ARTICLE, Development/Plasticity/Repair

Generation of a Novel Functional Neuronal Circuit inHoxa1 Mutant Mice

Eduardo Domı́nguez del Toro, Véronique Borday, Marc Davenne, Rüdiger Neun, Filippo M. Rijli and Jean Champagnat
Journal of Neuroscience 1 August 2001, 21 (15) 5637-5642; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-15-05637.2001

Abstract

Early organization of the vertebrate brainstem is characterized by cellular segmentation into compartments, the rhombomeres, which follow a metameric pattern of neuronal development. Expression of the homeobox genes of the Hox family precedes rhombomere formation, and analysis of mouse Hox mutations revealed that they play an important role in the establishment of rhombomere-specific neuronal patterns. However, segmentation is a transient feature, and a dramatic reconfiguration of neurons and synapses takes place during fetal and postnatal stages. Thus, it is not clear whether the early rhombomeric pattern of Hoxexpression has any influence on the establishment of the neuronal circuitry of the mature brainstem. The Hoxa1 gene is the earliest Hox gene expressed in the developing hindbrain. Moreover, it is rapidly downregulated. Previous analysis of mouseHoxa1−/− mutants has focused on early alterations of hindbrain segmentation and patterning. Here, we show that ectopic neuronal groups in the hindbrain ofHoxa1−/− mice establish a supernumerary neuronal circuit that escapes apoptosis and becomes functional postnatally. This system develops from mutant rhombomere 3 (r3)-r4 levels, includes an ectopic group of progenitors with r2 identity, and integrates the rhythm-generating network controlling respiration at birth. This is the first demonstration that changes inHox expression patterns allow the selection of novel neuronal circuits regulating vital adaptive behaviors. The implications for the evolution of brainstem neural networks are discussed.

In the hindbrain of the vertebrate embryo, Hox genes are segmentally expressed and loss- and gain-of-function mutations revealed their involvement in neuronal patterning (Carpenter et al., 1993; Mark et al., 1993; Goddard et al., 1996; Lumsden and Krumlauf, 1996; Studer et al., 1996; Gavalas et al., 1997, 1998; Helmbacher et al., 1998; Rijli et al., 1998; Bell et al., 1999; Davenne et al., 1999; Jungbluth et al., 1999; Rossel and Capecchi, 1999). Expression of Hoxa1 is one of the earliest signs of regionalization within the developing hindbrain. As early as 7.5 d postcoitum (dpc), the Hoxa1 expression domain extends from the posterior end of the mouse embryo up to the presumptive rhombomere 3 (r3)-r4 border and is downregulated before rhombomere boundary formation (Murphy and Hill, 1991). This transient expression has a profound impact on hindbrain patterning, becauseHoxa1-targeted inactivation results in a severe reduction of r4 and r5 and their derived structures (e.g., the motor nucleus of the facial nerve) and in lethality shortly after birth (Carpenter et al., 1993; Mark et al., 1993). However, it is unclear how transientHox expression before segment formation may influence the generation of functional neuronal networks in the postsegmental hindbrain (Fortin et al., 1999) and affect vital behaviors during postnatal life (Fortin et al., 2000). By examining hindbrain neural networks in Hoxa1−/− mice, we now identify ectopic groups of mis-specified neurons that escape apoptosis (Rossel and Capecchi, 1999) during development and control the respiratory rhythm-generating neural network (Champagnat and Fortin, 1996) after birth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mouse lines and genotyping. Hoxa1 mutant mice (Mark et al., 1993), embryos, and newborns were genotyped by PCR as described previously (Gavalas et al., 1998). The r2-lacZtransgenic line was obtained by injection of a construct carrying a 2.5 kb BamHI Hoxa2 genomic fragment (Frasch et al., 1995) cloned in a non-native orientation into the BGZ40 plasmid (Studer et al., 1996), containing the human β-globin promoter drivinglacZ expression. Transgenic r2-lacZ mice were bred with Hoxa1+/− mice to produceHoxa1+/−, r2-lacZanimals. The latter were bred withHoxa1+/− animals to produce embryos with the desired genotype. Detection of the transgene was performed by PCR.

Whole-mount in situ RNA hybridization, immunohistochemistry, and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl β-d-galactoside staining. Whole-mount in situ RNA hybridization was performed as described previously (Davenne et al., 1999) using thePhox2b (Pattyn et al., 1997) and Hoxb1 (Studer et al., 1996) probes. Whole-mount immunohistochemistry using the anti-ISL1 monoclonal antibody (4D5) (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Iowa City, IA) and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl β-d-galactoside staining was performed as described previously (Davenne et al., 1999). Hindbrains were dissected out and flat-mounted before being photographed. Postnatal neuronal groups (Jacquin et al., 1996) were identified on coronal, horizontal, and parasagittal 40-μm-thick sections processed alternatively using cresyl violet and polyclonal antibodies to choline acetyltransferase (1:1000 in PBS, pH 7.4; Chemicon, Temecula, CA) and to tyrosine hydroxylase (1:1000 in PBS; Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany) in the presence of Triton X-100 and were subsequently revealed using the Vectastain avidin–biotin complex kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) as described previously (Jacquin et al., 1996). To study axonal pathways, the trigeminal motor root or the bulbar reticular area ventral to the ambiguus nucleus was pressure injected with DiI (5 mg/ml in DMSO) after brain fixation. Incubation times (at 37°C) were 3 d after trigeminal injections and 4 d after bulbar injections.

Plethysmograph recordings and naloxone treatment in vivo. We used 231 mice from 34 Hoxa1 litters. Sixty mice were wild type (WT), 124 mice were heterozygous mutants, and 47 mice were homozygous mutants, a proportion close to the Mendelian expectation. Respiratory activity was measured every 6 hr using a modified barometric method used previously in neonates (Jacquin et al., 1996). The whole-body plethysmograph chamber (20 ml) equipped with a temperature sensor (LN 35 Z) was connected to a reference chamber of the same volume. The pressure difference between the two chambers was measured with a differential pressure transducer (DP 103-12; Validyne, North Ridge, CA) connected to a sine wave carrier demodulator (CD15; Validyne). Neonates were removed individually from the litter and placed in the plethysmograph chamber, which was kept hermetically closed and maintained at 31°C during the recording session (2 min). During quiet breathing, a computer-assisted method was used to measure the duration of inspirations and expirations from which the respiratory frequency is derived. Naloxone was administered (3.33 mg/kg, s.c., in 50 μl of saline) using a Hamilton syringe at the end of the first plethysmographic recording (1–2 hr after birth), and the stimulatory effect on respiration was controlled 0.5–1 hr later.

Network analysis in vitro. The brainstem was removed as described previously (Jacquin et al., 1996, 1999) and cut horizontally (see Fig. 3F) under visual control with a vibratome (series 1000; Technical Products International, O'Fallon, MO). The 1200-μm-thick slice was transferred, dorsal side up, into a recording chamber and perfused with artificial CSF, pH 7.4, containing (in mm) 130 NaCl, 5.4 KCl, 0.8 KH2PO4, 26 NaHCO3, 30 glucose, 1 MgCl2, and 0.8 CaCl2, saturated with carbogen (90% O2, 10% CO2). Motor activities were recorded from the motor trigeminal roots using suction electrodes. Previous experiments (Jacquin et al., 1999) have demonstrated that the respiratory activityin vitro propagates to this nerve. The selected root was contralateral to the studied pontine neuronal structure (see Fig.3G) to avoid stimulating directly the recorded motoneurons. Other electrodes were located on the dorsal surface under the visual guidance of a microscope (ACM; Zeiss, Thornwood, NY), and locations were identified histologically. Neurons were recorded in the whole-cell configuration with patch-clamp electrodes as described byFortin et al. (1999). Electrodes containing 0.1–0.5 mm AMPA in artificial CSF were used for pressure application (0.1 bar, 20 msec). Experiments were performed according to authorization by the ministry of Research Technology and Agriculture, which provides authorization to have the animal facilities.

RESULTS

A supernumerary neuronal structure in the dorsal pons ofHoxa1−/− mice

Morphological analysis of the pons at birth indicates a rather extensive cellular reorganization inHoxa1−/− mutants, affecting different cell types. First, in keeping with the heterogeneous anteroposterior (A-P) pattern of the ventricular zone, the anterior fourth ventricle exhibits a characteristic morphological abnormality in newborn mutants (Fig. 1, compareA–D). Moreover, the size of the reticular formation is affected both dorsally and ventrally. Ventrally, a 40% reduction in the length of the ventral pons (vP) (Fig. 1E,F,rectangle) results from the elimination of r4- and r5-derived structures. In contrast, dorsally, a 6% increase in the postnatal A-P length of the dorsal pons (dP) (Fig.1E,F, arrow) was observed, so that the ratio of dP to vP in Hoxa1−/−animals, although variable (average ± SEM, 1.45 ± 0.08;n = 18), is much larger than in wild-type animals (0.77 ± 0.02; n = 18).

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Distinct dorsal and ventral anatomical phenotypes in the Hoxa1−/− brainstem at birth.A–D, Adjacent horizontal sections showing the ependymal epithelium at the anterior end of the fourth ventricle;A and C are dorsal to Band D, respectively. Scale bar, 250 μm. Also seeE and F [caudal to dorsal tegmental area (DTg)] and Fig. 2B for location. The epithelium forms a single invagination in WT mice (A, B, E), closing in the dorsal pons medially to the trigeminal motor nucleus and forms multiple invaginations (2–5) in Hoxa1−/−mice (C, D, F).E, F, Parasagittal sections of the hindbrain at P0 in WT (E) andHoxa1−/− (F) littermates; the A-P length of the pons is affected differently dorsally [arrow, from the rostral limit of the hypoglossal nucleus (12) to the caudal limit of theDTg] and ventrally [rectangle, from the rostral pole of the inferior olive (IO) to the caudal pole of the pontine nuclei (Pn)]. IP, Interpeduncular nucleus; Sol, solitary nucleus.

We have localized in the dorsolateral pons the anatomical modifications underlying this dP increase. In wild-type mice, caudal to the trigeminal motor nucleus, the parvocellular reticular formation (Rpc-α) (Fig. 2A,B,pc) normally contains trigeminal premotor interneurons involved in feeding behaviors (Lund et al., 1998). The Rpc-α is likely derived from r3, because it is eliminated inKrox-20−/− mutants (Jacquin et al., 1996), in which pontine defects lead to an abnormal suction behavior after birth. In allHoxa1−/− mice (n = 10), the anatomy of the Rpc-α is reorganized (Fig. 2) and extended along the A-P axis, in keeping with the abnormalities of the r3-r4 region at early developmental stages (described below) (Carpenter et al., 1993; Mark et al., 1993; Gavalas et al., 1998; Helmbacher et al., 1998; Rijli et al., 1998; Rossel and Capecchi, 1999). In particular, radial stripes of reticular formation and ectopic motoneurons alternate, forming a compound reticular and motor supernumerary neuronal structure (SNS). Most extensive labeling of ectopic SNS motoneurons included three distinct subnuclei (Fig.2A,B) identified by analysis with anti-choline acetyltransferase antibodies. In addition, injecting the fluorescent marker DiI into the trigeminal motor root (Fig.2C–F) revealed that these ectopic subnuclei form a distinct dorsoventral trigeminal motor fasciculus running laterally in the SNS (Fig. 2D,F, asterisks) caudal to the normal root (Fig. 2E, asterisk). Therefore, a dP increase inHoxa1−/− mice results from the generation of three additional trigeminal subnuclei alternating with stripes of reticular formation at the same location as the wild-type Rpc-α.

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

The dorsal anatomical phenotype inHoxa1−/− mice at birth: identification of motoneurons showing location of the SNS.A, Sagittal sections of the brainstem, cut parallel to Figure 1E,F. The drawings on theleft (including the analysis of 5Hoxa1−/− mice) include both lateral and medial structures. Scale bar, 1 mm. Medial sections (ingray, showing the ventricular surface) are illustrated in Figure 1E,F. Note that supernumerary motor (lateral) and ventricular (medial) structures are at the same anteroposterior level of the dorsal pons. Lateral sections (on theright) show choline acetyltransferase-immunoreactive WT (+/+) ventral facial structures eliminated by the mutation: the branchial motor nucleus (VII), the preganglionic nucleus (pg), and accessory nuclei (between VII and pg, extending close to the descending facial root,VIIn). In Hoxa1−/−mice, caudal to the trigeminal nucleus (V), the SNS includes three dorsal motor subnuclei (outlined and numbered) alternating with two unstained stripes of reticular formation. IO, Inferior olive;IP, interpeduncular nucleus; pc, parvocellular reticular formation; Pn, pontine nuclei;SO, superior olive; X,XII, dorsal–vagal and hypoglossal motor nuclei.B, Horizontal sections cut parallel to thearrow in Figure 1E,F. Drawings on the left (including the analysis of 5Hoxa1−/− mice) show the left part of the pons (scale bar, 1 mm) and the relative positions of the V and VII nuclei and trigeminal nerve root (Vn). Close to the midline (dotted line), note the appearance of a supernumerary ventricular structure (illustrated in Fig.1D) and elimination of the abducens motor nucleus (VI). The right part superimposes choline acetyltransferase-immunoreactive pontine neurons in WT (black) and Hoxa1−/−(red) littermates from four horizontal sections sampling, in each littermate, the entire V nucleus and adjacent areas. Supernumerary motor nuclei (1, 2, and3) are at the same place as the WT Rpc-α (pc), VIIn, and pg, respectively. C–E, Horizontal sections showing retrograde DiI labeling of trigeminal and SNS motoneurons in a WT (C; arrow, 200 μm) and aHoxa1−/− (D, E) mouse. Labeling of the SNS shows the three ectopic trigeminal subnuclei (compare D with C), and a more ventral view (E) shows a supernumerary dorsoventral fasciculus located laterally in subnucleus 2 (asteriskin D and E) and distinct from the WT-like Vn.F, Medial half of subnucleus 2 at higher magnification (arrow, 67 μm, oriented as in C; the border of the V is in the upper left corner; subnucleus 1 is lacking). The supernumerary motoneuron (open triangle) shows an axon (asterisks) running in the direction of the lateral fasciculus.

Function of ectopic reticular neurons in the dorsolateral pons ofHoxa1−/− mice

To further characterize the reticular cells of the SNS, we investigated their functional connectivity (Fig.3G). The hindbrain was isolated in vitro during the first postnatal days [postnatal day 0 (P0) and P1], and the dorsal pons was exposed in a thick horizontal slice (Fig. 3F) and made accessible to dorsal approach under microscopic control. This slice preparation also included the bilateral ventral respiratory group (VRG) (Fig.3G, asterisks), which generates a persisting rhythmic activity propagating to cranial (e.g., trigeminal) motor neurons from which it can be recorded (Jacquin et al., 1996, 1999). Neuronal populations immediately caudal to the trigeminal nucleus (which in wild type include the Rpc-α premotor neurons) (Fig.3G, rectangle) were stimulated by pressure application of the glutamatergic agonist AMPA. The contralateral trigeminal nerve root was recorded to avoid direct stimulation of motoneurons.

Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Functional connectivity of reticular neurons in the Hoxa1−/−supernumerary neuronal structure at birth. A–D, Modification of the contralateral trigeminal nerve activity (Vn) induced by exciting SNS neuronal cell bodies using brief (25 msec) pressure applications of AMPA in WT (A, B) and Hoxa1−/− (C, D) hindbrain slices in vitro. A, C, Four samples of integrated Vn activity (2 min long) starting (from top to bottom) at −2, 0, 3, and 5 min after AMPA application (time indicated on theleft). In both WT andHoxa1−/− littermates, the rhythm generator produces bursts of activity (fast upward deviations), and AMPA generates background nonrhythmic activity starting at 0 min.B, D, Temporal evolution (calibration, 2 min) of average (±SE) burst frequency from five experiments. A significant increase followed by inhibition (p < 0.001) indicates a functional connection to the rhythm generator inHoxa1−/− mice but not in WT mice.E, Vn, Integrated nerve activity;Em, membrane potential of a single (Hoxa1−/−) neuron located in the SNS area (scale bars, 20 mV, 1 sec). A connection from the rhythm generator results in a simultaneous Vn burst and neuronal depolarization inducing firing of action potentials. F, G, Schematic presentation of the slice preparation in sagittal (F, arrowhead indicates the top side) and horizontal (G) sections. Therectangle in G indicates the approximate extent of the area affected by AMPA applications, indicated by thearrowhead; more medial applications were ineffective.Thin arrows indicate WT projections, preserved in mutants; these are either rhythmic, from the bilateral rhythm generator (asterisks) to the contralateral trigeminal nucleus (VMo) and Vn (recorded), or nonrhythmic premotor neurons from Rpc-α/SNS to VMo.Thick arrows indicate supernumerary connections in mutants, including those from the SNS to the rhythm generator and the trigeminal axons of SNS motoneurons. H–J, Sagittal sections (location in J, rostral to theleft) of the most lateral 300 μm of the pons showing in mutant (I) but not in WT (H) animals, an axonal fasciculus stained after DiI injection in the area of the rhythm generator (bottom right corner). Scale bar, 200 μm.

AMPA-induced nonrhythmic trigeminal activities recorded from the contralateral trigeminal motor rootlet (the upward noisy deflection of the traces in Figs. 3A,C) indicate that normal premotor Rpc-α inputs to the trigeminal motoneurons (Lund et al., 1998) persist in Hoxa1−/− mutants. The Rpc-α normally lacks respiratory-related functions. AMPA application had no effect on rhythm frequency in the wild-type preparations (Fig.3B). In the mutants, a robust increase in rhythm frequency is followed in all cases by a transient inhibition of the rhythm (Fig.3C,D). This effect strongly suggests the presence of supernumerary functional efferent connections of the SNS to the rhythm generator, resembling the wild-type ventral pontine respiratory connections, located rostrally to the SNS and originating in r2 and r3 (Jacquin et al., 1996; Borday et al., 1997). Moreover, rhythmic activity recorded from single neurons in the SNS area (Fig.3E) also indicated afferent connections from the rhythm generator. In addition, abnormal axonal pathways were found in the lateral pons by injecting the fluorescent marker DiI into the VRG area (Fig. 3H–J). In the mutants, labeling from the VRG revealed a robust axonal pathway (Fig. 3I); this pathway was not present in the wild-type (Fig. 3H) and ran laterally in the pons. Thus, inHoxa1−/− mice, the SNS exhibits a novel relationship with the respiratory rhythm generator, while preserving premotor connections with the trigeminal system.

Embryological origin of the supernumerary neuronal system

The appearance of this ectopic neuronal system prompts the question of its embryological origin. We investigated the expression of rhombomere-specific molecular markers inHoxa1−/− mutant hindbrains (Fig.4). Rhombomere-restricted gene expression persists in the ventricular zone after the segmentation period (Wingate and Lumsden, 1996). In 11.5 dpc mutants, expression of the r4 marker Hoxb1 is drastically reduced and patchy along the dorsoventral axis (Fig. 4, compare A,B). To assay for r2 features, we generated a transgenic line containing the lacZreporter under the control of a Hoxa2 r2-specific enhancer (Frasch et al., 1995) (Fig. 4C). InHoxa1−/− mutants, ectopic patches of cells expressing the r2 marker are present at the r4 axial level (Fig. 4, compare C,D); this is remarkably similar to what is observed in Hoxb1−/− mice (Studer et al., 1996). In addition, patches of r2-like cells are also present at the r3 level, as described previously (Helmbacher et al., 1998). Thus, in the absence of Hoxa1, some neural precursors at the presumptive r3-r4 levels fail to activate or properly maintain their appropriate molecular programs and acquire an r2 identity.

Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.

Molecular and morphological patterning defects in a Hoxa1 mutant hindbrain. A dorsal view of 11.5 dpc WT (A, C) andHoxa1−/− (B, D) mutant hindbrains hybridized with the r4-specific Hoxb1(A, B) or carrying a lacZ reporter under the control of an r2-specific enhancer (C, D) is shown.Vertical arrows indicate the location of the motoneuron progenitor columns.

To investigate the developmental fate of these ectopic r2-like precursors, we examined motoneuron development in the hindbrain ofHoxa1−/− mice. In wild-type 11.5 dpc embryos, the Phox2b gene is expressed in migrating motoneurons (Pattyn et al., 1997). Phox2b expression in ventral r4 identifies facial motoneurons migrating caudally through r5 into r6 (Fig. 5A, bent arrow) to form the facial (VIIth) motor nucleus, whereas strings ofPhox2b-positive cells in r2 are indicative of dorsal migration of trigeminal motoneurons (Fig.5A, straight arrows). In the Hoxa1−/−mutant r4 region (Fig. 5B), a much reduced, although not abolished, Phox2b expression identifies a small number of facial motoneurons migrating caudally (Fig. 5B,bent and dashed arrow). In addition, an abnormal trigeminal-like lateral migration of cells can be detected (Fig. 5B, straight arrows) that is completed at ∼12.5 dpc (Fig. 5D) and results in a characteristic dorsolateral accumulation of ectopicPhox2b-positive cells (Fig. 5, rectangle, compareC,D). This population includes ectopic motoneurons as assessed by anti-Islet1 immunohistochemistry (Fig. 5,arrows, compare E,F). Remarkably, lack of caudal migration of facial motoneurons and lateral trigeminal-like migration are also observed inHoxb1−/− mice (Studer et al., 1996). Thus, together with the above molecular analysis (Fig. 4), these data suggest facial-to-trigeminal changes in motoneuron subtype identity in Hoxa1 mutants that could be induced by lack ofHoxb1 activation in pre-r4 cells.

Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.

The Hoxa1−/−supernumerary motoneurons: migration and final postnatal location. A dorsal view of 11.5 (A, B) and 12.5 (C–F) dpc WT andHoxa1−/− mutant hindbrains, respectively, flat-mounted and hybridized with Phox2b(A–D) or Isl1 (E, F) probes is shown. The bent white arrowin A and B indicates caudal migration of facial (VII) motoneurons. The straight arrows in A and B indicate dorsal migration of trigeminal (V) motoneurons and, inHoxa1−/− mice (B), of supernumerary motoneurons from r4. Therectangles in C and D and the arrows in F indicate ectopic, dorsolateral accumulation of Phox2b- andIsl1-positive cells, which was not present in WT mice.

Persistence and functional role of the supernumerary neuronal system after birth

To investigate the functional role of the SNS in controlling respiratory and feeding rhythms in vivo, we have compared mutant and wild-type behaviors in relation to the anatomical modification of the pons. Although irregular after birth, the wild-type minute ventilation increases progressively and stabilizes at the end of the first day (Fig. 6A,left). In contrast, mutants exhibited a variable neonatal respiratory frequency (NRF) 2–4 hr after birth and eventually apneic breathing and death (Fig. 6A, right). A correlation was found in mutants between the NRF and the hindbrain anatomical index dP/vP (r = 0.83 vs r= 0.32 in wild-type mice) (Fig. 6B), indicating that there are pontine abnormalities accelerating spontaneous breathing at birth. In contrast, the suction behavior, estimated by the frequency of jaw openings induced by a buccal stimulus (Jacquin et al., 1996), was normal in the mutants and unrelated to dP/vP (r = 0.25). In addition, Hoxa1−/−newborns with a low NRF (<35 breaths/min; n = 7) died within 2.5 ± 0.8 hr (Fig. 6C, bottom left triangles), whereas those exhibiting a higher NRF (n = 15) progressively increased their respiratory rate to normal values (Fig. 6A,C) and survived for 18 ± 7 hr. Thus, one possibility is that the appearance of the SNS may result in enhanced survival rates by significantly increasing NRF values, so that the rhythm promoting action of the SNS seems to compensate for the lethal apneic breathing resulting from vP hypoplasia. To further investigate this hypothesis, animals with the highest NRF were submitted to naloxone administration, a treatment known to be effective on life-threatening pathologies resulting from the vP hypoplasia (for example, inKrox-20−/− mutants) (Jacquin et al., 1996). A striking effect of naloxone administration was obtained in two of the five treatedHoxa1−/− newborns (Fig.6C, filled circles); one of them survived 4 d, whereas the other was killed 12 d after birth. Interestingly, in this animal, histological analysis revealed the same pattern of SNS motoneurons (Fig. 6D) that was observed at birth (Fig. 2). The survival of these motoneurons is noteworthy, considering the wave of apoptosis that normally removes abnormal motoneurons in the fetal hindbrain before birth (deLapeyrière and Henderson, 1997). Altogether, the presentin vitro and in vivo observations demonstrate that the Hoxa1 mutation results in the incorporation of a SNS, which originates from the mutant r3-r4 region, into the hindbrain neural network. As a consequence, the animal acquires a novel respiratory-related function enhancing survival, while not affecting suction, a function that is under the control of neuronal populations from the same region.

Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.

TheHoxa1−/− breathing pattern after birth. A, Samples of plethysmographic recording (inspiration upwards) 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hr after birth [postnatally (p.n.)] showing normal maturation in a WT mouse and transient increase of frequency in a mutant mouse. Calibration: 20 μl, 1 sec. The mutant animal typically exhibits irregular breathing at birth (top trace) and eventually apneic breathing and death (bottom trace). B, IndividualHoxa1−/− (open triangles) and WT (filled squares) mice identified by their respiratory rate at birth (ordinates) and the dP/vP index quantifying the abnormality of the pontine A-P distances [seearrow (dP) and rectangle (vP) in Fig.1E,F]. A correlation exists inHoxa1−/− mice but not in WT mice.C, Temporal evolution of average respiratory frequency (±SEM) in Hoxa1−/−animals breathing faster or slower than 35 breaths/min at birth (open triangles). The slowest animals lack the rhythm stimulation shown in A (6–18 hours p.n.); the fastest animals survive longer; death was delayed by >3 days postnatally (d.p.n.)] in two animals (filled circles) treated with subcutaneous naloxone (NLX). D, Supernumerary motoneurons in a NLX-treated animal killed 12 d after birth. The sagittal section (rostral to the left) shows choline acetyltransferase-immunoreactive motoneurons (arrowheads) caudal to the trigeminal motor nucleus (located in the top left corner). Scale bar, 100 μm.

DISCUSSION

These results allow a hypothesis that is compatible with the involvement of developmental control genes in the assembly of functional neuronal circuits (Tanabe and Jessell, 1996; Brunet and Ghysen, 1999). In fact, this work provides the first formal evidence that selective modification of the expression pattern of aHox gene whose expression is transient in the presumptive hindbrain, namely Hoxa1, is sufficient to incorporate a novel functional neural circuit in the mature hindbrain. This striking finding prompts the question of the cascade of regulatory events triggered by Hoxa1 loss-of-function, leading to long-term modification of hindbrain neural networks. Previous work demonstrated a role for Hoxa1 in the activation of Hoxb1expression in the presumptive r4 (Studer et al., 1998). Thus, some of the long-term effects of the Hoxa1 mutation could be attributable to the lack of Hoxb1 activation in a subset of presumptive r4 cells, leading to r2-like specification. However, Hoxa1, unlike Hoxb1, appears to control both r4 and, indirectly, r3 development (Helmbacher et al., 1998) (this study). Thus, it is tempting to speculate that regulatory changes in two adjacent rhombomeres may be required for the generation of a SNS. Interestingly, we have shown recently that assembling of a rhythm-promoting respiratory network also requires a two-segment functional unit in the chick (Fortin et al., 1999). In this respect, it will be interesting to compare the physiology of neuronal networks inHoxb1−/− mutants with that ofHoxa1−/− mutants.

Because hindbrain neurons control adaptive behaviors, these findings have considerable significance both on developmental and evolutionary grounds. The evolution of neural networks of multisegmental origin may be facilitated by the partitioning of the early hindbrain in a number of metameric units initially developing as independent modules (Lumsden, 1990; Clarke and Lumsden, 1993; Champagnat and Fortin, 1996). As a result, subsets of neurons may be developmentally isolated from each other and allowed to evolve independently. Our present data suggest that Hox genes may provide a genetic basis for segment-specific modulation of neuronal development and connectivity. Changes in Hox cis-regulatory modules and downstream targets have been suggested to underlie morphological changes of segmented structures in animal evolution (Gellon and McGinnis, 1998). Similarly, local changes in the regulation ofHox genes within the segmented hindbrain of vertebrates may offer novel opportunities for the evolution of distinct subsets of neurons, without affecting the function of others, eventually resulting in novel functional features (Brunet and Ghysen, 1999). In this respect, studies of conditional segment-specific Hoxmutations, which may not result in lethality of the animal, will be important to further investigate adaptive mechanisms in the development of hindbrain neuronal networks.

Footnotes

  • Work in J.C.'s laboratory was supported by Human Frontier Science Program Research Grant 101/97, Action Concertée Incitative (Biologie du Développement et Physiologie Intégrative) #57 the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, and the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FRM). E.D.T. was supported by The European Community (BIO4-CT975-096) and FRM (EP001227/1) training grants. Work in F.M.R.'s laboratory was supported by the CNRS, the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, the Hôpital Universitaire de Strasbourg, the Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer (LNCC), the Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer, and the Programme Génome du CNRS. M.D. was supported by fellowships from the LNCC and FRM. R.N. was supported by Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst and FRM fellowships. We thank P. Chambon, G. Fortin, C. Goridis, R. Krumlauf, and A. Lumsden for valuable discussions and comments on this manuscript. We also thank T. Jacquin for his participation in some in vitro experiments and M. Poulet for excellent technical assistance. We acknowledge the following colleagues for kind gifts of reagents: P. Chambon (Hoxa1 mice), R. Krumlauf (BGZ40 plasmid and Hoxb1 probe), and J. F. Brunet (Phox2b probe). The 4D5 antibody was obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank under contract NO1-HD-7-3263.

    E.D.T., V.B., and M.D. contributed equally to this work

    Correspondence should be addressed to J. Champagnat, Institut de Neurobiologie Alfred Fessard, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Propre de Recherche 2216 (bât. 33), 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France. E-mail:Jean.Champagnat{at}iaf.cnrs-gif.fr.

    V. Borday's present address: Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement, Université Paris 7, case 7077, 2 place Jussieu, 75251 Paris, France.

    M. Davenne's present address: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1 Bungtown Road, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Bell E,
    2. Wingate RJ,
    3. Lumsden A
    (1999) Homeotic transformation of rhombomere identity after localized Hoxb1 misexpression. Science 284:2168–2171.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Borday V,
    2. Kato F,
    3. Champagnat J
    (1997) A ventral pontine pathway promotes rhythmic activity in the medulla of neonate mice. NeuroReport 8:3679–3683.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Brunet JF,
    2. Ghysen A
    (1999) Deconstructing cell determination: proneural genes and neuronal identity. Bioessays 21:313–318.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Carpenter EM,
    2. Goddard JM,
    3. Chisaka O,
    4. Manley NR,
    5. Capecchi MR
    (1993) Loss of HoxA1 (Hox-1.6) function results in the reorganization of the murine hindbrain. Development 118:1063–1075.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Champagnat J,
    2. Fortin G
    (1996) Primordial respiratory-like rhythm generation in the vertebrate embryo. Trends Neurosci 20:119–124.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Clarke JD,
    2. Lumsden A
    (1993) Segmental repetition of neuronal phenotype sets in the chick embryo hindbrain. Development 118:151–162.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  7. ↵
    1. Davenne M,
    2. Maconochie MK,
    3. Neun R,
    4. Pattyn A,
    5. Chambon P,
    6. Krumlauf R,
    7. Rijli FM
    (1999) Hoxa2 and Hoxb2 control dorsoventral patterns of neuronal development in the rostral hindbrain. Neuron 22:677–691.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. deLapeyrière O,
    2. Henderson CE
    (1997) Motoneuron differentiation, survival, and synaptogenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev 7:642–650.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Fortin G,
    2. Jungbluth S,
    3. Lumsden A,
    4. Champagnat J
    (1999) Segmental specification of GABAergic inhibition during development of hindbrain neural networks. Nat Neurosci 2:873–877.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Fortin G,
    2. Domı́nguez del Toro E,
    3. Abadie V,
    4. Guimarães L,
    5. Foutz AS,
    6. Denavit-Saubié M,
    7. Rouyer F,
    8. Champagnat J
    (2000) Genetic and developmental models for the neural control of breathing in vertebrates. Respir Physiol 122:247–257.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Frasch M,
    2. Chen X,
    3. Lufkin T
    (1995) Evolutionary-conserved enhancers direct region-specific expression of the murine Hoxa-1 and Hoxa-2 loci in both mice and Drosophila. Development 121:957–974.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  12. ↵
    1. Gavalas A,
    2. Davenne M,
    3. Lumsden A,
    4. Chambon P,
    5. Rijli FM
    (1997) Role of Hoxa-2 in axon pathfinding and rostral hindbrain patterning. Development 124:3683–3691.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  13. ↵
    1. Gavalas A,
    2. Studer M,
    3. Lumsden A,
    4. Rijli FM,
    5. Krumlauf R,
    6. Chambon P
    (1998) Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 synergize in patterning the hindbrain, cranial nerves, and second pharyngeal arch. Development 125:1123–1136.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  14. ↵
    1. Gellon G,
    2. McGinnis W
    (1998) Shaping animal body plans in development and evolution by modulation of Hox expression patterns. Bioessays 20:116–125.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Goddard JM,
    2. Rossel M,
    3. Manley NR,
    4. Capecchi MR
    (1996) Mice with targeted disruption of Hoxb-1 fail to form the motor nucleus of the VIIth nerve. Development 122:3217–3228.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  16. ↵
    1. Helmbacher F,
    2. Pujades C,
    3. Desmarquet C,
    4. Frain M,
    5. Rijli FM,
    6. Chambon P,
    7. Charnay P
    (1998) Hoxa1 and Krox-20 synergize to control the development of rhombomere 3. Development 125:4739–4748.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  17. ↵
    1. Jacquin TD,
    2. Borday V,
    3. Schneider-Maunoury S,
    4. Topilko P,
    5. Ghilini G,
    6. Kato F,
    7. Charnay P,
    8. Champagnat J
    (1996) Reorganisation of pontine rhythmogenic neuronal networks in Krox-20 knockout mice. Neuron 17:747–758.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Jacquin TD,
    2. Sadoc G,
    3. Borday V,
    4. Champagnat J
    (1999) Pontine and medullary control of the respiratory activity in the trigeminal and facial nerves of the newborn mouse: an in vitro study. Eur J Neurosci 11:213–222.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Jungbluth S,
    2. Bell E,
    3. Lumsden A
    (1999) Specification of distinct motor neuron identities by the singular activities of individual Hox genes. Development 126:2751–2758.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  20. ↵
    1. Lumsden A
    (1990) The cellular basis of segmentation in the developing hindbrain. Trends Neurosci 13:329–335.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Lumsden A,
    2. Krumlauf R
    (1996) Patterning the vertebrate neuraxis. Science 274:1109–1115.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Lund JP,
    2. Kolta A,
    3. Westberg KG,
    4. Scott G
    (1998) Brainstem mechanisms underlying feeding behaviors. Curr Opin Neurobiol 8:718–724.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Mark M,
    2. Lufkin T,
    3. Vonesh JL,
    4. Ruberte E,
    5. Olivo JC,
    6. Dollé P,
    7. Gorry P,
    8. Lumsden A,
    9. Chambon P
    (1993) Two rhombomeres are altered in Hoxa-1 mutant mice. Development 119:319–338.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  24. ↵
    1. Murphy P,
    2. Hill RE
    (1991) Expression of the mouse labial-like homeobox-containing genes, Hox 2.9 and Hox 1.6, during segmentation of the hindbrain. Development 111:61–74.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  25. ↵
    1. Pattyn A,
    2. Morin X,
    3. Cremer H,
    4. Goridis C,
    5. Brunet JF
    (1997) Expression and interactions of the two closely related homeobox genes Phox2a and Phox2b during neurogenesis. Development 124:4065–4075.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  26. ↵
    1. Rijli FM,
    2. Gavalas A,
    3. Chambon P
    (1998) Segmentation and specification in the branchial region of the head: the role of the Hox selector genes. Int J Dev Biol 42:393–401.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Rossel M,
    2. Capecchi MR
    (1999) Mice mutant for both Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 show extensive remodeling of the hindbrain and defects in craniofacial development. Development 126:5027–5040.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  28. ↵
    1. Studer M,
    2. Lumsden A,
    3. Ariza-McNaughton L,
    4. Bradley A,
    5. Krumlauf R
    (1996) Altered segmental identity and abnormal migration of motor neurons in mice lacking Hoxb-1. Nature 384:630–634.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Studer M,
    2. Gavalas A,
    3. Marshall H,
    4. Ariza-McNaughton L,
    5. Rijli FM,
    6. Chambon P,
    7. Krumlauf R
    (1998) Genetic interactions between Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 reveal new roles in regulation of early hindbrain patterning. Development 125:1025–1036.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  30. ↵
    1. Tanabe Y,
    2. Jessell TM
    (1996) Diversity and pattern in the developing spinal cord. Science 274:1115–1123.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Wingate RJT,
    2. Lumsden A
    (1996) Persistence of rhombomeric organisation in the postsegmental hindbrain. Development 122:2143–2152.
    OpenUrlAbstract
Back to top

In this issue

Email
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Respond to this article
Generation of a Novel Functional Neuronal Circuit inHoxa1 Mutant Mice
Eduardo Domı́nguez del Toro, Véronique Borday, Marc Davenne, Rüdiger Neun, Filippo M. Rijli, Jean Champagnat
Journal of Neuroscience 1 August 2001, 21 (15) 5637-5642; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-15-05637.2001
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Keywords

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.