Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Fig. 1.
Schematic of testing sequence for the reinforcer devaluation study. Control subjects received no surgery and were given a period of rest equivalent to that provided for the operated monkeys. Note that surgery 2 completes the disconnection of amygdala and orbital prefrontal cortex in all operated subjects.
- Fig. 2.
Intended lesion and plots of the orbital prefrontal cortex and amygdala lesions in the four operated cases (Op1–Op4), shown on ventral surface views (top) and coronal sections (bottom) from a standard rhesus monkey brain. The intended lesion is shown in the leftmost column. The thick black line and small rectangle between the hemispheres in this and other ventral views indicates the extent of the section of the corpus callosum and anterior commissure, respectively; positions of the stereotaxic levels illustrated in the coronal sections are also indicated. The ventral views for Op1–Op4 show reconstructions of the extent of the orbital prefrontal cortex lesions, and are reversed to aid in matching to the individual sections (i.e., the left hemisphere is on theleft). The numbers to theleft of the coronal sections indicate the distance in millimeters from the interaural plane. Compare and contrast with Figure3.
- Fig. 3.
Photomicrographs of Nissl-stained coronal sections from case Op3. A, Coronal section ∼30 mm rostral to the interaural plane. The extent of the orbital prefrontal cortex lesion in the left hemisphere is marked by the black arrows. The section of the corpus callosum is also apparent at this level and is marked by the white arrowhead.B, Coronal section 16 mm rostral to the interaural plane. Note the marked loss in volume of the amygdala in the right compared with the left hemisphere. The section of the corpus callosum is marked by the white arrowhead. Therectangles over the left and right temporal lobes show the approximate locations of the regions shown at higher power inC and D, respectively. C, Photomicrograph of the intact (left) amygdala. D, Photomicrograph of the right amygdala ∼9 months after injection of ibotenic acid, at the same magnification used in C. The marked neuronal cell loss and gliosis are characteristic of excitotoxic lesions.
- Fig. 4.
The effects of reinforcer devaluation performed before (Test 1) and after (Test 2) the surgical disconnection had been completed. Difference scores (devaluation − baseline) for the control and disconnection group means are shown as bars, with the symbols representing scores of individual monkeys. Normal monkeys showed an enhancement of the devaluation effect in the second test, whereas operated monkeys showed a significant reduction of this effect in the second test. Op1,Filled diamonds; Op2, filled squares; Op3, filled inverted triangles; Op4, filled circles; Con1, open diamonds; Con2, open squares; Con3, open inverted triangles; Con4,open circle.
- Fig. 5.
Results of the devaluation procedure (selective satiation) on progressive ratio testing. Baseline data shown are the mean, for each subject, of the maximum number of responses emitted (i.e., maximum ratio attained) during all four baseline sessions. Satiation data are scores for the single satiation session. Group means are shown as bars, with the symbols representing scores of individual monkeys. All monkeys, regardless of group membership, decreased responding during the test session in which the reinforcer was devalued by selective satiation. Symbols as in Figure 4.
Tables
- Table 1.
Percent damage to amygdala and orbital prefrontal cortex in the four operated subjects
Case Amygdala Orbital prefrontal Hemisphere Percent damage Hemisphere Percent damage Op1 L (first) 42.9 R (second) 65.5 Op2 L (second) 34.9 R (first) 73.3 Op3 R (first) 95.3 L (second) 57.1 Op4 R (second) 28.4 L (first) 41.1 Mean 50.4 59.3 The hemisphere in which each lesion was placed (left, L; right, R) and the order in which the surgeries were conducted are indicated. For example, case Op1 received a neurotoxic amygdala lesion in the left hemisphere before beginning behavioral testing and a lesion of the orbital prefrontal cortex in the right hemisphere, with forebrain commissurotomy in the same surgery, to complete the disconnection. See Figure 1 for a schematic of the behavioral testing sequence.
Case Test 1 Test 2 Test 2-test 1 difference Baseline F1:F2 Satiation F1 F1:F2 Satiation F2 F1:F2 Difference score (sum) Baseline F1:F2 Satiation F1 F1:F2 Satiation F2 F1:F2 Difference score (sum) Con1 22:8 14 :16 26 :4 12 23.5:6.5 7 :23 27 :3 20 8 Con2 14:16 12 :18 22 :8 10 19.5:10.5 13 :17 28 :2 15 5 Con3 27.5:2.5 28:2 29 :1 1 20:10 13 :17 19 :11 6 5 Con4 21.5:8.5 7 :23 22 :8 15 15.5:14.5 6 :24 24 :6 18 3 Mean 9.5 14.75 5.25 Op1 18.5:11.5 16 :14 26 :4 10 25:5 23 :7 28 :2 5 −5 Op2 24.5:5.5 17 :13 26 :4 9 29.5:0.5 23 :7 30 :0 7 −2 Op3 20.5:9.5 12 :18 25 :5 13 23.5:6.5 21 :9 22 :8 1 −12 Op4 2.5:27.5 0 :30 2 :28 2 0:30 0 :30 2 :28 2 0 Mean 8.5 3.75 −4.75 The number of food 1 (F1) and food 2 (F2) objects chosen in the baseline sessions (mean of two sessions) and each of the two satiation sessions (preceded by satiation with food 1 or food 2), as well as the difference score between the satiation sessions and the baseline sessions (summed for the two satiation sessions), are given for reinforcer devaluation test 1 and test 2 for each of the eight monkeys (Con1–Con4, control monkeys; Op1–Op4, operated monkeys).
In this issue
