Skip to main content

Umbrella menu

  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Preparing a Manuscript
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Fees
    • Journal Club
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Preparing a Manuscript
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Fees
    • Journal Club
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
ARTICLE, Behavioral/Systems

Peptide Cotransmitter Release from Motorneuron B16 inAplysia californica: Costorage, Corelease, and Functional Implications

Ferdinand S. Vilim, Elizabeth C. Cropper, David A. Price, Irving Kupfermann and Klaudiusz R. Weiss
Journal of Neuroscience 1 March 2000, 20 (5) 2036-2042; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-05-02036.2000
Ferdinand S. Vilim
1Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth C. Cropper
1Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David A. Price
2C. V. Whitney Laboratory, University of Florida, St. Augustine, Florida 32086, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Irving Kupfermann
3Center for Neurobiology and Behavior, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, New York 10032
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Klaudiusz R. Weiss
1Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    A, Myomodulin immunostaining in the ARC muscle using lissamine–rhodamine-conjugated donkey anti-rat secondary antibody. B, Buccalin immunostaining of the same field in the ARC muscle using fluorescein-labeled donkey anti-rabbit secondary antibody. Short arrows point to processes that stain for buccalin alone and correspond to B15 processes. Longer arrows point to processes that stain for both myomodulin and buccalin, corresponding to B16 processes. Scale bar, 100 μm (applies to A and B).C, Post-embedding immunogold dual labeling of BUC and MM in a B16 neuromuscular junction of the ARC. BUC is labeled with a rabbit antibody and a 5 nm gold-labeled secondary antibody. MM is labeled with a rat antibody and a 10 nm gold-labeled secondary antibody. Most of the DCVs are labeled with both small (5 nm) and large (10 nm) gold particles, indicating the presence of both BUCs and MMs in the same DCVs. Scale bar, 100 nm.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Effect of extracellular calcium and hexamethonium on peptide release from B16 in the ARC. A1, Results from a single experiment in which MM release is measured with and without normal calcium in the perfusate. Motorneuron B16 was stimulated during four 5 min periods (indicated by the black bars) with a physiologically relevant frequency and pattern (20 Hz for 3.5 sec every 7 sec). A2, The average of four such experiments for each peptide. For each peptide, the mean ± SE of four separate experiments is plotted at each calcium concentration. The results show that release of both peptides is dependent on extracellular calcium (p < 0.0001). B1, Results from a single experiment in which BUC release is measured without and with 0.1 mm hexamethonium (which completely abolished the contraction of the muscle) in the perfusate. Motorneuron B16 was stimulated during four 5 min periods (indicated by the black bars) with a physiologically relevant frequency and pattern (20 Hz for 3.5 sec every 7 sec). B2, The mean ± SE of the normalized release from four such experiments for each peptide. The results show that release of both peptides is not dependent on contraction of the muscle (p > 0.5).

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Corelease of MMs and BUCs within the ARC in response to stimulation of motorneuron B16. During the 1 hr period indicated by the bar, the neuron was fired at 20 Hz for 3.5 sec every 7 sec, which is within the physiological range of B16 firing. Samples of ARC perfusate were collected every 2.5 min and analyzed by radioimmunoassay for their peptide content. Alternate samples were analyzed for their MM or BUC content. A1, MM and BUC release in a single experiment. A2, Same asA1 except that BUC was scaled so those total amounts released were equal for both MM and BUC, enabling a more direct comparison of their profiles. B1, MM and BUC release from four experiments was expressed as a percentage of the total amount of peptide (MM + BUC) released in the experiment, and the percentages were averaged for each 5 min (2 sample) period. B2, Same as B1, except that BUC was scaled so that total percentages were equal for both MM and BUC, enabling a more direct comparison of their profiles. The ratio of MM and BUC remains constant even though the absolute peptide content of the samples varies considerably over the course of B16 stimulation.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Effect of increasing either contraction frequency or amplitude on peptide release from motorneuron B16.A1, Hypothetical consequences of increased rate of feeding with no concomitant alteration of muscle properties. The closer is not sufficiently relaxed and opposes the contractions of opener muscles. Consequently, the radula does not open, and functional feeding is compromised. When the relaxation rate of the closer muscle is increased, functional feeding can be restored. A2,Results from a single experiment in which BUC release is measured at different interburst intervals, simulating changes in the rate of feeding, whereas the intraburst frequency (20 Hz) and the duration of bursts (3.5 sec) are kept constant. The duration of stimulation in this type of experiment was 5 min. The physiological range of interburst intervals for B16 varies from 3.5 to 10 sec (or more) (Cropper et al., 1990b). BUC release decreases as the interval between bursts increases.A3, Peptide release is normalized to the total release during an experiment and for the total number of action potentials delivered in each condition. The results from four separate experiments for each peptide were averaged and plotted (± SE) for each of the three interburst intervals. There is a statistically significant (BUC:F = 23.13; df = 2,6; p < 0.002 MM: F = 25.1; df = 2,6;p < 0.002) inverse relationship between peptide released per action potential and the duration between bursts. The fact that this relationship is nearly identical for the two peptides indicates that they are released at a fixed ratio. B1, Hypothetical consequences of increased contraction amplitude of the radula closer with no concomitant alteration of muscle properties. The closer is not sufficiently relaxed and opposes the contractions of opener muscles. Consequently, the radula does not open, and functional feeding is compromised. As in A1, when the relaxation rate of the closer muscle is increased, functional feeding can be restored. B2, Results from a single experiment in which MM release is measured at three different intraburst frequencies, which produce contractions of differing amplitudes, while the duration of bursts (3.5 sec) and the interburst interval (3.5 sec) are kept constant. The physiological range of firing frequencies for B16 varies between 10–20 Hz (Cropper et al., 1990b). The duration of stimulation in this type of experiment was 5 min. MM release is lower at the lower intraburst frequencies. B3, Normalized release per action potential at each of the three intraburst frequencies corrected to give the release per action potential. The results from four separate experiments for each peptide were averaged and plotted (± SE) for each of the three intraburst frequencies of stimulation. There is a statistically significant (BUC: F = 47.36; df = 2,6; p < 0.0005; MM: F = 126.78; df = 2,6; p < 0.0001) increase of peptide released per action potential and as the frequency of action potentials increases. The fact that this relationship is nearly identical for the two peptides also indicates that they are released at a fixed ratio.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Comparison of the peptide release per action potential from motorneurons B15 and B16 as a function of intraburst frequency and interburst interval. A, Normalized release per action potential at each of the three intraburst frequencies corrected to give the release per action potential. Burst duration (3.5 sec) and interburst interval (3.5 sec) were identical in all experiments. The results from eight separate experiments for each motorneuron were averaged and plotted (± SE) at three different intraburst frequencies of stimulation. The physiological range of firing frequencies for B15 varies between 7.5 and 12 Hz, and B16 varies between 10 and 20 Hz. Peptide release appears to be coordinated with the normal operating range of frequencies of each motorneuron.B, Normalized release per action potential at each of the three interburst intervals corrected to give the release per action potential. Burst duration (3.5 sec) and intraburst frequencies (12 Hz for B15, 20 Hz for B16) were identical in all experiments. The results from eight separate experiments for each motorneuron was averaged and plotted (± SE) at three interburst intervals of stimulation (3.5, 5, and 7 sec). The data for B15 have been described previously (Vilim et al., 1996b). The data for B16 were recalculated from Figure 4.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 20 (5)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 20, Issue 5
1 Mar 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Peptide Cotransmitter Release from Motorneuron B16 inAplysia californica: Costorage, Corelease, and Functional Implications
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Peptide Cotransmitter Release from Motorneuron B16 inAplysia californica: Costorage, Corelease, and Functional Implications
Ferdinand S. Vilim, Elizabeth C. Cropper, David A. Price, Irving Kupfermann, Klaudiusz R. Weiss
Journal of Neuroscience 1 March 2000, 20 (5) 2036-2042; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-05-02036.2000

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Peptide Cotransmitter Release from Motorneuron B16 inAplysia californica: Costorage, Corelease, and Functional Implications
Ferdinand S. Vilim, Elizabeth C. Cropper, David A. Price, Irving Kupfermann, Klaudiusz R. Weiss
Journal of Neuroscience 1 March 2000, 20 (5) 2036-2042; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-05-02036.2000
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Aplysia
  • neuropeptide
  • cotransmitter
  • buccalin
  • myomodulin
  • immunolocalization
  • RIA
  • release
  • motorneuron

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

ARTICLE

  • Cytoskeletal and Morphological Alterations Underlying Axonal Sprouting after Localized Transection of Cortical Neuron AxonsIn Vitro
  • Aberrant Chloride Transport Contributes to Anoxic/Ischemic White Matter Injury
  • Developmental Increase in Vesicular Glutamate Content Does Not Cause Saturation of AMPA Receptors at the Calyx of Held Synapse
Show more ARTICLE

Behavioral/Systems

  • Spinal Inhibitory Neurons that Modulate Cutaneous Sensory Pathways during Locomotion in a Simple Vertebrate
  • Interaction of Excitation and Inhibition in Anteroventral Cochlear Nucleus Neurons That Receive Large Endbulb Synaptic Endings
  • Efferent Protection from Acoustic Injury Is Mediated via α9 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors on Outer Hair Cells
Show more Behavioral/Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2021 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.