Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
ARTICLE, Behavioral/Systems

Feature Selectivity and Interneuronal Cooperation in the Thalamocortical System

Lee M. Miller, Monty A. Escabı́ and Christoph E. Schreiner
Journal of Neuroscience 15 October 2001, 21 (20) 8136-8144; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-20-08136.2001
Lee M. Miller
1W. M. Keck Center for Integrative Neuroscience and University of California San Francisco/Berkeley Bioengineering Group, San Francisco, California 94143,
2Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Monty A. Escabı́
3Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Bioengineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christoph E. Schreiner
1W. M. Keck Center for Integrative Neuroscience and University of California San Francisco/Berkeley Bioengineering Group, San Francisco, California 94143,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Functionally connected thalamocortical pair.a, The cross-correlogram is normalized to express the thalamic firing rate relative to a cortical spike occurring at time lag 0. The brief, short-latency peak, with thalamic spikes leading cortical (2 msec), is indicative of a monosynaptic-like functional connection. The yellow box denotes the time-locked thalamic spikes that precede a cortical spike by 1–10 msec. The cyan line is the mean, and the green lines are the 99% confidence intervals, under an assumption of independent, Poisson spike trains. b, Thalamic STRF. Thex-axis represents time preceding a spike, and they-axis represents stimulus frequency. STRFcolor indicates a differential change in firing rate from the occurrence of stimulus energy in a particular spectrotemporal location. Warm colors mean that stimulus energy at that location tends to increase firing rate above the mean (4.85 spikes/sec), and cool colors indicate a decrease in firing rate. This cell, for instance, fires maximally 7.5 msec after stimulus energy occurs at 13–14 kHz. c, Cortical STRF. Overlying the cortical STRF, for comparison, is a green contour circumscribing the high-energy peak of the thalamic STRF. If one would shift the green contour by the 2 msec lag seen in the correlogram, these STRFs would overlap very well.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Potentially causal thalamic spikes are more selective for stimulus features than expected. The differences in FSI for all thalamic cells between time-locked and average spikes are summarized in a histogram. Positive differences indicate that time-locked spikes have a greater FSI than average. Many cells show very little difference; a few have a negative difference, indicating that time-locked spikes are less selective than average; and many show a positive difference, up to fourfold greater. The mean difference of 65% is significantly different from 0 (paired t test,p = 0.013); that is, time-locked thalamic spikes tend to be more selective than average for spectrotemporal stimulus features.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Schematic of methods to identify the stimulus-dependent influence that conditions whether the spikes of a thalamic cell are propagated by the target cortical cell.a, The cross-correlogram can be conceptually divided into subsets of thalamic spikes. Time-locked spikes (yellow box) are those that precede a cortical spike by 1–10 msec. Of the time-locked spikes, the baseline spikes (blue) would have occurred even in the absence of a functional connection. Peak spikes (red) are those that actually caused the cortical cell to fire. The cyan lineis the mean, and the red lines are the 99% confidence intervals, under an assumption of independent, Poisson spike trains. In this figure only, STRFs are simulated for clarity (b–g). The time-locked STRF (b) minus the baseline STRF (c; see Materials and Methods) gives an estimate of the peak, causal STRF (d). The degree to which the peak STRF differs from the average thalamic STRF is the degree to which other influences condition whether the thalamic spikes are propagated by cortex. Therefore, the peak STRF (e) minus the average thalamic STRF (f) gives a spectrotemporal description of the conditioning influence (g). Positive regions in the conditioning influence mean that for the spikes of this thalamic cell to be propagated through cortex, there must be more average energy in that region than typically drives the thalamic cell. Negative regions require that for spikes to be propagated, there must be less average energy in that region than usually drives the thalamic cell.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Absence of conditioning influence.a, In the thalamocortical correlogram, red bins are the peak thalamic spikes, those that presumably caused a cortical spike. (See Fig. 1 legend for other correlogram details.)b, Thalamic STRF. c, Cortical STRF. To aid interpretation, only the significant (p< 0.002) STRFs are plotted. In deriving the peak and conditioning STRFs, however, all operations were performed on the raw, nonthresholded signals. The STRFs in d–f are plotted with the same color scale for comparison. d, The peak STRF (spike-normalized) estimates the response properties of only the thalamic spikes that caused a cortical spike. e, The thalamic STRF is replotted but here is spike-normalized for direct comparison with the peak STRF. In this case, the peak STRF is similar in location and magnitude to the average thalamic STRF.f, Stimulus-related conditioning influence on whether thalamic spikes are propagated through the cortical cell. For this thalamic neuron, when the average STRF is subtracted from the peak STRF, only noise remains, so that no significant conditioning influence is observed; the presumed causal spikes are not unique in the way they represent stimuli. For visual reference in c,d, and f, a green contourindicates the location of the high-energy peak of the thalamic STRF.Freq., Frequency; Norm., normalized.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    a–f, Cooperative conditioning influence. a, In the thalamocortical correlogram,red bins are the peak thalamic spikes, those that presumably caused a cortical spike. (See Fig. 1 legend for other correlogram details.) b, Thalamic STRF.c, Cortical STRF. To aid interpretation, only the significant (p < 0.002) STRFs are plotted. In deriving the peak and conditioning STRFs, however, all operations were performed on the raw, non-thresholded signals. The STRFs ind–f are plotted with the same color scale for comparison. d, The peak STRF (spike-normalized) estimates the response properties of only the thalamic spikes that caused a cortical spike. e, The thalamic STRF is replotted but here is spike-normalized for direct comparison with the peak STRF. In this case, the peak STRF has considerably greater magnitude than the average thalamic STRF. Its excitatory region, moreover, overlaps only the lower-frequency portion of the average thalamic excitatory subfield. f, Stimulus-related conditioning influence on whether thalamic spikes are propagated through the cortical cell. For this thalamic neuron, the conditioning influence is cooperative. For thalamic spikes to cause a cortical spike, both excitatory and inhibitory regions must be of greater average magnitude and of slightly different frequency content than typically causes the thalamic cell to fire. For visual reference inc, d, and f, agreen contour indicates the location of the high-energy peak of the thalamic STRF. g–l, Antagonistic conditioning influence. g, Thalamocortical correlogram.h, Thalamic STRF. i, Cortical STRF. The STRFs in j–l are plotted with the same color scale for comparison. j, The peak STRF (spike-normalized) estimates the response properties of only the thalamic spikes that caused a cortical spike. k, The thalamic STRF is replotted but here is spike-normalized for direct comparison with the peak STRF. In this case, the peak STRF is similar in magnitude but more limited in spectrotemporal extent than the average thalamic STRF.l, Stimulus-related conditioning influence on whether thalamic spikes are propagated through the cortical cell. For this thalamic neuron, the conditioning influence is antagonistic. For thalamic spikes to cause a cortical spike, the stimulus must contain less energy, on average, in regions that typically excite the thalamic cell. For visual reference in i, j, andl, a green contour indicates the location of the high-energy peak of the thalamic STRF. Freq., Frequency; Norm., normalized.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Relationship between the cooperativity of conditioning influence and the difference in feature selectivity for potentially causal spikes. The similarity index for the conditioning influence and the average thalamic STRF indicates the degree of cooperation (positive values) or antagonism (negative values). The FSI difference between time-locked, potentially causal spikes and average spikes quantifies how much more or less stimulus information the time-locked spikes carry. Similarity index and FSI differences are significantly and positively correlated (r = 0.50; 0.01 <p < 0.02). The dashed line is the best fit in a least mean squares sense. Asterisks are pairs from Figures 4 and 5. Cooperative conditioning influences tend to increase the feature selectivity of time-locked spikes, and antagonistic conditioning tends to decrease it.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 21 (20)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 21, Issue 20
15 Oct 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Feature Selectivity and Interneuronal Cooperation in the Thalamocortical System
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Feature Selectivity and Interneuronal Cooperation in the Thalamocortical System
Lee M. Miller, Monty A. Escabı́, Christoph E. Schreiner
Journal of Neuroscience 15 October 2001, 21 (20) 8136-8144; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-20-08136.2001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Feature Selectivity and Interneuronal Cooperation in the Thalamocortical System
Lee M. Miller, Monty A. Escabı́, Christoph E. Schreiner
Journal of Neuroscience 15 October 2001, 21 (20) 8136-8144; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-20-08136.2001
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • convergence
  • information
  • receptive field
  • feature selectivity
  • medial geniculate
  • auditory cortex

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

ARTICLE

  • Single-Cell Microarray Analysis in Hippocampus CA1: Demonstration and Validation of Cellular Heterogeneity
  • Heme Oxygenase-2 Protects against Lipid Peroxidation-Mediated Cell Loss and Impaired Motor Recovery after Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Gene Microarrays in Hippocampal Aging: Statistical Profiling Identifies Novel Processes Correlated with Cognitive Impairment
Show more ARTICLE

Behavioral/Systems

  • Electroconvulsive Seizure Behavior in Drosophila: Analysis of the Physiological Repertoire Underlying a Stereotyped Action Pattern in Bang-Sensitive Mutants
  • Appetitive and Aversive Olfactory Learning in Humans Studied Using Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Spinal Inhibitory Neurons that Modulate Cutaneous Sensory Pathways during Locomotion in a Simple Vertebrate
Show more Behavioral/Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.