Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
ARTICLE, Behavioral/Systems

Consistent Features in the Forelimb Representation of Primary Motor Cortex in Rhesus Macaques

Michael C. Park, Abderraouf Belhaj-Saı̈f, Michael Gordon and Paul D. Cheney
Journal of Neuroscience 15 April 2001, 21 (8) 2784-2792; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-08-02784.2001
Michael C. Park
1Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology and Mental Retardation Research Center, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abderraouf Belhaj-Saı̈f
1Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology and Mental Retardation Research Center, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Gordon
2Departments of Pharmacology and Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas 66160
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul D. Cheney
1Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology and Mental Retardation Research Center, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Examples of stimulus-triggered averages of rectified EMG activity (15 μA at 15 Hz) illustrating the criteria used for categorizing the strength of poststimulus facilitation (PStF) effects. Time 0 corresponds to the stimulus event used as a trigger for averaging. A pretrigger period of 12.5 msec (baseline) was used to determine mean baseline activity (mean) and SD for each average.A, Peaks <2 SD of baseline and peaks that remained >2 SD for <0.75 msec period were considered insignificant, and the average was categorized as having no effect. B, Weak effects had peaks >2 SD of mean baseline activity but ≤5 SD of mean baseline activity. C, Moderate and strong effects had peaks >5 SD of mean baseline activity. LAT, Latissimus dorsi; FDI, first dorsal interosseus;APB, abductor pollicis brevis. The numberof trigger events is given in parentheses.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Method for flattening and unfolding cortical layer V in the anterior bank of the central sulcus for two-dimensional representation. A, Parasagittal diagram representing the stimulated cortex, constructed from electrode tracks with the same M-L coordinate (4L) organized in an anterior-to-posterior order. Identification of white matter–gray matter border (thin line), central sulcus (CS), and sensory cortex were based on electrophysiological observations. Then, reference lines (dashed lines), similar to those used by Sato and Tanji (1989), were placed onto the diagram to represent cortical layer V. Ahorizontal reference line(h) was placed at 1.5 mm depth, and avertical reference line (v) was placed at 1.5 mm from the estimated central sulcus to approximate the position of layer V. The intersection of the reference lines (asterisk) was defined to be the convexity of the precentral gyrus. Projecting the selected stimulation sites (●) onto the reference lines, when necessary, flattened the curvature of layer V. In the case of track 2P, stimulation at a depth of 1.0 mm (●) is projected onto the reference line h (○). In this track, the 1.5 mm site was not used because the effects at 1.0 mm were much stronger. B, Flattened and unfolded two-dimensional map of cortical layer V. Layer V was unfolded by rotating the reference line v with respect to the convexity of the precentral gyrus (asterisk). This straightened the two reference lines into one line (dashed line). Completing this manipulation for all tracks yielded a two-dimensional map of M1. C, Tracing of an MR image through the same parasagittal plane as 4L with overlaid electrode tracks and stimulation sites corresponding to layer V (●). A, Anterior;P, posterior; L, lateral;M, medial.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    A, B, Cortical recording chambers implanted over M1 cortex in monkeys D and M, respectively. The coordinate system (5 mm grid) is overlaid in yellow, and locations of electrode tracks are indicated with black-outlined red dots. Thelarge black rectangle overlying each chamber identifies the cortical area represented in maps C–F. In monkey D, a 15 mm incision was made in the dura for visual identification of the central sulcus. C–F, Maps of motor cortex for two monkeys represented in two-dimensional coordinates after unfolding the precentral gyrus. C, D, Maps for monkeys D and M, respectively, based on strong and moderate PStF effects together with R-ICMS-evoked movements. E,F, Maps for monkeys D and M, respectively, based on weak, moderate, and strong effects together with R-ICMS-evoked movements.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Distribution of PStF effects in forelimb muscles from a PDC site. Time 0 corresponds to the stimulus event used for the average. Stimulation was 15 μA at 15 Hz. Moderate and strong PStF effects were observed in both proximal (BIS,BIL, BRA, BR,TLON, PEC) and distal (APB, FDI, FDP,ED23) forelimb muscles. The range of number of trigger events for different channels is given in parentheses.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Stimulus-triggered averages of rectified EMG activity (15 μA at 15 Hz) of a proximal muscle, biceps shorthead (BIS), for monkey D plotted on a two-dimensional map of M1. Each record is color coded for strength of PStF according to the number of SDs above pre-trigger baseline activity (color bar at top of Figure). The color-shaded motor representation map is taken from Figure 3E.Yellow line, Convexity of the precentral gyrus;black dashed line, fundus.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Stimulus-triggered averages of rectified EMG activity (15 μA at 15 Hz) of a distal muscle, extensor digitorum communis (EDC), for monkey D plotted on a two-dimensional map of M1. Each record is color coded for strength of PStF according to the number of SDs above pre-trigger baseline activity (color bar at top of Figure). The color-shaded motor representation map is taken from Figure3E. Yellow line, Convexity of the precentral gyrus; black dashed line, fundus.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Summary of proximal and distal forelimb muscle representation in M1 of rhesus macaques based on the motor output effects in stimulus-triggered averages. Three separable zones are consistent across monkeys, a central zone oriented mediolaterally along the caudal border of M1 representing distal muscle synergies, surrounded by a zone representing synergies involving both distal and proximal muscles, which, in turn, is surrounded by a zone representing only proximal muscle synergies. The latter two zones are not complete circles; rather, they are horseshoe-shaped and open at the 3a/4 border. The proximal muscle forelimb representation in M1 is bordered laterally by a face representation and medially by a trunk and hindlimb representation. We found no evidence supporting the existence of major distal or proximal muscle representations, separate from the core representations. A, Anterior; L, lateral;CS, central sulcus; Fundus, fundus of the central sulcus; P, proximal; D, distal;PDC, proximal–distal cofacilitation.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • In the article "Consistent Features in the Forelimb Representation of Primary Motor Cortex in Rhesus Macaques," by Michael C. Park, Abderraouf Belhaj-Saïf, Michael Gordon, and Paul D. Cheney,which appeared on pages 2784-2792 of the April 15, 2001 issue, a color discrepancy exists between Figures 5 and 6 due to a printer error. A corrected version of each figure is printed here. Corrected versions of these figures also appear in the full text of the article.


    Figure 5.   Stimulus-triggered averages of rectified EMG activity (15 µA at 15 Hz) of a proximal muscle, biceps shorthead (BIS), for monkey D plotted on a two-dimensional map of M1. Each record is color coded for strength of PStF according to the number of SDs above pre-trigger baseline activity (color bar at top of Figure). The color-shaded motor representation map is taken from Figure 3E. Yellow line, Convexity of the precentral gyrus; black dashed line, fundus.

    GIF Image


    Figure 6.   Stimulus-triggered averages of rectified EMG activity (15 µA at 15 Hz) of a distal muscle, extensor digitorum communis (EDC), for monkey D plotted on a two-dimensional map of M1. Each record is color coded for strength of PStF according to the number of SDs above pre-trigger baseline activity (color bar at top of Figure). The color-shaded motor representation map is taken from Figure 3E. Yellow line, Convexity of the precentral gyrus; black dashed line, fundus.

    GIF Image

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 21 (8)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 21, Issue 8
15 Apr 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Consistent Features in the Forelimb Representation of Primary Motor Cortex in Rhesus Macaques
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Consistent Features in the Forelimb Representation of Primary Motor Cortex in Rhesus Macaques
Michael C. Park, Abderraouf Belhaj-Saı̈f, Michael Gordon, Paul D. Cheney
Journal of Neuroscience 15 April 2001, 21 (8) 2784-2792; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-08-02784.2001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Consistent Features in the Forelimb Representation of Primary Motor Cortex in Rhesus Macaques
Michael C. Park, Abderraouf Belhaj-Saı̈f, Michael Gordon, Paul D. Cheney
Journal of Neuroscience 15 April 2001, 21 (8) 2784-2792; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-08-02784.2001
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • forelimb
  • muscles
  • stimulus-triggered averaging
  • poststimulus facilitation
  • EMG
  • macaque
  • primary motor cortex

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

ARTICLE

  • Intracranially Administered Anti-Αβ Antibodies Reduce β-Amyloid Deposition by Mechanisms Both Independent of and Associated with Microglial Activation
  • Neural Correlates of Competing Fear Behaviors Evoked by an Innately Aversive Stimulus
  • Calcium Influx via L- and N-Type Calcium Channels Activates a Transient Large-Conductance Ca2+-Activated K+Current in Mouse Neocortical Pyramidal Neurons
Show more ARTICLE

Behavioral/Systems

  • Vocal Control Neuron Incorporation Decreases with Age in the Adult Zebra Finch
  • Modulation by Central and Basolateral Amygdalar Nuclei of Dopaminergic Correlates of Feeding to Satiety in the Rat Nucleus Accumbens and Medial Prefrontal Cortex
  • Confocal Analysis of Reciprocal Feedback at Rod Bipolar Terminals in the Rabbit Retina
Show more Behavioral/Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.