Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
MINI-REVIEW

Neurogenesis in the Adult Brain

Fred H. Gage
Journal of Neuroscience 1 February 2002, 22 (3) 612-613; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-03-00612.2002
Fred H. Gage
1Laboratory of Genetics, The Salk Institute, La Jolla, California 92037
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

A milestone is marked in our understanding of the brain with the recent acceptance, contrary to early dogma, that the adult nervous system can generate new neurons. One could wonder how this dogma originally came about, particularly because all organisms have some cells that continue to divide, adding to the size of the organism and repairing damage. All mammals have replicating cells in many organs and in some cases, notably the blood, skin, and gut, stem cells have been shown to exist throughout life, contributing to rapid cell replacement. Furthermore, insects, fish, and amphibia can replicate neural cells throughout life. An exception to this rule of self-repair and continued growth was thought to be the mammalian brain and spinal cord. In fact, because we knew that microglia, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes all normally divide in the adult and respond to injury by dividing, it was only neurons that were considered to be refractory to replication. Now we know that this long accepted limitation is not completely true, because there are two rather discrete areas of the brain, the dentate gyrus of the hippocampal formation and the subventricular zone and its projection through the rostral migratory stream to the olfactory bulb, which can generate new neurons.

Although the discovery that there are limited areas of the brain where neurons do regenerate is important, it also deepens our curiosity as to why it is that most neurons in fact cannot replicate. One reason why neuronal replication in the adult was considered unlikely was the complexity of most neurons; with their highly branched dendrites and polysynaptic axonal combinations, they were considered to be terminally differentiated and unable to re-enter the cell cycle and divide, strictly from a mechanistic view. Another problem was conceptual. If neurons were able to divide, how would the newly created cells with their new dendrites, axons, and synapses, functionally integrate into the brain without disrupting existing circuits? With the dominant theories of brain function being based on a computer analogy with fixed circuits, it did not seem at all logical that adult brain circuitry could be continually adding new components.

Several recent discoveries and refinements of our conception of the brain have converged to help make the concept of neurogenesis in the adult brain more easily acceptable.

The mechanical problem of accommodating the dividing neurons has been overcome by the discovery that neural stem cells exist throughout life in the adult brain and can renew and give rise to new neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes, just as in the developing brain. This was first shown from the subventricular zone (Reynolds and Weiss, 1992;Richards et al., 1992) and then in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus (Gage et al., 1995; Palmer et al., 1997), and in most structures of the brain examined (Palmer et al., 1995; Shihabuddin et al., 2000), even where no neurons existed (Palmer et al., 1999; Kondo and Raff, 2000).

These studies demonstrating that cells with stem cell properties exist in the adult brain were conducted in vitro, so it is not clear whether these cultured cells have the same potential in vivo as in vitro. Nevertheless, they showed that we no longer had to consider that a complex neuron was required to divide for adult neurogenesis to occur. Now we know that these neurons can be generated from primitive cells, similar to what happens in development.

A second change in thinking was more gradual and conceptual, and is still not completely resolved. Almost as soon as the first computers were made, the analogy with the brain was accepted. The model of the brain as a computer, with hard-wired connections that are adaptive and flexible mostly with respect to the software and with information that is distributed over the hard-wired network still dominates.

The pervasive theory of adaptability or plasticity was provided by Hebb (1949), who postulated that plasticity, and adaptability could be accomplished by “strengthening synapses” without requiring structural reorganization.

A decade or so after the ascendance of the computer model of brain circuitry, Altman (1962) made his original claim of neurogenesis, and a theory of structural plasticity began to emerge. Soon afterward, examples of axonal elongation and synaptic reorganization in response to injury were provided (Raisman, 1969; Moore et al., 1971; Lynch et al., 1973). Within the same time period, investigators demonstrated that experience alone could promote structural changes in presynaptic and postsynaptic elements (Greenough et al., 1978).

The willingness to accept adult neurogenesis was further enhanced by the convincing evidence that fetal tissue could be grafted in the adult intact brain. Even more convincing was the evidence that the damaged adult brain and spinal cord allowed these newly grafted cells to survive and differentiate (Bjorklund and Gage, 1985). The grafted cells could also receive and send connections and release transmitter in a behavior- dependent manner in the adult damaged brain (Dunnett and Bjorklund, 1994)

The stage has been now set for accepting the ability of stem cells in the adult neuronal system to give rise to neurons. In addition, the damaged adult brain appears to retain enough potential to accept, if not participate in, the differentiation of developing cells into functional neurons.

The authors of the following mini-reviews are significant contributors to the current re-emergence of adult neurogenesis. There are several themes that the authors have independently identified. First, they each have presented a historical perspective that helps explain how their view of this field developed. Although it is likely that a field as young as this is searching for it origins, it is likely that it will take more time for the field to reveal its historically relevant origins.

A second theme that emerges from these reviews is the concern over the techniques that are used to document the neurogenic events that are being reviewed and examined. Each of these authors has contributed to the continued development of the tools, but it is clear that more and better methods are needed to quantitatively document the birth, proliferation, and migration of the new neurons and provide evidence for the extent to which new neurons functionally integrate into the adult brain. Will better techniques reveal more neurogenesis in more areas?

Another theme that all of the authors developed and acknowledge is the remarkable extent to which the environment in which the adult animal finds itself, and in particular how the organism behaves in that environment, can affect the birth rate and fate of the newly born cells. Is it possible that, with the appropriate behavioral and environmental stimulation and more accurate techniques, neurogenesis will be revealed or induced in other regions previously considered non-neurogenic? Or will they give insight into the mechanisms that limit neurogenesis in different brain regions, and by so doing, lead to ways to circumvent those mechanisms?

A series of questions related to the identity of the endogenous cells as they transition from the most primitive stem-like cell to the most mature neuron is currently being very intensely investigated and debated. The answers to those questions may surprise us and force a re-evaluation of our current understanding of stem cell or precursor biology. Clearly there are lessons to be learned from developmental biology, in which the process and mechanisms of neurogenesis have been the topic of intense investigation for decades. A fundamental question raised in the last review asks to what extent the mechanisms of neurogenesis in development and in the adult are the same. Given the wealth of knowledge available in developmental biology, this should be a tractable problem.

Finally, the two unresolved questions that all agree on are: (1) why does adult neurogenesis persist in only a few identified brain regions and, even more perplexing, (2) what is the function that underlies this residual structural plasticity?

Solutions to the first question will likely require a comparative approach, which considers the evolutionary development of these structures. The second question of function will likely require a reconceptualization of neural plasticity that incorporates structural plasticity into its theoretical framework. A more complete answer to either of the questions will require a better understanding of the normal function of the hippocampal formation and olfactory bulb and their local circuits. Perhaps a better understanding of the process of neurogenesis within these structures will elucidate more completely the functions these more global structures subserve.

The series begins with Pasko Rakic and Elizabeth Gould discussing the strengths and limitations of the methodologies used to identify cells undergoing neurogenesis in the mammalian dentate gyrus of the hippocampus. Fernando Nottebohm describes the perspective from work on avian brains, which have shown prominent abilities for neurogenesis in the adult. Arturo Alvarez-Buylla discusses a system in the mammalian brain, the anterior migratory stream, that continues to generate new neurons during adult olfactory bulb, and he discusses recent work on the origin and phenotype of the initiating cell. Gerd Kempermann returns to neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus and focuses on the role of behavioral activity on the regulation of adult neurogenesis, and he discusses the functional significance of this process in the hippocampus. Finally, Chris Kintner summarizes the key elements and principles of neurogenesis that have been revealed from the extensive developmental neurobiology literature, and he makes parallels with adult neurogenesis. Importantly, this last review leads to some specific hypothesis and prediction when determining whether adult and developmental neurogenesis are equivalent.

Footnotes

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Gage at the above address. E-mail: gage{at}salk.edu.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Altman J
    (1962) Are neurons formed in the brains of adult mammals? Science 135:1127–1128.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Bjorklund A,
    2. Gage FH
    (1985) Neural grafting in animal models of neurodegenerative diseases. in Hope for a new neurology, ed Nottebohm F (Ann NY Acad Sci, New York), pp 53–81.
  3. ↵
    1. Dunnett SB,
    2. Bjorklund A
    (1994) Functional neural transplantation. (Raven, New York).
  4. ↵
    1. Gage FH,
    2. Coates PW,
    3. Palmer TD,
    4. Kuhn HG,
    5. Fisher LJ,
    6. Suhonen JO,
    7. Peterson DA,
    8. Suhr ST,
    9. Ray J
    (1995) Survival and differentiation of adult neuronal progenitor cells transplanted to the adult brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:11879–11883.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Greenough WT,
    2. West RW,
    3. DeVoogd TJ
    (1978) Postsynaptic plate perforations: changes with age and experience in the rat. Science 202:1096–1098.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Hebb DO
    (1949) The organization of behavior. (Wiley, New York).
  7. ↵
    1. Kondo T,
    2. Raff M
    (2000) Oligodendrocyte precursor cells reprogrammed to become multipotential CNS stem cells. Science 289:1754–1757.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Lynch G,
    2. Deadwyler D,
    3. Cotman CW
    (1973) Post lesion axonal growth produces permanent functional connections. Science 180:1364–1366.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Moore RY,
    2. Bjorklund A,
    3. Stenevi U
    (1971) Plastic changes in the adrenergic innervation of the rat septal area in response to denervation. Brain Res 33:13–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Palmer TD,
    2. Ray J,
    3. Gage FH
    (1995) FGF-2-responsive neuronal progenitors reside in proliferative and quiescent regions of the adult rodent brain. Mol Cell Neurosci 6:474–486.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Palmer TD,
    2. Markakis EA,
    3. Willhoite AR,
    4. Safar F,
    5. Gage FH
    (1999) Fibroblast growth factor 2 activates a latent neurogenic program in neural stem cells from diverse regions of the adult CNS. J Neurosci 19:8487–8497.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Palmer TD,
    2. Takahashi J,
    3. Gage FH
    (1997) The adult rat hippocampus contains primordial neural stem cells. Mol Cell Neurosci 8:389–404.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Raisman G
    (1969) Neuronal plasticity in the septal nuclei of the adult rat. Brain Res 14:25–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Reynolds BA,
    2. Weiss S
    (1992) Generation of neurons and astrocytes from isolated cells of the adult mammalian central nervous system. Science 255:1707.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Richards LJ,
    2. Kilpatrick TJ,
    3. Bartlett PF
    (1992) De novo generation of neuronal cells from the adult mouse brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:8591–8595.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Shihabuddin LS,
    2. Horner PJ,
    3. Ray J,
    4. Gage FH
    (2000) Adult spinal cord stem cells generate neurons after transplantation in the adult dentate gyrus. J Neurosci 20:8727–8735.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 22 (3)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 22, Issue 3
1 Feb 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Neurogenesis in the Adult Brain
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Neurogenesis in the Adult Brain
Fred H. Gage
Journal of Neuroscience 1 February 2002, 22 (3) 612-613; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-03-00612.2002

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Neurogenesis in the Adult Brain
Fred H. Gage
Journal of Neuroscience 1 February 2002, 22 (3) 612-613; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-03-00612.2002
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Metzincin Proteases and Their Inhibitors: Foes or Friends in Nervous System Physiology?
  • Dopaminergic Mechanisms in Actions and Habits
  • The Neural Basis of Choice and Decision Making
Show more MINI-REVIEW
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.