Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
ARTICLE, Cellular/Molecular

Glutamine Uptake by Neurons: Interaction of Protons with System A Transporters

Farrukh A. Chaudhry, Dietmar Schmitz, Richard J. Reimer, Peter Larsson, Andrew T. Gray, Roger Nicoll, Michael Kavanaugh and Robert H. Edwards
Journal of Neuroscience 1 January 2002, 22 (1) 62-72; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-01-00062.2002
Farrukh A. Chaudhry
1Departments of Neurology,
4Physiology, Graduate Programs in Neuroscience, Cell Biology and Biomedical Sciences, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California 94143-0435, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dietmar Schmitz
2Pharmacology,
4Physiology, Graduate Programs in Neuroscience, Cell Biology and Biomedical Sciences, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California 94143-0435, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard J. Reimer
1Departments of Neurology,
4Physiology, Graduate Programs in Neuroscience, Cell Biology and Biomedical Sciences, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California 94143-0435, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Larsson
5Vollum Institute, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon 97201
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew T. Gray
3Anesthesia, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roger Nicoll
2Pharmacology,
4Physiology, Graduate Programs in Neuroscience, Cell Biology and Biomedical Sciences, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California 94143-0435, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Kavanaugh
5Vollum Institute, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon 97201
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert H. Edwards
1Departments of Neurology,
4Physiology, Graduate Programs in Neuroscience, Cell Biology and Biomedical Sciences, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California 94143-0435, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Restricted tissue distribution of SA2.A, The sequence of the rat SA2 (rSA2) cDNA predicts a protein with strong similarity to rat SA1 (rSA1) and rat SN1 (rSN1) transporters. The bars indicate putative transmembrane domains,black indicates the amino acids identical to at least one other of the three proteins, and gray indicates similar amino acid residues. B, Northern analysis of poly(A+) RNA (2 μg/lane) from different tissues shows expression of an ∼8 kb SA2 transcript restricted to the heart and brain.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Transport by SA1 and SA2 depends on membrane potential. a, HeLa cells expressing SA2 with the vaccinia virus-T7 polymerase system (filled circles) show greater uptake of 3H-MeAIB at pH 8 than cells expressing vector alone (open circles);n = 3. b, Expression of SA2 confers saturable transport of 3H-MeAIB in the presence of either Na+ or Li+ (120 mm). The Km for MeAIB at pH 8 in the presence of Na+ is 1.54 ± 0.28 mm(Vmax, 4.04 ± 0.40 nmol/3 min) and 9.62 ± 1.34 mm(Vmax, 3.74 ± 0.68 nmol/3 min) in the presence of Li+; n = 3.c, Na+ and to a lesser extent Li+ but not choline support the uptake of3H-MeAIB by SA2 (left panel).Filled bars indicate HeLa cells transfected with the rat SA2 cDNA, and open bars indicate cells transfected with the vector alone. Transport by SA2 tolerates the replacement of Cl− by SCN− (right panel); n = 3. d,Depolarization by 60 mm KCl (with 60 mm NaCl in the presence or absence of the K+ ionophore valinomycin) reduces the uptake of 3H-MeAIB by HeLa cells expressing SA2 (left panel) and SA1 (right panel); n = 3.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Currents associated with SA1 and SA2.a, Alanine (A), MeAIB (m), and glutamine (Q) (all 1 mm) produce inward currents in oocytes expressing SA2 and held at −50 mV, pH 8. Glutamine and alanine produce currents considerably larger than MeAIB. b, Oocytes expressing SA1 exhibit the largest currents in response to addition of alanine, followed by glutamine and MeAIB. c, Currents associated with SA2 are inhibited by low pHo. d,Uninjected oocytes show no significant currents induced by these amino acids. e–g, Different amino acids (all at 1 mm) produce currents of different magnitudes in oocytes expressing SA2 (e, f) and SA1 (g) in Na+(e) or Li+ (f, g). The responses are normalized to the currents induced by alanine. The letters refer to the standard single-letter amino acid code, with m representing MeAIB,g representing GABA, c representing cystine, and t representing taurine. h,Relationship of SA2 currents induced by glutamine to membrane potential. Replacement of Na+ by choline dramatically reduces the size of the currents produced by 1 mm glutamine. However, the currents produced by 1 mm glutamine in Li+ almost equal the currents produced by 1 mm glutamine in Na+. i, Current–voltage relationship of oocytes expressing SA2 in NaCl and Na gluconate, with and without addition of 1 mm glutamine. Replacement of chloride by gluconate has little effect on these unsubtracted currents and in particular on their reversal potential. However, glutamine shifts the reversal potential in the positive direction, consistent with electrogenic amino acid transport.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    System A Transporters SA1 and SA2 do not translocate protons. a, Charge–flux ratios were determined in oocytes expressing SA1 and SA2 held at −60, −10, and +30 mV from the total current generated over 10 min by 1 mm3H-alanine in individual oocytes and the total accumulation of radiolabeled substrate by the same individual oocytes over the same interval. Currents and 3H-alanine uptake by uninjected oocytes was subtracted. The ratios approximate 1 at all potentials in the case of SA1, consistent with the net inward movement of one charge along with each amino acid. In the case of SA2, the charge–flux ratios exceed 1; n = 3 for each condition. b, c, PS120 cells expressing SA2 (b) and SN1 (c) were loaded with the pH-sensitive dye BCECF-AM, and pHi was measured by ratiometric imaging at 440 and 490 nm. Glutamine (Q) at 10 mm produces no change in the pHi of cells expressing SA2 (b), whereas 1 mmdramatically increases the pHi of cells expressing SN1 (c). Because PS120 cells expressing SN1 are much more acidic at baseline (pHi ∼6.5) (c) than cells expressing SA2 (b), we have used 15 mm ammonium chloride to demonstrate that we can easily detect an increase in pHi under both circumstances.d, Simultaneous measurement of currents and pHi in oocytes expressing SA2 shows that although 1 mm glutamine induces inward currents, it does not change pHi. Thus, transport by SA2 does not involve H+ translocation.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Protons compete with Na+ for binding to System A transporters. a, b, Increasing Na+ concentrations saturate the uptake of3H-MeAIB by HeLa cells expressing SA2 (a). At 4 μm MeAIB, theKm for Na+ at pHo 7 greatly exceeds the Km at pHo 8. Increasing MeAIB concentrations also saturate uptake by SA2 (b), with a difference inVmax but not Kmbetween pHo 7 and 8. Representative experiments are shown, and the average of multiple experiments ± SEM is compiled in Table 2. c, d, SA1 demonstrates saturation of3H-MeAIB transport in HeLa cells by Na+(c) and MeAIB (d). TheKm for Na+ is higher at pHo 7 than pHo 8, similar to SA2. However, it is more clear that pHo has little effect on theVmax of SA1 at high Na+. pHo also affects the Vmax but not Km for MeAIB (Table 2).

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Ordered binding of substrates to SA1.A, The currents induced in an oocyte expressing SA1 by different concentrations of alanine in the presence of 6 mmNa+ (left) as a function of holding potential. The same oocyte in 96 mm Na+(right) exhibits no change inImax but the Kmdrops considerably, suggesting that Na+ binds before amino acid. b, Currents induced in an oocyte expressing SA1 by different concentrations of Na+ in the presence of 0.1 mm alanine (A) (left). The same oocyte in 1 mm alanine (right) shows a much largerImax and a differentKm, supporting the ordered binding of first Na+ and then amino acid. The average of multiple experiments ± SEM is compiled in Table 3.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    SA2 mediates a Na+ conductance in the absence of amino acid. a, In the absence of external amino acid, oocytes expressing SA2 exhibit currents that depend on Na+ and Li+. The shift in reversal potential depends on the Na+concentration and varies by 40 mV from 0–96 mmNa+ (b). c,Oocytes expressing SA1 exhibit smaller cation-dependent currents, and uninjected oocytes exhibit none (d);n = 3 for all conditions.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Expression of SA2 by central neuronal populations.a–f,In situ hybridization of coronal sections from the rat brain with 35S-labeled antisense SA2 RNA (a–c) and sense RNA (d–f). All brain regions show specific hybridization signal, but labeling is particularly pronounced in the hippocampus and cerebellum.g–i, Visualized by dark-field illumination, all layers of the cortex contain cells labeled by SA2 antisense RNA (g). In the hippocampus (h), principal cells in the pyramidal and granule cell layers are strongly stained. Scattered positive cells suggestive of interneurons also occur in other layers of CA1 (i). j–m, Related H+-driven amino acid transporters differ in their distribution within the cerebellar cortex. j, Byin situ hybridization with specific antisense RNA, SA2 strongly labels the Purkinje cell layer (p).k, SA1 labels the granule cell layer (g). l, The closely related System N transporter SN1 shows expression by glial-like cells in the granule cell layer. m, The more distantly related vesicular GABA transporter shows expression by inhibitory neurons in the molecular layer (m) and Purkinje cells.

  • Fig. 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 9.

    Glutamine and MeAIB reduce GABAergic transmission and depolarize interneurons in hippocampal area CA1. a,The membrane potential of CA1 stratum radiatum interneurons depolarizes to a greater extent in response to glutamine (2 mm) than to MeAIB (5 mm). In b, the effects of 2 mm (n = 4) and 5 mmglutamine (n = 5) as well as 5 mm MeAIB (n = 5) are summarized. c, Glutamine (5 mm) reduces the amplitude of the stimulus-evoked IPSCs by ∼30% (top traces). Bottom graphsshow the time course of the experiment. Filled circlesshow the amplitude of the first response, and open symbols show the amplitude of the second. Both responses during the control period have been normalized to 100%. The response to the second stimulus (P2) is less affected by glutamine than the response to the first (P1), thereby increasing the paired pulse ratio (P2/P1). Ind, the effects of glutamine and MeAIB on the first response are summarized. In individual experiments (e), glutamine reversibly affects the paired pulse ratio (n = 5).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    The Hill coefficients of SA1 and SA2 for Na+ at pH 7 and 8

    pHHill coefficient ± SEM
    SA171.04  ± 0.15 (n = 6)
    80.78  ± 0.27 (n = 4)
    SA271.15  ± 0.11 (n = 4)
    81.48  ± 0.17 (n = 4)
    • The Na+ dependence of 3H-MeAIB uptake by SA1 and SA2 was measured in transfected HeLa cells. The linear phase of MeAIB uptake was measured, and the Na+ concentration varied by replacing the NaCl in Krebs'–Ringer's solution by choline chloride. The curves were fitted using Ultrafit (Biosoft) to determine the Hill coefficient.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Effect of pH on the kinetics of transport by SA1 and SA2

    Km(mm) ± SEMVmax ± SEMn
    SA1
     Na+, pH 752.2  ± 10.725.2 ± 12.9 pmol/3 min3
     Na+, pH 811.1  ± 4.133.2 ± 9.8 pmol/3 min3
     MeAIB, pH 70.65  ± 0.072.34 ± 0.28 nmol/3 min4
     MeAIB, pH 80.56  ± 0.073.6 ± 0.44 nmol/3 min4
    SA2
     Na+, pH 7>140>3.1 pmol/3 min3
     Na+, pH 8146  ± 608.3 ± 2.3 pmol/3 min3
     MeAIB, pH 72.28  ± 0.191.95 ± 0.71 nmol/3 min3
     MeAIB, pH 82.12  ± 0.174.48 ± 1.34 nmol/3 min3
    • The uptake of 3H-MeAIB by transfected HeLa cells was measured in different proportions of NaCl and choline (at 4 μm MeAIB) to determine the Km for Na+ and in different amounts of MeAIB (at 120 mm Na+) to determine theKm for MeAIB. For both SA1 and SA2, theKm for Na+ is much higher at pH 7 than pH 8. The Vmax of SA1 at 4 μmMeAIB and high Na+ does not differ significantly at the two pH, and the Vmax of SA2 under these conditions is difficult to extrapolate. In contrast, the Kmof both SA1 and SA2 for MeAIB does not differ between pH 7 and 8, whereas the Vmax is higher at pH 8.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Ordered binding of Na+ and amino acid to SA1

    Vm (mV)Km ± SEMI/IND6 ± SEM
    Km alanine, ND6−900.51  ± 0.141
    −500.79  ± 0.211
    −301.07  ± 0.291
    +102.41  ± 0.81
    Km alanine, ND96−900.22  ± 0.031.1  ± 0.08
    −500.24  ± 0.031.1  ± 0.04
    −300.28  ± 0.051.1  ± 0.08
    +100.46  ± 0.081.3  ± 0.10
    I/I0.1A
    Km Na+, 0.1 mmalanine−9063.5  ± 57.31
    −50116  ± 94.41
    −30128  ± 1061
    +1052.3  ± 37.61
    Km Na+, 1 mmalanine−905.5  ± 1.41.8  ± 0.25
    −509.4  ± 1.81.5  ± 0.36
    −3013  ± 2.51.5  ± 0.38
    +1027.7  ± 6.72.7  ± 0.40
    • The Km for alanine was determined in individual oocytes at two concentrations of Na+ (6 and 96 mm) by replacing the NaCl in ND96 with choline chloride. The Km for Na+ was determined in individual oocytes at two different concentrations of alanine (0.1 and 1 mm). The currents are normalized to the maximum current observed in an individual oocyte at ND6 (I/IND6) or at 0.1 mmalanine (I/I0.1A); n= 3 for all.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 22 (1)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 22, Issue 1
1 Jan 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Glutamine Uptake by Neurons: Interaction of Protons with System A Transporters
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Glutamine Uptake by Neurons: Interaction of Protons with System A Transporters
Farrukh A. Chaudhry, Dietmar Schmitz, Richard J. Reimer, Peter Larsson, Andrew T. Gray, Roger Nicoll, Michael Kavanaugh, Robert H. Edwards
Journal of Neuroscience 1 January 2002, 22 (1) 62-72; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-01-00062.2002

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Glutamine Uptake by Neurons: Interaction of Protons with System A Transporters
Farrukh A. Chaudhry, Dietmar Schmitz, Richard J. Reimer, Peter Larsson, Andrew T. Gray, Roger Nicoll, Michael Kavanaugh, Robert H. Edwards
Journal of Neuroscience 1 January 2002, 22 (1) 62-72; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-01-00062.2002
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • glutamine-glutamate cycle
  • system A
  • system N
  • glutamine
  • synaptic transmission
  • H+ coupling

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

ARTICLE

  • Neural Correlates of Competing Fear Behaviors Evoked by an Innately Aversive Stimulus
  • Distinct Developmental Modes and Lesion-Induced Reactions of Dendrites of Two Classes of Drosophila Sensory Neurons
  • Functional Dissociation among Components of Remembering: Control, Perceived Oldness, and Content
Show more ARTICLE

Cellular/Molecular

  • Presynaptic trafficking of Glutamate Decarboxylase isoforms is dispensable for basal GABAergic neurotransmission
  • Co-release of GABA and ACh from Medial Olivocochlear Neurons as a Fine Regulatory Mechanism of Cochlear Efferent Inhibition
  • Synaptic Gpr85 influences cerebellar granule cells electrical properties and light-induced behavior in zebrafish.
Show more Cellular/Molecular
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.