Fig. 2. Time course and concentration dependence of DHP-mediated neuronal death. A, The graph represents one experiment in which cell counts were made at sequential time points during DHP treatment. Counts of DHP-treated cultures were significantly different from control cultures at DIV 8 and 10 (treatment days 5 and 7). In the graph, counts of individual microscopic fields, including those of control dishes, were expressed relative to the mean control counts; thus both control and experimental treatment groups show error bars. B, The graph represents the effects of treatment of cultures with 0.3, 1.5, and 3.0 μm DHP. Cell counts were obtained at DIV 10. C, Lack of metabolism of steroids in culture. A bioassay was used to determine the amount of steroid remaining in cultures 10 d after treatment. Conditioned medium (CM) from DIV 14 cultures was harvested from untreated cultures or cultures treated with 3 μmDHP. Unconditioned medium (UM) was used as a comparison and was either spiked immediately before use with 3 μm DHP (+DHP) or left untreated. For all samples, hydrophobic steroids were separated from hydrophilic molecules using a Baker 10 SPE octadecyl column. The hydrophobic fraction was eluted with methanol, dried, and resuspended inXenopus oocyte recording medium to a final predicted concentration of 1 μm DHP for the DHP-treated samples (assuming no degradation in the conditioned medium samples). This final concentration of DHP (1 μm) was used for evaluation because it is near the EC50 for modulation of GABAA receptors (Zorumski et al., 1998). GABA (1 μm) was added to each of the reconstituted samples. Solutions containing GABA alone or the diluted culture medium were applied to voltage-clamped Xenopus oocytes. The amplitudes of responses to each solution are expressed relative to the response to GABA alone in the bar graph.Inset, Raw traces from a representative oocyte. Experimental conditions for the inset are in the order shown on the bar graph.