Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
ARTICLE, Behavioral/Systems

Control of Response Selection by Reinforcer Value Requires Interaction of Amygdala and Orbital Prefrontal Cortex

Mark G. Baxter, Amanda Parker, Caroline C. C. Lindner, Alicia D. Izquierdo and Elisabeth A. Murray
Journal of Neuroscience 1 June 2000, 20 (11) 4311-4319; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-11-04311.2000
Mark G. Baxter
1Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amanda Parker
2School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caroline C. C. Lindner
3Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alicia D. Izquierdo
3Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, and
4Department of Psychology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elisabeth A. Murray
3Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

DOI 
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-11-04311.2000
PubMed 
10818166
Published By 
Society for Neuroscience
History 
  • Received February 10, 2000
  • Revision received March 17, 2000
  • Accepted March 17, 2000
  • First published June 1, 2000.
  • Version of record published June 1, 2000.
Copyright & Usage 
Copyright © 2000 Society for Neuroscience

Author Information

  1. Mark G. Baxter1,
  2. Amanda Parker2,
  3. Caroline C. C. Lindner3,
  4. Alicia D. Izquierdo3,4, and
  5. Elisabeth A. Murray3
  1. 1Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138,
  2. 2School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom,
  3. 3Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, and
  4. 4Department of Psychology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052
View Full Text

Author contributions

Disclosures

    • Received February 10, 2000.
    • Revision received March 17, 2000.
    • Accepted March 17, 2000.
  • This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Mental Health. We thank Richard Saunders for invaluable assistance in surgery, Alison Schaefer for help with behavioral testing, Tim Bussey for programming the progressive ratio task, and Peter Holland and Steve Wise for helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

    Correspondence should be addressed to either Dr. Mark G. Baxter, Department of Psychology, Harvard University, 906 William James Hall, 33 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, E-mail:mbaxter{at}wjh.harvard.edu, or Dr. Elisabeth A. Murray, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, Building 49, Room 1B80, 49 Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-4415, E-mail:eam{at}ln.nimh.nih.gov. Reprint requests should be addressed to Elisabeth A. Murray.

Online Impact

 

Article usage

Select a custom date range for the past year
E.g., 2025-06-12
to
E.g., 2025-06-12

Article usage: January 2018 to June 2025

AbstractFullPdf
Jan 20188238
Feb 201802410
Mar 201823911
Apr 20181325
May 20183489
Jun 201815315
Jul 20185206
Aug 201881910
Sep 20187192
Oct 201811267
Nov 2018103718
Dec 201852218
Total 201861362119
Jan 20191231526
Feb 201952410
Mar 2019153828
Apr 2019123626
May 2019124022
Jun 201972514
Jul 201962822
Aug 2019612420
Oct 2019724120
Nov 2019125317
Dec 20194818
Total 2019981005213
Jan 2020112713
Feb 2020102613
Mar 202022619
May 2020122411
Jun 20208169
Jul 20208319
Aug 202041311
Sep 202095519
Oct 2020145220
Nov 2020154312
Dec 2020135726
Total 2020106370162
Jan 2021156519
Feb 2021116721
Mar 2021174323
Apr 2021234413
May 2021246022
Jun 202186219
Jul 2021195027
Aug 2021166424
Sep 202183915
Oct 202183426
Nov 2021114937
Dec 202151910
Total 2021165596256
Jan 2022153821
Feb 20224289
Mar 2022173020
Apr 202216366
May 2022113629
Jun 202265616
Jul 20229338
Aug 202262411
Sep 2022113021
Oct 202283118
Nov 2022385
Dec 20227141
Total 2022113364165
Jan 2023187816
Feb 2023152714
Mar 202366612
Apr 2023175019
May 2023104316
Jun 202395710
Jul 202357714
Aug 202356214
Sep 202357510
Oct 202376111
Nov 2023104511
Dec 202316848
Total 2023123725155
Jan 2024311159
Feb 20242210418
Mar 20245489
Apr 20241313815
May 202413123911
Jun 202478815
Jul 202489513
Aug 2024165511
Sep 202469813
Oct 2024163819
Nov 2024124423
Dec 20241011023
Total 20241592172179
Jan 202566815
Feb 20252124414
Mar 2025622019
Apr 202578117
May 2025156116
Jun 20258197
Total 20256369388
Total88862871337
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 20 (11)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 20, Issue 11
1 Jun 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Control of Response Selection by Reinforcer Value Requires Interaction of Amygdala and Orbital Prefrontal Cortex
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Control of Response Selection by Reinforcer Value Requires Interaction of Amygdala and Orbital Prefrontal Cortex
Mark G. Baxter, Amanda Parker, Caroline C. C. Lindner, Alicia D. Izquierdo, Elisabeth A. Murray
Journal of Neuroscience 1 June 2000, 20 (11) 4311-4319; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-11-04311.2000

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Control of Response Selection by Reinforcer Value Requires Interaction of Amygdala and Orbital Prefrontal Cortex
Mark G. Baxter, Amanda Parker, Caroline C. C. Lindner, Alicia D. Izquierdo, Elisabeth A. Murray
Journal of Neuroscience 1 June 2000, 20 (11) 4311-4319; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-11-04311.2000
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • amygdala
  • crossed-lesion technique
  • decision-making
  • orbital prefrontal cortex
  • reinforcer devaluation
  • representation
  • rhesus monkey

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

ARTICLE

  • Electrophysiological Imaging of Functional Architecture in the Cortical Middle Temporal Visual Area of Cebus apella Monkey
  • The Role of the Hyperpolarization-Activated Cationic CurrentIh in the Timing of Interictal Bursts in the Neonatal Hippocampus
  • The Basement Membrane Components Nidogen and Type XVIII Collagen Regulate Organization of Neuromuscular Junctions inCaenorhabditis elegans
Show more ARTICLE

Behavioral/Systems

  • Enhancement of Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Phase Locking for Small Inputs by a Low-Threshold Outward Current in Auditory Neurons
  • Inhibition of cAMP Response Element-Binding Protein or Dynorphin in the Nucleus Accumbens Produces an Antidepressant-Like Effect
  • Sensitivity to Instrumental Contingency Degradation Is Mediated by the Entorhinal Cortex and Its Efferents via the Dorsal Hippocampus
Show more Behavioral/Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.