Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
ARTICLE, Cellular/Molecular

Molecular and Physiological Diversity of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in the Midbrain Dopaminergic Nuclei

Ruby Klink, Alban de Kerchove d'Exaerde, Michele Zoli and Jean-Pierre Changeux
Journal of Neuroscience 1 March 2001, 21 (5) 1452-1463; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-05-01452.2001
Ruby Klink
1Laboratoire de Neurobiologie Moléculaire, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité de Recherche Associée 2182 “Récepteurs et Cognition,” Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris Cédex 15, France, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alban de Kerchove d'Exaerde
1Laboratoire de Neurobiologie Moléculaire, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité de Recherche Associée 2182 “Récepteurs et Cognition,” Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris Cédex 15, France, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michele Zoli
1Laboratoire de Neurobiologie Moléculaire, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité de Recherche Associée 2182 “Récepteurs et Cognition,” Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris Cédex 15, France, and
2Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Physiology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41100 Modena, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Pierre Changeux
1Laboratoire de Neurobiologie Moléculaire, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité de Recherche Associée 2182 “Récepteurs et Cognition,” Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris Cédex 15, France, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Electrophysiological and molecular profile of VTA and SN neurons. Electrophysiological classes were distinguished on the basis of intrinsic membrane potential and firing properties in response to current steps applied from −64 mV (first panel from left); on action potential waveform and duration, measured at rheobase current (second panel); and on firing frequency at the resting membrane potential for neurons that were spontaneously active (third panel). DA neurons in the SNc and SNr were indistinguishable; they exhibited strong Ihactivation and slow potential oscillations in the subthreshold range. DA neurons in the VTA showed a less pronouncedIh activation and a slow ramp potential before firing initiation. Gaba-Ac neurons in the VTA were characterized by marked spike-frequency accommodation in response to depolarizing current steps. Gaba-RS neurons in the SNr fired with a regular discharge pattern, at all amplitudes of depolarizing current steps and from depolarized as well as hyperpolarized holding potentials. Vertical calibration bar is 20 mV in all three panels. The right panel shows agarose gels of the PCR amplification products corresponding to the illustrated neuron. Only detected products are labeled (left to right): nicotinic subunits α2–7 and β2–4, marker, GAD (GAD 65 and GAD 67), TH, CB, CCK, CR, NT, and PV. The gel for the GABA-Ac neuron (third from top) shows a faint TH band; such (rare) TH bands were discounted. When GAD and TH were coexpressed (see Results) both bands were of equal intensity.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Frequency distribution of mRNAs for neurotransmitter synthesizing enzymes, neuropeptides, and Ca2+-binding proteins in SN and VTA.A, Percentage of neurons coexpressing GAD and TH mRNA versus age; numbers at the base of histogram bars indicate the total number of neurons in each age group bin (2 d).B1, Percentage of neurons expressing the neuropeptides CCK and NT and the Ca2+-binding proteins CR, PV, and CB. B2, Percentage of DA and Gaba neurons that are CCK positive. CCK is preferentially expressed in DA neurons.B3, Percentage of CB-positive neurons in the SNc, SNr, and VTA. CB was found preferentially in the VTA (**p < 0.01).

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Frequency distribution of nicotinic subunit mRNAs in the SN and VTA. A, Nicotinic subunits are sorted by order of decreasing prevalence: subunit α4 was present in all neurons, and subunit α2 was present in none (data not shown).B, The same distribution segregated with respect to neuron class. β3, α5, and α6 mRNAs are significantly more prevalent in DA than in Gaba neurons (***p < 0.001).

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Neurons containing subunit α7 mRNA exhibit fast currents gated by choline and ACh. Choline (10 mm; 30 msec) elicits identical current waveforms in DA and Gaba neurons (left panel). In the same neurons, ACh (1 mm; 30 msec) elicits different current waveforms (middle panel), in both of which a fast component can be recognized. In this and subsequent figures, currents were evoked from a holding potential of −70 mV, and the width of the black box at the beginning of each trace indicates duration of pressure-pulse application. Agarose gels (right panel) corresponding to the DA and Gaba neuron show the presence of subunit α7 mRNA (gels truncated after the nAChR subunit wells).

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Nicotine elicits larger currents than cytisine in neurons lacking subunit β4. Nicotine (20 μm;left panel) and cytisine (20 μm;middle panel) were pressure-applied for 1 sec. Agarose gel (right panel; truncated after the nAChR subunit wells) shows the absence of subunit β4.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Nicotinic currents in DA neurons of the SN and VTA. A1, ACh (1 mm; 30 msec) elicits currents of similar waveform in the VTA and SN, characterized by a round peak and sigmoid decay. B1, In the same neurons, nicotine (20 μm; 300 msec) elicits much longer lasting currents. A2, Mean ACh-elicited current amplitude in the SN and VTA. B2, Mean nicotine-elicited current amplitude in the SN and VTA. Nicotine induces larger currents in the VTA than in the SN (*p < 0.05).

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    ACh-elicited currents in Gaba neurons of the SN and VTA. A1, In the Gaba-Ac subclass of the VTA, ACh elicits current waveforms characterized by a sharp peak, exponential decay, and small amplitude. A2, In the Gaba-RS subclass of the SNr, the ACh current waveform is often slower and of larger amplitude. B, ACh elicited current amplitude plotted versus corresponding rise time in Gaba-Ac (○) and Gaba-RS neurons (●); mean ACh-elicited current amplitude versus mean rise time in DA neurons was also reported (double triangle).

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    MLA affects two different types of currents.A1, In a VTA DA neuron, MLA (1 nm) blocks the choline-gated current, which partially recovers after a 15 min wash period. A2, In the same neuron, MLA blocks the fast component of the ACh-gated current without affecting the slower component. B1, In another VTA DA neuron, MLA (1 nm) blocks the choline-gated current. B2, In the same neuron, the ACh-gated current does not show a clear fast component; however, MLA inhibits the slow peak current occurring later. In the superimposition panels, MLA trace is ingray.

  • Fig. 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 9.

    α-conotoxin MII inhibits the MLA-sensitive component of ACh-gated currents. A, In an SNc DA neuron, α-conotoxin MII (10 nm) inhibits the ACh-gated current. In the panel labeled superimposition, the MLA trace is in gray. B, In the same neuron, increased concentration of α-conotoxin MII (100 nm) does not result in greater inhibition (note change in scale); addition of MLA (1 nm) to the α-conotoxin MII (100 nm) also has no effect (middle). In thesuperimposition panel, the α-conotoxin MII (100 nm) and MLA traces are in gray. α-Cntx MII, α-Conotoxin MII.

  • Fig. 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 10.

    Neuron classes and their ACh-elicited currents in the SN and VTA of WT and nAChR subunit null mutant mice. Electrophysiological classes (left panel) and ACh-elicited current waveforms in WT (second panel fromleft) were similar to those described in rat. In β2−/− mice, only a fast, α7-homomeric type of ACh-gated current could be recorded in the illustrated neuronal subclasses (third panel). In α4−/− mice, a slow current could be elicited only in DA neurons (right panel). Calibration in second row applies also to top row.

  • Fig. 11.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 11.

    MLA-sensitive currents in WT and nAChR subunit null mutant mice. Left, DA neurons in WT mice are partially inhibited by MLA (1 nm); middle, MLA sensitivity is abolished in α4−/− mice; right, MLA sensitivity is not affected in α7−/− mice. MLA traces are ingray.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Electrophysiological parameters of DA and Gaba neurons in the SN and VTA

    Spike thresholdfAHPSpike widthIh SagFiring frequency
    DA (n = 55) 24/9/22−34  ± 1 mV20  ± 1 mV2.62  ± 0.08 msec39  ± 3%2.4  ± 0.3 Hz (n = 24)
    Gaba (n = 24) 3/11/10−42  ± 1 mV13  ± 1 mV1.32  ± 0.09 msec9  ± 2%17.2  ± 3.1 Hz (n = 11)
    • Number of neurons in each of the SNc/SNr/VTA is indicated below neuron class label. All quantified parameters were significantly different (p < 0.001) between DA and Gaba neurons. Fast afterhyperpolarization (fAHP) was measured from threshold; spike width was measured at threshold; Ih sag quantifies the time-dependent relaxation in the voltage response to hyperpolarizing current steps, indicative of Ihcurrent activation; firing frequency was evaluated at the resting membrane potential in spontaneously active neurons.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    ACh-elicited current waveform parameters of slow nAChR-mediated currents

    DA (n = 38)Gaba-Ac (n = 8)Gaba-RS (n = 7)
    Rise time251  ± 22 msec85  ± 13 msec2-160214  ± 31 msec
    Amplitude249  ± 25 pA45  ± 10 pA*194  ± 57 pA
    • When an α7-homomeric component was present, current parameters were measured at the break of its sharp exponential decay.

    • ↵* p < 0.05;

    • ↵F2-160 p < 0.01.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Distribution of MLA-probed neurons in terms of subclass and MLA (1–10 nm) sensitivity

    Not (I < 11%)Partially (34 < I < 61%)Highly (I > 85%)
    DA (n = 25)6181
    Gaba-Ac (n = 2)200
    Gaba-RS (n = 3)003
    • Neurons were assigned to a not, partially, or highly MLA-sensitive group based on percentage inhibition (I) of control ACh-elicited current.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    ACh-elicited current waveform parameters in DA neurons of WT and α4 −/− mice

    WT (n = 8)α4 −/− (n = 15)
    Amplitude132  ± 26 pA72  ± 7 pA4-160
    Rise time242  ± 38 msec96  ± 17 msec4-160
    Decay T1/2562  ± 66 msec316  ± 47 msec4-160
    • Decay T1/2 was the time measured between peak and half maximal amplitude.

    • ↵F4-160 p < 0.01.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 21 (5)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 21, Issue 5
1 Mar 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Molecular and Physiological Diversity of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in the Midbrain Dopaminergic Nuclei
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Molecular and Physiological Diversity of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in the Midbrain Dopaminergic Nuclei
Ruby Klink, Alban de Kerchove d'Exaerde, Michele Zoli, Jean-Pierre Changeux
Journal of Neuroscience 1 March 2001, 21 (5) 1452-1463; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-05-01452.2001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Molecular and Physiological Diversity of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in the Midbrain Dopaminergic Nuclei
Ruby Klink, Alban de Kerchove d'Exaerde, Michele Zoli, Jean-Pierre Changeux
Journal of Neuroscience 1 March 2001, 21 (5) 1452-1463; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-05-01452.2001
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • addiction
  • dopamine
  • GABA
  • nAChR
  • nicotinic
  • Parkinson's disease
  • substantia nigra
  • ventral tegmental area

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

ARTICLE

  • A Precise Retinotopic Map of Primate Striate Cortex Generated from the Representation of Angioscotomas
  • Differential Role of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase in Three Distinct Phases of Memory for Sensitization in Aplysia
  • Evidence for Long-Lasting Cholinergic Control of Gap Junctional Communication between Adrenal Chromaffin Cells
Show more ARTICLE

Cellular/Molecular

  • Flow Cytometry of Synaptoneurosomes (FCS) Reveals Increased Ribosomal S6 and Calcineurin Proteins in Activated Medial Prefrontal Cortex to Nucleus Accumbens Synapses
  • Nanoscale Phosphoinositide Distribution on Cell Membranes of Mouse Cerebellar Neurons
  • Subunit-dependent surface mobility and localization of NMDA receptors in hippocampal neurons measured using nanobody probes
Show more Cellular/Molecular
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.