Skip to main content

Umbrella menu

  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Preparing a Manuscript
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Fees
    • Journal Club
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Preparing a Manuscript
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Fees
    • Journal Club
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
ARTICLE, Cellular/Molecular

Inhibition of Krebs Cycle Enzymes by Hydrogen Peroxide: A Key Role of α-Ketoglutarate Dehydrogenase in Limiting NADH Production under Oxidative Stress

Laszlo Tretter and Vera Adam-Vizi
Journal of Neuroscience 15 December 2000, 20 (24) 8972-8979; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-24-08972.2000
Laszlo Tretter
1Department of Medical Biochemistry, Neurochemical Group, Semmelweis University of Medicine, Budapest, H-1444, Hungary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vera Adam-Vizi
1Department of Medical Biochemistry, Neurochemical Group, Semmelweis University of Medicine, Budapest, H-1444, Hungary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Inhibition of aconitase by H2O2. Nerve terminals were incubated in the absence (control) or presence of different concentrations of H2O2. Aconitase activity was measured after incubation with H2O2 for 5 min. In the control samples the activity of aconitase was 86.4±3.4 nmol · min−1 · mg−1protein taken as 100%. Enzyme activities are expressed as percentage of control. Data are the average ± SEM of eight determinations made in four independent experiments. *Significant compared with the control, p < 0.05.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Inhibition of α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase by H2O2. Nerve terminals were incubated in the absence (control) or presence of different concentrations of H2O2 for 5 or 10 min (a), or with 100 and 500 μmH2O2, respectively, for different lengths of time (b). In control samples the activity of α-KGDH was 14.2 ± 1.2 nmol · min−1 · mg−1taken as 100%. Data are the average ± SEM of eight determinations made in three independent experiments. *Significant compared with the control, p < 0.05.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Decrease in the NAD(P)H level by H2O2. Fluorescence of NAD(P)H was monitored in synaptosomes (0.5 mg/ml protein) incubated in standard medium in the presence or absence of H2O2. Five minutes after application of H2O2, rotenone (2 μm) was added. To calculate ΔNAD(P)H, the fluorescence measured 10 sec before addition of rotenone was subtracted from that obtained 100 sec after rotenone application. ΔNAD(P)H representing the effect of rotenone in the absence of H2O2(inset, trace a) was taken as control (100%). The rotenone-induced NAD(P)H signals obtained in the presence of 100 or 500 μm H2O2 are shown (% of control) as a function of time; 100% represents 1.18 ± 0.04 nmol NAD(P)H, calibrated with added amounts of NADPH. Results are mean ± SEM of five determinations from three independent experiments. *Significant compared with the control, p < 0.05.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Decrease in the NAD(P)H level by H2O2 in the absence or presence of BCNU, inhibitor of glutathione reductase. Synaptosomes (6 mg/ml) were incubated in the presence (b) or absence (a) of BCNU for 30 min at 37°C, then cooled to 0°C. Aliquots (1 mg protein) were incubated in standard medium (0.5 mg/ml), and NAD(P)H fluorescence was measured as described for Figure3, in the presence of different concentrations of H2O2 for 5 min. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments; 100% represents 1.17 ± 0.06 nmol NAD(P)H. Inset shows the activity of glutathione reductase measured after incubation with different concentrations of BCNU for 30 min. The activity of glutathione reductase in control samples (100%) was 28 ± 0.56 nmol · min−1 · mg−1protein. Data are mean ± SEM of five determinations,p < 0.05.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Relationship between inhibition of aconitase or α-KGDH and decrease in the rotenone-induced NAD(P)H fluorescence. Decreases in the rotenone-induced NAD(P)H signal (data in Fig. 4,curve b) are shown as a function of percentage inhibition of aconitase (derived from Fig. 1) or α-KGDH (from Fig.2a) as measured after incubation with H2O2 for 5 min. H2O2concentrations (in micromoles) are indicated inbrackets. We have shown in separate control experiments (data not shown) that BCNU at 200 μm concentration has no effect on the activities of aconitase or α-KGDH, nor does it influence the effect of H2O2 on these enzymes. Data are average of five [for NAD(P)H measurement] or eight (for enzyme assays) determinations ± SEM.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Reactions in the Krebs cycle influenced by low or high concentrations of H2O2. In the presence of low concentrations of H2O2, (a) when aconitase is completely inactivated but α-KGDH is still functional, glutamate becomes a key metabolite driving a segment of the Krebs cycle (thick arrows) and NADH production is maintained. When α-KGDH is also partially inhibited (b) in the presence of higher concentrations of H2O2 (≥100 μm), NADH generation becomes limited, resulting in an impaired respiratory capacity.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    The effect of H2O2 on the activity of citrate synthase, succinate dehydrogenase, and malate dehydrogenase

    Activity (% of control)
    100 μm H2O2500 μm H2O2
    5 min10 min5 min10 min
    Citrate synthaseNDND98.2  ± 1.898.3  ± 1.2
    Succinate dehydrogenase88  ± 1.121-a76  ± 2.91-a74  ± 4.61-a70.8  ± 3.71-a
    Malate dehydrogenase101.2  ± 1.8104  ± 1.897.4  ± 2.3105  ± 4.1
    • Nerve terminals were incubated with H2O2as indicated, then enzyme activities were determined in assay media containing Triton X-100 to permeabilize the plasma membrane as described in Materials and Methods. Results are expressed as percentage activity of the corresponding controls measured without H2O2 treatment. The following activities were taken as 100%: (1) citrate synthase, 778 ± 70 nmol · min−1 · mg−1 protein (n = 4); (2) succinate dehydrogenase, 30 ± 0.69 nmol · min−1 · mg−1 protein (n = 4); and (3) malate dehydrogenase, 12 ± 0.26 μmol · min−1 · mg−1 protein (n = 4). Results are the average of four independent determinations ± SEM. ND, Not determined.

    • ↵F1-a Significantly different from the corresponding control.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Comparison of the effect of H2O2 on the rotenone-induced NAD(P)H signal in the presence or absence of glucose

    ΔNAD(P)H nmol/mg protein
    Control25 μmH2O2100 μmH2O2500 μmH2O2
    + Glucose1.054  ± 0.140.840  ± 0.13*0.544  ± 0.08*0.518  ± 0.07*
    − Glucose1.285  ± 0.170.850  ± 0.17*0.567  ± 0.09*0.418  ± 0.06*
    • Synaptosomes were incubated with H2O2 for 5 min, then rotenone (2 μm) was added, and the increase in the NAD(P)H signal [ΔNAD(P)H] was measured as shown in Figure 3,inset. Data are mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. Values obtained in samples containing H2O2 are significantly different (

    • ↵* ) from the corresponding controls. Differences between values obtained at a given H2O2 concentration in glucose-containing or glucose-free medium are not statistically different.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    The effect of H2O2 on the total pyridine nucleotide pool

    NAD+/NADH (pmol/mg protein)NADP+/NADPH (pmol/mg protein)
    0 min5 min10 min0 min5 min10 min
    Control3381  ± 1743509  ± 3703357  ± 570359  ± 55387  ± 42351  ± 62
    100 μmH2O2ND3199  ± 2253277  ± 381ND433  ± 86403  ± 62
    500 μmH2O2ND3016  ± 4102852  ± 425ND380  ± 49349  ± 54
    • Synaptosomes (0.5 mg/ml protein) were incubated in standard medium with or without H2O2 as indicated, and the content of pyridine nucleotides was measured as described in Materials and Methods. Results are given as mean ± SEM of four independent experiments. ND, Not determined. The content of pyridine nucleotides in H2O2-treated samples is not significantly different from the corresponding controls.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Effects of H2O2 and glucose-free medium on the glutamate content of synaptosomes

    Glutamate (nmol/mg protein)
    0 min10 min20 min
    Control36.1  ± 3.234.5  ± 2.435.9  ± 2.2
    H2O2 (5 μm)ND34.5  ± 333.6  ± 5.1
    H2O2 (10 μm)ND29.3  ± 2.128.3  ± 1.74-a
    H2O2 (50 μm)36.2  ± 1.824.4  ± 1.44-a18  ± 1.54-a
    H2O2 (500 μm)31.6  ± 4.320.6  ± 1.94-a18.2  ± 1.84-a
    − Glucose30.9  ± 3.725.1  ± 5.84-a16.9  ± 0.54-a
    • Synaptosomes were incubated in the presence or absence of H2O2 or in glucose-free medium as indicated. After different lengths of time, aliquots were taken, and glutamate content was measured as described in Materials and Methods. Each point represents a mean ± SEM of four experiments performed in duplicate.

    • ↵F4-a Significantly different from the corresponding controls (p < 0.005).

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 20 (24)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 20, Issue 24
15 Dec 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inhibition of Krebs Cycle Enzymes by Hydrogen Peroxide: A Key Role of α-Ketoglutarate Dehydrogenase in Limiting NADH Production under Oxidative Stress
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Inhibition of Krebs Cycle Enzymes by Hydrogen Peroxide: A Key Role of α-Ketoglutarate Dehydrogenase in Limiting NADH Production under Oxidative Stress
Laszlo Tretter, Vera Adam-Vizi
Journal of Neuroscience 15 December 2000, 20 (24) 8972-8979; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-24-08972.2000

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Inhibition of Krebs Cycle Enzymes by Hydrogen Peroxide: A Key Role of α-Ketoglutarate Dehydrogenase in Limiting NADH Production under Oxidative Stress
Laszlo Tretter, Vera Adam-Vizi
Journal of Neuroscience 15 December 2000, 20 (24) 8972-8979; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-24-08972.2000
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • hydrogen peroxide
  • oxidative stress
  • mitochondria
  • Krebs cycle
  • α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase
  • aconitase
  • NADH

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

ARTICLE

  • Calcium Influx via L- and N-Type Calcium Channels Activates a Transient Large-Conductance Ca2+-Activated K+Current in Mouse Neocortical Pyramidal Neurons
  • Neural Correlates of Competing Fear Behaviors Evoked by an Innately Aversive Stimulus
  • Distinct Developmental Modes and Lesion-Induced Reactions of Dendrites of Two Classes of Drosophila Sensory Neurons
Show more ARTICLE

Cellular/Molecular

  • Calcium Influx via L- and N-Type Calcium Channels Activates a Transient Large-Conductance Ca2+-Activated K+Current in Mouse Neocortical Pyramidal Neurons
  • Neural Correlates of Competing Fear Behaviors Evoked by an Innately Aversive Stimulus
  • Distinct Developmental Modes and Lesion-Induced Reactions of Dendrites of Two Classes of Drosophila Sensory Neurons
Show more Cellular/Molecular
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2021 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.