Skip to main content

Umbrella menu

  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Preparing a Manuscript
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Fees
    • Journal Club
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Preparing a Manuscript
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Fees
    • Journal Club
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
ARTICLE, Behavioral/Systems

Discharge Profiles of Juxtacellularly Labeled and Immunohistochemically Identified GABAergic Basal Forebrain Neurons Recorded in Association with the Electroencephalogram in Anesthetized Rats

Ian D. Manns, Angel Alonso and Barbara E. Jones
Journal of Neuroscience 15 December 2000, 20 (24) 9252-9263; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-24-09252.2000
Ian D. Manns
1Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2B4
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angel Alonso
1Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2B4
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barbara E. Jones
1Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2B4
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Example of EEG and unit activity patterns before and during somatosensory stimulation. I, EEG (A) from retrosplenial cortex and unit discharge rate (B, PSH of the rate of discharge in spikes per second) for periods preceding and during somatic stimulation conditions. The EEG (C) and unit discharge (D) traces are expanded for the period of transition from irregular slow cortical activity to rhythmic slow activity. Note the change in pattern of the EEG activity and concomitant increase in rate of tonic discharge by the unit.II, EEG analysis during prestimulation and stimulation conditions. EEG ACFs (in A, with correlation coefficient on vertical axes) and power spectra (with low- and high-frequency ranges, respectively placed in left and right insets) are shown for prestimulation and stimulation records. These indicate the shift from low-frequency irregular slow activity to a higher frequency rhythmic slow activity with stimulation, in addition to the concomitant increase in gamma amplitude seen in the high-frequency power spectra (data from neuron #9918014.)

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Photomicrographs of recorded and juxtacellularly labeled Nb+/GAD+ or Nb+/GAD− neurons located in the basal forebrain cholinergic cell area. Nb was revealed with green fluorescent Cy2-conjugated streptavidin (left) and GAD immunostaining with red fluorescent Cy3-conjugated secondary antibodies (right). A, Nb+/GAD+ on (tonic) neuron in SI. B, Nb+/GAD+ off (tonic/cluster) neuron in MCPO.C, Nb+/GAD+ off (burst) neuron in MCPO.D, Nb+/GAD+ off (tonic) neuron in MCPO.E, Nb+/GAD− on (tonic) neuron in MCPO. The location of each cell is shown in the atlas inset to thebottom left of each cell, and together with other cells, as the largest symbol for its subgroup in this figure; the recording of each cell (A–E) is shown in order in subsequent figures (3–7, respectively). Scale bar, 20 μm.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Location of Nb+/GAD+ and Nb+/GAD− neurons in the basal forebrain [represented on atlas sections adapted from Gritti et al. (1993)]. Each subgroup of GAD+ cells (triangular symbols) and GAD− cells (circular symbols) is represented by a particular symbol (as indicated in the figure), and the exemplary cell from each subgroup (illustrated in Figs.1A–E, 3–7, respectively) is represented by the largest symbol. Scale bar, 1 mm. Acb, Accumbens nucleus;ac, anterior commissure; BST, bed of the stria terminalis; CPu, caudate putamen;DBB, diagonal band of Broca nucleus; f, fornix; FStr, fundus of striatum; GP, globus pallidus; LPOA, lateral preoptic area;LS, lateral septum; MCPO, magnocellular preoptic nucleus; MS, medial septum; oc, optic chiasm; OTu, olfactory tubercle;Pir, Piriform cortex; Ret, Reticularis nucleus; SIa, substantia innominata pars anterior;SIp, substantia innominata pars posterior;sm, stria medullaris.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Nb+/GAD+ on (tonic) cell (#98o18009/11 shown in Fig. 1A). I, EEG and unit recording during prestimulation and stimulation conditions. EEG (A) from retrosplenial cortex and unit discharge rate (B, PSH, plotting spikes per second) are shown for periods preceding and during somatic stimulation. The EEG (C) is expanded and shown with the unit traces (D) for each condition (below, left, and right). Note that the unit discharge is tonic during both the prestimulation and stimulation conditions and increases in rate in association with the stimulation-evoked EEG changes from irregular slow to rhythmic slow activity, indicative of cortical activation. II. EEG and unit analysis during prestimulation and stimulation conditions. EEG autocorrelation functions (ACF, in A, with correlation coefficient on vertical axes) and power spectra (with low- and high-frequency ranges, respectively, placed in left and right insets) are shown for prestimulation and stimulation records. These illustrate the shift from low-frequency irregular slow activity to a higher frequency rhythmic slow activity with stimulation and the concomitant increase in gamma amplitude seen in the high-frequency range of the power spectra. Unit autocorrelation histograms (ACH, inB, with normalized incidence on vertical axes) and ISIH (in insets on right) are shown for the same records. An expansion of the ACH is shown (below each) for shorter intervals along with the spectra of the ACH (as insetsin top right corners in which † indicates rhythmic activity according to established criterion). Note that the unit discharge is moderately high and relatively regular during the prestimulation condition with a frequency at ∼20 Hz and higher and very regular (such as to be considered rhythmic) with a frequency at ∼40 Hz during the stimulation-evoked increase in gamma activity and cortical activation.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Nb+/GAD+ off (tonic/cluster) cell (#03/25/LM2 shown in Fig. 1B). I, Note in the PSH (B), that the average rate of discharge decreases in association with cortical activation (A). At the same time, the pattern of discharge changed from tonic spiking during prestimulation to a cluster discharge pattern (D) in association with the appearance of rhythmic slow activity that occurred on the EEG (C) during stimulation. II, Note in the analysis, that after stimulation, the EEG shifted from irregular slow activity to a faster rhythmic slow activity, accompanied by an increase in gamma activity. During stimulation the unit discharge is rhythmic (in the ACH shown in B) at ∼2 Hz (as evident in the power spectrum of the ACH shown in inset ontop left). The expanded ACH for the stimulation condition (drop down) indicates that the high-frequency activity within the spike clusters is relatively regular at ∼40 Hz (but does not meet criterion for being rhythmic). STAs (shown in C) of the unit-to-EEG cross-correlation (with millivolts on vertical axes) indicate that the correlation for the unit (black line) is significantly different from that for the randomized-spike train (gray line, Wilcoxon test; *p< 0.05). The power spectrum for the unit-to-EEG STA is shown (ininset). Note that the cross-correlated unit-to-EEG activity occurs at a frequency of ∼2 Hz, which did not correspond to the prominent EEG rhythmic slow activity or spectral peak but to a secondary peak in the power spectrum (shown in A withinset on top left). See Figure 3 for further explanation of measures.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Nb+/GAD+ off (burst) neuron (#98n030016/19 shown in Fig. 1D). I, Note the virtual cessation of discharge (in the PSH in B) with somatic stimulation that evokes cortical activation in the EEG (A). In association with the irregular slow EEG activity during prestimulation (C), high-frequency bursting occurs (D, including inset with blow up below on left). II, Note in the analysis of the EEG a shift from irregular slow to faster rhythmic slow activity with stimulation. The unit analysis for prestimulation indicates the high-frequency spike mode (at ∼200 Hz in the ISIH inB) reflecting the bursting and the slower frequency activity reflecting the recurrence of the bursting at a similar frequency as the EEG activity (at ∼1.2 Hz, evident in the ISIH, ACH, and spectrum of the ACH for the unit in B and in the spectrum of the ACF for the EEG in A). The unit discharge was significantly cross-correlated with the EEG (as shown in the STA in C) at this same frequency (evident in power spectrum in inset). See Figures 3 and 4 for further explanation of measures.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Nb+/GAD+ off (tonic) cell (#98o16010 shown in Fig.1C). I, Note in the PSH (B), the marked decrease in discharge and in the recording (C), the relatively tonic slow discharge of the unit in association with the irregular slow activity of the EEG (C). II, Note in the analysis, the shift in EEG activity from the irregular slow activity to a higher frequency rhythmic slow activity. Also note, the slow (8.5 Hz mode in ISIH) and relatively irregular discharge of the unit (B) and the lack of relationship with the EEG (B, C). See Figures 3 and 4 for further explanation of measures.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Nb+/GAD− on (tonic) neuron (#03/23/R2 as shown in Fig. 1E). I, Note the increase in average discharge rate (B) and regularity of discharge, which becomes clearly tonic (D) in association with cortical activation (A, C) during stimulation. II, Note in the analysis that with stimulation the EEG shifts from irregular slow activity to a faster rhythmic slow activity, concomitant with an increase in gamma activity. The tonic discharge of the unit shows no sign of rhythmicity in the high-frequency range (B with drop down) in contrast to the Nb+/GAD+ on (tonic) cell (shown in Fig. 3). See Figure 3 for further explanation of measures.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Frequency of anatomical and physiological characteristics in GABAergic and non-GABAergic cell groups1-a

    All cellsNb+/GAD+ cellsNb+/GAD− cellsStatistic
    (n = 55)(n= 21)(n = 34)χ2 (df)
    Anatomy
     Area0.004 (1)
      SI16610
      MCPO391524
     Shape0.064 (1)
      Oval-fusiform (Bipolar)301119
      Polygonal (Multipolar)251015
     Size2.99 (1)
      Small (≤15 μm)303
      Medium-Large (>15 μm)522131
    Physiology
     Response to stimulation (PSH1-b)10.14 (1)1-165
      Increase (“on”)36828
      Decrease (“off”)18126
     Discharge pattern0.47 (2)
      Tonic291217
      Tonic and/or cluster16511
      Tonic and/or burst1046
     Low-frequency rhythmicity during stimulation (ACH1-c)2.31 (1)
      Rhythmic20515
      Not rhythmic351619
     Unit-to-EEG cross-correlation during stimulation (STA1-d)3.79 (1)*
      Correlated19415
      Not correlated361719
    • ↵F1-a Frequencies (n, number of cells) for the two groups are presented and compared using the likelihood ratio χ2 statistic;

    • ↵* p < 0.05;

    • F1-160 p < 0.01;

    • ↵F1-165 p < 0.001.

    • ↵F1-b Classification based on peristimulus histogram (PSH) measure of average discharge rate.

    • ↵F1-c Based on autocorrelation histogram (ACH) values.

    • ↵F1-d Based on unit-to-EEG spike-triggered averages (STA) with EEG from retrosplenial cortex.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Morphological and physiological measures of GABAergic and non-GABAergic cell groups 2-a

    Cell size (μm)2-bSpike width (msec)2-cAntidromic latency (msec)2-d
    Nb+/GAD+ cells average†23.14  ± 0.99 (21)0.56  ± 0.03 (21)12.05  ± 2.24 (6)
     “On” average20.85  ± 0.70 (8)0.57  ± 0.06 (8)11.80  ± 3.94 (3)
      On (tonic)
     “Off” average ⊗24.80  ± 1.48 (12)0.56  ± 0.03 (12)12.30  ± 3.10 (3)
      Off (tonic/cluster)24.68  ± 3.33 (5)0.48  ± 0.03 (5)
      Off (burst)23.85  ± 1.38 (4)0.60  ± 0.04 (4)12.30  ± 3.06 (3)
      Off (tonic)26.20  ± 2.45 (3)0.65  ± 0.06 (3)
    Nb+/GAD− cells average20.53  ± 0.78 (34) †0.61  ± 0.02 (34)11.09  ± 1.59 (7)
     “On” average21.09  ± 0.88 (28)0.61  ± 0.02 (28)10.55  ± 1.75 (6)
      On (tonic)20.32  ± 1.00 (12)0.63  ± 0.03 (12)11.30  ± 1.90 (5)
      On (cluster)21.44  ± 1.76 (10)0.56  ± 0.04 (10)
      On (burst)22.06  ± 2.30 (6)0.64  ± 0.06 (6)6.50 (1)
     “Off” average17.91  ± 1.29 (6)⊗0.58  ± 0.05 (6)14.30 (1)
      Off (tonic)
    • ↵F2-a Mean ± SEM values (withn in parentheses) for Nb+/GAD+ and Nb+/GAD− cell groups and subgroups. GAD− groups or subgroups were compared with homologous GAD+ cell groups or subgroups by ANOVA, and a significant difference was indicated by the specific symbol of the GAD+ group (shown in the first column) with which the comparison was made (with one symbol =p < 0.05).

    • ↵F2-b Large diameter of cell soma.

    • ↵F2-c Spike width measured from initial positive inflection to first zero crossing.

    • ↵F2-d Latency to antidromically activated spikes from prefrontal cortex.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    GABAergic and non-GABAergic cells' mean average discharge rate (PSH), instantaneous firing frequency (ISIH), rhythmic discharge rate (ACH), unit-to-EEG cross-correlation frequency (STA), and associated dominant EEG spectral peak during prestimulation and stimulation conditions 3-a

    Group percentUnit rate (PSH, Hz)Unit frequency (ISIH, Hz)Unit rhythmic frequency (ACH, Hz)Unit-to-EEG frequency (STA, Hz)EEG spectral peak (Hz)
    PrestimulationStimulationPrestimulationStimulationPrestimulationStimulationPrestimulationStimulationPrestimulationStimulation
    Nb+/GAD+ cells average†100%17.91  ± 2.78 (20)17.31  ± 3.84 (20)60.52  ± 27.69 (20)60.62  ± 26.99 (20) 1.42 ± 0.39 (4)1.52 ± 0.14 (5)1.08 ± 0.21 (9)1.69 ± 0.14 (3)0.97 ± 0.13 (16)3.20 ± 0.21 (16)3-165
    high: 29.34 ± 3.05 (7)high: 31.81 ± 3.74 (7)
    “On” average §40%23.15  ± 5.22 (8)33.01  ± 5.61 (8)3-16028.49  ± 6.32 (8)49.29  ± 14.63 (8) 0.86 (1)—0.68 ± 0.01 (3)—1.16 ± 0.21 (8)3.21 ± 0.25 (8)3-165
     On (tonic)high: 30.88 ± 5.31 (4)high: 31.81 ± 3.74 (7)
    “Off” average60%14.40  ± 2.82 (12)6.85  ± 2.03 (12)3-16581.88  ± 45.67 (12)68.17  ± 44.64 (12) 1.61 ± 0.49 (3)1.52 ± 0.14 (5)1.28 ± 0.29 (6)1.69 ± 0.14 (3)0.77 ± 0.12 (8)3.19 ± 0.36 (8)3-165
    high: 27.30 ± 2.22 (3)
     Off (tonic-cluster)25%18.90  ± 3.00 (5)9.18  ± 3.07 (5)3-16026.32  ± 4.26 (5)37.78  ± 6.22 (5) 1.5 (1)1.52 ± 0.14 (5)1.49 ± 0.01 (2)1.69 ± 0.14 (3)0.55 ± 0.05 (2)3.66 ± 0.74 (2)
    high: 27.30 ± 2.22 (3)
     Off (burst)20%16.88  ± 5.73 (4)8.30  ± 4.23 (4)208.6  ± 121.73 (4)155.00  ± 133.77 (4)0.82 (1)—0.82 ± 0.01 (2)—1.11 ± 0.13 (3)3.26 ± 0.52 (3)
     Off (tonic)15%3.62  ± 0.75 (3)0.99  ± 0.51 (3)5.53  ± 1.60 (3)3.02  ± 0.68 (3)2.5 (1)—1.53 ± 0.98 (2)—0.61 ± 0.16 (3)2.80 ± 0.79 (3)
    Nb+/GAD− cells average100%8.95  ± 1.51 (34)††12.93  ± 1.84 (34)3-165(†)25.17  ± 5.12 (34)31.27  ± 8.38 (34) 1.40 ± 0.28 (10)2.02 ± 0.26 (15)1.01 ± 0.30 (12)2.34 ± 0.31 (15)3-1501.24 ± 0.13 (26)2.71 ± 0.18 (26)3-165
    high: 23.82 ± 3.57 (6)high: 33.28 ± 4.92 (5)
    “On” average82%8.98  ± 1.58 (28)§§§14.76  ± 1.96 (28)3-165§§§(§)26.09  ± 6.00 (28)35.85  ± 9.93 (28) 1.40 ± 0.28 (10)2.06 ± 0.28 (14)0.71 ± 0.80 (10)2.17 ± 0.28 (14)3-1501.14 ± 0.09 (21)2.63 ± 0.20 (21)3-165
    high: 23.82 ± 3.57 (6)high: 33.28 ± 4.92 (5)
     On (tonic)35%12.10  ± 2.77 (12)20.72  ± 3.19 (12)3-165(§)26.51  ± 5.34 (12)29.90  ± 4.08 (12) 0.84 ± 0.14 (3)—0.79 ± 0.12 (4)2.10 ± 1.42 (2)1.30 ± 0.17 (10)2.72 ± 0.31 (10)3-165
    high: 23.70 ± 0.70 (3)high: 24.70 ± 5.03 (2)
     On (cluster)29%7.57  ± 2.50 (10)10.28  ± 2.45 (10)3-16019.32  ± 4.25 (10)21.67  ± 4.02 (10) 1.41 ± 0.30 (4)1.62 ± 0.13 (10)0.78 ± 0.14 (3)1.57 ± 0.12 (7)1.14 ± 0.15 (5)2.60 ± 0.27 (5)3-150
    high: 23.93 ± 7.95 (3)high: 39.00 ± 5.51 (3)
     On (burst)18%5.06  ± 1.61 (6)10.3  ± 2.74 (6)3-15040.33  ± 7.67 (6)71.37  ± 45.06 (6) 1.95 ± 0.83 (3)3.15 ± 0.71 (4)0.55 ± 0.16 (3)3.02 ± 0.44 (5)3-1500.91 ± 0.06 (6)2.86 ± 0.39 (6)3-160
    “Off” average18%8.81  ± 4.78 (6)4.39  ± 3.50 (6)3-15017.10  ± 7.68 (6)9.92  ± 5.51 (6)3-150—1.55 (1)2.50 ± 1.71 (2)4.73 (1)1.61 ± 0.60 (5)3.01 ± 0.46 (5)3-150
     Off (tonic)
    • ↵F3-a Mean ± SEM (withn in parentheses) values are presented for the prestimulation and stimulation conditions for Nb+/GAD+ and Nb+/GAD− cell groups and subgroups. Within each group or subgroup, measures were compared across the prestimulation and stimulation conditions by pairedt tests for the unit discharge PSH and ISIH values and for the EEG spectral peak or by unpaired t tests for ACH and STA values (

    • ↵F3-150 p < 0.05;

    • ↵F3-160 p < 0.01;

    • ↵F3-165 p< 0.001). GAD− groups or subgroups were compared with homologous GAD+ cell groups or subgroups by ANOVA, and a significant difference indicated by the specific symbol of the GAD+ group (shown in the first column) with which the comparison was made (with one symbol =p < 0.05, two symbols = p < 0.01, or three symbols = p < 0.001). Symbols in parentheses indicate that the GAD− cell group differed from the GAD+ cell group according to a two-way ANOVA with group (GAD− or GAD+) as a between factor and condition (prestimulation and stimulation) as repeated measure within each group. Symbols out of parentheses indicate that they differed according to a one-way ANOVA between groups in the prestimulation or stimulation condition.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 20 (24)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 20, Issue 24
15 Dec 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Discharge Profiles of Juxtacellularly Labeled and Immunohistochemically Identified GABAergic Basal Forebrain Neurons Recorded in Association with the Electroencephalogram in Anesthetized Rats
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Discharge Profiles of Juxtacellularly Labeled and Immunohistochemically Identified GABAergic Basal Forebrain Neurons Recorded in Association with the Electroencephalogram in Anesthetized Rats
Ian D. Manns, Angel Alonso, Barbara E. Jones
Journal of Neuroscience 15 December 2000, 20 (24) 9252-9263; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-24-09252.2000

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Discharge Profiles of Juxtacellularly Labeled and Immunohistochemically Identified GABAergic Basal Forebrain Neurons Recorded in Association with the Electroencephalogram in Anesthetized Rats
Ian D. Manns, Angel Alonso, Barbara E. Jones
Journal of Neuroscience 15 December 2000, 20 (24) 9252-9263; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-24-09252.2000
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • juxtacellular labeling
  • gamma
  • paradoxical sleep
  • slow wave sleep
  • theta
  • waking

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

ARTICLE

  • Netrin-1 Is a Chemorepellent for Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cells in the Embryonic Spinal Cord
  • Selective Enhancement of Synaptic Inhibition by Hypocretin (Orexin) in Rat Vagal Motor Neurons: Implications for Autonomic Regulation
  • Single-Cell Microarray Analysis in Hippocampus CA1: Demonstration and Validation of Cellular Heterogeneity
Show more ARTICLE

Behavioral/Systems

  • Efferent Protection from Acoustic Injury Is Mediated via α9 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors on Outer Hair Cells
  • Attenuation of Nicotine-Induced Antinociception, Rewarding Effects, and Dependence in μ-Opioid Receptor Knock-Out Mice
  • Rostral Ventromedial Medulla Neurons That Project to the Spinal Cord Express Multiple Opioid Receptor Phenotypes
Show more Behavioral/Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2021 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.