.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Jensen JB,
    2. Schousboe A,
    3. Pickering DS
    (1998) AMPA receptor mediated excitotoxicity in neocortical neurons is developmentally regulated and dependent upon receptor desensitization. Neurochem Int 32:505–513.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Jonas P,
    2. Sakmann B
    (1992) Glutamate receptor channels in isolated patches from CA1 and CA3 pyramidal cells of rat hippocampal slices. J Physiol (Lond) 455:143–171.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Katayama Y,
    2. Becker DP,
    3. Tamura T,
    4. Hovda DA
    (1990) Massive increases in extracellular potassium and the indiscriminate release of glutamate following concussive brain injury. J Neurosurg 73:889–900.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Kiskin NI,
    2. Krishtal OA,
    3. Tsyndrenko AY
    (1986) Excitatory amino acid receptors in hippocampal neurons: kainate fails to desensitize them. Neurosci Lett 63:225–230.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Koh JY,
    2. Goldberg MP,
    3. Hartley DM,
    4. Choi DW
    (1990) Non-NMDA receptor-mediated neurotoxicity in cortical culture. J Neurosci 10:693–705.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Lyeth BG,
    2. Jenkins LW,
    3. Hamm RJ,
    4. Dixon CE,
    5. Phillips LL,
    6. Clifton GL,
    7. Young HF,
    8. Hayes RL
    (1990) Prolonged memory impairment in the absence of hippocampal cell death following traumatic brain injury. Brain Res 526:249–258.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Mayer ML,
    2. Westbrook GL
    (1987) The physiology of excitatory amino acids in the vertebrate central nervous system. Prog Neurobiol 28:197–276.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. McIntosh TK,
    2. Vink R,
    3. Noble L,
    4. Yamakami I,
    5. Fernyak S,
    6. Soares H,
    7. Faden AL
    (1989) Traumatic brain injury in the rat: characterization of a lateral fluid percussion model. Neuroscience 28:233–244.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. McIntosh TK,
    2. Saatman KE,
    3. Raghupathi R,
    4. Graham DI,
    5. Smith DH,
    6. Lee VM,
    7. Trojanowski JQ
    (1998) The Dorothy Russell memorial lecture. The molecular and cellular sequelae of experimental traumatic brain injury: pathogenetic mechanisms. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 24:251–267.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. McKinney JS,
    2. Willoughby KA,
    3. Liang S,
    4. Ellis EF
    (1996) Stretch-induced injury of cultured neuronal, glial, and endothelial cells. Effect of polyethylene glycol-conjugated superoxide dismutase. Stroke 27:934–940.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. Ohno K,
    2. Okada M,
    3. Tsutsumi R,
    4. Matsumoto N,
    5. Yamaguchi T
    (1998) Characterization of cyclothiazide-enhanced kainate excitotoxicity in rat hippocampal neurons. Neurochem Int 32:265–271.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Palmer AM,
    2. Marion DW,
    3. Botscheller ML,
    4. Swedlow PE,
    5. Styren SD,
    6. DeKosky ST
    (1993) Traumatic brain injury-induced excitotoxicity assessed in a controlled cortical impact model. J Neurochem 61:2015–2024.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Paoletti P, Asher P (1994) Mechanosensitivity of NMDA receptors in cultured mouse central neurons. 13:645–655.
  42. ↵
    1. Patneau DK,
    2. Mayer ML
    (1991) Kinetic analysis of interactions between kainate and AMPA: evidence for activation of a single receptor in mouse hippocampal neurons. Neuron 6:785–798.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Pelletier MR,
    2. Hablitz JJ
    (1994) Altered desensitization produces enhancement of EPSPs in neocortical neurons. J Neurophysiol 72:1032–1036.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Persson K,
    2. Sando JJ,
    3. Tuttle JB,
    4. Steers WD
    (1995) Protein kinase C in cyclic stretch-induced nerve growth factor production by urinary tract smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol 269:C1018–C1024.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Povlishock JT,
    2. Pettus EH
    (1996) Traumatically induced axonal damage: evidence for enduring changes in axolemmal permeability with associated cytoskeletal change. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wein) 66:81–86.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Raman IM,
    2. Trussell LO
    (1992) The kinetics of the response to glutamate and kainate in neurons of the avian cochlear nucleus. Neuron 9:173–186.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Rothman SM,
    2. Olney JW
    (1986) Glutamate and the pathophysiology of hypoxic-ischemic brain damage. Ann Neurol 19:105–111.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Saatman KE,
    2. Graham DI,
    3. McIntosh TK
    (1998) The neuronal cytoskeleton is at risk after mild and moderate brain injury. J Neurotrauma 15:1047–1058.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Silver RA,
    2. Colquhoun D,
    3. Cull-Candy SG,
    4. Edmonds B
    (1996) Deactivation and desensitization of non-NMDA receptors in patches and the time course of EPSCs in rat cerebellar granule cells. J Physiol (Lond) 493:167–173.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Tang CM,
    2. Dichter M,
    3. Morad M
    (1989) Quisqualate activates a rapidly inactivating high conductance ionic channel in hippocampal neurons. Science 243:1474–1477.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Tavalin SJ,
    2. Ellis EF,
    3. Satin LS
    (1997) Inhibition of the electrogenic pump underlies delayed depolarization of cortical neurons after mechanical injury or glutamate. J Neurophysiol 77:632–638.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Trussell LO,
    2. Thio LL,
    3. Zorumski CF,
    4. Fischbach GD
    (1988) Rapid desensitization of glutamate receptors in vertebrate central neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:4562–4566.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Turski L,
    2. Huth A,
    3. Sheardown M,
    4. McDonald F,
    5. Neuhaus R,
    6. Schneider HH,
    7. Dirnagl U,
    8. Wiegand F,
    9. Jacobsen P,
    10. Ottow E
    (1998) ZK200775: a phosphonate quinoxalinedione AMPA antagonist for neuroprotection in stroke and trauma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:10960–10965.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. ↵
    1. Vink R,
    2. Faden AI,
    3. McIntosh TK
    (1988) Changes in cellular bioenergetic state following graded traumatic brain injury in rats: determination by phosphorus 31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Neurotrauma 5:315–330.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Vyklicky L Jr.,
    2. Patneau DK,
    3. Mayer ML
    (1991) Modulation of excitatory synaptic transmission by drugs that reduce desensitization at AMPA/kainate receptors. Neuron 7:971–984.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Wang LY,
    2. Salter MW,
    3. MacDonald JF
    (1991) Regulation of kainate receptors by cAMP-dependent protein kinase and phosphatases. Science 253:1132–1135.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    1. Wang LY,
    2. Dudek EM,
    3. Browning MD,
    4. MacDonald JF
    (1994) Modulation of AMPA/kainate receptors in cultured murine hippocampal neurons by protein kinase C. J Physiol (Lond) 475:431–437.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Weber JT,
    2. Rzigalinski BA,
    3. Willoughby KA,
    4. Ellis EF
    (1997) Calcium dynamics in stretch-injured neurons. J Neurotrauma 14:778.
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    1. Yaghmai A,
    2. Povlishock JT
    (1992) Traumatically induced reactive change as visualized through the use of monoclonal antibodies targeted to neurofilament subunits. J Neuropathol Exp 51:158–176.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  60. ↵
    1. Zauner A,
    2. Bullock R,
    3. Kuta AJ,
    4. Woodward J,
    5. Young HF
    (1996) Glutamate release and cerebral blood flow after severe human head injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wein) 67:40–44.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Zhang L,
    2. Rzigalinski BA,
    3. Ellis EF,
    4. Satin LS
    (1996) Reduction of voltage-dependent Mg2+ blockade of NMDA current in mechanically injured neurons. Science 274:1921–1923.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. ↵
    1. Zorumski CF,
    2. Thio LL,
    3. Clark GD,
    4. Clifford DB
    (1990) Blockade of desensitization augments quisqualate excitotoxicity in hippocampal neurons. Neuron 5:61–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 19 (17)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 19, Issue 17
1 Sep 1999
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Enhancement of AMPA-Mediated Current after Traumatic Injury in Cortical Neurons
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Enhancement of AMPA-Mediated Current after Traumatic Injury in Cortical Neurons
Paulette B. Goforth, Earl F. Ellis, Leslie S. Satin
Journal of Neuroscience 1 September 1999, 19 (17) 7367-7374; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-17-07367.1999

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Enhancement of AMPA-Mediated Current after Traumatic Injury in Cortical Neurons
Paulette B. Goforth, Earl F. Ellis, Leslie S. Satin
Journal of Neuroscience 1 September 1999, 19 (17) 7367-7374; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-17-07367.1999
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • glutamate
  • traumatic brain injury
  • AMPA Receptor
  • desensitization
  • excitotoxicity
  • cortex

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Bandpass Filtering at the Rod to Second-Order Cell Synapse in Salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum) Retina
  • Scaffolding of Fyn Kinase to the NMDA Receptor Determines Brain Region Sensitivity to Ethanol
  • Increased Seizure Susceptibility and Proconvulsant Activity of Anandamide in Mice Lacking Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase
Show more ARTICLE
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.