Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
ARTICLE, Behavioral/Systems

Activation of ERK/MAP Kinase in the Amygdala Is Required for Memory Consolidation of Pavlovian Fear Conditioning

Glenn E. Schafe, Coleen M. Atkins, Michael W. Swank, Elizabeth P. Bauer, J. David Sweatt and Joseph E. LeDoux
Journal of Neuroscience 1 November 2000, 20 (21) 8177-8187; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-21-08177.2000
Glenn E. Schafe
1W. M. Keck Foundation Laboratory of Neurobiology, Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Coleen M. Atkins
2Division of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael W. Swank
3Department of Psychiatry, Cornell University Medical Center, White Plains, New York 10605
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth P. Bauer
1W. M. Keck Foundation Laboratory of Neurobiology, Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. David Sweatt
2Division of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph E. LeDoux
1W. M. Keck Foundation Laboratory of Neurobiology, Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Time course of ERK/MAPK activation in the amygdala. A, Mean ± SE percent pMAPK immunoreactivity from amygdala punches taken from rats decapitated at 15 (n = 10), 30 (n = 10), 60 (n = 14), or 180 (n = 10) min after conditioning. Rats were presented with five tone–foot shock pairings. Paired samples in each group were normalized relative to sham-trained (Box) controls (for details, see Materials and Methods). p42 and p44 correspond to the molecular weights (in kilodaltons) of the two isoforms of mammalian ERK (ERK1 and ERK2) that are recognized by the pMAPK antibody. *p< 0.05 relative to the 15 min time point. B, Representative pMAPK blots from Box andPaired conditions at different time points after conditioning. C, Mean ± SE percent tMAPK immunoreactivity at different time points after conditioning (15, 30, 60, or 180 min) from the samples in A. Paired samples in each group were normalized relative to sham-trained (Box) controls.D, Representative tMAPK blots from Boxand Paired conditions at different time points after conditioning. E, Schematic of the amygdala at approximately bregma −3.3 (according to Paxinos and Watson, 1997). F, Mean ± SE pMAPK-immunoreactive cells in the LA at 15 (n = 5), 30 (n = 5), 60 (n = 5), or 180 (n = 5) min after conditioning. Rats were presented with five tone–foot shock pairings. *p < 0.05 relative to the 15 min time point. G, Representative photomicrograph of pMAPK labeling in the amygdala at 15 min after conditioning. CPu, Caudate/putamen; EC, external capsule. H, Representative photomicrograph of pMAPK labeling in the amygdala at 30 min after conditioning.I, Representative photomicrograph of pMAPK labeling in the amygdala at 60 min after conditioning. J, Representative photomicrograph of pMAPK labeling in the amygdala at 180 min after conditioning.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Pairing specificity of ERK/MAPK activation in the LA. A, Mean ± SE pMAPK-immunoreactive cells in the LA after presentation of tone alone (Tone;n = 5), foot shock alone (Shock;n = 5), or tone–foot shock pairings (Paired; n = 5). Rats were given five presentations of each stimulus and perfused 60 min later. *p < 0.05 relative to the other groups.B, Mean ± SE pMAPK-immunoreactive cells in the LA after box alone (Box; n = 3), tone alone (Tone; n = 3), or foot shock alone (Shock; n = 3). Rats were perfused 60 min after treatment. C, Representative photomicrograph of pMAPK labeling in the amygdala after conditioning.AST, Amygdala/striatal transition zone.D, Representative photomicrograph of pMAPK labeling in the amygdala after foot shock alone. E, Representative photomicrograph of pMAPK labeling in the amygdala after tone alone.F, 10× magnification of pMAPK labeling in the LA and surrounding nuclei from C. G, 40× magnification of pMAPK labeling in the LA from the insetin F. H, 100× magnification of pMAPK labeling in an LA pyramidal cell (from G;arrow), showing nuclear labeling.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Associative specificity of ERK/MAPK activation in the LA. A, Mean ± SE pMAPK-immunoreactive cells in the LA after paired (Paired; n = 5) or unpaired (Unpaired; n = 5) presentations of tone and shock. Rats were perfused 60 min later. *p < 0.05 relative to the unpaired group.B, Representative photomicrograph of pMAPK labeling in the amygdala after paired stimulation. C, Representative photomicrograph of pMAPK labeling in the amygdala after unpaired stimulation.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Effects of intra-LBA administration of U0126 on single-trial fear conditioning. A, Schematic of behavioral protocol. B, Mean ± SE post-shock freezing immediately after the conditioning trial in rats given intra-LBA infusions of 50% DMSO (vehicle; n = 4), 0.1 μg of U0126 (n = 4), or 1.0 μg of U0126 (n = 8). Rats were given a single tone–foot shock pairing. C, Mean ± SE auditory LTM in the rats from B. Rats were assessed for LTM at 24 hr after conditioning. D, Mean ± SE auditory fear memory after reconditioning in the rats from C. Rats were reconditioned drug-free ∼1 week after the initial drug infusions, training, and testing. E, Mean ± SE auditory STM in rats given intra-LBA infusions of 50% DMSO vehicle (n = 8) or 1.0 μg of U0126 (n= 8). Rats were assessed for STM at 1 hr after conditioning.F, Mean ± SE auditory STM in rats given intra-LBA infusions of 50% DMSO vehicle (n = 6) or 1.0 μg of U0126 (n = 6) 24 hr before conditioning and STM testing (see adjacent schematic of behavioral procedures).

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Effects of intra-LBA administration of U0126 on multiple-trial fear conditioning. A, Schematic of behavioral protocol. B, Representative blots and mean ± SE percent pMAPK immunoreactivity from amygdala punches taken from rats given intra-LBA infusions of 50% DMSO (vehicle;n = 6), 0.1 μg of U0126 (n = 6), or 1.0 μg of U0126 (n = 6). *p < 0.05 relative to vehicle controls.C, Mean ± SE post-shock freezing between conditioning trials in rats given intra-LBA infusions of 50% DMSO (vehicle; n = 8), 0.1 μg of U0126 (n = 4), or 1.0 μg of U0126 (n = 7). Rats were given five tone–foot shock pairings. D, Mean ± SE auditory fear memory assessed at 1 hr after conditioning in the rats from C.E, Mean ± SE auditory fear memory assessed at 3 hr after conditioning in the rats from C. F, Mean ± SE auditory fear memory assessed at 6 hr after conditioning in the rats from C. G, Mean ± SE auditory fear memory assessed at 24 hr after conditioning in the rats from C.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Histological verification of cannula placements.A, Cannula tip placements from rats trained with a single pairing and tested for LTM 24 hr later (see Fig.4B–D). Rats were infused with ACSF (black squares), 0.1 μg of U0126 (white triangles), or 1.0 μg of U0126 (dark gray triangles).B, Cannula tip placements from rats trained with a single pairing and tested for STM 1 hr later (see Fig.4E). Rats were infused with ACSF (black squares) or 1.0 μg of U0126 (dark gray triangles). C, Cannula tip placements from rats trained with a single pairing and tested for STM 1 hr later (see Fig.4F). Rats were infused with ACSF (black squares) or 1.0 μg of U0126 (dark gray triangles) 24 hr before conditioning and STM testing.D, Cannula tip placements from rats trained with multiple pairings and tested for fear memory at 1, 3, 6, and 24 hr after conditioning (see Fig. 5C–G). Rats were infused with ACSF (black squares), 0.1 μg of U0126 (white triangles), or 1.0 μg of U0126 (dark gray triangles). Panels were adapted from Paxinos and Watson (1997).

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Impaired amygdala LTP by U0126. A, Schematic of the amygdala slice preparation, showing placement of stimulating and recording electrodes. Afferent fibers from the auditory thalamus enter the LA medially, coursing through the ventralmost part of the striatum just above the central nucleus. Recordings were made just below the site of termination of auditory thalamic fibers terminating in the LAd. IC, Internal capsule;OT, optic tract; EC, external capsule.B, Mean ± SE percent EPSP slope (relative to baseline) in cells treated with 0.1% DMSO vehicle (n = 5; black squares) or 10 μm U0126 (n = 4; gray triangles) before and after LTP induction. U0126 was applied at the time indicated by solid bar, plus variable time before breaking into the cell indicated by dashed bar.Traces from an individual experiment before and 40 min after induction are shown in the inset.Traces are averages of five responses. C, Mean ± SE percent EPSP slope (relative to baseline) in cells (n = 3) before and after treatment with U0126 (10 μm; solid bar). Traces from an individual experiment before and 30 min after application of U0126 are shown in the inset. Traces are averages of five responses.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Schematic of the cellular events that may underlie formation of long-term fear memories in the amygdala. Pairing of CS and US inputs in LA principal cells leads to calcium influx through either NMDA receptors or L-type VGCCs. L-type channels are opened on dendritic shafts and spines, possibly by backpropagating action potentials (AP) during training. The increase in intracellular Ca2+ leads to the activation of protein kinases, such as PKA and ERK/MAPK. Once activated, these kinases can translocate to the nucleus where they activate transcription factors such as CREB. The activation of CREB by PKA and ERK/MAPK promotes CRE-mediated gene transcription and the synthesis of new proteins. PKA, ERK/MAPK, CREB, RNA, and protein synthesis in the amygdala have all been shown to be necessary for the establishment of long-term fear memories.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 20 (21)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 20, Issue 21
1 Nov 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Activation of ERK/MAP Kinase in the Amygdala Is Required for Memory Consolidation of Pavlovian Fear Conditioning
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Activation of ERK/MAP Kinase in the Amygdala Is Required for Memory Consolidation of Pavlovian Fear Conditioning
Glenn E. Schafe, Coleen M. Atkins, Michael W. Swank, Elizabeth P. Bauer, J. David Sweatt, Joseph E. LeDoux
Journal of Neuroscience 1 November 2000, 20 (21) 8177-8187; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-21-08177.2000

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Activation of ERK/MAP Kinase in the Amygdala Is Required for Memory Consolidation of Pavlovian Fear Conditioning
Glenn E. Schafe, Coleen M. Atkins, Michael W. Swank, Elizabeth P. Bauer, J. David Sweatt, Joseph E. LeDoux
Journal of Neuroscience 1 November 2000, 20 (21) 8177-8187; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-21-08177.2000
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • amygdala
  • fear conditioning
  • ERK
  • MAPK
  • learning
  • LTP

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

ARTICLE

  • Emotion Processing in Chimeric Faces: Hemispheric Asymmetries in Expression and Recognition of Emotions
  • Gating of Hippocampal-Evoked Activity in Prefrontal Cortical Neurons by Inputs from the Mediodorsal Thalamus and Ventral Tegmental Area
  • Cytoskeletal and Morphological Alterations Underlying Axonal Sprouting after Localized Transection of Cortical Neuron AxonsIn Vitro
Show more ARTICLE

Behavioral/Systems

  • Genetic Dissociation of Opiate Tolerance and Physical Dependence in δ-Opioid Receptor-1 and Preproenkephalin Knock-Out Mice
  • Functional Heterogeneity in Human Olfactory Cortex: An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
  • Induction of Hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation during Waking Leads to Increased Extrahippocampal zif-268 Expression during Ensuing Rapid-Eye-Movement Sleep
Show more Behavioral/Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.