Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
ARTICLE, Development/Plasticity/Repair

Adult Rodent Neurogenic Regions: The Ventricular Subependyma Contains Neural Stem Cells, But the Dentate Gyrus Contains Restricted Progenitors

Raewyn M. Seaberg and Derek van der Kooy
Journal of Neuroscience 1 March 2002, 22 (5) 1784-1793; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-05-01784.2002
Raewyn M. Seaberg
1Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 1A8, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Derek van der Kooy
1Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 1A8, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Dissection and rate of sphere formation of adult mouse neurogenic regions. A, B, Atlas images of adult mouse brain sections (Franklin and Paxinos, 1997) adapted to show the microdissection of viable 500 μm vibratome sections used to isolate tissue from neurogenic regions.A, Coronal section through the anterior lateral ventricle (aLV) with the dissected region highlighted. Note that this dissection includes both subependymal and ependymal tissue, but for the purposes of this study ependymal sphere formation was ignored. B, Coronal section through the hippocampus. Note that the dentate gyrus (DG) dissection excludes all regions containing subependymal tissue; these regions were dissected and cultured separately. 3rd V, Third ventricle; pLV, posterior lateral ventricle;HA, hippocampal arch. This dissection scheme was used for both rats and mice.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    A, Comparison of the numbers of primary spheres generated from different neurogenic regions in the adult mouse brain. The data are expressed as the mean (+SEM) number of spheres generated per 10,000 cells plated (i.e., per well; density = 20 cells per microliter). Tissue from each region (aLV, anterior lateral ventricle; pLV, posterior lateral ventricle; 3rd V, third ventricle;HV, hippocampal arch; DG, dentate gyrus) was dissociated into single cells and plated in serum-free media containing EGF + FGF2 and B27 supplement; spheres were counted at 7 DIV. Note that the aLV cells generate neurospheres at a rate ∼120-fold higher than the DG cells (0.54 ± 0.1), on the basis of data from n > 120 animals and 10 separate experiments. B, Comparison of the number of spheres generated from adult dentate gyrus at different rostrocaudal levels. Rostral, middle, and caudal sections through the DG yield a similar number of sphere colonies. Tissue from each individual 500 μm section (n = 85 sections from >20 animals) through the DG was separately dissociated into single cells and cultured at 20 cells per microliter; spheres were counted at 7 DIV.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    A, B, Comparison of the self-renewal ability of adult anterior lateral ventricle (subependymal) and dentate gyrus spheres. A, The data are expressed as the mean (+SEM) number of spheres generated per single sphere dissociation. At each passage, individual spheres (n > 60 spheres per condition) were dissociated per tissue culture well, and the number of sphere colonies that formed was counted after 7 DIV. Although the adult aLV neurosphere-initiating cells demonstrated self-renewal by giving rise to secondary and tertiary neurospheres (as did the adult pLV, 3rd V, and HA neurospheres; data not shown), the adult DG sphere-initiating cells did not demonstrate self-renewal and did not give rise to secondary sphere colonies. Individual spheres were dissociated and replated in identical media conditions as were used for primary culture (EGF + FGF2 with B27 supplement). B, The data are expressed as the percentage of individual spheres that passaged to generate new spheres. Procedures were followed as described for A. Note that nearly 100% of adult aLV spheres give rise to new spheres at each passage.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    A, B, Comparison of the size of primary spheres derived from adult anterior lateral ventricle (subependyma) (A) and dentate gyrus (B). Note that the DG spheres are smaller than the aLV spheres. Scale bars, 100 μm.C–G, Comparison of the ability of adult aLV- and DG-derived primary spheres to contribute to different neural cell lineages. Primary adult aLV neurospheres generate both GFAP+ astrocytes (C) and βIII-tubulin+ neurons (E), whereas adult DG spheres generate only GFAP+astrocytes (D). Small adult DG clumps generate only βIII-tubulin+ neurons (F). Note that although both cell types can be derived from adult aLV or DG cultures, the aLV-derived neurons and glia are generated by a common precursor, whereas the DG-derived neurons and glia are derived from separate progenitors. Individual spheres or clumps were plated on MATRIGEL basement membrane matrix in 1% FBS for 7–8 DIV and then processed for immunocytochemistry. Scale bars, 50 μm. G, Neuronal and glial gene expression were confirmed using RT-PCR. RNA was isolated from differentiated aLV and DG sphere colonies. Primers were used to detect GFAP (150 bp) and NF-H (452 bp). Sphere colonies derived from subependymal tissue (aLV) generate both neuronal (NF-H) and glial (GFAP) progeny, whereas colonies derived from dentate gyrus cells (DG) generate differentiated progeny that express GFAP but do not express NF-H. Data are representative of at least three separate experiments.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Comparison of the sphere-forming ability of primary tissue from adult rat neurogenic regions and a clonal cell line of adult hippocampal progenitors in the presence and absence of growth factors (GF). The data are expressed as the mean (+SEM) number of spheres generated per 10,000 cells plated (i.e., per well; density = 20 cells per microliter). Cells were plated in either serum-free media (no GF) or serum-free media with EGF and FGF2 (GF). AHPs were compared with primary adult rat tissue (DG, dentate gyrus;aLV, anterior lateral ventricle). Resultant spheres were counted at 7 DIV. Note that both AHPs and primary aLV spheres (12 ± 2) were generated in no GF, whereas zero spheres arose from adult DG in the absence of growth factors (0.0 ± 0.0). A small number of DG spheres were generated in GF(1.5 ± 0.3).

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Comparison of the numbers of spheres formed from PND1, PND10, and adult anterior lateral ventricle (subependyma) and dentate gyrus. The data are expressed as the mean (+SEM) number of spheres generated per brain dissection. Tissue was dissected from adult, PND1, and PND10 brains (n > 40 animals from 5 separate experiments) from viable vibratome sections and cultured in EGF + FGF2 with B27 supplement at 20 cells per microliter. Spheres were counted at 7 DIV. Cells from the PND1 DG generated 30-fold more spheres than adult DG cells, whereas cells from the PND1, PND10, and adult aLV did not generate significantly different numbers of spheres.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Mean percentages of neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes generated from adult dentate gyrus and anterior lateral ventricle neurospheres (mean % ± SEM)

    Neurons (MAP2+)Astrocytes (GFAP+)Oligodendrocytes (O4+)
    aLV8.0  ± 0.988.7  ± 1.42.3  ± 0.5
    DG0.0  ± 0.098.9  ± 0.50.0  ± 0.0
    • Summary table illustrating the fundamental differences in cell lineage potential of spheres generated from different adult neurogenic brain regions. Spheres were cultured individually in MATRIGEL-coated wells in SFM and 1% FBS. Numbers are expressed as a percentage of Hoescht-positive nuclei and are based on at least 14 random fields for each condition. aLV, Anterior lateral ventricle; DG, dentate gyrus.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Summary of dissection technique and culture conditions used for the comparison of adult subependymal and dentate gyrus primary cell isolates

    SE dissectionDG dissectionGross HC dissection
    EGF + FGF2 + H + B27 (uncoated dishes)+−+
    10% FBS; FGF2 + N2 (uncoated dishes; or polyornithine/laminin coated)+−+
    10% FBS; FGF2 + N2 + AHP-conditioned media (uncoated dishes; or polyornithine/laminin coated)+−+
    • Summary table illustrating the various dissection techniques and culture conditions used for the comparison of primary adult subependymal and dentate gyrus cells. A simplified version of the results is also illustrated where “+” represents the isolation of a multipotent, self-renewing cell in the tissue cultures from the various experimental conditions. Importantly, cell viability in all culture conditions was high. SE, Subependyma; DG, dentate gyrus; HC, hippocampus; EGF, epidermal growth factor; FGF2, fibroblast growth factor 2; H, heparin; B27, B27 supplement; N2, N2 supplement; FBS, fetal bovine serum; AHP, adult hippocampal progenitor.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 22 (5)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 22, Issue 5
1 Mar 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Adult Rodent Neurogenic Regions: The Ventricular Subependyma Contains Neural Stem Cells, But the Dentate Gyrus Contains Restricted Progenitors
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Adult Rodent Neurogenic Regions: The Ventricular Subependyma Contains Neural Stem Cells, But the Dentate Gyrus Contains Restricted Progenitors
Raewyn M. Seaberg, Derek van der Kooy
Journal of Neuroscience 1 March 2002, 22 (5) 1784-1793; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-05-01784.2002

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Adult Rodent Neurogenic Regions: The Ventricular Subependyma Contains Neural Stem Cells, But the Dentate Gyrus Contains Restricted Progenitors
Raewyn M. Seaberg, Derek van der Kooy
Journal of Neuroscience 1 March 2002, 22 (5) 1784-1793; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-05-01784.2002
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • hippocampus
  • subgranular zone
  • subependyma
  • stem cells
  • progenitor cells
  • neurospheres

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

ARTICLE

  • Calcium Influx via L- and N-Type Calcium Channels Activates a Transient Large-Conductance Ca2+-Activated K+Current in Mouse Neocortical Pyramidal Neurons
  • Netrin-1 Is a Chemorepellent for Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cells in the Embryonic Spinal Cord
  • Selective Enhancement of Synaptic Inhibition by Hypocretin (Orexin) in Rat Vagal Motor Neurons: Implications for Autonomic Regulation
Show more ARTICLE

Development/Plasticity/Repair

  • LUZP1 Regulates Dendritic Spine Maturation and Synaptic Plasticity in the Hippocampal Dentate Gyrus of Mice
  • Acoustic Enrichment Prevents Early Life Stress-Induced Disruptions in Sound Azimuth Processing
  • Concentration-Dependent Bidirectional Modification of Evoked Synaptic Transmission by Gadolinium and Adverse Effects of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent
Show more Development/Plasticity/Repair
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.